Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 5305U vs Intel Core i7-12800H vs Intel Core i7-10610U

Intel Celeron 5305U

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron 5305U

The Intel Celeron 5305U is a low-power dual-core SoC for laptops, based on the Comet Lake architecture, which was introduced in 2020. Compared to Kaby Lake and Whiskey Lake, there are apparently no differences with Comet Lake apart from the two additional cores in the Top model Core i7-10710U. The processor is still manufactured using the mature 14nm process (14nm++ like Whiskey Lake). The processor cores clock at a fixed 2.3 GHz (no Turbo) and also only offer 2 threads (no HyperThreading). Compared to the more powerful Core i3, i5 and i7 variants, the Celeron does not offer SSE (2) support.

You can find more information about the Comet Lake architecture and the available processors on our Comet Lake topic page.

According to Intel, the integrated graphics card is called Intel UHD Graphics, but is an old Intel UHD Graphics 610. It is clocked in the Celeron 5205U at 300 - 900 MHz and is only sufficient for very demanding games. The CPU also offers an integrated DDR4-2666 / LPDDR4x 2933 / LPDDR3-2133 dual-channel memory controller as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoder and encoder.

Performance

The performance of the Celeron 5305U is in the lowest entry-level class of notebook processors in 2020. Due to the lack of Turbo and only 2 cores, the CPU cannot score points in either single-core or multi-core tasks. The processor is therefore only suitable for undemanding tasks such as surfing with a few tabs and office tasks.

The power consumption and performance can be set from 15 to 12.5 watts by the notebook manufacturer via cTDP-down. However, the processor then only runs at 800 MHz and significantly reduced performance. Even at 15 watts, however, the processor is suitable for thin and light notebooks.

Intel Core i7-12800H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12800H

The Intel Core i7-12800H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.4 to 4.8 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.8 to3.7 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the 12900H, the 12800H is lower clocked and also features  the full "Enterprise" set of vPro features (for remote management).

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.4 GHz.

Performance

The average 12800H in our database matches the Ryzen 9 6900HS and the Core i9-11900H in multi-thread performance. Which is fairly impressive, as of mid 2022.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 70 W, the ZBook Studio 16 G9 is among the fastest laptops built around the 12800H that we know of. It can be about 70% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i7 series chip has a "minimum assured" power consumption of 35 W, with 45 W being its Base power consumption. The maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sits at 115 W.

The i7-12800H is built with Intel's fourth-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-10610U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-10610U

The Intel Core i7-10610U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks based on the Comet Lake (CML-U) generation and was announced in August 2019. Compared to the similar Whiskey Lake processors (e.g. Core i7-8665U), the only difference is support for higher memory speeds (DDR4-2666 vs 2400) and two additional cores in the top model (not in this i7-10610U). The processor cores are clocked between 1.8 and 4.9 GHz (unverified). Thanks to Hyper-Threading 8 threads can be used. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Compared to the similar Core i7-10510U, the 10610U supports vPro.

The integrated graphics adapter however is still the same as in the previous generations. It should be still called Intel UHD Graphics 620 and clock from 300 - 1150 MHz in the i7. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a VP9 and H.265 de- and encoder and an integrated dual channel DDR4-2666 / LPDDR4x 2933 / LPDDR3-2133 memory controller.

Performance

The average 10610U in our database is in the same league as the Core i5-1035G1 and also the Core i5-8257U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term power limit of 25 W, the HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 is among the fastest laptops built around the 10610U that we know of. It can be about 30% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i7 has a default TDP of 15 W (also known as the long-term power limit). Laptop manufacturers are free to change that value to anything between 10 W and 25 W, with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly. Perhaps more importantly, short-term power consumption of 10th gen Comet Lake U processors can be as high as 80 W or even 90 W, making passively cooled designs rather unlikely to appear.

