Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-1360P vs Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

Intel Core i7-1360P

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1360P

The Intel Core i7-1360P is a higher-end Raptor Lake-P (Alder Lake-P refresh) family CPU, an expensive 28 W part meant for use in ultra-light, ultra-thin (yet actively cooled) laptops. This CPU was announced in early 2023 and it has 4 of the 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores are Hyper-Threading-enabled for a total of 16 threads when combined with the E-cores. The P-cores clock from 2.2 GHz (base) to 5 GHz (single core boost) and the E-Cores from 1.6 to 3.7 GHz.

Performance

The average 1360P in our extensive database is in the same league as the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which is a pretty good result, as of mid 2023.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 40 W, the NUC 13 Pro Kit NUC13ANK is among the fastest systems built around the 1360P that we know of. It can be more than two times as fast in CPU-bound workloads as the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

The CPU still only supports PCIe 4.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The i7-1360P is rated at 28 Watt tDP (PL1, 64 Watt PL2 for short bursts). The CPU is manufactured in the further improved Intel 7 process (10nm SuperFin).

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 5 125H

The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H is a mid-range Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 14 cores (4 + 8 + 2) and 18 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 4, are HT-enabled and run at up to 4.5 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island), run at up to 3.6 GHz. The 7-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.20 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestwood architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 5 125H comes with 18 MB of L3 cache which is a significant reduction compared to the 24 MB that the 155H, the 165H and the 185H have. The processor has a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s; it supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the 125H features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support. It is also worth mentioning that Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 125H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

While we have no way of knowing what the 125H will be like, as of December 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be slightly slower than the Ryzen 7 7735HS (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.75 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 7-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.20 GHz is set to overshadow the Radeon 760M; just like the 8-core Arc GPU, this graphics adapter is set to be miles ahead of the aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. As long as one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

The Base power consumption, in the case of the 125H, is 28 W while its maximum Turbo power consumption is supposed to be within 115 W. A powerful cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

This Core Ultra 5 series processor is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

