Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is a powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in June 2024. The APU comes with 12 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.1 GHz, the 16 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 890M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support.

Of the 12 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores and 8 are smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter run at significantly lower clock speeds than the former.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the HX 370 supports LPDDR5x-8000 and DDR5-5600 RAM, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

Given the IPC improvement, we expect 4 Zen 5 cores combined with 8 Zen 5c cores to perform about as well as 16 Zen 4 cores meaning there is a real chance of the HX 370 dethroning the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. We'll make sure to update this section once we get our hands on a laptop powered by the HX 370.

Graphics

The Radeon 890M is the most powerful iGPU that AMD has on offer right now. It features 16 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (1024 unified shaders) running at up to 2,900 MHz. We expect the graphics adapter to deliver gaming performance good enough for playing 2023 and 2024 games in 1080p (Low detail settings).

Naturally, the 890M is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The HX 370 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of mid 2024, energy efficiency.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 285H

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is a mobile high-end CPU for larger notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 16 cores consisting of 6 fast performance cores (Lion Cove) with up to 5.4 GHz and 8 smaller efficiency cores (Skymont) with up to 4.5 GHz clock speed and two additional low power cores with up to 2.5 GHz (Skymont). The CPU has access to 24 MB of cache and is specified with a TDP of 45 watts.

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Enterprise. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB LPDDR5/x-8400 or DDR5-6400 (dual channel). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is an Intel Arc 140T graphics card that offers eight Xe cores with up to 2.35 GHz.

Performance - High End

The top model offers all the cores that are built into the chip and clocks relatively high at up to 5.4 GHz. Thanks to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should reach the level of the old Raptor Lake Core Core 9 270H (6 + 8 cores, max 5.8 / 4.1 GHz). This makes the CPU ideal for very demanding tasks such as high-end gaming and content creation.

Chiplet Design

Like the desktop and HX chips, the Arrow Lake-H chips are based on individual chiplets that are placed on a 22nm base tile from Intel using Foveros 3D packaging. The CPU part comes from TSMC using the modern N3B (3nm) process. As with HX, the GPU also is produced at TSMC and is manufactured using the N5P process. SoC and I/O Tile are also from TSMC but in the older N6 process.

ModelAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
CodenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)Arrow Lake-H
SeriesAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)Intel Arrow Lake
Clock2000 - 5100 MHz4500 - 5400 MHz
L2 Cache12 MB
L3 Cache24 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 24
4 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
16 / 16
6 x 5.4 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
8 x 4.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
TDP28 Watt45 Watt
TDP Turbo PL254 Watt115 Watt
Technology4 nm5 nm
max. Temp.100 °C110 °C
SocketFP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)Intel Arc Graphics 140T ( - 2350 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
Series: Arrow Lake Arrow Lake-H
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H « 4.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H compare4.5 - 5.3 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H compare4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H compare4.3 - 4.9 GHz14 / 14 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H compare4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
$651 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.1 pt (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 285H
43.1 pt (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 113.6     avg: 116.6     median: 116 (65%)     max: 121 Points
min: 126     avg: 127.6     median: 127 (71%)     max: 130 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 621     avg: 1060     median: 1135 (21%)     max: 1284 Points
min: 740     avg: 986     median: 991 (18%)     max: 1194 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10435     avg: 20440     median: 21761 (20%)     max: 23902 Points
min: 16632     avg: 19618     median: 20442 (19%)     max: 22080 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1921     avg: 2010     median: 2018 (85%)     max: 2049 Points
min: 2105     avg: 2137     median: 2133 (90%)     max: 2163 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 753     avg: 789     median: 791 (86%)     max: 804 Points
min: 809     avg: 819     median: 817 (89%)     max: 830 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6449     avg: 8372     median: 8830 (22%)     max: 9280 Points
min: 6517     avg: 7633     median: 7920 (19%)     max: 8251 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2498.13     avg: 3220     median: 3409.5 (22%)     max: 3551 Points
min: 2797     avg: 3085     median: 3137 (20%)     max: 3333 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 192.1     avg: 299.8     median: 307 (85%)     max: 315 Points
min: 309     avg: 313     median: 313 (87%)     max: 318 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 38.84     avg: 40.2     median: 40.7 (53%)     max: 41.17 Points
min: 35.99     avg: 38.3     median: 38.7 (50%)     max: 40.33 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.68     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (88%)     max: 3.7 Points
min: 3.7     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (88%)     max: 3.82 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8639     avg: 8701     median: 8668 (52%)     max: 8797 Points
min: 11334     avg: 11456     median: 11459 (69%)     max: 11576 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 53766     avg: 55510     median: 56074 (41%)     max: 56689 Points
min: 72114     avg: 77213     median: 74797 (54%)     max: 84729 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 96857     avg: 100361     median: 100569 (64%)     max: 103657 Points
min: 111175     avg: 113680     median: 113680 (73%)     max: 116185 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 15698     avg: 15853     median: 15927 (19%)     max: 15935 Points
min: 17328     avg: 17422     median: 17421.5 (21%)     max: 17515 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 50.536     avg: 69.8     median: 79.4 (1%)     max: 79.442 s
min: 104.802     avg: 206.2     median: 238.3 (3%)     max: 275.558 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.701     avg: 3.1     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 3.743 s
min: 3.3     avg: 4.6     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 7.1 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4008     avg: 4286     median: 4090 (6%)     max: 4759 Points
min: 6751     avg: 10391     median: 7690 (12%)     max: 16732 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 66154     avg: 78114     median: 80572.5 (46%)     max: 83714 MIPS
min: 53335     avg: 61495     median: 60639 (35%)     max: 69676 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5859     avg: 6144     median: 6135 (72%)     max: 6497 MIPS
min: 5999     avg: 6146     median: 6136 (72%)     max: 6419 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 169.8     avg: 175.5     median: 171.5 (57%)     max: 185.1 fps
min: 176.05     avg: 180.6     median: 180.6 (60%)     max: 185.15 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 304.5     avg: 313.5     median: 306 (71%)     max: 330 fps
min: 356.5     avg: 359.8     median: 359.8 (83%)     max: 363 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.3     avg: 25.1     median: 26.1 (46%)     max: 28.7 fps
min: 18.8     avg: 22.6     median: 23.6 (41%)     max: 25.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.6     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (47%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (32%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.5     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (45%)     max: 2.7 GB/s
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 15.3     avg: 15.7     median: 15.3 (40%)     max: 16.6 GB/s
min: 8.9     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (25%)     max: 10 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 208     avg: 239.2     median: 221 (3%)     max: 306 Seconds
min: 259     avg: 328.8     median: 341 (4%)     max: 417 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 139     avg: 156.5     median: 148 (1%)     max: 192 Seconds
min: 159     avg: 193.2     median: 197 (1%)     max: 235 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3892     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.529 sec
min: 0.4111     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4428 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13761     avg: 16184     median: 16571.5 (35%)     max: 17466 Points
