Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G68 MP4 vs Qualcomm Adreno 642L

ARM Mali-G68 MP4

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G68 MP4

The ARM Mali-G68 MP4 (or G68MC4) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). The MP4 version uses four of the six possible clusters / cores.

It was introduced mid 2021 in the Mediatek Dimensity 900. It is based on the Valhall architecture and is advertised by ARM as a "sub-premium GPU". It offers all features of the Mali-G78 series including improvements for battery runtime and machine learning.

Qualcomm Adreno 642L

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 642L

The Qualcomm Adreno 642L is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SoC. The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642L GPU offers a 40% improved performance over the Adreno 620 (compared to the specified +50% of the 642 in the SD 780G), its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.

The Adreno 642L supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 778G and therefore also the 642L is manufactured in the modern 6nm UEV process at TSMC that should provide a good power efficiency.

show full text
ARM Mali-G68 MP4Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Adreno 600 Series
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 compare @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureValhall
Pipelines4 - unified
Shared Memorynoyes
technology5 nm6 nm
Date of Announcement14.09.2021 07.05.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
CPU in Mali-G68 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 70508 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 10808 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 9208 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
» show 2 more
min. - max.? - 900 MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 642LGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 38 x 2400 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Adreno 642L
0.3 pt (1%)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
0.05576 -82%
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
0.0842 -73%
Qualcomm Adreno 540
0.192 -39%
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
0.3143
...
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
0.3143 0%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
33.3 10495%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 220     avg: 248     median: 250 (1%)     max: 272 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 2001     avg: 2220     median: 2242.5 (1%)     max: 2409 Points
min: 2321     avg: 2517     median: 2493.5 (1%)     max: 2831 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 567     avg: 612     median: 619 (1%)     max: 656 Points
min: 681     avg: 696     median: 687.5 (1%)     max: 768 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 782     avg: 789     median: 788.5 (1%)     max: 795 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 832     avg: 840     median: 840 (1%)     max: 848 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
37738 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
48592 Points (5%)
min: 46148     avg: 74921     median: 88482 (9%)     max: 90133 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
30747 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
4790 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
5577 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 4505     avg: 5078     median: 5061 (22%)     max: 5612 Points
min: 6398     avg: 6666     median: 6638 (29%)     max: 7281 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5193     avg: 5883     median: 6021 (13%)     max: 6313 Points
min: 7199     avg: 7627     median: 7536 (17%)     max: 8605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 3514     avg: 4058     median: 4173 (18%)     max: 4362 Points
min: 5032     avg: 5413     median: 5393.5 (23%)     max: 5763 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3678     avg: 4183     median: 4213 (10%)     max: 4406 Points
min: 5103     avg: 5654     median: 5612 (14%)     max: 6240 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 4021     avg: 4779     median: 4796 (43%)     max: 5335 Points
min: 6320     avg: 6409     median: 6358 (56%)     max: 6798 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 4927     avg: 5628     median: 5747 (34%)     max: 6110 Points
min: 7138     avg: 7328     median: 7238 (43%)     max: 8182 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 3378     avg: 3886     median: 3887 (19%)     max: 4225 Points
min: 4967     avg: 5076     median: 5031.5 (25%)     max: 5385 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 3580     avg: 4104     median: 4085.5 (14%)     max: 4372 Points
min: 5134     avg: 5267     median: 5205 (17%)     max: 5807 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1067     avg: 1072     median: 1072 (1%)     max: 1077 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 995     avg: 996     median: 996 (1%)     max: 997 Points
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 7.15     avg: 7.8     median: 7.8 (0%)     max: 8.38 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 4.1     avg: 6     median: 4.5 (2%)     max: 32 fps
min: 5.9     avg: 6.2     median: 6.1 (2%)     max: 6.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 9.4     avg: 10.6     median: 11 (2%)     max: 12 fps
min: 13     avg: 13.6     median: 13.5 (2%)     max: 15 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 24     avg: 27.9     median: 28 (2%)     max: 31 fps
min: 34     avg: 36.4     median: 36 (3%)     max: 40 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 23     avg: 25.2     median: 25 (2%)     max: 27 fps
min: 33     avg: 33.7     median: 33 (3%)     max: 37 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 35     avg: 41.9     median: 42 (1%)     max: 46 fps
min: 56     avg: 57.7     median: 57 (1%)     max: 64 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 60     avg: 64.5     median: 64.5 (3%)     max: 69 fps
min: 77     avg: 79.1     median: 78 (3%)     max: 89 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G68 MP4
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 91     avg: 100.7     median: 101.5 (1%)     max: 108 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642L
min: 81     avg: 131.6     median: 133 (1%)     max: 148 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 109691     avg: 127408     median: 128282 (13%)     max: 140863 Points
min: 135972     avg: 157798     median: 157454 (16%)     max: 175807 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 104333     avg: 107286     median: 107208 (7%)     max: 109771 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 25.38     avg: 34.4     median: 33.2 (1%)     max: 39.37 fps
min: 45.96     avg: 49.6     median: 46.9 (1%)     max: 54.4 fps
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 2243     avg: 2305     median: 2301 (1%)     max: 2394 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 2298     avg: 2329     median: 2310.5 (1%)     max: 2376 Points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
42 Samples/s (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
53 Samples/s (0%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
944 Points (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 13104     avg: 21255     median: 21981 (8%)     max: 26121 Points
min: 23666     avg: 31803     median: 30994 (11%)     max: 38436 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 4174     avg: 20359     median: 22932.5 (30%)     max: 27937 Points
min: 26134     avg: 36660     median: 40236 (53%)     max: 43000 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.95     avg: 4.3     median: 4.1 (2%)     max: 7.55 Watt
min: 0     avg: 4.3     median: 4 (2%)     max: 9.27 Watt

