Notebookcheck Logo
HMD Fusion Smartphone Review

HMD Fusion review - Modular phone with ruggedness and gaming capabilities

Multiple personality.

Everyone wants a modular smartphone, and HMD makes it easy: The HMD Fusion can be outfitted in different ways, turning it into an outdoor or gaming phone. Many parts can also be replaced quite easily. In the test, we evaluate whether this seems too good to be true.
Florian Schmitt, Anton Avdyushkin (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
5G AI Android ARM Smartphone

Verdict

The HMD Fusion expands its range of applications with its smart outfits, which turn it into either a gaming console, an outdoor pro, or a selfie expert with a ring light. At the same time, it's great that HMD is making its developer kit available to everyone as open source.

The repair is still a long way from being as easy as with a Fairphone 5 where you can simply remove the battery and replace the screen in just a few steps. The HMD Fusion is repair-friendly for ambitious users. However, inexperienced buyers who do not want to damage their device should contact the service department in case of damage.

HMD offers a decent update promise for the price range, but there is still room for improvement in terms of the product's sustainability.

The display should be brighter in this price range, but at least it manages without PWM flickering. The performance of the SoC and the speed of the memory are also only average considering the price.

Overall, the HMD Fusion is a decent mid-range phone that gains flexibility thanks to the Smart Outfits. It remains to be seen how many third-party providers will use the open-source toolkit.

Pros

+ flexible thanks to modular outfits
+ easy to repair for experienced users
+ Fingerprint sensor
+ eSIM-capable
+ 3-year update promise
+ no PWM flickering
+ good battery life

Cons

- moderate system performance
- low-resolution screen...
- ... with rather low maximum brightness
- low camera quality

Price and availability

The HMD Fusion is already available from many retailers and has already become significantly cheaper.

At the time of review, the variant with 128 GB mass storage was already available from Amazon for about $300.

Amazon Logo
$7.99
beukei (3 Pack) Designed for HMD Fusion Screen Protector Tempered Glass, 9H Hardness
  • $9.59
    Ranyi [5 Pack] Tempered Glass Screen Protector for HMD Fusion (6.56" 2024), HMD Fusion Screen Protector, 9H Hardness Anti-Scratch No Bubble Tempered Glass Screen Protector Film for HMD Fusion
  • $11.99
    18W USB-C Charger for Nokia HMD Fusion/Skyline/XR21/Vibe, 3.3ft Type C Fast Charger Cord USB-C Cable 3A PD Power Adapter for iPhone 16 15 Pro Max Plus iPad 10th, White

Possible competitors in comparison

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
71.8%
HMD Fusion
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 613 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $7.99
beukei (3 Pack) Designed for...
2. $9.59
Ranyi [5 Pack] Tempered Glas...
3. $11.99
18W USB-C Charger for Nokia ...
List Price: 299€
202.5 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.56"
1612x720
269 PPI
IPS
2.
75.8%
CMF Phone 1
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $27.00
CMF Buds Wireless Bluetooth ...
2. $7.99
Anoowkoa [2 Pack for Nothing...
3. $349.00
CMF Phone 1 8+256GB Bundle w...
List Price: 269€
197 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
395 PPI
Super AMOLED
3.
81.5% v7 (old)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon: $199.99
List Price: 299€
181 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
395 PPI
AMOLED
4.
84.5% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280 ⎘
ARM Mali-G68 MP4 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon: $192.70
List Price: 299€
197 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"
2340x1080
396 PPI
Super AMOLED
5.
74.7%
Motorola Moto G85
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 619 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon: $240.00
List Price: 349€
171 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
405 PPI
P-OLED

The concept of the HMD Fusion needs a bit of explanation, although it's not actually all that new.

Modular smartphones, in which functions can be added or omitted and individual parts can be replaced comparatively easily, have been around before: Motorola, for example, had already introduced the Moto Z in 2016, where you could add a better speaker or even a projector by attaching mods. However, the smartphone was not really successful and remained the only one of its kind.

The concept offers advantages for all sides: Customers can repair the device themselves more easily and customize it to their needs. The environment benefits because the device can be used for longer thanks to inexpensive repairs. And the manufacturer can sell accessories. Apple has at least partially taken up the concept with MagSafe.

So it will be exciting to see whether the HMD Fusion idea works. Let's take a closer look at the device in our test.

