Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-14650HX vs AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

Intel Core i7-14650HX

► remove from comparison Intel i7-14650HX

The Intel Core i7-14650HX is a high-end CPU based on the new Raptor Lake architecture for large and heavy notebooks. The CPU was introduced at the beginning of 2024 and is similar to the older Core i7-13700HX except for slightly higher CPU clock rates (max 200 MHz).

The total of 24 threads are divided into P-cores and E-cores, which we already know from Alder-Lake. The 13700HX offers 8 performance cores (P-cores) with hyperthreading and 8 efficiency cores (E-cores) without hyperthreading. A total of 20 threads are therefore supported. The P-cores clock from 2.2 to 5.2 GHz (single core) or 4.5 GHz (all cores) and the E-cores from 1.6 to 3.7 GHz. The integrated memory controller supports a maximum of DDR5 with 4800 MHz (and not 5600 MHz like the i9 HX models).

Compared to Alder Lake, the new Raptor Lake architecture offers improved P-cores (Raptor Cove architecture with more cache), more E-cores (same Gracemont architecture) and higher clock rates thanks to the improved Intel 7 process. Furthermore, Intel now supports faster DDR5 main memory in the top models (up to 5600 MHz in the i9).

The performance should be slightly above the older Core i7-13700HX (with the same TDP settings and cooling). This makes the CPU ideal for demanding tasks and games.

The 14650HX continues to be manufactured using Intel's improved 10nm FinFET process (Intel 7 process) and is specified with 55 watts of base power and 157 watts of turbo power.

