Core i7-13700HX performance debut: Uniwill GM6PX7X IDX laptop review

The Uniwill GM6PX7X is a 16-inch white label gaming laptop design known in some markets as the Schenker XMG Neo 16 E23. It is a newer model revealed at CES 2023 alongside the mobile 13th gen Raptor Lake-H series and mobile Ada Lovelace GeForce RTX 40 series.
Like most other Uniwill or Schenker models, the GM6PX7X is highly configurable with CPU options up to the Core i9-13900HX and GPU options ranging from to the mobile GeForce RTX 4060 up to the 4090. Our specific review unit is a midrange configuration equipped with the Core i7-13700HX and RTX 4070.
See our full review on the RTX 4090-powered Schenker XMG Neo 16 E23 for more information on the chassis and as our RTX 4070-powered Uniwill GM6PX7X utilizes the same design. There are, however, several physical differences between them that we will note below.
More Uniwill/Schenker reviews:
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- Specialist News Writer
- Magazine Writer
- Translator (DE<->EN)
Details here
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.2 % | 03/2023 | Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 22 mm | 16.00" | 2560x2600 | |
87.7 % | 04/2023 | Schenker XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 29.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.4 % | 03/2023 | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 30.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.4 % | 02/2023 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 26 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.2 % | 03/2023 | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 18 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
91.2 % | 02/2023 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 21.99 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
Join our Support Satisfaction Survey 2023: We want to hear about your experiences!
Participate here
Case
There are two chassis versions of the Schenker XMG Neo 16: one thinner build for all RTX 4060 and 4070 configurations and one thicker build for all RTX 4080 and 4090 configurations. The mobile RTX 4080/4090 GPUs are more power-hungry than the mobile RTX 4060/4070 and so they demand a larger chassis size. Major differences between the two versions include:
- Thickness: 22 mm vs. 26.1 mm
- Weight: 2.2 kg vs. 2.5 kg
- Battery capacity: 62 Wh vs. 99 Wh
- Webcam: 1 MP vs. 2 MP
- AC adapter: 280 W vs. 330 W
Both builds otherwise share the same keyboard options (membrane or Cherry MX mechanical), clickpad, ports, display and chassis materials.
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Schenker XMG Neo 16 E23 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Schenker XMG Neo 16 E23 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
Communication
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Schenker XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Schenker XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
Webcam

Display
There are no second display options for this particular chassis design and so our Uniwill utilizes the same BOE NE160QDM-NZ1 IPS panel as found on the RTX 4090-powered Schenker Neo 16. The panel is notable for its fast 240 Hz refresh rate and >95 percent sRGB coverage. Nonetheless, competing laptops like the Asus ROG Strix G16 or Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED offer even deeper colors and faster response times that hardcore gamers or graphics editors can appreciate.
|
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 338.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 1058:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.18 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 0.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
68.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x2600, 16.00 | Schenker XMG Neo 16 E23 BOE0AF0 NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ TL160ADMP03-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Samsung SDC4191 (ATNA60YV09-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.00 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 24% | 3% | 31% | 27% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67.5 | 67.3 0% | 97 44% | 69.1 2% | 99.9 48% | 98.5 46% |
sRGB Coverage | 96.4 | 96.7 0% | 99.9 4% | 99.7 3% | 100 4% | 100 4% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.6 | 68.9 0% | 84.9 24% | 71.2 4% | 96.4 41% | 89.7 31% |
Response Times | -2% | 47% | 21% | 82% | 13% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 12.6 ? | 14.5 ? -15% | 5.1 ? 60% | 12.3 ? 2% | 2 ? 84% | 6.6 ? 48% |
Response Time Black / White * | 9.8 ? | 8.6 ? 12% | 6.6 ? 33% | 5.9 ? 40% | 1.98 ? 80% | 12 ? -22% |
PWM Frequency | 60 | |||||
Screen | 9% | 16% | 33% | 142% | 8% | |
Brightness middle | 338.6 | 372 10% | 470 39% | 511 51% | 389.97 15% | 456.8 35% |
Brightness | 328 | 349 6% | 459 40% | 469 43% | 395 20% | 437 33% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 88 -1% | 93 4% | 86 -3% | 97 9% | 83 -7% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.32 -0% | 0.42 -31% | 0.4 -25% | 0.03 91% | 0.35 -9% |
Contrast | 1058 | 1163 10% | 1119 6% | 1278 21% | 12999 1129% | 1305 23% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.18 | 2.06 6% | 1.86 15% | 0.95 56% | 2 8% | 3.7 -70% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.14 | 3 58% | 3.87 46% | 2.07 71% | 4.1 43% | 6.42 10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.93 | 1.5 -61% | 0.93 -0% | 0.91 2% | 1.68 -81% | 0.66 29% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 1.9 49% | 2.7 27% | 0.6 84% | 2.23 40% | 2.6 30% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.312 95% | 2.246 98% | 2.176 101% | 2.41 91% | 2.3 96% |
CCT | 7245 90% | 6747 96% | 6711 97% | 6545 99% | 6323 103% | 6108 106% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
5% | 29% /
22% | 19% /
25% | 85% /
109% | 16% /
13% |
* ... smaller is better
The display is decently calibrated out of the box with average grayscale and color deltaE values of 3.7 and 2.18, respectively. Color temperature is slightly on the cool side, however, which our own X-Rite calibration addresses. Users can apply our calibrated ICM profile above to get more accurate colors out of the Uniwill.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
9.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.1 ms rise | |
↘ 4.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
12.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.3 ms rise | |
↘ 6.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.2 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18889 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Performance
Testing Conditions
We set our unit to Turbo mode via the pre-installed Control Center software with Optimus turned off prior to running any benchmarks below. The system does not support Advanced Optimus meaning a reboot is required when switching between the discrete GPU and Optimus. Users are encouraged to become familiar with the pre-installed Control Center software as it is the hub for adjusting performance profiles, Optimus, and more.
G-Sync is not supported on the internal display.
Processor
We can finally see how the upper midrange Core i7-13700HX CPU scales after having testing several enthusiast gaming laptops with 13th gen Core i9 processors. Benchmarks show it to be roughly 25 percent faster than the previous generation 12th gen Core i7-12700H commonly found on most mid-range to higher-end gaming laptops of 2022. Upgrading to the Core i9-13900HX configuration is expected to boost performance quite significantly by 35 percent.
Overall performance is far ahead of any mobile Zen 3+ CPU while the latest Zen 4 Ryzen 9 7945HX is still the faster processor by 20 to 50 percent. Performance stability is excellent with no major clock rate fluctuations when stressed.
More technical details and benchmark comparisons about the Core i7-13700HX can be found on our dedicated page here.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Schenker XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX |
System Performance
PCMark results are comparable to other high-end gaming laptops running on 13th gen Core CPUs and GeForce 40 GPUs like the Gigabyte AERO 16 or Razer Blade 16. Scores are consistently ahead of the Schenker XMG Neo 15 running on older Zen 3+ and GeForce 30 hardware.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Schenker XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Schenker XMG Neo 16 E23 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Schenker XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Schenker XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Schenker XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Schenker XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Schenker XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Schenker XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
PCMark 10 Score | 8486 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latency
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Schenker XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
Our test unit ships with a PCIe4 x4 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ NVMe SSD supporting sequential read rates of 6700 MB/s. The fast rates are sustainable as well with no performance dips when stressed.
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Schenker XMG Neo 16 E23 |