Specifications

HMD Fusion
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, 2x Cortex-A78 / 6x Cortex-A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.56 inch 20:9, 1612 x 720 pixel 269 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 220 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD (shared), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 164.2 x 75.5 ( = 0.33 x 6.46 x 2.97 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix phase comparison-AF, LED-flash (Camera 1); 2.0MP, depth of field (Camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 1.41W/​kg Head, 1.56W/​kg Body, IP54 certified, eSIM, fanless
Weight
202.5 g ( = 7.14 oz / 0.45 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case & equipment - Plastic chassis with good repairability

When you unpack the HMD Fusion for the first time, you might think that HMD had forgotten to attach the back. You get a glimpse of numerous screws, a pogo PIN port, and even the battery. But that's the concept of the modular smartphone: leaving the back off so that the customer can install what they need and at the same time allow easy access to all parts. A transparent cover is included with the smartphone so that everyone can see straight away that this is no ordinary cell phone.

The smartphone is solidly built and can hardly be twisted or dented. Nevertheless, the chassis is only made of plastic. This is roughened, which creates a special feel. Black is the only color available for the housing. The phone is protected against dust and splash water in accordance with IP54, but it is better not to take the HMD Fusion on a dive.

The biggest special feature is the Smart Outfits, which can be simply "put on" like a cover and give the smartphone a different look. The Smart Outfits can also be used to add new functions such as a ring flash for the cameras or wireless charging. Some variants are shown in the picture gallery below. We were also able to test some of the outfits, which can be easily put on like a case and automatically connect to the device when required. However, the slim form factor is then of course lost.

Thanks to the open-source toolkit, third-party providers can offer additional extensions and even ambitious private users with programming skills and 3D printers have the opportunity to add functions to their smartphones.

The manufacturer offers two memory variants:

  • 6 GB RAM and 128 GB mass storage: 270 euros
  • 8 GB RAM and 256 GB mass storage: 300 euros

NFC for wireless charging is on board, the USB port is only connected with USB 2.0 and therefore does not enable wired image output. However, it is possible to share the screen wirelessly.

The microSD reader takes up one SIM slot, so you can either insert two nano-SIM cards or one nano-SIM and the microSD at the same time. However, dual SIM is also possible with an inserted memory card, as there is the option of storing an eSIM profile.

The card reader works comparatively quickly, but cannot utilize the maximum possible data rates of our Angelbird V60 reference microSD card.

HMD Fusion test
HMD Fusion test
HMD Fusion test
HMD Fusion test
HMD Fusion test
HMD Fusion test

Size comparison

164.2 mm / 6.46 in 75.5 mm / 2.97 in 8.3 mm / 0.3268 in 202.5 g0.4464 lbs164 mm / 6.46 in 77 mm / 3.03 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 197 g0.4343 lbs161.9 mm / 6.37 in 73.1 mm / 2.88 in 7.6 mm / 0.2992 in 171 g0.377 lbs161 mm / 6.34 in 76.5 mm / 3.01 in 8.3 mm / 0.3268 in 197 g0.4343 lbs161.1 mm / 6.34 in 74.95 mm / 2.95 in 7.98 mm / 0.3142 in 181 g0.399 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (Angelbird V60)
37.3 MB/s
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (Angelbird V60)
34.6 MB/s -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=84, last 2 years)
29.6 MB/s -21%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280 (Angelbird V60)
27.4 MB/s -27%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
22.1 MB/s -41%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
19.14 MB/s -49%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
HMD Fusion Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38 (27-48.1)
CMF Phone 1 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38.2 (30.2-49.5)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.2 (28.8-46.3)
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø33.1 (17.6-53.8)
HMD Fusion Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø79.6 (28-89.4)
CMF Phone 1 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø72.1 (33.5-83.5)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø64.4 (40.3-78.4)
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.1 (39.1-107.7)

Communication, software & sustainability - With 3 years of updates

We measure the connection speeds with our Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000 as a router. These are in the range of other WiFi 5 devices and this is actually the fastest standard that our test device supports. With around 255 MBit/s in the sending direction and around 354 MBit/s in the receiving direction, the HMD Fusion is at best in the midfield compared to similarly priced phones.

A 5G modem is installed, so that you can also use the fastest mobile communications standard currently available. Enough frequencies are supported so that you can also access the mobile internet in some travel destinations, but the HMD Fusion is not a true world phone.

The software is based on Android 14 and remains very close to Google's original operating system. Only the icons on the home screen are mostly in black and white, which is HMD's way of making Digital Detox a little easier by reducing the incentive to call up the apps. However, it is also possible to set colored icons again without any problems. Some third-party apps are pre-installed ex-works but can be easily deleted.

The manufacturer promises feature updates until Android 16 and 3 years of security updates, i.e. until 2027. That's a decent update promise in this price range.

In terms of sustainability, the HMD Fusion scores highly when it comes to software updates. When it comes to self-repair, you can visit iFixit to see how easy or complicated it is: you can't do it completely without special tools, but more experienced users will find the repair quite easy. Spare parts should also be available here soon.

