Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs Intel Core i7-13700HX

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

► remove from comparison AMD R5 5600G

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a Zen 3-based, desktop-grade APU featuring the Radeon Vega 7 graphics adapter. This Ryzen 5 was unveiled in H1 2021. It features six SMT-enabled CPU cores for 12 threads in total, running at 3.9 GHz to 4.4 GHz.

The CPU ships with AMD's Wraith Stealth cooler (as long as it's not an OEM version).

Architecture

Zen 3-based processors bring a moderate performance boost over Zen 2 generation CPUs. Core counts are left where they were before, while per-MHz performance is getting several percentage points higher.

Ryzen 5 5600G's CPU cores have access to 16 MB of L3 cache. The processor is compatible with DDR4-3200 RAM and has plenty of PCI-Express 3.0 lanes for connecting graphics cards, SSDs and other devices. Four PCI-Express 3.0 lanes allow for read/write rates of up to 3.9 GB/s, provided a sufficiently fast NVMe SSD is used. PCI-Express 4.0 spec is not supported here, since Ryzen 5 5600G is pretty much a laptop-grade SoC in disguise rather than a "proper" desktop chip, like a Ryzen 5 5600X.

You can replace this Ryzen with a faster CPU easily as it uses AMD's AM4 socket interface. Another way to get a performance boost would be to overclock the CPU, which is easy to do with AMD's very own software (many motherboard vendors offer overclocking software of their own as well).

Performance

The six Zen 3 cores will rip through most workloads rutlessly, more demanding ones included (like gaming and high-res video editing). Multi-thread benchmarks put the R5 5600G in the same league as the Core i5-10600K, Core i7-10700, Core i5-11600K, Core i7-11850H. A huge advantage of the Ryzen over the aforementioned alternatives is its decent integrated graphics adapter - more on this below.

Graphics

The Radeon RX Vega 7 iGPU has seven Compute Units (= 448 shaders) and runs at up to 1,900 MHz. It is casual gaming-friendly, allowing one to play most games at 900p / Low quality preset. On the other hand, there is no SUHD 4320p monitor support here, nor can the graphics adapter HW-decode AV1, the latest video codec.

Fast RAM is a prerequisite for decent gaming performance as the Vega has no memory of its own.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 is manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process for great, as of early 2022, energy efficiency.

The chip has a default TDP of 65 W (also known as the long-term Power Limit). According to AMD's guidelines, that 65 W value can be reduced by PC makers significantly, the lower limit being 45 W, resulting in lower temperatures, lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system built around this Ryzen.

Intel Core i7-13700HX

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13700HX

The Intel Core i7-13700HX is a fast high-end mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023 and is based on the desktop Core i7-13700K with combined 16 cores and 24 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading clocking between 2.1 - 5 GHz (4.5 GHz all core boost) and eight Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading (1.5 - 3.7 GHz).

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX, but only 4800 MHz for the i7).

Performance

The average 13700HX in our database is in the same league as the i7-13650HX, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned, and thus outguns the Ryzen 7 7745HX by a significant margin. This is a very fast chip, as of early 2023.

Thanks to its powerful cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 122 W, the Uniwill GM6PX7X is among the fastest laptops built around the 13700HX that we know of. It can be at least 10% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

The chip's "minimum assured" power consumption sits at 45 W. Its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 157 W; its Base power consumption is supposed to be around 55 W. Most laptop makers will probably go for a value much higher than 55 W to get better performance.

