Verdict - Surface Pro OLED 2026 offers a faster iGPU
Microsoft updates its Surface Pro OLED convertible with the latest Snapdragon processors from Qualcomm, but Microsoft only uses the slowest Snapdragon X Elite processor from Qualcomm with the slowest Adreno X2-85 GPU. The GPU performance is still considerably better than before, but the CPU performance is just slightly better. Microsoft once again offers an Intel model for business customers with Panther Lake CPUs, but the performance should actually be pretty comparable to the Snapdragon version.
All the other aspects are pretty much identical including the good OLED screen with decent brightness values (600 nits SDR, up to 930 nits HDR) and accurate color profiles for sRGB as well as P3 out of the box. Connectivity is limited to two USB-C 4.0 ports as well as Microsoft's proprietary Surface Connect port, but there is no card reader or 3.5 mm stereo jack. You can still replace the compact M.2-2230 SSD and you get speedy Wi-Fi 7, but 5G capabilities are reserved for the business model.
The Surface Pro is also affected by the current price increases and the new base model with the OLED screen, Snapdragon X2 Elite, 16 GB RAM and 512 GB SSD storage starts at $1799 and therefore $300 more than the 2024 model. The difference between the two models is very small, so we recommend you get the previous generation as long as it is available.
Pros
Cons
Price and Availability
You can purchase the new Surface Pro OLED with the Snapdragon X2 Elite starting at $1799 directly from Microsoft.
Specifications
Case, Connectivity and Input Devices
Microsoft did not change the Surface Pro, which means you still get a high-quality chassis with excellent stability and an integrated kickstand. There is a small magnetic maintenance hatch at the back that gives you access to the replaceable M.2-2230 SSD. Our review unit does not include a keyboard cover, but Microsoft sells different models.
Microsoft still includes two USB-C ports as well as the Surface Connect port for Microsoft's own peripherals (like a docking station). The Wi-Fi 7 module from Qualcomm offers very good transfer rates in combination with a corresponding router, but Bluetooth is limited to the 5.4 standard. The cameras are still pretty good and also support facial recognition. The capacitive touchscreen once again supports stylus inputs.
| Networking | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Display - 13-inch OLED with 120 Hz
The display specs did not change and the OLED panel is still supplied by Samsung. The overall image quality is still very good, but you can once again see a slight raster effect on brighter contents due to the touch layer. The response times are very good, but we once again determine PWM flickering at 480 Hz, even though the amplitude is quite small. Both the brightness as well as the color temperature can be controlled automatically via sensor.
Our analysis with the professional CalMAN software reveals good brightness values and accurate colors out of the box with the pre-installed color profiles (sRGB and Vivid for P3). The SDR brightness is around 600 nits and we measure up to 930 nits (798 nits for a completely white image) for HDR contents. The color accuracy is already excellent and the Surface Pro does not require additional calibration, so picture editing is no problem.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 599 cd/m²
Contrast: 11980:1 (Black: 0.05 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.72}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
89% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
98.8% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
98.8% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
CCT: 6556 K
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED ATNA30DW05-0, OLED, 2880x1920, 13", 120 Hz | Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake ATNA30DW02-0, OLED, 2880x1920, 13", 120 Hz | Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ ATNA30DW01-1, OLED, 2880x1920, 13", 120 Hz | Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ LP129WT342166, IPS, 2880x1920, 13", 120 Hz | Minisforum V3 BOE, NE140QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 14", 165 Hz | Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 ATNA33AA08-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 1% | -9% | -1% | 1% | |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 930 | |||||
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 98.8 | 99.5 1% | 98.9 0% | 83.4 -16% | 97.7 -1% | 99.5 1% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 98.8 | 100 1% | 99.4 1% | 99.7 1% | 99.8 1% | 99.6 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 89 | 89.7 1% | 89.5 1% | 79.4 -11% | 85.4 -4% | 89.9 1% |
| Response Times | -3% | 6% | -7754% | -2203% | -215% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.32 ? | 0.43 ? -34% | 0.32 ? -0% | 39.6 ? -12275% | 10 ? -3025% | 1.54 ? -381% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.54 ? | 0.54 ? -0% | 0.58 ? -7% | 18 ? -3233% | 8 ? -1381% | 1.41 ? -161% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 480 ? | 480 ? | 480 ? | 240 ? | ||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 33 | 25 24% | 25 24% | 67 -103% | ||
| Screen | 19% | 22% | -142% | -186% | 25% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 599 | 574 -4% | 580 -3% | 585 -2% | 512 -15% | 362 -40% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 603 | 578 -4% | 581 -4% | 574 -5% | 495 -18% | 364 -40% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 99 | 99 0% | 99 0% | 89 -10% | 91 -8% | 99 0% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.05 | 0.04 20% | 0.56 -1020% | 0.48 -860% | 0.01 80% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 11980 | 14500 21% | 1045 -91% | 1067 -91% | 36200 202% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 0.9 31% | 0.7 46% | 1.3 -0% | 4.32 -232% | 1.5 -15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.8 | 2.3 18% | 2.1 25% | 3 -7% | 7.04 -151% | 3.1 -11% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 0.6 70% | 0.6 70% | 2 -0% | 4.22 -111% | 1.6 20% |
| Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.16 102% | 2.16 102% | 2.18 101% | 2.31 95% | 2.12 104% |
| CCT | 6556 99% | 6482 100% | 6484 100% | 6914 94% | 6770 96% | 6514 100% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.17 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
9% | 10% /
14% | -2635% /
-1282% | -797% /
-454% | -63% /
-32% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.29 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.25 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 480 Hz Amplitude: 33 % | ≤ 80 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7763 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Performance
Testing Conditions
The Surface Pro only uses the regular Windows performance profiles. We used Best Performance for our benchmarks and measurements.
