Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A6-9220 vs Intel Core i5-7300HQ

AMD A6-9220

► remove from comparison AMD A6-9220

The AMD A6-9220 is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. The 9210 is a mid-range Stoney Ridge processor (dual-core version of Bristol Ridge) and integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 2.5 - 2.9 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R4 GPU, probably with 192 shaders at 655 MHz, as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Because of the significantly lower clock range, the A6-9220 should be noticeably slower than the A9-9410. In the Cinebench R15 Multi benchmark e.g. it was around 15% slower in our benchmarks (see below). The single core benchmarks were quite similar overall.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) GPU is probably similar to the R5 with 192 active shader units (3 compute cores), but a reduced clock of just 655 instead of 800 MHz. More details about the GPU are available in the linked articles above. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A6-9220 with 15 Watts, but it can be configured between 10-15 Watts. This means the APU is a good choice for thin and light notebooks.

Intel Core i5-7300HQ

► remove from comparison Intel i5-7300HQ

The Intel Core i5-7300HQ is a quad-core processor for notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. Compared to the faster Core i7 models, the Core i5 does not support Hyper Threading and has lower clocks. The CPU cores run at 2.5 - 3.5 GHz (4 cores up to 3.1, 2 cores up to 3.3 GHz). The processor is also equipped with the HD Graphics 630 GPU as well as a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2400). It is manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

The performance should be quite similar to the old Core i5-6440HQ (2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake) that offers the same per-MHz performance and only 100 MHz higher core speed. The performance is therefore sufficient even for demanding tasks.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 630 has 24 Execution Units (similar to previous HD Graphics 530) running at 350 - 1000 MHz (i7 models up to 1100). The performance depends a lot on the memory configuration; it should be comparable to a dedicated Nvidia GeForce 920M in combination with fast DDR4-2133 dual-channel memory.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors, which were announced in January, should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel still specifies the TDP with 45 Watts, but it can also be reduced to 35 Watts by the notebook manufacturers (cTDP down). This will obviously affect the performance, because the Turbo Boost cannot be maintained for longer periods.

ModelAMD A6-9220Intel Core i5-7300HQ
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Kaby Lake
CodenameStoney RidgeKaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
AMD A9-9425 compare3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420e compare - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420 compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9410 compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9225 compare2.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220 « 2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9210 compare2.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120 compare2.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9010 compare2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9000 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220e compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ « 2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock2500 - 2900 MHz2500 - 3500 MHz
L1 Cache160 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
TDP10-15 Watt45 Watt
Transistors1200 Million
Technology28 nm14 nm
Die Size124.5 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C100 °C
SocketBGA
FeaturesSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 630 (300 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.com
L3 Cache6 MB
$250 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 109     avg: 111.5     median: 111.5 (1%)     max: 114 Points
min: 501     avg: 512     median: 513 (3%)     max: 520 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 68     avg: 68.5     median: 68.5 (21%)     max: 69 Points
min: 129     avg: 141.1     median: 142 (43%)     max: 149 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.4 Points (2%)
min: 5.38     avg: 5.8     median: 5.9 (8%)     max: 5.93 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.8 Points (20%)
min: 1.49     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (38%)     max: 1.68 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2432 Points (15%)
min: 4920     avg: 5319     median: 5434.5 (33%)     max: 5581 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3941 Points (3%)
min: 17197     avg: 17956     median: 18064.5 (13%)     max: 18304 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 21912     avg: 22625     median: 22845 (16%)     max: 23117 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 6594     avg: 6811     median: 6700 (8%)     max: 7138 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
915 s (11%)
min: 331.1     avg: 346.7     median: 348.1 (4%)     max: 351.3 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
27.7 s (6%)
min: 10.98     avg: 11.3     median: 11.1 (2%)     max: 12.41 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 A6-9220 +
770 Points (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
8.7 fps (3%)
min: 34     avg: 34.1     median: 34.1 (12%)     max: 34.2 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
46.5 fps (11%)
min: 160     avg: 160.9     median: 160.8 (37%)     max: 162 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
4.7 fps (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
0.3 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1 GB/s (3%)
2.3 GB/s (6%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
901 Seconds (6%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2253 Points (5%)
min: 6266     avg: 6279     median: 6279 (13%)     max: 6292 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
20.9 s (5%)
min: 10.68     avg: 10.8     median: 10.7 (2%)     max: 11.29 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
46.9 s (2%)
min: 24.38     avg: 24.5     median: 24.5 (1%)     max: 24.89 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1022 s (5%)
min: 590     avg: 604     median: 596 (3%)     max: 654 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 A6-9220 +
4236 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1467     avg: 1470     median: 1469.5 (4%)     max: 1472 Points
min: 5382     avg: 6022     median: 6042 (16%)     max: 6627 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
16010 Points (13%)
min: 42492     avg: 50667     median: 52482 (43%)     max: 53471 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
15125 Points (12%)
min: 39401     avg: 48909     median: 50273 (41%)     max: 53025 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
15704 Points (13%)
min: 46577     avg: 50186     median: 50280 (42%)     max: 52451 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1241 Points (3%)
min: 4269     avg: 4697     median: 4722 (12%)     max: 4855 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1721 Points (3%)
min: 6020     avg: 6672     median: 6733 (12%)     max: 6881 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
634 Points (3%)
min: 2726     avg: 2847     median: 2856 (12%)     max: 2912 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1960 Points (20%)
min: 3387     avg: 3862     median: 4040 (40%)     max: 4159 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2857 Points (3%)
min: 8081     avg: 10065     median: 11039 (12%)     max: 11075 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1885 Points (26%)
min: 3387     avg: 3823     median: 4022 (55%)     max: 4061 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2805 Points (7%)
min: 8085     avg: 9720     median: 10525 (26%)     max: 10551 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
2921 Points (5%)
min: 9728     avg: 9773     median: 9752 (17%)     max: 9840 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
1798 Points (35%)
min: 3163     avg: 3184     median: 3195 (62%)     max: 3195 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 A6-9220 +
3115 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 A6-9220 +
1909 Points (29%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 A6-9220 +
3245 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 A6-9220 +
2855 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 A6-9220 +
3510 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 A6-9220 +
3822 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 A6-9220 +
3461 Points (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2416 ms (3%)
min: 955     avg: 1040     median: 1044 (1%)     max: 1132 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 A6-9220 +
162.1 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
14724 Points (13%)
min: 31952     avg: 33838     median: 33589 (30%)     max: 36008 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
47.6 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
41.3 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
12.3 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A6-9220 → 100% n=32

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-7300HQ → 272% n=32

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 06. 13:59:33

#0 checking url part for id 9326 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8417 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.038s ... 0.039s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.039s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9326 +0.003s ... 0.042s

#7 got single benchmarks 9326 +0.011s ... 0.053s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8417 +0.003s ... 0.055s

#9 got single benchmarks 8417 +0.102s ... 0.157s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.157s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.261s ... 0.418s

#12 return log +0.024s ... 0.442s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)