Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G76 MP12 vs Qualcomm Adreno 644 vs ARM Mali-G78 MP24

ARM Mali-G76 MP12

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G76 MP12

The ARM Mali-G76 MP12 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced early 2019 in the Samsung Exynos 9820 (e.g. Galaxy S10 Plus). It integrates 12 of the 20 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing. Compared to the old Mali-G72, the G76 should offer twice the performance per cluster.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.

Qualcomm Adreno 644

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 644

The Qualcomm Adreno 644 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SoC. The chip was announced mid 2022 and was available in early 2023 in upper mid-range Android smartphones.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 644 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 642, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 780G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR5 with 3200 MHz. In our benchmarks with the Mi 13 Lite however, the performance was only on par with the old Adreno 642.

The Adreno 644 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is manufactured in the modern 4nm process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

ARM Mali-G78 MP24

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G78 MP24

The ARM Mali-G78MP24 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced late 2020 in the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 (e.g. Huawei Mate 40). It integrates all of the 24 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Valhal architecture. According to ARM it offers two new features: asynchronous top level and fragment dependency tracking.

The graphics card is one of the fastest in Android devices of 2020 and therefore able to run all games fluently.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 and OpenCL 2.0.

ARM Mali-G76 MP12Qualcomm Adreno 644ARM Mali-G78 MP24
Mali-G Series
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
ArchitectureBifrostValhall
Pipelines10 - unified24 - unified
Shared Memorynoyesno
APIOpenGL ES 3.2OpenGL ES 3.2OpenGL ES 3.2
technology7 nm4 nm5 nm
Date of Announcement31.08.2018 07.05.2021 26.05.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.comwww.arm.com
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
PredecessorAdreno 642
CodenameValhall
CPU in Mali-G76 MP12GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 98258 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 98208 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 644GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G78 MP24GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 90008 x 2050 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 65614     avg: 68730     median: 68654 (8%)     max: 72022 Points
123332 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 4052     avg: 4561     median: 4618 (20%)     max: 5048 Points
min: 6303     avg: 6921     median: 6953.5 (30%)     max: 7472 Points
11895 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 4449     avg: 5066     median: 5083 (11%)     max: 5605 Points
min: 8656     avg: 8893     median: 8751 (19%)     max: 9414 Points
17612 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 4529     avg: 4827     median: 4720.5 (23%)     max: 5300 Points
min: 5501     avg: 6158     median: 6262 (31%)     max: 6466 Points
9643 Points (48%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5358     avg: 5606     median: 5394.5 (16%)     max: 6087 Points
min: 6767     avg: 7037     median: 7012.5 (21%)     max: 7388 Points
12146 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3035     avg: 3133     median: 3140 (2%)     max: 3184 Points
6923 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 825     avg: 833     median: 829 (1%)     max: 854 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 7     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (3%)     max: 7.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 16     avg: 17.2     median: 17 (3%)     max: 18 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 38     avg: 43.8     median: 45 (3%)     max: 48 fps
min: 37     avg: 38.2     median: 38 (4%)     max: 40 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 47     avg: 58.7     median: 59 (1%)     max: 67 fps
min: 52     avg: 62.4     median: 65 (1%)     max: 67 fps
min: 86     avg: 89.2     median: 88 (5%)     max: 94 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G76 MP12
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 50     avg: 103.7     median: 96.5 (1%)     max: 143 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 644
min: 147     avg: 150.2     median: 148 (1%)     max: 158 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 174679     avg: 177977     median: 175343 (22%)     max: 187645 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 50.74     avg: 51.7     median: 51.7 (0%)     max: 52.63 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 2448     avg: 2513     median: 2497 (1%)     max: 2610 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 2650     avg: 2776     median: 2729.5 (1%)     max: 2993 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
7354 Points (7%)
30029 Points (30%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
6315 Points (11%)
42541 Points (74%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.19     avg: 4.8     median: 4.6 (2%)     max: 5.9 Watt

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G76 MP12 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 146% n=4

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G78 MP24 → 258% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 644:
42  fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 644:
45  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 644:
45 89 ~ 67 fps
Mali-G78 MP24:
60  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
58  fps
103%
Adreno 644:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
med.
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
39  fps
103%
Adreno 644:
40  fps
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
38 39 40 40 ~ 39 fps
103%
Adreno 644:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
103%
Mali-G78 MP24:
40  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
58 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
60  fps
100%
Adreno 644:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
29 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
29 29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 644:
60 61 ~ 61 fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G76 MP12 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 102%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 102%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G78 MP24 → 103%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 103%

Qualcomm Adreno 644lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal4245
Armajet67
PUBG Mobile604040
Dead Trigger 260
Subway Surfers61
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1

1


1
3

1







ARM Mali-G78 MP24lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet60
PUBG Mobile40
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps







1
1









ARM Mali-G76 MP12lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile583939
Arena of Valor6060
Shadow Fight 36060
Battle Bay60
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
2

1


2
3


1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 01. 07:20:51

#0 checking url part for id 9822 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10564 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:39:27 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.13s ... 0.131s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.131s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.131s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9822 +0.037s ... 0.169s

#9 got single benchmarks 9822 +0.015s ... 0.184s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0.001s ... 0.185s

#11 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.015s ... 0.201s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10564 +0.002s ... 0.202s

#13 got single benchmarks 10564 +0.009s ... 0.211s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.211s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.104s ... 0.315s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.315s

#17 Got 42 rows for game benchmarks. +0.014s ... 0.329s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.329s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.333s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.019s ... 0.352s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.352s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.354s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)