HMD also provides an environmental report for the HMD Fusion, although it does not list the device's CO2 footprint. It also shows that although the device complies with all legal requirements, there are no recycled materials or other measures to reduce the environmental impact. Nevertheless, the packaging consists of 76% recycled material and is plastic-free.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=190, last 2 years)
715 MBit/s +180%
CMF Phone 1
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
404 (203min - 418max) MBit/s +58%
Motorola Moto G85
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
361 (316min, 320.06P1 - 373max) MBit/s +42%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
357 (59min - 385max) MBit/s +40%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (10.5 - 718, n=190)
350 MBit/s +37%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
304 (288min - 328max) MBit/s +19%
HMD Fusion
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
255 (208min - 322max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=188, last 2 years)
702 MBit/s +98%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
390 (366min - 387max) MBit/s +10%
CMF Phone 1
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
381 (362min - 387max) MBit/s +8%
HMD Fusion
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
354 (331min - 374max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G85
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
341 (322min, 323.74P1 - 347max) MBit/s -4%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
339 (325min - 345max) MBit/s -4%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (20.1 - 695, n=189)
328 MBit/s -7%
050100150200250300350Tooltip
HMD Fusion; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø254 (208-322)
HMD Fusion; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø355 (331-374)

Camera - Mediocre single camera

Photot from the front camera
Photot from the front camera

There is only one camera on the back that can be used for pictures: A sensor with 108 megapixels from Samsung. Normally, the phone takes photos with 12 megapixels, i.e. it combines 9 pixels on the sensor into one pixel and thus increases the light yield. If you want very high-resolution photos, you can also use the full resolution of the sensor in a special mode, but the recording and processing will then take a few seconds.

In standard mode, the main camera takes usable pictures in daylight, but the level of detail could be higher. Bright areas tend to over-illuminate and the dynamic range could also be higher in darker areas. The general image sharpness is average but by no means on par with high-quality smartphone cameras. In low light and high contrasts, the sharpness is OK, but in very bright and very dark areas you can hardly make out any details.

In the lab with full studio lighting, the main camera in our test device shows little detail and a clear blue cast.

Videos can be recorded at a maximum of 1080p and 60 fps. The autofocus takes a little longer from time to time, but the automatic exposure adjusts to changing light conditions quite quickly.

On the front of the phone is a 50-megapixel camera for selfies. It usually uses a quarter of the resolution and offers a decent dynamic range even with bright backgrounds. The face looks reasonably detailed but could be brightened up a little more.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
6.7 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
10 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
9 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker HMD Fusion: 9.14 ∆E min: 6.23 - max: 14.31 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.1 ∆E
53.2 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
37.9 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
26.6 ∆E
66.1 ∆E
64.8 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
49.9 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
77.6 ∆E
42.1 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
92.1 ∆E
70.3 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
13 ∆E
ColorChecker HMD Fusion: 46.74 ∆E min: 12.97 - max: 92.1 ∆E

Display - Not quite as bright

Subpixel structure
Subpixel structure

The screen is a pitfall of the HMD Fusion: On the one hand, the IPS screen only has a resolution of 1612 x 720 pixels, on the other hand, it cannot keep up with similarly expensive devices in terms of brightness. We measured a maximum brightness of 554 cd/m² and the manufacturer itself states 600 cd/m² as the maximum.

Other devices such as the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G offer an AMOLED screen with Full HD resolution and over 900 cd/m² of brightness. The display on the HMD Fusion is visibly less fine; if you look closely, you can see blurring and even a stepping effect in letters.

The phone is much less flexible outdoors, as reflections quickly appear on the screen glass on brighter days, which can hardly be outshone by the screen.

At least you don't have to worry about PWM: We measured no flickering even at minimum brightness.

518
cd/m²
536
cd/m²
542
cd/m²
522
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
539
cd/m²
546
cd/m²
522
cd/m²
521
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 554 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 533.3 cd/m² Minimum: 3.26 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 554 cd/m²
Contrast: 2052:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.28 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.145
HMD Fusion
IPS, 1612x720, 6.6"
CMF Phone 1
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"
Motorola Moto G85
P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
65%
62%
54%
69%
Brightness middle
554
1169
111%
1016
83%
912
65%
1207
118%
Brightness
533
1183
122%
1016
91%
928
74%
1177
121%
Brightness Distribution
94
97
3%
94
0%
96
2%
94
0%
Black Level *
0.27
Contrast
2052
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.28
1.5
54%
1.1
66%
1.09
67%
1.36
59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.97
2.9
51%
1.9
68%
2.26
62%
2.8
53%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.6
1.9
47%
1.3
64%
1.6
56%
1.4
61%
Gamma
2.145 103%
2.22 99%
2.28 96%
2.251 98%
2.23 99%
CCT
7322 89%
6733 97%
6420 101%
6491 100%
6591 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8684 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.


CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color space sRGB
CalMAN color space sRGB
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
35.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.4 ms rise
↘ 22.3 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25.2 ms rise
↘ 22.9 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Performance, emissions & battery life - Good endurance

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 is an entry-level SoC and therefore actually a little too weak for the price range of the HMD Fusion. It can barely keep up with the comparison devices in the benchmarks and is clearly lagging behind in terms of graphics performance in particular. The lower screen resolution still helps in on-screen benchmarks, but our test device clearly loses out in the more comparable off-screen benchmarks.

The HMD Fusion is also somewhat stingier than many similarly priced comparison devices when it comes to memory: Only UFS 2.1 flash is installed, but it can still keep up to some extent in terms of speed.

The casing does not heat up significantly, even after a prolonged load. In the 3DMark stress tests, we can see that the stability of the performance is also quite constant after several runs of a benchmark.

The mono speaker of the HMD Fusion is located at the bottom edge of the phone. It can get reasonably loud but sounds a little treble-heavy with music and movie sound. If you value good sound, you might want to connect an external speaker or headphones. These can be connected via a 3.5mm port or Bluetooth. In terms of wireless codecs for audio transmission, Hi-Res Audio variants are also available with LDAC and aptX HD.

The HMD Fusion comes with a 5,000 mAh battery and achieved a battery life of 15:15 hours in our Wi-Fi test. This is a good value, meaning the Fusion lasts a little longer than many of its competitors and should also survive two days of normal use without charging. If the phone does need to be plugged in, it can be charged with up to 30 watts. As with most smartphones, a charger is no longer included, but the HMD Fusion works with all the chargers we tested. The maximum charging time with an empty battery is around 1:45 hours.

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=179, last 2 years)
1482 Points +61%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1027 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
976 Points +6%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
940 Points +2%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
922 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
  (920 - 922, n=2)
921 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
730 Points -21%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=179, last 2 years)
4163 Points +86%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
2948 Points +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
  (2240 - 2252, n=2)
2246 Points 0%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
2240 Points
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2152 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
2067 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1994 Points -11%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
13748 Points +68%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13228 Points +62%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
12367 Points +52%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
11724 Points +44%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
10603 Points +30%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
8160 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
  ()
8160 Points 0%
Geekbench AI
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 13084, n=18, last 2 years)
1603 Points +240%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
471 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
  ()
471 Points 0%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 9453, n=18, last 2 years)
907 Points +363%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
196 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
  ()
196 Points 0%
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 1501, n=18, last 2 years)
424 Points +116%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
196 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
  ()
196 Points 0%
GFXBench
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 53, n=209, last 2 years)
16 fps +841%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
6.5 fps +282%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4.5 fps +165%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
3.8 fps +124%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
2.4 fps +41%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
1.7 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
  (1.7 - 1.7, n=2)
1.7 fps 0%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=210, last 2 years)
38.9 fps +199%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
22 fps +69%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
15 fps +15%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
13 fps 0%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
13 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
  (5.9 - 13, n=2)
9.45 fps -27%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
8.3 fps -36%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 129, n=209, last 2 years)
34.1 fps +753%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
15 fps +275%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
10 fps +150%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
8.6 fps +115%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
5.4 fps +35%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
4 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
  (4 - 4, n=2)
4 fps 0%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 166, n=209, last 2 years)
50.5 fps +140%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
36 fps +71%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
23 fps +10%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
21 fps 0%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
21 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
  (9.9 - 21, n=2)
15.5 fps -26%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
12 fps -43%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 321, n=209, last 2 years)
85.3 fps +611%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
40 fps +233%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
28 fps +133%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
23 fps +92%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
14 fps +17%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
12 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
  (11 - 12, n=2)
11.5 fps -4%
3DMark
Wild Life Score
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
3123 Points +363%
Average of class Smartphone
  (270 - 13896, n=114, last 2 years)
2794 Points +314%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2367 Points +251%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
1575 Points +133%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1233 Points +83%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
675 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
  (663 - 675, n=2)
669 Points -1%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (271 - 25785, n=189, last 2 years)
7919 Points +1084%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
3130 Points +368%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2401 Points +259%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
1578 Points +136%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1221 Points +83%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
669 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
  (665 - 669, n=2)
667 Points 0%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (61 - 7094, n=195, last 2 years)
2179 Points +1221%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
850 Points +415%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
640 Points +288%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
418 Points +153%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
345 Points +109%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
165 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
  (157 - 165, n=2)
161 Points -2%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 7212, n=194, last 2 years)
2164 Points +1228%
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
847 Points +420%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
631 Points +287%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
410 Points +152%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
335 Points +106%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
163 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
  (155 - 163, n=2)
159 Points -2%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=211, last 2 years)
38768 Points +25%
Motorola Moto G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288
34162 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
32736 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
  (31097 - 31853, n=2)
31475 Points +1%
HMD Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192
31097 Points
CMF Phone 1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
22739 Points -27%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
22678 Points -27%
HMD FusionCMF Phone 1Xiaomi Poco M6 ProMotorola Moto G85Average 256 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
32%
14%
-12%
-27%
72%
Sequential Read 256KB
894.5
1024.12
14%
973.53
9%
529.8
-41%
Sequential Write 256KB
778
535.66
-31%
910.9
17%
525.3
-32%
Random Read 4KB
218.4
294.28
35%
236.72
8%
220.7
1%
168.8 ?(108.4 - 265, n=23)
-23%
Random Write 4KB
189.4
394.59
108%
228.61
21%
237
25%
143.6 ?(22.1 - 280, n=23)
-24%