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8845HS

The Ryzen 7 8845HS is a powerful Hawk Point family chip that we believe to be a Ryzen 7 7840HS in disguise but with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The R7 8845HS was brought to life in H2 2023; it features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 5.1 GHz. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say that there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD uncorks its 2nd generation Ryzen AI technology meaning the new processors are expected to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs. Dozens of popular apps such as DaVinci Resolve support this technology, as of late 2023.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8845HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the 8845HS is a 7840HS in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The R7 8845HS is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-14650HXAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
CodenameRaptor Lake-HX RefreshHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HXAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Intel Core i9-14900HX compare1.6 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700HX compare3.9 - 5.5 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14650HX « 1.6 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500HX compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14450HX compare1.8 - 4.8 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 H 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS compare3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock1600 - 5200 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz
L2 Cache24 MB8 MB
L3 Cache30 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 24
8 x 5.2 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.7 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP55 Watt45 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2157 Watt
Technology10 nm4 nm
Die Size257 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1964FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1600 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache512 KB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-14650HX
42.3 pt (70%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8845HS
39.9 pt (66%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 116     avg: 116.5     median: 116.5 (65%)     max: 117 Points
min: 102     avg: 104.4     median: 103.8 (58%)     max: 107.8 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 835     avg: 1035     median: 1035 (19%)     max: 1235 Points
min: 567     avg: 869     median: 902 (17%)     max: 956 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16453     avg: 20454     median: 20454 (19%)     max: 24455 Points
min: 14895     avg: 16165     median: 16192 (15%)     max: 18037 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1963     avg: 1969     median: 1969 (83%)     max: 1975 Points
min: 1623     avg: 1751     median: 1769 (74%)     max: 1783 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 754     avg: 758     median: 758 (83%)     max: 762 Points
min: 673     avg: 686     median: 685 (75%)     max: 698 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6236     avg: 7793     median: 7792.5 (19%)     max: 9349 Points
min: 5808     avg: 6317     median: 6346 (15%)     max: 7026 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3142     avg: 3471     median: 3470.5 (22%)     max: 3799 Points
min: 2342     avg: 2563     median: 2575 (16%)     max: 2908 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 284     avg: 285.5     median: 285.5 (79%)     max: 287 Points
min: 269     avg: 276     median: 276 (76%)     max: 283 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
43.9 Points (57%)
min: 29.28     avg: 29.8     median: 29.8 (39%)     max: 30.3 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.4 Points (81%)
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (79%)     max: 3.34 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
15819 Points (96%)
min: 7426     avg: 7545     median: 7523 (45%)     max: 7685 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
112749 Points (82%)
min: 47332     avg: 47532     median: 47500 (34%)     max: 47764 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 85872     avg: 86827     median: 86827 (55%)     max: 87782 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14163     avg: 14360     median: 14360 (17%)     max: 14557 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
642 s (8%)
min: 70.718     avg: 113.2     median: 98.9 (1%)     max: 170 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
14.8 s (3%)
min: 2.703     avg: 3.6     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 5.3 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
38336 Points (61%)
min: 7275     avg: 11203     median: 7327 (12%)     max: 19008 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 68711     avg: 81199     median: 81198.5 (47%)     max: 93686 MIPS
min: 62669     avg: 68390     median: 68354 (39%)     max: 74664 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6364     avg: 6530     median: 6529.5 (77%)     max: 6695 MIPS
min: 5197     avg: 6319     median: 6393 (75%)     max: 6714 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 143.7     avg: 146.8     median: 146.8 (49%)     max: 149.8 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 286.5     avg: 287.8     median: 287.8 (66%)     max: 289 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 12.6     avg: 19.1     median: 19.1 (34%)     max: 25.6 fps
min: 18.6     avg: 20.1     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 22.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.9 GB/s (56%)
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
3.7 GB/s (64%)
min: 2     avg: 2     median: 2 (34%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
19.8 GB/s (52%)
min: 14     avg: 14.4     median: 14.4 (38%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 247     avg: 307     median: 307 (4%)     max: 367 Seconds
min: 288     avg: 326.8     median: 318 (4%)     max: 367 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 141     avg: 173.5     median: 173.5 (1%)     max: 206 Seconds
min: 179     avg: 200.9     median: 198 (1%)     max: 216 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4195     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4244 sec
min: 0.4304     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4935 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15091     avg: 15422     median: 15313 (33%)     max: 15969 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.4 s (1%)
min: 7.1     avg: 7.2     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.331 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
14.1 s (1%)
min: 17.6     avg: 17.8     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 18.138 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
337.3 s (1%)
min: 659.5     avg: 662     median: 662.4 (3%)     max: 665.289 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 82048     avg: 82541     median: 82586.5 (63%)     max: 82943 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 20090     avg: 22127     median: 22126.5 (54%)     max: 24163 Points
min: 19492     avg: 22379     median: 22207 (55%)     max: 26212 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 81620     avg: 84501     median: 84429 (69%)     max: 88462 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 81607     avg: 85179     median: 85402 (69%)     max: 88305 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 83958     avg: 87188     median: 85870 (69%)     max: 93052 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
17628 Points (45%)
min: 18507     avg: 20158     median: 20268.5 (51%)     max: 22215 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 28404     avg: 30196     median: 30196 (54%)     max: 31988 Points
min: 25099     avg: 27322     median: 27428 (49%)     max: 30715 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 12741     avg: 14026     median: 14026 (59%)     max: 15311 Points
min: 8550     avg: 11247     median: 10853 (46%)     max: 19164 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2744     avg: 2753     median: 2752.5 (69%)     max: 2761 Points
min: 2510     avg: 2624     median: 2630 (66%)     max: 2698 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 12892     avg: 14451     median: 14451 (56%)     max: 16010 Points
min: 11073     avg: 12854     median: 12998 (50%)     max: 14014 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2577     avg: 2844     median: 2846 (90%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12719     avg: 16862     median: 16862.5 (69%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1933     avg: 1937     median: 1936.5 (76%)     max: 1940 Points
min: 1765     avg: 1931     median: 1949 (76%)     max: 2004 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12584     avg: 14697     median: 14697 (26%)     max: 16810 Points
min: 11256     avg: 11906     median: 11864 (21%)     max: 12726 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1869     avg: 1895     median: 1898 (8%)     max: 1914 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11742     avg: 12016     median: 12086 (38%)     max: 12109 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8034     avg: 8109     median: 8077.5 (81%)     max: 8245 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47602     avg: 48576     median: 48614.5 (48%)     max: 49473 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 483     avg: 484.5     median: 484.5 (1%)     max: 486 ms
min: 496     avg: 534     median: 527 (1%)     max: 664 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
98007 Points (72%)
min: 85632     avg: 90739     median: 90496 (66%)     max: 96330 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 271     avg: 277     median: 277 (76%)     max: 283 Points
min: 176.4     avg: 255.2     median: 256.5 (70%)     max: 314 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 289     avg: 300     median: 300 (54%)     max: 311 Points
min: 275     avg: 304.2     median: 305 (55%)     max: 334 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1965     avg: 2029     median: 2028.5 (76%)     max: 2092 Points
min: 1531     avg: 1772     median: 1795.5 (67%)     max: 1939 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 155.8     avg: 157.6     median: 157.6 (27%)     max: 159.3 Watt
min: 42.5     avg: 82.2     median: 81.1 (14%)     max: 147.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
197 Watt (36%)
min: 39     avg: 79.3     median: 78.1 (14%)     max: 145.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 22.4     avg: 23.6     median: 23.6 (16%)     max: 24.8 Watt
min: 3.78     avg: 9     median: 7.1 (5%)     max: 16.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 15     avg: 16.3     median: 16.3 (18%)     max: 17.6 Watt
min: 5.42     avg: 8.9     median: 7.8 (9%)     max: 16.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
19.3 Points per Watt (14%)
min: 20     avg: 35.5     median: 33.7 (25%)     max: 66.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-14650HX → 100% n=40

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS → 108% n=40

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 13. 04:37:49

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17170 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16399 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755052669s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Aug 2025 05:18:26 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17170 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 17170 +0.008s ... 0.019s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 16399 +0.005s ... 0.024s

#10 got single benchmarks 16399 +0.025s ... 0.048s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.048s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.053s ... 0.102s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.104s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)