Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-12900HK vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H

Intel Core i9-12900HK

► remove from comparison Intel i9-12900HK

The Intel Core i9-12900HK is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.5 to 5 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 3.8 GHz on the efficiency cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare with the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. As a K-variant, the CPU offers an open multiplicator and therefore the possibility to overclock the CPU cores. Compared to the similar i9-12900H, the 12900HK only offers the "Essentials" features of vPro.

Performance

The average 12900HK in our database is in the same as the Core i9-13900H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. It's also almost as fast as the Ryzen 7 7745HX and the Core i5-13500HX. This is a super-fast processor, as of mid 2023; it will have no issues running any app or any game for at least two more years.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 134 W, the Alienware x17 R2 P48E is among the fastest laptops built around the 12900HK that we know of. It can be more than 40% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.45 GHz.

Power consumption

This Core i9 series chip has a "minimum assured" power consumption of 35 W, with 45 W being its Base power consumption. The maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sits at 115 W.

The i9-12900HK is manufactured on Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower-than-average, as of mid-2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 6850H

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is a processor for big (workstation) laptops based of the Rembrandt generation. The R7 6800H integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3.2 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.7 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 6 nm TSMC process. This is a professional version of the consumer R7 6800H with additional managment features and the Microsoft Pluton Security processor.

The new Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip itself however, offers a lot of new features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2, and AV1 decode.

A big novelty is the integrated GPU Radeon 680M, that is now based on the RDNA2 architecture and offers 12 CUs at up to 2.2 GHz. It should be the fastest iGPU of all at the time of announcement.