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G68 MP4 → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 133% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
197%
Adreno 642L:
59 59 ~ 59 fps
ultra Ultra
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
29.8 30 30 ~ 30 fps
187%
Adreno 642L:
51 60 ~ 56 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
ultra
Adreno 642L:
61  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
30.5 32 37 43.5 ~ 36 fps
ultra
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
23 27 34.6 35 ~ 30 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
30 30 59 60 60 60 79 108 112 115 118 ~ 76 fps
117%
Adreno 642L:
60 60 60 60 89 99 103 119 120 121 ~ 89 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
30 30 30 30 40 58.7 59 59 60 60 60 60 ~ 48 fps
121%
Adreno 642L:
40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps
med.
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
40 40 40 60 ~ 45 fps
89%
Adreno 642L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
28 30 30 30 30 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 37 fps
103%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 38 fps
ultra
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
39.8  fps
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
Adreno 642L:
33.7 36.2 ~ 35 fps
med. 1366x768
Adreno 642L:
25 26.3 ~ 26 fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 642L:
14.8 14.8 ~ 15 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 642L:
13 13 ~ 13 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
71  fps
85%
Adreno 642L:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
30  fps
100%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
60 60 120 ~ 80 fps
113%
Adreno 642L:
90  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G68 MP4 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 121%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 130%

ARM Mali-G68 MP4Qualcomm Adreno 642L
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal30305956
Genshin Impact3630
Armajet7689
PUBG Mobile48453739.8584038
Dead Trigger 27160
Asphalt 9: Legends30303030
Subway Surfers8090
ARM Mali-G68 MP4Qualcomm Adreno 642L
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
4


1


2
3

3







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3


1


2
3

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 14. 02:46:29

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10953 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10945 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1763084789s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Nov 2025 05:21:34 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.011s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10953 +0.012s ... 0.023s

#9 got single benchmarks 10953 +0.035s ... 0.058s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10945 +0.004s ... 0.062s

#11 got single benchmarks 10945 +0.018s ... 0.08s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.08s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.032s ... 0.112s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.112s

#15 Got 121 rows for game benchmarks. +0.017s ... 0.129s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.129s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.13s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.134s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.134s

#20 return log +0.001s ... 0.135s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)