Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 618 vs Qualcomm Adreno 610 vs Qualcomm Adreno 644

Qualcomm Adreno 618

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 618 is a mobile graphics card for upper mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 and 730G SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

In our benchmarks, the Adreno 618 in the Snapdragon 730 was 14 to 30% faster than the Adreno 616 in the Snapdragon 710. The performance in the 730G should be additional 15% faster, due to higher clock rates.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 610

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 610 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

In synthetic benchmarks, the Adreno 610 positions itself between the old Adreno 510 and Adreno 512 / 612

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 644

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 644

The Qualcomm Adreno 644 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SoC. The chip was announced mid 2022 and was available in early 2023 in upper mid-range Android smartphones.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 644 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 642, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 780G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR5 with 3200 MHz. In our benchmarks with the Mi 13 Lite however, the performance was only on par with the old Adreno 642.

The Adreno 644 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is manufactured in the modern 4nm process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

Qualcomm Adreno 618Qualcomm Adreno 610Qualcomm Adreno 644
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
ArchitectureAdreno 600Adreno 600
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanOpenGL ES 3.2
technology14 nm11 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement09.04.2019 09.04.2019 07.05.2021
PredecessorAdreno 642
CPU in Adreno 618GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 28 x 2550 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c8 x 2400 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G8 x 2300 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.500 MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 610GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6658 x 2200 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? - 500 MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 644GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
129 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
112 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
2900 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
3273 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
494 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
504 Points (1%)
min: 975     avg: 1844     median: 1819 (8%)     max: 2254 Points
min: 6303     avg: 6921     median: 6953.5 (30%)     max: 7472 Points
min: 1295     avg: 1746     median: 1737 (4%)     max: 2187 Points
min: 8656     avg: 8893     median: 8751 (19%)     max: 9414 Points
min: 267     avg: 1164     median: 1164 (6%)     max: 1597 Points
min: 5501     avg: 6172     median: 6286 (31%)     max: 6466 Points
min: 240     avg: 1027     median: 1029.5 (3%)     max: 1436 Points
min: 6767     avg: 7065     median: 7023 (21%)     max: 7388 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 637     avg: 899     median: 934 (0%)     max: 1124 Points
min: 3035     avg: 3133     median: 3143 (2%)     max: 3184 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 258     avg: 447     median: 313 (0%)     max: 1047 Points
min: 825     avg: 834     median: 829 (1%)     max: 854 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
1921 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
1849 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 624     avg: 639     median: 645 (1%)     max: 648 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 572     avg: 590     median: 599 (1%)     max: 599 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 618
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
288 Points (0%)
min: 7     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (3%)     max: 7.9 fps
min: 1.4     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 3.6 fps
min: 15     avg: 16.6     median: 17 (3%)     max: 18 fps
min: 5.1     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (1%)     max: 10.1 fps
min: 41     avg: 46     median: 47 (3%)     max: 49 fps
min: 37     avg: 38.2     median: 38 (4%)     max: 40 fps
min: 52     avg: 62.4     median: 65 (1%)     max: 67 fps
min: 86     avg: 89.2     median: 88 (5%)     max: 94 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 618
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 610
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 644
min: 147     avg: 150.2     median: 148 (1%)     max: 158 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 74888     avg: 89032     median: 90943.5 (11%)     max: 95350 Points
min: 174679     avg: 177977     median: 175343 (22%)     max: 187645 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 23.89     avg: 26.3     median: 26.3 (0%)     max: 28.78 fps
min: 8.79     avg: 11.7     median: 11.4 (0%)     max: 14.76 fps
min: 50.74     avg: 51.7     median: 51.7 (0%)     max: 52.63 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
343 Points (0%)
min: 2496     avg: 2535     median: 2498 (1%)     max: 2610 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
577 Points (0%)
min: 2650     avg: 2794     median: 2738 (1%)     max: 2993 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 10269     avg: 16045     median: 10289 (10%)     max: 27578 Points
min: 7370     avg: 16213     median: 17873 (18%)     max: 21734 Points
30029 Points (30%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 3043     avg: 9739     median: 3056 (5%)     max: 23117 Points
min: 1595     avg: 12281     median: 13408 (23%)     max: 20711 Points
42541 Points (74%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
3.4 Watt (1%)
min: 4.19     avg: 4.8     median: 4.6 (2%)     max: 5.9 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 618 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 610 → 77% n=16