Performance

The average 6850H in our database matches the Intel Core i7-11800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 9 4900H in multi-thread benchmark scores. Which puts it slightly behind the powerful 12th Gen Alder Lake-H processors; still, this is a more than decent option for your 3D-rendering jobs and gaming on the go as energy efficiency is good here. More on that below.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W. A high-performance cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is built with TSMC's 6 nm process for great, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i9-12900HKAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-PAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
CodenameAlder Lake-HRembrandt-H (Zen 3+)
Series: Rembrandt (Zen 3+) Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+)
Intel Core i9-12900HK « 1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H compare1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H compare1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H compare2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H compare1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H compare1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HX compare3.3 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H compare3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H « 3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H compare3.3 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock1800 - 5000 MHz3200 - 4700 MHz
L1 Cache1.2 MB512 KB
L2 Cache11.5 MB4 MB
L3 Cache24 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 208 / 16
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm6 nm
max. Temp.100 °C95 °C
SocketBGA1744FP7/FP7r2
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)AMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900HK
44.8 pt (62%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 PRO 6850H
38.4 pt (53%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
min: 105     avg: 109.5     median: 109.5 (76%)     max: 114 Points
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
min: 746     avg: 811     median: 811 (15%)     max: 876 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 13410     avg: 17662     median: 18373 (17%)     max: 19282 Points
min: 12016     avg: 12393     median: 12393 (12%)     max: 12770 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1586     avg: 1797     median: 1901 (81%)     max: 1940 Points
min: 1469     avg: 1480     median: 1480 (63%)     max: 1491 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 596     avg: 679     median: 685 (76%)     max: 739 Points
min: 564     avg: 574     median: 576 (64%)     max: 583 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5168     avg: 6742     median: 7040 (17%)     max: 7366 Points
min: 2990     avg: 4274     median: 4887 (12%)     max: 4946 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1975     avg: 2695     median: 2836 (18%)     max: 2944 Points
min: 2081     avg: 2086     median: 2085.5 (13%)     max: 2090 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 226     avg: 258.1     median: 270 (81%)     max: 279 Points
min: 166.2     avg: 205.1     median: 205.1 (62%)     max: 244 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 23.44     avg: 27.9     median: 27.3 (35%)     max: 33 Points
21.3 Points (28%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.69     avg: 3.1     median: 3.3 (81%)     max: 3.28 Points
2.6 Points (65%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7710     avg: 8840     median: 9397 (57%)     max: 9412 Points
5791 Points (35%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 48838     avg: 51988     median: 49924 (36%)     max: 57202 Points
34412 Points (25%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 75223     avg: 75585     median: 75585 (52%)     max: 75947 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12378     avg: 13841     median: 13840.5 (17%)     max: 15303 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 186.394     avg: 193.7     median: 193.7 (2%)     max: 201.062 s
103.6 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.375     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 3.454 s
3.7 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7387     avg: 8565     median: 8735 (14%)     max: 9573 Points
5263 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 55620     avg: 68839     median: 72836 (42%)     max: 75564 MIPS
min: 52391     avg: 54445     median: 54444.5 (31%)     max: 56498 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5257     avg: 5769     median: 5803 (69%)     max: 6186 MIPS
min: 5374     avg: 5417     median: 5417 (65%)     max: 5460 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 113.7     avg: 132.8     median: 125.1 (44%)     max: 159.6 fps
104.1 fps (36%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 276     avg: 298     median: 300.4 (69%)     max: 317.5 fps
222.5 fps (51%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 15.7     avg: 19.4     median: 20.5 (36%)     max: 21.6 fps
min: 12.7     avg: 14.3     median: 14.3 (25%)     max: 15.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (0%)     max: 1.5 GB/s
1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.2     avg: 2.4     median: 2.3 (40%)     max: 2.6 GB/s
1 GB/s (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 13     avg: 14.5     median: 14.1 (37%)     max: 16.3 GB/s
9.1 GB/s (24%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
413 Seconds (5%)
min: 414     avg: 469.5     median: 469.5 (6%)     max: 525 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 172.5     avg: 191.9     median: 181 (1%)     max: 234 Seconds
min: 235     avg: 241.5     median: 241.5 (2%)     max: 248 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4155     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4997 sec
min: 0.516     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.524 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13096     avg: 15289     median: 15597.5 (33%)     max: 16864 Points
11620 Points (25%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.281     avg: 7.7     median: 7.3 (2%)     max: 8.438 s
0.9 s (0%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 16.1     avg: 17.2     median: 16.5 (1%)     max: 18.844 s
22.7 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 383.9     avg: 405.7     median: 397.4 (2%)     max: 435.936 s
800 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 59882     avg: 65775     median: 60056 (53%)     max: 77386 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17378     avg: 22097     median: 22297.5 (60%)     max: 25556 Points
min: 12978     avg: 13828     median: 13828 (37%)     max: 14678 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 66129     avg: 78262     median: 71995 (58%)     max: 96663 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 65657     avg: 78481     median: 72055 (58%)     max: 97730 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 75600     avg: 88980     median: 88770 (75%)     max: 102779 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16214     avg: 18700     median: 18585 (47%)     max: 21231 Points
min: 16089     avg: 16231     median: 16230.5 (41%)     max: 16372 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 23308     avg: 27794     median: 28300 (50%)     max: 31045 Points
min: 23064     avg: 23155     median: 23155 (41%)     max: 23246 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 9449     avg: 12247     median: 12430.5 (52%)     max: 14252 Points
min: 8354     avg: 8631     median: 8631 (36%)     max: 8908 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2611 Points (79%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
10721 Points (42%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1596     avg: 1793     median: 1868 (79%)     max: 1918 Points
min: 1474     avg: 1478     median: 1477.5 (62%)     max: 1481 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10378     avg: 13176     median: 13682.5 (25%)     max: 14294 Points
min: 8093     avg: 8472     median: 8472 (15%)     max: 8851 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1795     avg: 1834     median: 1848 (8%)     max: 1859 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10276     avg: 12524     median: 13538 (43%)     max: 13757 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7925     avg: 7957     median: 7932 (79%)     max: 8015 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 39510     avg: 46971     median: 50218 (55%)     max: 51184 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 490     avg: 520     median: 499 (1%)     max: 582 ms
min: 586     avg: 599     median: 599 (1%)     max: 612 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 102.4     avg: 107.1     median: 107.1 (1%)     max: 111.7 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
94352 Points (85%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 249     avg: 259     median: 259 (74%)     max: 269 Points
min: 166.7     avg: 179.6     median: 179.6 (52%)     max: 192.4 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 285     avg: 303.2     median: 300 (63%)     max: 331 Points
min: 218     avg: 232     median: 232 (48%)     max: 246 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
43.3 MB/s (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
2539 MB/s (78%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
81.5 MB/s (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
3600 MB/s (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
20584 Points (95%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1727     avg: 1945     median: 1944.5 (74%)     max: 2138 Points
min: 1336     avg: 1407     median: 1407 (54%)     max: 1478 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 82.3     avg: 117     median: 117.5 (20%)     max: 174.7 Watt
min: 51     avg: 76.5     median: 76.5 (13%)     max: 101.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 77.7     avg: 130.6     median: 138.5 (25%)     max: 166 Watt
103 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 13.2     avg: 38.1     median: 38.1 (25%)     max: 63 Watt
min: 8.57     avg: 9.3     median: 9.3 (6%)     max: 10.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
8.8 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 17.2     avg: 20.3     median: 19.4 (14%)     max: 25.4 Points per Watt
20.2 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900HK → 100% n=38

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H → 79% n=38

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 13. 05:55:34

#0 checking url part for id 14041 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14374 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 May 2024 05:39:12 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.035s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.035s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14041 +0.019s ... 0.054s

#7 got single benchmarks 14041 +0.042s ... 0.095s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14374 +0.019s ... 0.114s

#9 got single benchmarks 14374 +0.014s ... 0.128s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.128s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.344s ... 0.472s

#12 return log +0.023s ... 0.496s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)