min: 15781     avg: 16231     median: 16206.5 (34%)     max: 16728 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.224     avg: 8.3     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.43 s
min: 7.084     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 7.338 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.504     avg: 17.6     median: 17.6 (1%)     max: 17.767 s
min: 15.516     avg: 15.8     median: 15.7 (1%)     max: 16.138 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
389.3 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 66119     avg: 73944     median: 75793 (58%)     max: 77565 Points
min: 81047     avg: 90659     median: 91977.5 (71%)     max: 97633 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17129     avg: 20239     median: 20686 (51%)     max: 23282 Points
min: 19102     avg: 22397     median: 22766 (56%)     max: 24334 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 50952     avg: 59510     median: 61220 (50%)     max: 67655 Points
min: 96324     avg: 109770     median: 112526 (91%)     max: 117704 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 50955     avg: 60322     median: 61072 (50%)     max: 67802 Points
min: 97320     avg: 107393     median: 109206 (89%)     max: 113839 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 48351     avg: 58447     median: 59313.5 (48%)     max: 66810 Points
min: 103278     avg: 114769     median: 116506 (94%)     max: 124524 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16960     avg: 19395     median: 19571 (50%)     max: 21349 Points
min: 20952     avg: 21910     median: 21599 (55%)     max: 23640 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24918     avg: 29844     median: 30184.5 (54%)     max: 33844 Points
min: 27803     avg: 33382     median: 34056 (61%)     max: 35532 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8866     avg: 10400     median: 10519 (44%)     max: 12293 Points
min: 6727     avg: 11394     median: 11650 (49%)     max: 13154 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2780     avg: 2881     median: 2876 (72%)     max: 2965 Points
min: 2665     avg: 2902     median: 2895 (72%)     max: 3110 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 11973     avg: 14488     median: 14896 (58%)     max: 15994 Points
min: 15330     avg: 16238     median: 15647.5 (61%)     max: 17992 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2645     avg: 2952     median: 3105 (99%)     max: 3105 Points
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12664     avg: 18473     median: 21003 (86%)     max: 21003 Points
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1957     avg: 2083     median: 2098 (82%)     max: 2160 Points
min: 1973     avg: 2073     median: 2060 (81%)     max: 2256 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11394     avg: 14057     median: 14301 (26%)     max: 15759 Points
min: 14243     avg: 15350     median: 15207 (27%)     max: 16626 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1827     avg: 1941     median: 1947 (8%)     max: 2041 Points
min: 1945     avg: 2056     median: 2027 (9%)     max: 2196 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12962     avg: 14070     median: 14244 (45%)     max: 14828 Points
min: 14890     avg: 15084     median: 15136 (48%)     max: 15225 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7480     avg: 8044     median: 8033.5 (80%)     max: 8628 Points
min: 8471     avg: 8740     median: 8530 (85%)     max: 9220 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 42842     avg: 52269     median: 54586.5 (54%)     max: 57060 Points
min: 54076     avg: 55531     median: 55924 (56%)     max: 56593 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 419     avg: 441.1     median: 438 (1%)     max: 503 ms
min: 418     avg: 443.8     median: 450 (1%)     max: 465 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 64079     avg: 107304     median: 107598 (79%)     max: 124105 Points
min: 109360     avg: 115546     median: 115823 (85%)     max: 121454 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 210     avg: 256.3     median: 262 (72%)     max: 277 Points
min: 254     avg: 298.5     median: 311 (85%)     max: 323.6 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 252     avg: 307     median: 319 (57%)     max: 347 Points
min: 280     avg: 323.4     median: 324 (58%)     max: 358 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1402     avg: 1766     median: 1778 (66%)     max: 1981 Points
min: 1812     avg: 2055     median: 2064 (77%)     max: 2227 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.6     avg: 90.8     median: 90.8 (16%)     max: 133.7 Watt
min: 53.2     avg: 82.3     median: 69.5 (12%)     max: 131.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.3     avg: 94.2     median: 104 (19%)     max: 130.3 Watt
min: 65.4     avg: 97.7     median: 102.8 (19%)     max: 130.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.89     avg: 9.1     median: 7.6 (5%)     max: 19.6 Watt
min: 5.27     avg: 10.9     median: 6.5 (4%)     max: 29.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.31     avg: 9.5     median: 9.2 (10%)     max: 12.8 Watt
min: 5.65     avg: 7.4     median: 6.4 (7%)     max: 10.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 26.9     avg: 36.1     median: 31.4 (23%)     max: 54.9 Points per Watt
min: 25.5     avg: 32.8     median: 31.9 (24%)     max: 42.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 → 100% n=54

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 285H → 106% n=54

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 13. 03:16:52

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17543 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18542 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755047812s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Aug 2025 05:18:26 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17543 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 17543 +0.028s ... 0.037s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18542 +0.003s ... 0.041s

#10 got single benchmarks 18542 +0.011s ... 0.052s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.052s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.067s ... 0.119s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.12s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)