Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 613 vs ARM Mali-G57 MP4 vs Qualcomm Adreno 620

Qualcomm Adreno 613

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 613

The Adreno 613 is an entry-level graphics card, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2. It is intended for use in low-cost smartphones.

The performance is on a par with the ARM Mali-G52 MP2 (e.g. Helio G85) and is just ahead of the Adreno 612 in the Snapdragon 678. Although it is the successor to the Adreno 619 in the SD 4 Gen 1, the performance is significantly lower.

It works with a maximum clock frequency of 955 MHz and is manufactured in the 4 nm process at Samsung (in the SD 4 Gen 2). It supports common graphics APIs such as OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

ARM Mali-G57 MP4

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G57 MP4

The ARM Mali-G57 MP4 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced late 2020 in the MediaTek Dimensity 800 and uses 4 clusters (hence the MC4/MP4 name). 

The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. 

The performance of the G57MP4 in our benchmarks is comparable to the Adreno 620.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

Qualcomm Adreno 620

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 620

The Qualcomm Adreno 620 is a mobile graphics card for upper mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G and 765 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 620 in the 765G is 10% faster than the one in the 765 and 20% faster than the old Adreno 618. In our benchmarks, the Adreno 620 in the Snapdragon 765G even was 25% faster in selected benchmarks, but the faster CPU will also influence the results.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 613ARM Mali-G57 MP4Qualcomm Adreno 620
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
ArchitectureAdreno 600BifrostAdreno 600
Core Speed955 MHz
Shared Memoryyesnoyes
APIDirectX 11.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1
technology4 nm7 nm14 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 11.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 11_1)
Date of Announcement26.06.2023 03.07.2020 09.04.2019
CodenameValhall
Pipelines4 - unified
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.com
CPU in Mali-G57 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 8008 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Unisoc T9100 (T820)8 x 2100 MHz? MHz850 MHz
UNISOC Tangula T7708 x 2000 MHz? MHz780 MHz
Unisoc T8100 (T760)8 x 2000 MHz? MHz650 MHz
min. - max.? MHz650 - 850 MHz
CPU in Adreno 620GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7658 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 665     avg: 667     median: 667 (0%)     max: 669 Points
min: 1599     avg: 1620     median: 1620 (1%)     max: 1641 Points
min: 1022     avg: 1402     median: 1604 (1%)     max: 1681 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 155     avg: 159     median: 159 (0%)     max: 163 Points
434 Points (1%)
min: 443     avg: 443.5     median: 443.5 (1%)     max: 444 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
37882 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 4259     avg: 4459     median: 4459 (19%)     max: 4659 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 4497     avg: 4609     median: 4609 (10%)     max: 4721 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
1817 Points (8%)
min: 3216     avg: 3394     median: 3410 (14%)     max: 3557 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
1591 Points (4%)
min: 3016     avg: 3246     median: 3353 (8%)     max: 3368 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 4497     avg: 4544     median: 4544 (40%)     max: 4591 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 4722     avg: 4764     median: 4764 (29%)     max: 4806 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 3288     avg: 3334     median: 3334 (16%)     max: 3380 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 3145     avg: 3193     median: 3193 (11%)     max: 3241 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
1.7 fps (1%)
min: 3     avg: 3.5     median: 3.3 (1%)     max: 4.3 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
4 fps (1%)
min: 7     avg: 8.3     median: 8.2 (1%)     max: 9.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 11     avg: 11.5     median: 11.5 (1%)     max: 12 fps
min: 16     avg: 21     median: 22 (2%)     max: 26 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
9.6 fps (1%)
min: 19     avg: 20.7     median: 20 (2%)     max: 23 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
19 fps (0%)
min: 31     avg: 34.3     median: 34 (1%)     max: 38 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
27 fps (1%)
min: 47     avg: 52     median: 51.5 (2%)     max: 58 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 613
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
54 fps (0%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP4
min: 73     avg: 82.3     median: 84 (1%)     max: 88 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 620
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 92378     avg: 101623     median: 105516 (11%)     max: 106975 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
49834 Points (3%)
min: 84104     avg: 92827     median: 92826.5 (6%)     max: 101549 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
17.2 fps (0%)
34.2 fps (1%)
30.4 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
411 Points (0%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
626 Points (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
24573 Points (8%)
min: 11776     avg: 21536     median: 21536 (7%)     max: 31296 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
22448 Points (30%)
min: 5334     avg: 16658     median: 16657.5 (22%)     max: 27981 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 613 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP4 → 204% n=11

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 620 → 210% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
100%
Adreno 613:
87.3  fps
69%
Adreno 620:
60  fps
high
Adreno 620:
60  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 613:
59.6  fps
101%
Adreno 620:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 613:
38.9  fps
med.
Adreno 620:
52  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 613:
14.4  fps
160%
Adreno 620:
23  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Mali-G57 MP4:
61  fps
Adreno 620:
60 90 ~ 75 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 613:
39  fps
77%
Mali-G57 MP4:
30  fps
97%
Adreno 620:
30 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 38 fps
med.
Adreno 620:
40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Adreno 613:
29.9  fps
100%
Mali-G57 MP4:
30  fps
104%
Adreno 620:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 40 ~ 31 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 620:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
ultra
Adreno 620:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 620:
62 120 ~ 91 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Mali-G57 MP4:
30  fps
Adreno 620:
29 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Mali-G57 MP4:
30  fps
Adreno 620:
21 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 29 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 613 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G57 MP4 → 89%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 620 → 106%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 93%

Qualcomm Adreno 613ARM Mali-G57 MP4Qualcomm Adreno 620
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift87.359.6606060
Genshin Impact38.914.45223
PUBG Mobile3929.93030384031
Qualcomm Adreno 613ARM Mali-G57 MP4Qualcomm Adreno 620
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
1



1


1
1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1





1










< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1

2


1
1
1

1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.35
log 02. 04:48:10

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12697 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10599 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 10317 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1767325690s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 01 Jan 2026 05:18:57 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.006s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12697 +0.019s ... 0.025s

#10 got single benchmarks 12697 +0.006s ... 0.031s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10599 +0s ... 0.031s

#12 got single benchmarks 10599 +0.008s ... 0.039s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 10317 +0s ... 0.04s

#14 got single benchmarks 10317 +0.018s ... 0.057s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.057s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.026s ... 0.084s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.084s

#18 Got 55 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.093s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.093s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.094s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.096s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.096s

#23 return log +0s ... 0.097s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)