Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX vs Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX

► remove from comparison Ryzen 9 7945HX Dragon Range CPU

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX is the top 16-core Dragon Range refresh lineup laptop processor that debuted in April 2025. The product offers 16 SMT-enabled Zen 4 cores (32 threads) running at 2.5 GHz to 5.4 GHz, along with a rather basic Radeon 610M RDNA 2 architecture iGPU. This Ryzen 9 8000 APU is essentially a rebadged Ryzen 9 7945HX.

The 8945HX is composed of three dies made on two different nodes (5 nm for CPU cores; 6 nm for other componentry). It features a very healthy 28 PCIe 5 lanes for connecting graphics cards and SSDs as fast as 15.75 GB/s. The RAM controller is limited to DDR5-5200 or slower; there is no NPU and no Thunderbolt support, the product page on amd.com indicates, but the clock multiplier is unlocked for easy overclocking.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system featuring the 8945HX as of April 2025, we have reviewed multiple systems built around the 7945HX. In Cinebench benchmarks, it has no trouble leaving the mighty Ryzen AI Max+ 395 behind by a few percentage points.

With this many cores, the APU will probably do a much better job serving content creators rather than gamers.

Power consumption

Much like the 7945HX, the 8945HX has a base TDP (long-term power limit) of 55 watts that can officially be jacked up to as high as 75 watts. However, most of the 7945HX systems tested by Notebookcheck had an even higher value of 100+ watts. To dissipate this much heat, a couple of high-RPM fans are a must.

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 275HX

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX is a mobile high-end CPU for gaming notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 24 cores consisting of 8 fast performance cores with up to 5.4 GHz and 16 smaller efficiency cores with up to 4.6 GHz clock speed. The CPU has access to 40 MB L2 cache and 36 MB L3 cache and is specified with a TDP of 55 watts.

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Essentials. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB DDR5-6400 (dual channel, ECC optional). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is a small Intel Graphics graphics card with four Xe cores running at 300 - 1900 MHz.

Performance - High End

The performance of the Ultra 9 275HX is only slightly behind the top model, the Core Ultra 9 285HX, due to the 100 MHz lower boost clock of the P-cores Core Ultra 9 285HX and therefore also remains below the similar Desktop Core Ultra 9 285K (higher clocked with up to 5.7 GHz and more TDP with 125 watts). Due to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should perform just behind or at the level of the Raptor Lake Core i9-14900HX (8 + 16 cores, max 5.8 / 4.1 GHz). This makes the CPU ideal for very demanding tasks such as high-end gaming and content creation.

Production - TSMC and Foveros

The Arrow Lake-HX chips are based on the desktop Arrow Lake-S chips and are composed of several chiplets. The CPU part is manufactured at TSMC in the modern N3B (3nm) process, the GPU also comes from TSMC in the N5P process. The SoC and I/O tile are manufactured in the TSMC N6 process. The base tile is manufactured by Intel in the 22nm process and carries the individual chiplets thanks to Fovero's 3D packaging.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 8945HXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX
CodenameDragon Range refresh (Zen 4)Arrow Lake-HX
SeriesAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X)Intel Arrow Lake
Series: Arrow Lake Arrow Lake-HX
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX « 2.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX compare2.9 - 5.1 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX compare3.6 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX compare2.1 - 5.5 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX « 2.1 - 5.4 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX compare2.3 - 5.3 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX compare2.3 - 5.2 GHz20 / 20 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX compare2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX compare2.6 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores26 MB L3
Clock2500 - 5400 MHz2100 - 5400 MHz
L1 Cache1 MB
L2 Cache16 MB40 MB
L3 Cache64 MB36 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 32
16 x 5.4 GHz AMD Zen 4
24 / 24
8 x 5.4 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
16 x 4.6 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
TDP55 Watt55 Watt
TechnologyCCD = 5nm, I/O = 6 nm3 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketFL1
FeaturesDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (300 - 1900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufactureramd.comwww.intel.com
TDP Turbo PL2160 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 275HX
48.4 pt (81%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 123.1     avg: 133.9     median: 133.9 (75%)     max: 138.2 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1547     avg: 2017     median: 2058.5 (38%)     max: 2288 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 30712     avg: 35716     median: 35589 (33%)     max: 40970 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2009     avg: 2190     median: 2193 (92%)     max: 2267 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 774     avg: 842     median: 844.5 (92%)     max: 870 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 12026     avg: 13992     median: 14068 (34%)     max: 16108 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4756     avg: 5600     median: 5696.5 (36%)     max: 6271 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 306     avg: 331     median: 334 (93%)     max: 343 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 98236     avg: 113855     median: 114988 (66%)     max: 124155 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6063     avg: 6710     median: 6664 (79%)     max: 7149 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 30.7     avg: 38.1     median: 39 (69%)     max: 43.8 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 134     avg: 155.3     median: 152 (2%)     max: 190 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 82     avg: 95.7     median: 93 (1%)     max: 116 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3943     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4568 sec
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
123908 Points (95%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 21109     avg: 26541     median: 26659 (66%)     max: 29050 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 104288     avg: 107108     median: 107108 (87%)     max: 109928 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 22080     avg: 26013     median: 25896 (66%)     max: 29274 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 37357     avg: 46616     median: 47850 (85%)     max: 53054 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 13789     avg: 16188     median: 16317.5 (69%)     max: 17607 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2784 Points (70%)
min: 2886     avg: 3050     median: 3057 (76%)     max: 3160 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
15473 Points (60%)
min: 16033     avg: 19502     median: 19464 (76%)     max: 21668 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2033     avg: 2208     median: 2225 (87%)     max: 2292 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 19105     avg: 22991     median: 22703 (41%)     max: 25855 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 402     avg: 412.9     median: 411 (0%)     max: 432 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 124210     avg: 127668     median: 127952 (94%)     max: 130140 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 285     avg: 328.7     median: 333 (91%)     max: 341 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 306     avg: 352.1     median: 347 (62%)     max: 532 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1857     avg: 2168     median: 2193 (82%)     max: 2339 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 93.9     avg: 195.6     median: 206 (36%)     max: 270 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 153.1     avg: 229.2     median: 241 (44%)     max: 259 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 10.3     avg: 28.4     median: 27 (18%)     max: 46.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 10.1     avg: 21.6     median: 21.3 (24%)     max: 38.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20.4     avg: 25.2     median: 24.1 (18%)     max: 33.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX → 118% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 14. 07:01:25

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 19594 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18886 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755147685s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Aug 2025 05:18:40 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 19594 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 19594 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18886 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 18886 +0.028s ... 0.042s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.042s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 0.061s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.063s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)