Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U vs Intel Core i7-8650U vs Intel Core i5-8350U

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 PRO 3500U

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is a mobile SoC for business laptops that was announced in April  2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.7 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics card with 8 CUs (512 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar consumer variant Ryzen 5 3500U, the PRO model features additional management and security features (e.g., full memory encryption) and longer warranty / availability.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 5 3500U should be ahead the Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz) and nearly on par with the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U (2.2 - 3.8 GHz).

Intel Core i7-8650U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8650U

The Intel Core i7-8650U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation and was announced in August 2017. Contrary to its direct predecessor the Core i7-7600U, which were still dual-cores, the i7-8650U is equipped with four cores but at a lower base frequency of 1.9 GHz. The Turbo Boost can go up to 4,2 GHz and therefore also offer good short term single core speeds. The GPU is now named Intel UHD Graphics 620 but otherwise identical to the Intel HD Graphics 620. The integrated memory controller supports DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

According to Intel, the new quad core models are up to 40% faster than their dual core predecessors. Due to the reduced TDP and the same 14nm+ process, the long term performance and throttling behaviour will be interesting and depending on the laptop design. Therefore, the older 35 Watt quad-core models should be faster in applications that demand longer CPU loads. The performance however is highly depending on the TDP settings and cooling solution of the laptop. Especially, longer loads will show varying results in different laptops.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

Intel Core i5-8350U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-8350U

The Intel Core i5-8350U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation and was announced in August 2017. Contrary to its direct predecessor the Core i5-7300U, which were still dual-cores, the i7-8350U is equipped with four cores but at a lower base frequency of 1.7 GHz. The Turbo Boost can go up to 3,6 GHz and therefore also offer good short term single core speeds. The GPU is now named Intel UHD Graphics 620 but otherwise identical to the Intel HD Graphics 620. The integrated memory controller supports DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