Processor Performance
Microsoft uses the X2E-78-100, which is the slowest Snapdragon X2 Elite chip from Qualcomm. It offers 12 cores (6 performance cores running at 4.0 GHz and 6 efficiency cores running at 3.4 GHz). The CPU can consume up to 30 Watts and then drops to 18 Watts over the course of a few minutes (identical behavior on battery power). The CPU performance is only a couple percent better compared to the previous X1E-80-100 and the Panther Lake CPU in the Intel SKU for business customers should be a bit slower in multi-core scenarios. We listed native benchmarks (Cinebench 2024 & Geekbench 6) first but also included emulated benchmarks below so you get the full picture.
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (619 - 1078, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Tablet (124.9 - 133, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Average of class Tablet (1104 - 16544, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Average of class Tablet (323 - 4128, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (8043 - 11875, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Average of class Tablet (1400 - 1921, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Average of class Tablet (3137 - 4581, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Average of class Tablet (529 - 739, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (1285 - 2320, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Average of class Tablet (255 - 299, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (285 - 484, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (24486 - 50406, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Tablet (4769 - 5991, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Average of class Tablet (7.11 - 12.9, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (48.3 - 62.8, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Tablet (0.4361 - 0.603, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Minisforum V3 -1! | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake -1! | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED -1! | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 -1! | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ -1! | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ -1! | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Minisforum V3 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Tablet (7564 - 12759, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Minisforum V3 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Tablet (27866 - 62102, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Minisforum V3 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Tablet (2056 - 3528, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Minisforum V3 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Tablet (n=1last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Minisforum V3 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Tablet (2435 - 4429, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Minisforum V3 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Tablet (16203 - 31836, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum V3 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Tablet (34551 - 63831, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Minisforum V3 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Tablet (434 - 853, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Minisforum V3 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Tablet (4019 - 6803, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Tablet (39444 - 54886, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum V3 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Average of class Tablet (857 - 2014, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
System and Storage Devices
The system performance is very good and the Surface Pro is a very snappy system. Microsoft has improved the compatibility noticeably, but we still recommend you check the software support before you purchase an ARM device. The base model only features a 512 GB SSD (422 GB free), but the performance of the small M.2-2230 SSD (PCIe 4.0) from SK hynix is very good and stable.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100, Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100, Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 2375, n=46, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100, Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Average of class Tablet (346 - 2036, n=44, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100, Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 (n=1) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Average of class Tablet (288 - 2620, n=44, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average of class Tablet (333 - 12671, n=44, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100, Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100, Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Average of class Tablet (108 - 520, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100, Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Average of class Tablet (39 - 376, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Average of class Tablet (243 - 27101, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100, Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
* ... smaller is better
» No benchmarks for this notebook found!
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Average of class Tablet (60613 - 110050, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (85395 - 122306, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Average of class Tablet (43045 - 117859, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Average of class Tablet (94.4 - 101.7, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
* ... smaller is better
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU and Gaming Performance
The X2E-78-100 features the Adreno X2-85 GPU, but it is also a the slowest version with a maximum clock of 1.35 GHz (other versions up to 1.7 GHz). The overall performance is much better compared to the old Adreno X1-85 (~40 % faster on average), but it still slower compared to the old Arc Graphics 140V from the Intel SKU (2025). The new Intel SKU from 2026 only features the slow Panther Lake iGPU (4 Xe cores), so the graphics performance should be pretty equal to the Snapdragon version overall. You can also play some games and we did not experience any compatibility issues, but you usually have to reduce the resolution or details.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 9002 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7218 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2926 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 711 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 3464 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (564 - 688, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Minisforum V3 -1! | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ -1! | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ -2! | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 -3! | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Average of class Tablet (22.8 - 28.3, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Average of class Tablet (21.1 - 27.8, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Average of class Tablet (23.1 - 34.4, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
| Average of class Tablet (44.4 - 58, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Average of class Tablet (29.4 - 40.4, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum V3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 135.9 | 127.5 | 62.5 | 27.2 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 91.8 | 76.2 | 68.1 | 60.9 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 79.6 | 42.9 | 23.1 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 54.7 | 48 | 40.4 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 196.2 | 70.4 | 57.6 | 48.3 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 39.4 | 29.3 | 25.6 | 25 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 40.7 | 31.9 | 27.2 | 23.9 |
Emissions & Power Consumption
System Noise
The Surface Pro uses an active cooling solution with a fan, but it is usually a very quiet or silent device in everyday scenarios. Short peak load or pure GPU load does result in much noise, either, but it will be very audible when you stress the CPU cores. We measured around 38 dB(A) while gaming and up to 47.2 dB(A) during our stress test, which is a bit louder than before and pretty loud in general. The other two performance modes stay a bit quieter (Balanced: 43.6 dB(A), Best power efficiency: 41.9 dB(A)), but not as quiet as we would have hoped. We did not hear any other electronic noises.