Core i7-10610U is manufactured on an old, as of late 2022, 14 nm Intel process for subpar energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Celeron 5305UIntel Core i7-12800HIntel Core i7-10610U
CodenameComet Lake-UAlder Lake-HComet Lake-U
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Alder Lake-PIntel Comet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-U
Intel Core i7-10810U1.1 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10710U1.1 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10610U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10510U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310U1.7 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210U1.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110U2.1 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6405U2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 5305U « 2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron 5205U1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i9-12900HK1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H « 1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10810U1.1 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10710U1.1 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10610U « 1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10510U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310U1.7 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210U1.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110U2.1 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6405U2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 5305U2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron 5205U1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2300 MHz1800 - 4800 MHz1800 - 4900 MHz
Cores / Threads2 / 214 / 204 / 8
TDP15 Watt45 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1528BGA1744BGA1528
FeaturesLPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thread Director, DL Boost, GNA, Remote Platform Erase, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHALPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2666/LPDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 610 (300 - 900 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1400 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache1.2 MB256 KB
L2 Cache11.5 MB1 MB
L3 Cache24 MB8 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12800H
38.6 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10610U
28.5 pt (47%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9777     avg: 14387     median: 15283 (14%)     max: 16597 Points
min: 3852     avg: 4049     median: 4048.5 (4%)     max: 4245 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1796     avg: 1824     median: 1828 (77%)     max: 1859 Points
min: 1151     avg: 1207     median: 1207 (51%)     max: 1263 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 690     avg: 703     median: 706 (77%)     max: 714 Points
min: 349     avg: 438     median: 446 (49%)     max: 482 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3741     avg: 5443     median: 5731 (14%)     max: 6433 Points
min: 1271     avg: 1466     median: 1477 (4%)     max: 1663 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1566     avg: 2236     median: 2222 (14%)     max: 2697 Points
min: 548     avg: 620     median: 604.5 (4%)     max: 738 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 242     avg: 260     median: 265 (73%)     max: 269 Points
min: 133     avg: 175.8     median: 178 (49%)     max: 200 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
7.5 Points (10%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (49%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7163 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
17253 Points (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
295.5 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.7 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4786 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 44553     avg: 59950     median: 62100 (36%)     max: 68930 MIPS
min: 15369     avg: 18407     median: 18717.5 (11%)     max: 20332 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5726     avg: 5835     median: 5820 (69%)     max: 5976 MIPS
min: 3653     avg: 4460     median: 4666.5 (55%)     max: 4853 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
43.9 fps (15%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
183.1 fps (42%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 11.7     avg: 16.3     median: 16.8 (30%)     max: 19.4 fps
min: 4.54     avg: 4.9     median: 4.6 (8%)     max: 5.66 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5 GB/s (13%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
337 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 192     avg: 233.2     median: 222 (2%)     max: 306 Seconds
min: 641     avg: 754     median: 791 (6%)     max: 816 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4442     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4715 sec
min: 0.637     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.855 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
8163 Points (17%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
467.3 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 15130     avg: 21336     median: 22022 (54%)     max: 24746 Points
min: 7306     avg: 8865     median: 8616.5 (21%)     max: 10773 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
79353 Points (64%)
min: 46042     avg: 53030     median: 53030 (43%)     max: 60018 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 49886     avg: 54889     median: 54888.5 (45%)     max: 59891 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
59103 Points (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 12719     avg: 17648     median: 18989 (48%)     max: 19895 Points
min: 5974     avg: 7273     median: 7267.5 (18%)     max: 9051 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 21866     avg: 27059     median: 27907 (50%)     max: 29584 Points
min: 8558     avg: 10716     median: 10982 (20%)     max: 13033 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 9325     avg: 11508     median: 11786 (50%)     max: 13353 Points
min: 2902     avg: 3339     median: 3123 (13%)     max: 4075 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
495 Points (12%)
2209 Points (55%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
865 Points (3%)
1421%
1 i7-12800H +
12290 Points (48%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1739     avg: 1790     median: 1771 (69%)     max: 1842 Points
min: 1155     avg: 1228     median: 1243.5 (49%)     max: 1261 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9607     avg: 11957     median: 12434 (22%)     max: 12940 Points
min: 3731     avg: 4134     median: 4123.5 (7%)     max: 4622 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 510     avg: 520     median: 513 (1%)     max: 542 ms
min: 807     avg: 833     median: 819.5 (1%)     max: 899 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
91965 Points (69%)
51613 Points (39%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
265 Points (73%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 284     avg: 294.8     median: 294.5 (53%)     max: 306 Points
min: 190     avg: 207.5     median: 211 (38%)     max: 213 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1768     avg: 1800     median: 1790 (67%)     max: 1843 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 67.7     avg: 108.7     median: 118 (20%)     max: 126 Watt
min: 37.5     avg: 50.9     median: 50.9 (9%)     max: 64.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 84.3     avg: 135.4     median: 143 (26%)     max: 158 Watt
min: 47.8     avg: 57.3     median: 57.3 (10%)     max: 66.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 14.1     avg: 16.4     median: 16.5 (12%)     max: 18.6 Points per Watt
min: 10.1     avg: 10.8     median: 10.8 (8%)     max: 11.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 5305U → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12800H → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10610U → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 18. 05:55:00

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 19784 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14045 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 12200 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752810900s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 17 Jul 2025 15:21:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 19784 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#9 got single benchmarks 19784 +0.003s ... 0.012s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14045 +0.004s ... 0.016s

#11 got single benchmarks 14045 +0.008s ... 0.024s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12200 +0.001s ... 0.026s

#13 got single benchmarks 12200 +0.001s ... 0.027s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.023s ... 0.05s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.05s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)