ModelIntel Core i7-1360PIntel Core Ultra 5 125H
CodenameRaptor Lake-PMeteor Lake-H
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-PIntel Meteor Lake-H
Series: Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H
Intel Core i7-1370P compare1.4 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1360P « 1.6 - 5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1350P compare1.4 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1340P compare1.4 - 4.6 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H compare3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H compare3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H compare3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H « 3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Clock1600 - 5000 MHz3600 - 4500 MHz
L1 Cache1.1 MB
L2 Cache10 MB
L3 Cache18 MB18 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 16
4 x 5.0 GHz Intel Golden Cove P-Core
8 x 3.7 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
14 / 18
4 x 4.5 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.6 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
Technology10 nm7 nm
max. Temp.100 °C110 °C
SocketBGA1744BGA2049
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-5200/LPDDR5-6400/LPDDR5x-6400 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL B., GNA, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Essen., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1500 MHz)Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU ( - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1360P
37.6 pt (63%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 5 125H
35.9 pt (60%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
113 Points (63%)
min: 97     avg: 100.2     median: 100 (56%)     max: 102.2 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
560 Points (10%)
min: 331     avg: 638     median: 668 (12%)     max: 815 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 6390     avg: 10472     median: 11266.5 (10%)     max: 12637 Points
min: 9194     avg: 12308     median: 12804.5 (12%)     max: 14564 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1596     avg: 1787     median: 1829 (78%)     max: 1909 Points
min: 1549     avg: 1668     median: 1682.5 (72%)     max: 1735 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 611     avg: 689     median: 705.5 (78%)     max: 736 Points
min: 622     avg: 643     median: 644 (71%)     max: 664 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2474     avg: 4033     median: 4199 (10%)     max: 4887 Points
min: 3673     avg: 4766     median: 4908.5 (12%)     max: 5618 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1079     avg: 1793     median: 1858 (12%)     max: 2214 Points
min: 1700     avg: 1983     median: 2053.5 (13%)     max: 2245 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 180     avg: 247.8     median: 258 (72%)     max: 271 Points
min: 235     avg: 243.8     median: 246.5 (69%)     max: 251 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 19.54     avg: 23.3     median: 24.7 (32%)     max: 25.12 Points
min: 21.9     avg: 25.6     median: 26.7 (34%)     max: 27.02 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.19     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (77%)     max: 3.3 Points
min: 2.86     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (70%)     max: 3.03 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 10300     avg: 10476     median: 10473 (63%)     max: 10631 Points
min: 8948     avg: 9295     median: 9334.5 (56%)     max: 9561 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 42685     avg: 49949     median: 51246 (37%)     max: 53525 Points
min: 45559     avg: 50476     median: 51477.5 (37%)     max: 53390 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 61639     avg: 70180     median: 71168.5 (45%)     max: 76744 Points
min: 78788     avg: 78803     median: 78802.5 (50%)     max: 78817 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14974     avg: 15212     median: 15201.5 (19%)     max: 15471 Points
min: 12858     avg: 13070     median: 13069.5 (16%)     max: 13281 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 240.083     avg: 512     median: 304.7 (4%)     max: 1260.3 s
min: 148.994     avg: 231     median: 247 (3%)     max: 296.9 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.735     avg: 8.6     median: 3.9 (1%)     max: 26.5 s
min: 4.107     avg: 6     median: 4.5 (1%)     max: 9.5 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4933     avg: 5590     median: 5759 (9%)     max: 6079 Points
min: 5594     avg: 7773     median: 6209 (10%)     max: 13080 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 26534     avg: 42429     median: 43043.5 (25%)     max: 52959 MIPS
0 MIPS (0%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4647     avg: 5625     median: 5742.5 (68%)     max: 5973 MIPS
min: 4663     avg: 4948     median: 5043 (59%)     max: 5136 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 94.7     avg: 108.1     median: 110.7 (37%)     max: 116.4 fps
min: 129.6     avg: 132     median: 132.3 (44%)     max: 134 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 273     avg: 294.6     median: 296.5 (68%)     max: 312.5 fps
min: 304.5     avg: 306.1     median: 305.3 (70%)     max: 308.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 6.9     avg: 11.6     median: 11.9 (21%)     max: 14.2 fps
min: 9.7     avg: 13.4     median: 13.8 (24%)     max: 16.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.935     avg: 1.1     median: 1.2 (35%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
min: 0.817     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (25%)     max: 0.869 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.7     avg: 2     median: 2.1 (35%)     max: 2.3 GB/s
min: 1.2     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (24%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 9.5     avg: 11.8     median: 12.4 (32%)     max: 12.9 GB/s
min: 8.8     avg: 8.9     median: 9 (23%)     max: 9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 464     avg: 619     median: 607 (8%)     max: 922 Seconds
min: 391     avg: 514     median: 479 (6%)     max: 671 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 268     avg: 331     median: 324 (2%)     max: 496 Seconds
min: 228     avg: 285.3     median: 266.5 (2%)     max: 364 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.445     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.583 sec
min: 0.4898     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.53 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9236     avg: 12529     median: 12800.5 (27%)     max: 14879 Points