Noise level
| Idle |
| 25.1 / 25.1 / 25.1 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 25.1 / 47.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.1 dB(A) | ||
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED X2E-78-100, X2-85 | Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V | Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Minisforum V3 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M | Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | -5% | 2% | -11% | 6% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 25.1 | 23.6 6% | 23.6 6% | 23.8 5% | 25.4 -1% | 23.7 6% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 25.1 | 23.6 6% | 23.6 6% | 23.8 5% | 26.7 -6% | 23.7 6% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 25.1 | 23.6 6% | 23.6 6% | 23.8 5% | 31.6 -26% | 23.7 6% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 25.1 | 23.6 6% | 25.2 -0% | 23.8 5% | 32.5 -29% | 23.7 6% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 25.1 | 23.6 6% | 39 -55% | 23.8 5% | 32.7 -30% | 26.7 -6% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 38.5 | 44.9 -17% | 39 -1% | 44.7 -16% | 35.1 9% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 47.2 | 44.9 5% | 44.8 5% | 44.7 5% | 34 28% | 40 15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 33.2 |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
The surfaces only warm up when you really stress the convertible and we measured up to 46 °C on the rear, which is a bit uncomfortable. However, if you use it on a table or your lap, there is usually no direct skin contact. The SoC consumes up to 37 Watts with combined CPU/GPU load, but once again levels off at around 18 Watts.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the class Tablet.
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED X2E-78-100, X2-85 | Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V | Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Minisforum V3 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M | Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -1% | -1% | 3% | -25% | -4% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 43.1 | 43.9 -2% | 43.1 -0% | 43.9 -2% | 50.5 -17% | 43.7 -1% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 45.9 | 45.3 1% | 46.3 -1% | 44.9 2% | 54.8 -19% | 43.9 4% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 26.8 | 29.5 -10% | 27.5 -3% | 26.2 2% | 34.9 -30% | 31.9 -19% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 27.2 | 25.7 6% | 26.8 1% | 24.6 10% | 36.3 -33% | 27.6 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
Speakers
The speaker performance is good and did not change compared to the previous ARM Surface Pro.
Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Minisforum V3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power Consumption and Battery Life
Our consumption measurements do not reveal any surprises, even though the idle values are a bit higher than before. We measure up to 60.3 Watts during the stress test, which levels off at around 39 Watts, so a 65W PSU is recommended.
The battery capacity is still 53 Wh, but we saw small improvements in our runtime tests. Our Wi-Fi test at 150 nits runs for almost 12 hours and still 6.5 hours at maximum brightness.
| Off / Standby | 0.13 / 0.38 Watt |
| Idle | 4.8 / 6.1 / 6.7 Watt |
| Load |
22.5 / 60.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
Battery Life
Notebookcheck Rating
Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED
- 07/07/2026 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: Potential Competitors in Comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 83.7%  | Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1899€ | 882 g | 9.3 mm | 13.00" 2880x1920 266 PPI OLED |
2. 84.2%  | Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake Intel Core Ultra 7 268V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,450.00 Microsoft Surface Pro Copilo... 2. $1,999.99 Microsoft Surface Pro (2026)... 3. $1,246.69 Microsoft Surface Pro 2-in-1... List Price: 2640€ | 882 g | 9.3 mm | 13.00" 2880x1920 266 PPI OLED |
3. 82.5%  | Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1999€ | 870 g | 9.3 mm | 13.00" 2880x1920 266 PPI OLED |
4. 80.7%  | Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1199€ | 872 g | 9.3 mm | 13.00" 2880x1920 266 PPI IPS |
5. 85.7% v7 (old)  | Minisforum V3 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $449.99 KOOTIGERS Mini PC N150 (up t... 2. MINISFORUM G1 Pro Gaming Min... 3. $819.00 MINISFORUM Venus UM790 Pro M... List Price: 1699 EUR | 928 g | 9.8 mm | 14.00" 2560x1600 IPS |
6. 85.3%  | Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,149.99 ASUS ProArt PZ13 AI Powered ... 2. $2,079.99 ASUS 2025 ProArt PX13 (Repla... 3. $1,179.99 ASUS ProArt PZ13 2-in-1 AI C... List Price: 1599€ | 874 g | 9 mm | 13.30" 2880x1800 255 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
No comments for this article