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 310% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 610:
25.6  fps
Adreno 644:
42  fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 610:
26.5  fps
Adreno 644:
45  fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
100%
Adreno 618:
114  fps
53%
Adreno 610:
60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
100%
Adreno 618:
99  fps
60%
Adreno 610:
56 59 60 60 ~ 59 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 618:
83.5  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
Adreno 618:
60  fps
85%
Adreno 610:
42 59 ~ 51 fps
high
100%
Adreno 618:
58  fps
69%
Adreno 610:
40  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 618:
57  fps
51%
Adreno 610:
29  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 610:
26.3 37 37 ~ 33 fps
med.
Adreno 610:
15  fps
ultra
Adreno 610:
11 14 15 ~ 13 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 618:
30 30 60.5 65 71 82 ~ 56 fps
93%
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 38 44 50 53 54 57 57 59 59 60 60 60 87 ~ 52 fps
120%
Adreno 644:
45 89 ~ 67 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 618:
30 38 40 40 40 40 ~ 38 fps
79%
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
158%
Adreno 644:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 618:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
63%
Adreno 610:
25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 ~ 25 fps
100%
Adreno 644:
40  fps
high
100%
Adreno 618:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
83%
Adreno 610:
25  fps
133%
Adreno 644:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Adreno 618:
30 60 60 61 61 ~ 54 fps
70%
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 60 ~ 38 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 618:
30 60 60 60 60 61 ~ 55 fps
69%
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 60 ~ 38 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
100%
Adreno 618:
60  fps
high
100%
Adreno 618:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
low 1280x720
100%
Adreno 618:
27.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Adreno 618:
19.7  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Adreno 618:
9.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Adreno 618:
8.7  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 610:
60 60 66 ~ 62 fps
Adreno 644:
60  fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
high
100%
Adreno 618:
30  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 618:
27 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 610:
20 20 24 26 30 59 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Adreno 618:
27 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
67%
Adreno 610:
11 12 15 17 22 23 41.5 ~ 20 fps
low 1280x720
100%
Adreno 618:
23  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Adreno 618:
17.6  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Adreno 618:
16.9  fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
Adreno 610:
60  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Adreno 618:
20.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Adreno 618:
20  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Adreno 618:
17.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Adreno 618:
12  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 644:
60 61 ~ 61 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 618 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 610 → 72%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 71%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 128%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 128%

Qualcomm Adreno 610lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal25.626.5
League of Legends: Wild Rift6059
Call of Duty Mobile514029
Genshin Impact331513
Armajet52
PUBG Mobile302525
Arena of Valor3838
Dead Trigger 262
Asphalt 9: Legends3020
Temple Run 260
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
5
1
2


2
3
2
3
1







Qualcomm Adreno 644lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal4245
Armajet67
PUBG Mobile604040
Dead Trigger 260
Subway Surfers61
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1

1


1
3

1







Qualcomm Adreno 618lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift1149983.5
Call of Duty Mobile605857
Armajet56
PUBG Mobile384030
Arena of Valor5455
Shadow Fight 36060
Dota 2 Reborn27.619.79.68.7
Asphalt 8: Airborne30
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
BioShock Infinite2317.616.9
Diablo III20.72017.212
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3
3
3
3
1

3
5
2
2
2
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 29. 05:28:01

#0 checking url part for id 9900 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9921 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 05:41:30 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.23s ... 0.231s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.231s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.231s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9900 +0.05s ... 0.281s

#9 got single benchmarks 9900 +0.078s ... 0.36s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9921 +0.002s ... 0.362s

#11 got single benchmarks 9921 +0.166s ... 0.528s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0.003s ... 0.531s

#13 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.017s ... 0.547s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.547s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.301s ... 0.848s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.848s

#17 Got 201 rows for game benchmarks. +0.1s ... 0.948s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.948s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.011s ... 0.959s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.043s ... 1.002s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 1.002s

#22 return log +0.003s ... 1.004s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)