min: 12498     avg: 13652     median: 13866 (30%)     max: 13971 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.7     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 6.817 s
min: 7.4     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 7.744 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 14.7     avg: 14.8     median: 14.8 (1%)     max: 14.863 s
min: 16.446     avg: 16.6     median: 16.5 (1%)     max: 16.967 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 331.676     avg: 373.8     median: 383.3 (2%)     max: 391.05 s
min: 394.697     avg: 406.3     median: 403.6 (2%)     max: 423.565 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 55221     avg: 62499     median: 63451.5 (49%)     max: 67460 Points
min: 43778     avg: 65927     median: 71115.5 (55%)     max: 71915 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7898     avg: 15116     median: 15563.5 (39%)     max: 19777 Points
min: 12766     avg: 16347     median: 17039 (43%)     max: 17992 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 66722     avg: 87344     median: 89713 (73%)     max: 99266 Points
min: 69572     avg: 72139     median: 72618 (59%)     max: 73481 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 64127     avg: 86400     median: 89464 (73%)     max: 99134 Points
min: 69751     avg: 71822     median: 72061.5 (58%)     max: 73412 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 74085     avg: 89264     median: 90430 (75%)     max: 97983 Points
min: 79411     avg: 83102     median: 84374 (70%)     max: 85520 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 7227     avg: 13243     median: 13170 (33%)     max: 17150 Points
min: 14164     avg: 14885     median: 14961 (38%)     max: 15261 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 10060     avg: 19646     median: 20678 (37%)     max: 26448 Points
min: 16291     avg: 20865     median: 21667.5 (39%)     max: 22978 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4251     avg: 7369     median: 7388 (31%)     max: 10701 Points
min: 6216     avg: 8210     median: 8720 (37%)     max: 9182 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 2003     avg: 2497     median: 2564 (65%)     max: 2646 Points
min: 2199     avg: 2277     median: 2288 (58%)     max: 2316 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 8909     avg: 10779     median: 10968 (43%)     max: 11781 Points
min: 11087     avg: 11404     median: 11411.5 (44%)     max: 11749 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2371     avg: 2448     median: 2449 (78%)     max: 2516 Points
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 9448     avg: 10103     median: 10214.5 (42%)     max: 10802 Points
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1435     avg: 1788     median: 1824 (71%)     max: 1871 Points
min: 1593     avg: 1660     median: 1676 (65%)     max: 1699 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7549     avg: 9644     median: 9967 (18%)     max: 10817 Points
min: 9696     avg: 10408     median: 10542 (19%)     max: 10856 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1557     avg: 1745     median: 1773 (8%)     max: 1826 Points
min: 1596     avg: 1628     median: 1627.5 (7%)     max: 1659 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8908     avg: 9815     median: 10000.5 (32%)     max: 10729 Points
min: 10676     avg: 10712     median: 10711.5 (34%)     max: 10747 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6698     avg: 7562     median: 7635 (76%)     max: 8084 Points
min: 6734     avg: 6816     median: 6750 (67%)     max: 6964 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 31629     avg: 36185     median: 37274 (37%)     max: 39852 Points
min: 38648     avg: 38726     median: 38736 (39%)     max: 38793 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 494     avg: 523     median: 501 (1%)     max: 633 ms
min: 560     avg: 575     median: 571 (1%)     max: 595 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 80242     avg: 85555     median: 83850 (70%)     max: 92146 Points
min: 85765     avg: 86220     median: 86219.5 (72%)     max: 86674 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 218     avg: 255.6     median: 265 (73%)     max: 328 Points
min: 227     avg: 233.2     median: 231 (63%)     max: 240 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 249     avg: 289.9     median: 301 (54%)     max: 316 Points
min: 245     avg: 254.7     median: 254 (46%)     max: 263 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1527     avg: 1710     median: 1744 (65%)     max: 1891 Points
min: 1522     avg: 1574     median: 1548 (58%)     max: 1633 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 34.9     avg: 48.2     median: 46.8 (8%)     max: 67.4 Watt
min: 41.3     avg: 64.4     median: 62.2 (11%)     max: 90.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 40.5     avg: 63     median: 59.2 (11%)     max: 92.2 Watt
min: 56.7     avg: 70.7     median: 64.3 (12%)     max: 89.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.69     avg: 7.4     median: 6.9 (5%)     max: 13.5 Watt
min: 4.31     avg: 8     median: 6.4 (4%)     max: 14.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.55     avg: 7.5     median: 6.8 (8%)     max: 14.3 Watt
min: 5.71     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (7%)     max: 7.68 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 24     avg: 28.9     median: 26.9 (20%)     max: 36.3 Points per Watt
min: 24     avg: 28     median: 28 (21%)     max: 31.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1360P → 100% n=55

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 125H → 99% n=55

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 13. 05:00:51

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14731 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16911 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1736740851s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 Jan 2025 05:19:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14731 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#8 got single benchmarks 14731 +0.024s ... 0.036s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 16911 +0.005s ... 0.041s

#10 got single benchmarks 16911 +0.013s ... 0.053s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.053s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.019s ... 0.072s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.046s ... 0.118s

#14 return log +0.002s ... 0.12s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)