Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G52 MP6 vs Qualcomm Adreno 690

ARM Mali-G52 MP6

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G52 MP6

The ARM Mali-G52 MP6 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2019 in the HiSilicon Kirin 810 and uses 6 clusters (hence the MP6 name). 

The G52 is based on the Bifrost architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. ARM claims that the G52 series offers 30% more performance density and 15% better energy efficiency compared to the ARM Mali G51 series.

The performance of the G52MP6 in our benchmarks (in the Kirin 810) is comparable to the Adreno 618 in the Snapdragon 730 and G76MP4 in the Helio G90T.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

Qualcomm Adreno 690

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 690

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 SoC for Windows laptops. According to Qualcomm, the 690 is up to 60% faster than the previous generation. In our tests with the Lenovo ThinkPad X13s, the Adreno 690 was only on par with a low en Intel UHD Graphics iGPU and not well suited for 3D games.

The chip is manufactured in 5nm at Samsung (5LPE) and suited for fanless laptops.

show full text
ARM Mali-G52 MP6Qualcomm Adreno 690
Adreno 600 Series
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 compare @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
ArchitectureBifrost
Pipelines6 - unified
Shared Memorynoyes
technology12 nm5 nm
Date of Announcement06.03.2018 06.12.2018
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.com
APIDirectX 12
Power Consumption7 Watt
CPU in Mali-G52 MP6GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 8108 x 1880 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 690GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 38 x 2400 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Adreno 690
1.1 pt (3%)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
0.05576 -95%
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
0.0842 -92%
Qualcomm Adreno 540
0.192 -82%
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
0.3143 -71%
Qualcomm Adreno 690
1.097
...
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
0.3143 -71%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
33.3 2936%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
3067 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2758     avg: 2835     median: 2834.5 (4%)     max: 2911 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2837     avg: 2933     median: 2932.5 (3%)     max: 3028 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
14652 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
909 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
811 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 45182     avg: 46563     median: 46944 (5%)     max: 47563 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 8602     avg: 9818     median: 9818 (9%)     max: 11034 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 13768     avg: 16708     median: 16707.5 (4%)     max: 19647 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3314     avg: 3463     median: 3483 (15%)     max: 3591 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3274     avg: 3389     median: 3406 (7%)     max: 3488 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2515     avg: 2810     median: 2954 (12%)     max: 2961 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2328     avg: 2626     median: 2752 (7%)     max: 2798 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 3252     avg: 3342     median: 3338 (30%)     max: 3437 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 3243     avg: 3318     median: 3327 (20%)     max: 3384 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 2502     avg: 2748     median: 2837 (14%)     max: 2904 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 2347     avg: 2599     median: 2710 (9%)     max: 2740 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3063     avg: 3085     median: 3077 (4%)     max: 3115 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 2898     avg: 2930     median: 2912 (2%)     max: 2979 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 690
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
558 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 13.4     avg: 13.7     median: 13.7 (1%)     max: 14 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 7.7     avg: 7.8     median: 7.8 (1%)     max: 7.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 20     avg: 21     median: 21 (2%)     max: 22 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 19     avg: 20     median: 20 (2%)     max: 21 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 33     avg: 34     median: 34 (1%)     max: 35 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 47     avg: 49.3     median: 48 (2%)     max: 53 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G52 MP6
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 85     avg: 87     median: 87 (1%)     max: 89 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
21.1 fps (1%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
8.6 fps (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
11576 Points (4%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
3831 Points (5%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 17     avg: 19.7     median: 19.7 (3%)     max: 22.3 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
15.8 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
16.4 Watt (4%)

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G52 MP6 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 690 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
26  fps
med. 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
22.5  fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
17  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
12.6  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G52 MP6:
40  fps
med.
100%
Mali-G52 MP6:
40  fps
high
100%
Mali-G52 MP6:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
low
100%
Mali-G52 MP6:
60  fps
X-Plane 11.11

X-Plane 11.11

2018
low 1280x720
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 20.7 21.3 ~ 14 fps
med. 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 18 18.9 ~ 12 fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 16.1 16.3 ~ 11 fps
4K 3840x2160
Adreno 690:
0 (!)  fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018
low 1280x720
Adreno 690:
19  fps
med. 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
12.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
7.3  fps
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
Adreno 690:
57.1 57.5 58.7 ~ 58 fps
med. 1366x768
Adreno 690:
54.5 54.5 55.2 ~ 55 fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
38.8 45.9 47 ~ 44 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
29.4 40.2 40.7 ~ 37 fps
The Witcher 3

The Witcher 3

2015
low 1024x768
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 35 38.6 ~ 25 fps
med. 1366x768
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 31.5 ~ 16 fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 19.1 ~ 10 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 690:
0 (!) 8.5 ~ 4 fps
4K 3840x2160
Adreno 690:
0 (!)  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
Adreno 690:
29.9  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-G52 MP6:
30  fps
high
100%
Mali-G52 MP6:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G52 MP6 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

ARM Mali-G52 MP6Qualcomm Adreno 690
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 222622.51712.6
X-Plane 11.11141211
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark1912.37.29
Dota 2 Reborn58554437
The Witcher 32516104
GTA V29.9
ARM Mali-G52 MP6Qualcomm Adreno 690
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

















< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		5
1

4
1

4
1

2
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 02. 03:48:06

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10362 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11411 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1767322085s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 01 Jan 2026 05:18:57 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.037s ... 0.037s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.037s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.037s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10362 +0.01s ... 0.047s

#9 got single benchmarks 10362 +0.004s ... 0.052s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11411 +0.005s ... 0.057s

#11 got single benchmarks 11411 +0.005s ... 0.061s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.03s ... 0.091s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.091s

#15 Got 52 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.095s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.095s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.095s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.099s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.099s

#20 return log +0.001s ... 0.1s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)