According to Intel, the new quad core models are up to 40% faster than their dual core predecessors. Due to the reduced TDP and the same 14nm+ process, the long term performance and throttling behaviour will be interesting and depending on the laptop design. Therefore, the older 35 Watt quad-core models should be faster in applications that demand longer CPU loads.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500UIntel Core i7-8650UIntel Core i5-8350U
CodenameZen+Kaby Lake RefreshKaby Lake Refresh
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)Intel Kaby Lake RefreshIntel Kaby Lake Refresh
Series: Kaby Lake Refresh Kaby Lake Refresh
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U « 2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8650U « 1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8650U1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U « 1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Clock2100 - 3700 MHz1900 - 4200 MHz1700 - 3600 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB8 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 84 / 8
TDP15 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million
Technology12 nm14 nm14 nm
SocketAM4BGA1356BGA1356
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
$409 U.S.$297 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 PRO 3500U
24.7 pt (41%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 354     avg: 361.5     median: 361.5 (39%)     max: 369 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1328     avg: 1339     median: 1338.5 (3%)     max: 1349 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 611     avg: 624     median: 624 (4%)     max: 637 Points
min: 451     avg: 589     median: 605 (4%)     max: 675 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 140     avg: 142     median: 142 (39%)     max: 144 Points
min: 128     avg: 165     median: 169 (47%)     max: 178 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5.04     avg: 6.4     median: 6.8 (9%)     max: 7.24 Points
min: 5.48     avg: 6.3     median: 6 (8%)     max: 7.33 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.67     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (46%)     max: 2.04 Points
min: 1.62     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (40%)     max: 1.71 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5307     avg: 6337     median: 6629 (40%)     max: 6782 Points
min: 5152     avg: 5461     median: 5460.5 (33%)     max: 5769 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 16227     avg: 18738     median: 18635 (14%)     max: 21455 Points
min: 16222     avg: 17931     median: 17931 (13%)     max: 19640 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
21677 Points (14%)
28684 Points (18%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
6864 Points (8%)
7593 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 268.3     avg: 301.9     median: 302.8 (4%)     max: 334.6 s
min: 305.7     avg: 330.5     median: 330.5 (4%)     max: 355.2 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 8.636     avg: 9.6     median: 9.9 (2%)     max: 10.28 s
min: 7.517     avg: 9.7     median: 9.7 (2%)     max: 11.89 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
413.8 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
10.3 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4140     avg: 4423     median: 4319 (7%)     max: 4915 Points
min: 1960     avg: 2961     median: 2961 (5%)     max: 3962 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 15910     avg: 16221     median: 16220.5 (9%)     max: 16531 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3432     avg: 3474     median: 3474 (41%)     max: 3516 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 35     avg: 39.1     median: 39.8 (1%)     max: 41.98 fps
min: 34     avg: 37.3     median: 37.3 (1%)     max: 40.55 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 149     avg: 165.4     median: 169.6 (4%)     max: 173.2 fps
min: 145     avg: 152.9     median: 152.9 (4%)     max: 160.7 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 3.36     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (6%)     max: 3.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.393     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (13%)     max: 0.444 GB/s
min: 0.363     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (12%)     max: 0.456 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.662     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (12%)     max: 0.733 GB/s
min: 0.623     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (12%)     max: 0.754 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 3.9     avg: 4.2     median: 4.3 (11%)     max: 4.4 GB/s
min: 3.7     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (11%)     max: 4.4 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 786     avg: 796     median: 795.5 (6%)     max: 805 Seconds
705 Seconds (5%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.8 sec (17%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 4487     avg: 6716     median: 6936 (15%)     max: 7939 Points
min: 5852     avg: 6131     median: 5925 (13%)     max: 6617 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8     avg: 8.6     median: 8.8 (2%)     max: 9 s
min: 10     avg: 10.9     median: 10.9 (2%)     max: 11.88 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 19     avg: 19.7     median: 20 (1%)     max: 20.1 s
min: 23     avg: 25.3     median: 25.3 (1%)     max: 27.62 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 501     avg: 513     median: 508 (2%)     max: 542 s
min: 580     avg: 637     median: 637 (3%)     max: 694 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
19125 Points (15%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 5150     avg: 5781     median: 5781 (14%)     max: 6412 Points
min: 5168     avg: 7106     median: 6863 (17%)     max: 8887 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
43514 Points (35%)
min: 39040     avg: 42198     median: 41275 (34%)     max: 47797 Points
min: 39950     avg: 43226     median: 43226 (35%)     max: 46502 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 41011     avg: 43029     median: 41405.5 (34%)     max: 48293 Points
min: 38261     avg: 42913     median: 42913 (35%)     max: 47565 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 44090     avg: 52920     median: 56455 (45%)     max: 58675 Points
min: 51828     avg: 52962     median: 53024 (43%)     max: 54034 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5629     avg: 5860     median: 5859.5 (15%)     max: 6090 Points
min: 4442     avg: 5935     median: 6089 (15%)     max: 7416 Points
min: 5408     avg: 6288     median: 6155 (16%)     max: 7190 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 8547     avg: 8809     median: 8808.5 (16%)     max: 9070 Points
min: 6823     avg: 8895     median: 9167 (16%)     max: 10541 Points
min: 7603     avg: 8941     median: 8945.5 (16%)     max: 10362 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2595     avg: 2638     median: 2638 (11%)     max: 2681 Points
min: 2685     avg: 3010     median: 2876 (12%)     max: 3569 Points
min: 2484     avg: 2537     median: 2537 (11%)     max: 2590 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
863 Points (33%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
2824 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3820 Points (38%)
min: 3646     avg: 4185     median: 4225 (42%)     max: 4685 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10419 Points (10%)
min: 11004     avg: 13358     median: 13605 (13%)     max: 15464 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4160     avg: 4210     median: 4210 (47%)     max: 4260 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12679     avg: 12800     median: 12799.5 (17%)     max: 12920 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
12270 Points (22%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3439 Points (45%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1097     avg: 1211     median: 1211 (1%)     max: 1325 ms
min: 809     avg: 1126     median: 1076.5 (1%)     max: 1912 ms
min: 1017     avg: 1193     median: 1216 (1%)     max: 1289 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 63.8     avg: 74.2     median: 74.4 (1%)     max: 83.1 ms
min: 78.9     avg: 161.1     median: 156.5 (2%)     max: 252.7 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 27185     avg: 27437     median: 27437 (20%)     max: 27689 Points
min: 11491     avg: 31341     median: 33906 (25%)     max: 42822 Points
min: 28223     avg: 32497     median: 31171 (23%)     max: 38722 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
142 Points (25%)
227 Points (41%)
min: 164     avg: 183.5     median: 183.5 (33%)     max: 203 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
9887 Points (52%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
15717 Points (34%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
11958 Points (78%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
19602 Points (98%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8650U → 114% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8350U → 105% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 08. 16:08:05

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11334 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9212 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 9214 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759932485s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11334 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 11334 +0.005s ... 0.017s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9212 +0.001s ... 0.018s

#11 got single benchmarks 9212 +0.011s ... 0.028s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9214 +0s ... 0.029s

#13 got single benchmarks 9214 +0.001s ... 0.03s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.03s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.036s ... 0.066s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.066s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)