This Raptor Lake family processor is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 5600GIntel Core i7-13700HX
CodenameCezanneRaptor Lake-HX
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)Intel Raptor Lake-HX
Clock3900 - 4400 MHz1500 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB
L2 Cache3 MB24 MB
L3 Cache16 MB30 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 1216 / 24
8 x 5.0 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.7 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP65 Watt55 Watt
Technology7 nm10 nm
max. Temp.95 °C100 °C
SocketAM4BGA1964
FeaturesDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1900 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1550 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX compare1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX compare1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX « 1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX compare1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX compare1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Die Size257 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 5600G
34.4 pt (57%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13700HX
40.9 pt (68%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 97     avg: 104.5     median: 104.5 (59%)     max: 112 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 875     avg: 923     median: 923 (17%)     max: 971 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
10551 Points (10%)
min: 15558     avg: 20642     median: 20479 (19%)     max: 22598 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1409 Points (59%)
min: 1666     avg: 1829     median: 1875 (79%)     max: 1933 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
552 Points (60%)
min: 644     avg: 707     median: 723 (79%)     max: 740 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4072 Points (10%)
min: 6160     avg: 7815     median: 7870 (19%)     max: 8610 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1724 Points (11%)
min: 2548     avg: 3226     median: 3277 (21%)     max: 3482 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
228 Points (63%)
min: 243     avg: 267     median: 272 (75%)     max: 279 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
19.9 Points (26%)
29.3 Points (38%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.7 Points (64%)
2.9 Points (69%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6052 Points (37%)
8314 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
35552 Points (26%)
47482 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
74369 Points (47%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13402 Points (16%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
125.3 s (1%)
229.3 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.5 s (1%)
4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7652 Points (12%)
8567 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
48700 MIPS (28%)
min: 58912     avg: 77687     median: 78076 (45%)     max: 89294 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5549 MIPS (65%)
min: 5552     avg: 6093     median: 6166 (73%)     max: 6409 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
102.5 fps (3%)
128.3 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
261.5 fps (7%)
259.5 fps (7%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
13.9 fps (24%)
min: 17.1     avg: 22.1     median: 22.2 (39%)     max: 25.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.9 GB/s (26%)
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.3 GB/s (22%)
2.2 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
9.7 GB/s (25%)
11.7 GB/s (30%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 240     avg: 286.5     median: 274 (3%)     max: 363 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
299.1 Seconds (2%)
min: 138     avg: 166     median: 159 (1%)     max: 207 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (11%)
min: 0.4274     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.513 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12904 Points (27%)
min: 13486     avg: 16248     median: 16363 (35%)     max: 18780 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.1 s (2%)
7.6 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.5 s (1%)
16.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
416.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
61544 Points (47%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
16538 Points (41%)
min: 18188     avg: 22880     median: 23714.5 (58%)     max: 25859 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
82675 Points (67%)
min: 82211     avg: 90112     median: 84480 (69%)     max: 103646 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
82504 Points (67%)
min: 84904     avg: 91420     median: 85425 (69%)     max: 103932 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
84083 Points (68%)
min: 85909     avg: 91763     median: 86039 (69%)     max: 103341 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
14444 Points (37%)
min: 16523     avg: 19648     median: 19993 (51%)     max: 22722 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
22382 Points (40%)
min: 26455     avg: 32785     median: 33196 (59%)     max: 36417 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
8016 Points (34%)
min: 11525     avg: 14232     median: 14663 (62%)     max: 16441 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1982 Points (48%)
min: 2372     avg: 2504     median: 2541 (61%)     max: 2638 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
8214 Points (32%)
min: 9865     avg: 12236     median: 11793 (46%)     max: 15022 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2175     avg: 2310     median: 2274.5 (72%)     max: 2516 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12046     avg: 13010     median: 13119.5 (54%)     max: 13756 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1506 Points (57%)
min: 1666     avg: 1817     median: 1834.5 (70%)     max: 1899 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
8003 Points (14%)
min: 10156     avg: 13912     median: 14435 (26%)     max: 15850 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1441 Points (6%)
min: 1654     avg: 1748     median: 1728 (8%)     max: 1855 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7991 Points (25%)
min: 10028     avg: 13248     median: 14283.5 (45%)     max: 15376 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6450 Points (64%)
min: 7490     avg: 7693     median: 7531 (75%)     max: 8059 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
31424 Points (31%)
min: 40182     avg: 45827     median: 40269 (39%)     max: 57031 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 489     avg: 511     median: 504 (1%)     max: 540 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 86875     avg: 92028     median: 92283 (68%)     max: 96670 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 247     avg: 266     median: 268 (74%)     max: 283 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 238     avg: 300.6     median: 309.5 (56%)     max: 336 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1452 Points (54%)
min: 1663     avg: 1863     median: 1802.5 (67%)     max: 2105 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
165 Watt (28%)
min: 100.4     avg: 152.8     median: 166.2 (29%)     max: 189.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
144 Watt (26%)
min: 124.7     avg: 176.9     median: 180.8 (33%)     max: 221 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 12.9     avg: 23.4     median: 22.3 (15%)     max: 36.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 12.1     avg: 16.8     median: 15.2 (18%)     max: 25.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
12 Points per Watt (9%)
min: 16.9     avg: 18.7     median: 17.7 (13%)     max: 20.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 5600G → 100% n=42

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13700HX → 135% n=42

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 06. 09:24:14

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14131 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14661 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759735453s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 Oct 2025 05:18:30 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14131 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 14131 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14661 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#10 got single benchmarks 14661 +0.018s ... 0.038s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.038s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.057s ... 0.095s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.096s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)