, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs AMD Radeon Pro 450

AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)

The AMD Radeon RX 460 Notebook (or also known as mobile RX 460M) is a laptop graphics card based on the smaller Polaris 10 chip in 14 nm FinFET. It is based on the same chip as the desktop RX 460 with 896 shaders with similar clock rates (1180 versus 1200 MHz). AMD presented the card during the desktop RX 460 launch and noted that the mobile version is only slightly slower (0-7% in the presented benchmarks) than the full desktop card.

The RX460M should launch in a HP Omen laptop according to AMD and was also presented in the Asus X550IU.  The desktop version of the RX 460 (XFX) was slightly faster than a refreshed 2016 GeForce GTX 965M. The mobile version should therefore perform similar to an older GTX 965M and slightly below the desktop RX 460 (see for gaming benchmarks). It should be most suited for full HD resolution and high settings (slightly reduced).

The laptop RX 460 should offer all the features of the desktop RX 460 / Polaris 10 like DisplayPort 1.4 (ready), HDMI 2.0b, HDR, H.265 improved en- and de-coding and architectural improvements (e.g. for Compute Shaders and VR).

The power consumption should be slightly lower than the desktop RX 460 which is rated at a TDP of 75 Watt for the whole card.

 

 

AMD Radeon Pro 450

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon Pro 450

The AMD Radeon Pro 450 is mobile graphics card for laptops that can be found in the entry-level model of the Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 Late 2016. It is based on the small Polaris 11 chip which is manufactured in 14 nm FinFET at Globalfoundries. Compared to the similar Radeon RX 460 (see for benchmarks), the Pro 450 features only 640 shaders (compared to the 896) and achieves a peak performance of 1 TFLOPS (versus the 2.2 of the RX 460). The Pro 455 is 30% faster with 1.3 TFLOPS and the Pro 460 86% faster (peak performance).

The graphics performance in our first tests (e.g. 3DMark 11) is slightly above a GeForce GTX 950M. A major drawback is the small VRAM size of only 2 GB GDDR5. Furthermore, Apple and AMD don't provide driver updates for Windows using Bootcamp. The only option is to use modified drivers from BootcampDrivers.com.

The features of the Radeon Pro 450 are identical to the faster RX 460 and all other Polaris chips. See more details on the Polaris architecture here. According to AMD the Pro 450 supports DisplayPort 1.2 (although the Polaris chips should support 1.4) and HDMI 2.0 via USB-C adapter.

The power envelope of the faster Radeon Pro 460 is rated at 35 Watt according to the AMD blog post. Due to the slower specs, the Radeon Pro 450 should use slightly less.

AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)AMD Radeon Pro 450
ManufacturerAMDAMD
Radeon RX 400M Series
Radeon RX 480 (Laptop) compare 2304 256 Bit
Radeon RX 490M compare
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) 896 @ 1.18 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon Pro 460 compare 1024 @ 0.9 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Radeon Pro 455 compare 768 @ 0.86 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Radeon Pro 450 640 @ 0.8 GHz128 Bit @ 5080 MHz
Radeon RX 480 (Laptop) compare 2304 256 Bit
Radeon RX 490M compare
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) 896 @ 1.18 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon Pro 460 compare 1024 @ 0.9 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Radeon Pro 455 compare 768 @ 0.86 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Radeon Pro 450 640 @ 0.8 GHz128 Bit @ 5080 MHz
CodenamePolaris 11 / Baffin XTPolaris 11
ArchitecturePolarisPolaris
Pipelines896 - unified640 - unified
Core Speed1180 (Boost) MHz800 MHz
Memory Speed6000 MHz5080 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4096 MB2048 MB
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 12DirectX 12
Transistors3000 Million3000 Million
technology14 nm14 nm
FeaturesDisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0, AMD FreeSyncDisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0, AMD FreeSync
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement08.08.2016 27.10.2016
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://creators.radeon.com/radeon-pro/

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
13 pt (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
1074 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
952 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
96383 Points (15%)
200518 Points (31%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
71660 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
9968 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
31294 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3962     avg: 4089     median: 4089 (10%)     max: 4216 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5062     avg: 5108     median: 5107.5 (10%)     max: 5153 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
76618 Points (10%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 5439     avg: 5488     median: 5488 (13%)     max: 5537 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 7791     avg: 7793     median: 7792.5 (13%)     max: 7794 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + AMD Radeon Pro 450
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
14245 Points (14%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + AMD Radeon Pro 450
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
12634 Points (12%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + AMD Radeon Pro 450
3DMark 06
24189 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6157 (29%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
42.1 fps (18%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
57.2 fps (16%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + AMD Radeon Pro 450
69.8 fps (20%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + AMD Radeon Pro 450
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
394 Samples/s (4%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
774 Samples/s (2%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4404 (9%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
44.5 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
112 Watt (25%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks AMD Radeon Pro 450 → 99% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
38.9  fps
med. 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
12  fps
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
37  fps
257%
Radeon Pro 450:
95  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
27  fps
152%
Radeon Pro 450:
41  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
24  fps
138%
Radeon Pro 450:
33  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
20  fps
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
63.3  fps
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
95.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
60.7  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
39.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
22.4  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
47.5  fps
4K 3840x2160
Radeon Pro 450:
19.3  fps
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
57.5  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
49.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
36.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
30.3  fps
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
68.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
26.5  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
16.4  fps
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
48.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
21.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
18.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
8  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
82.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
29.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
27.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
19.4  fps
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
47.4  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
17.6  fps
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
29.5  fps
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
58.7  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
36  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
63.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
24.7  fps
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
101  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
24.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
21.7  fps
low 1024x768
Radeon Pro 450:
61  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
25.8  fps
Mafia 3

Mafia 3

2016
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
28.3  fps
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
51.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
17.4 18.3 ~ 18 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
7.5  fps
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
100  fps
153%
Radeon Pro 450:
153  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
79.7  fps
72%
Radeon Pro 450:
57  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
43  fps
92%
Radeon Pro 450:
39.5  fps
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
53.4  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
20.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
24.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
21  fps
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
77  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
21.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
15.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
29  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
26  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
17  fps
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
63.7  fps
med. 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
24.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
15.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
5.6  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
61.5  fps
108%
Radeon Pro 450:
66.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
28.4  fps
74%
Radeon Pro 450:
20.7 20.9 ~ 21 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
19.7  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
39.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
34.1  fps
Fallout 4

Fallout 4

2015
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
55.4  fps
126%
Radeon Pro 450:
70  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
32.3  fps
75%
Radeon Pro 450:
24.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
27.7  fps
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
Radeon Pro 450:
87  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
18.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
44.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
67.2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
43  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
35  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
71.7  fps
57%
Radeon Pro 450:
40.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
29.6 fps  fps
69%
Radeon Pro 450:
20.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
17.2  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
24.7  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
42.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
29.5  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
96  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
41.4  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
175.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop):
48.7  fps

Average Gaming AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming AMD Radeon Pro 450 → 114%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 103%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 29. 04:23:17

#0 checking url part for id 7377 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7590 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Sep 2021 17:22:10 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.046s ... 0.047s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.047s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.047s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7377 +0.029s ... 0.076s

#8 got single benchmarks 7377 +0.006s ... 0.082s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7590 +0s ... 0.082s

#10 got single benchmarks 7590 +0.007s ... 0.089s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.089s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.099s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.1s

#14 Got 99 rows for game benchmarks. +0.011s ... 0.111s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.111s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.114s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.017s ... 0.131s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.131s

#19 return log +0.003s ... 0.134s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)