Temperature


Max. Load
 41.1 °C
106 F
36 °C
97 F
33.9 °C
93 F
 
 40.5 °C
105 F
36.9 °C
98 F
34.8 °C
95 F
 
 39.6 °C
103 F
35.3 °C
96 F
33.7 °C
93 F
 
Maximum: 41.1 °C = 106 F
Average: 36.9 °C = 98 F
32.2 °C
90 F
38 °C
100 F
39.6 °C
103 F
33.1 °C
92 F
35 °C
95 F
42.9 °C
109 F
33.4 °C
92 F
37.5 °C
100 F
42.4 °C
108 F
Maximum: 42.9 °C = 109 F
Average: 37.1 °C = 99 F
Power Supply (max.)  39.9 °C = 104 F | Room Temperature 19 °C = 66 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
HMD Fusion
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.7 %
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
CMF Phone 1
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % -1%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
CMF Phone 1
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 % +2%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 % +1%
Motorola Moto G85
Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % +1%
HMD Fusion
Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.1 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
CMF Phone 1
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.9 %
00.20.40.60.811.21.41.61.822.22.42.62.833.23.43.63.8Tooltip
HMD Fusion; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.989 (0.986-1.005)
HMD Fusion; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.04 (4.04-4.05)
Heatmap Front
Heatmap Front
Heatmap Back
Heatmap Back
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2045.943.82540.643.13134.835.64034.435.75037.841.46327.728.38018.426.210021.23012524.437.816023.644.820022.448.325019.548.631519.849.940014.45450012.86263014.269.480013.172.9100012.477.3125010.775.1160010.874.4200010.572.3250011.270.7315011.769.5400012.266.8500011.967.4630012.174800012.273.41000012.163.71250011.855.11600011.459.9SPL2584.2N0.758.5median 12.2median 66.8Delta2.610.938.63938.244.829.227.631.228.43941.224.523.818.719.623.325.617.328.314.734.810.439.312.542.612.349.59.656.610.160.913.459.71369.415.571.410.668.710.369.110.770.811.270.313.168.513.669.314.664.714.465.815.463.216.363.816.363.11752.225.680.20.745.6median 13.4median 63.22.311.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHMD FusionMotorola Moto G85
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HMD Fusion audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Moto G85 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
15h 15min
HMD Fusion
5000 mAh
CMF Phone 1
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G85
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
21%
-8%
-16%
-2%
WiFi v1.3
915
1104
21%
845
-8%
770
-16%
894
-2%
Reader / Idle
1763
1974
H.264
941
1114
Load
228
286

Notebookcheck overall rating

The smart outfits are a nice idea for the HMD Fusion, so you only need to change the module once between a mountain hike and an evening of gaming and don't have to buy a separate phone for each special case.

At the same time, HMD still needs to work on the screen, system performance, repairability and sustainability for the next generations.

HMD Fusion - 12/13/2024 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
80%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
42 / 69 → 61%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
83%
Games Performance
4 / 55 → 6%
Application Performance
58 / 85 → 68%
AI Performance
13%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 83%
Camera
53%
Average
59%
72%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
85%
Power Use
50%
Repairability
75%
Software Updates
45%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 42.5%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > HMD Fusion review - Modular phone with ruggedness and gaming capabilities
Florian Schmitt, 2024-12-14 (Update: 2024-12-14)