Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 4600H vs Intel Core i5-10300H

AMD Ryzen 5 4600H

► remove from comparison AMD R5 4600H

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600H is a mobile SoC for big laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4600H integrates six of the eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3 (guaranteed base clock) to 4 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (12 threads).

In addition to the six CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 6 integrated graphics adapter with 6 CUs and up to 1500 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

Performance

The average 4600H in our database matches the Intel Core i7-10875H and even the Core i9-10885H, both significantly more costly chips, in multi-thread performance, giving this Ryzen an outrageously high price-to-performance ratio.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

The Ryzen 5 chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 35 W and 54 W with clock speed and performance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, a high-performance cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The 7 nm TSMC process this APU is built with makes for better-than-average, as of early 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-10300H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10300H

The Intel Core i5-10300H is a fast processor for laptops with four cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.5 and 4.5 GHz (up to 4.2 with 4 cores) and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i5-9300H from 2019, the 10300H is clocked slightly higher (+100 MHz Base, +400 MHz Boost) and supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i5-10300H supports no vPro, TXT or SIPP. These business features are available in the faster Core i5-10400H (2.6 - 4.6 GHz) that was released at a later date.

Performance

The average 10300H in our database matches the AMD Ryzen 5 3550H in multi-thread performance. While not a poor result per se, it is indicative of an entry-level H-class CPU that is unlikely to meet the needs of hardcore gamers, professional videographers and similar clientele.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i5-9300H. As a low-end solution it will probably only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power consumption

The Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop makers are free to reduce slightly, 35 W being the lowest Intel-recommended value. Doing so would result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, a proper cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The i5-10300H is manufactured on one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for lower-than-average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 4600HIntel Core i5-10300H
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Intel Comet Lake
CodenameRenoir-H (Zen 2)Comet Lake-H
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H compare3.3 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H compare2.9 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H « 3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H « 2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock3000 - 4000 MHz2500 - 4500 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB256 KB
L2 Cache3 MB1 MB
L3 Cache8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 124 / 8
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology7 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketFP6BGA1440
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s, MMX, BMI2, AES-NI, SSE4.1, ABM, VMX, EIST, RDRAND, SSE4.2, TM1, RDSEED, SSE, AVX, FMA, SMEP, TM2, SSE2, AVX2, ADX, SMAP, Hyper-Threading, SGX, SSE3, Turbo, SSSE3, MPX, SST
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 4600H
32.4 pt (45%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10300H
31.8 pt (44%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
69 Points (48%)
68.2 Points (47%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
499 Points (9%)
331 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 7713     avg: 8161     median: 8072 (7%)     max: 8786 Points
min: 4621     avg: 5132     median: 5106 (5%)     max: 5668 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1134     avg: 1145     median: 1142.5 (49%)     max: 1161 Points
min: 1095     avg: 1126     median: 1136 (48%)     max: 1147 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 428     avg: 445.3     median: 449.5 (50%)     max: 454 Points
min: 312     avg: 443.2     median: 454 (50%)     max: 470 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3055     avg: 3233     median: 3229.5 (8%)     max: 3393 Points
min: 1397     avg: 2046     median: 2117 (5%)     max: 2240 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1398     avg: 1428     median: 1425 (9%)     max: 1467 Points
min: 536     avg: 825     median: 892 (6%)     max: 921 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 172.1     avg: 176.5     median: 176 (53%)     max: 179 Points
min: 108     avg: 174     median: 186 (56%)     max: 194 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
16.3 Points (21%)
min: 9.87     avg: 10     median: 10.1 (13%)     max: 10.06 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (51%)
min: 2.05     avg: 2.1     median: 2.2 (54%)     max: 2.17 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5365 Points (32%)
min: 6867     avg: 7056     median: 7130 (43%)     max: 7170 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
32756 Points (24%)
min: 26994     avg: 27496     median: 27692 (20%)     max: 27801 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 35899     avg: 36042     median: 36042 (25%)     max: 36185 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 9326     avg: 9339     median: 9338.5 (11%)     max: 9351 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
215.2 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.1 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4380 Points (7%)
4825 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 36693     avg: 37768     median: 37642.5 (22%)     max: 38873 MIPS
min: 15146     avg: 23295     median: 24158 (14%)     max: 24841 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4334     avg: 4395     median: 4397 (53%)     max: 4471 MIPS
min: 2945     avg: 4704     median: 4896 (59%)     max: 4956 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
82.9 fps (29%)
53.3 fps (19%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
197 fps (45%)
190.2 fps (44%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.27     avg: 9.8     median: 9.8 (17%)     max: 10.4 fps
min: 6.13     avg: 7.1     median: 7.3 (13%)     max: 7.78 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (0%)
0.4 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.4 GB/s (24%)
0.7 GB/s (12%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5 GB/s (13%)
3.1 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
631 Seconds (8%)
962 Seconds (12%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 337.2     avg: 351.9     median: 352 (2%)     max: 369 Seconds
min: 478.9     avg: 515     median: 515.5 (4%)     max: 555 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.607     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.627 sec
min: 0.625     avg: 0.7     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 1.088 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9731     avg: 9744     median: 9744 (21%)     max: 9757 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
10.5 s (2%)
8.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.1 s (1%)
19.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
607 s (3%)
516 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10904     avg: 11680     median: 11593.5 (31%)     max: 12640 Points
min: 8554     avg: 9719     median: 9884.5 (27%)     max: 10909 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 58736     avg: 60992     median: 61113 (50%)     max: 62933 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 58462     avg: 61155     median: 61387 (50%)     max: 62548 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 61439     avg: 63513     median: 63779 (54%)     max: 65322 Points
min: 38284     avg: 60059     median: 63707 (54%)     max: 63995 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 10548     avg: 11100     median: 11085.5 (28%)     max: 11681 Points
min: 8220     avg: 8936     median: 9017.5 (23%)     max: 9305 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 17769     avg: 18050     median: 18021.5 (32%)     max: 18378 Points
min: 12298     avg: 12919     median: 13016 (23%)     max: 13267 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5496     avg: 6170     median: 6251 (26%)     max: 6792 Points
min: 3772     avg: 4678     median: 4684 (20%)     max: 5600 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1525 Points (46%)
1599 Points (49%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
6631 Points (26%)
5340 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1099     avg: 1115     median: 1117 (47%)     max: 1124 Points
min: 703     avg: 1166     median: 1203.5 (51%)     max: 1241 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5260     avg: 6057     median: 6080 (11%)     max: 6574 Points
min: 2783     avg: 4351     median: 4478 (8%)     max: 4728 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1121     avg: 1175     median: 1172.5 (5%)     max: 1234 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3887     avg: 4333     median: 4365 (14%)     max: 4713 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4964 Points (50%)
min: 4844     avg: 5198     median: 5199 (52%)     max: 5549 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
25247 Points (28%)
min: 15448     avg: 17203     median: 17278 (19%)     max: 18807 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4605 Points (63%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
20939 Points (51%)
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 CPU Mark
12111 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 844     avg: 849     median: 848.5 (1%)     max: 855 ms
min: 812     avg: 872     median: 824 (1%)     max: 1366 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 46066     avg: 47138     median: 47137.5 (42%)     max: 48209 Points
min: 36854     avg: 47282     median: 48896 (44%)     max: 51952 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 198     avg: 206     median: 207 (43%)     max: 212 Points
min: 134     avg: 206.2     median: 210.5 (44%)     max: 231 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1061 Points (41%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
66.4 Watt (11%)
min: 76.8     avg: 95.8     median: 95.3 (16%)     max: 112 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
66.4 Watt (12%)
min: 75.3     avg: 85.7     median: 85.8 (16%)     max: 93 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
21.1 Points per Watt (16%)
min: 9.51     avg: 10.4     median: 10.5 (8%)     max: 11.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 4600H → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10300H → 87% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 09:28:43

#0 checking url part for id 11679 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11706 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.032s ... 0.033s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.033s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11679 +0.023s ... 0.055s

#7 got single benchmarks 11679 +0.059s ... 0.114s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11706 +0.018s ... 0.131s

#9 got single benchmarks 11706 +0.087s ... 0.218s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.218s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.428s ... 0.646s

#12 return log +0.027s ... 0.674s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)