Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Intel Core i9-9880H vs Intel Xeon E-2276M

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is a powerful processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new laptop chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 7 7840U with a slightly higher wattage as well as higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The 8840HS has eight Zen 4 cores running at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz that are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads, while the great Radeon 780M is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties. Compared to the consumer 8840HS, the PRO variant supports AMD PRO technologies with management features and usually longer availability and support.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs, making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more useful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the R7 PRO 8840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and therefore with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving NVMe SSDs up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Systems built around this Ryzen 7 series APU are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since this is a 7840U in disguise that we are dealing with here, it is safe to expect the 8840HS to be about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to tune to their liking, with values between 20 W and 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 8840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-9880H

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i9-9880H is a high-end processor for laptops with eight cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture (2019 refresh, CFL-HR). The processor clocks at between 2.3 - 4.8 GHz (4.1 GHz with 8 cores) and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 4.8 GHz can only be reached using the "Thermal Velocity Boost" which allows one core to boost to 4.8 GHz (+200 MHz) as long as the CPU temperature is below 50°C. Multiple cores can be boosted +100 MHz below 50°C (not verified). Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-8950HK, the 9980H is based on the same architecture but offers 2 more cores.

According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. The i9-8950HK is the fastest model of the Coffee-Lake-H series at the time of announcement and offers an unlocked multiplier for overclocking of the CPU.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 33% compared to a similar clocked predecessor and even up to 100% compared to older Kaby-Lake quad-cores. Single thread performance however only improved slightly and the multi-core performance is heavily depending on the cooling.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions.

Intel Xeon E-2276M

► remove from comparison Intel E-2276M

The Intel Xeon E-2276M is a high-end processor for professional laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture. The processor clocks at between 2.8 - 4.7 GHz and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading / SMT. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the similar consumer Core i7-9850H, the mobile Xeon offers support for ECC main memory and clocks 100-200 MHz higher.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

The Xeon E-2276M is a high end processor in 2019 and therefore well suited for all tasks. Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the single core performance is also very good. Long term performance however is very depending on good cooling and proper TDP settings and differs therefore for each laptop.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics P630 iGPU is the same as the old Intel HD Graphics P630 and the only difference to the UHD Graphics 630 in the consumer models are the professional drivers.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the Xeon is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HSIntel Core i9-9880HIntel Xeon E-2276M
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Coffee Lake-HCoffee Lake-H
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)Intel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H « 2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M « 2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Clock3300 - 5100 MHz2300 - 4800 MHz2800 - 4700 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB384 KB
L2 Cache8 MB2 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 166 / 12
TDP28 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology4 nm14 nm14 nm
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FCBGA1440
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics P630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 PRO 8840HS
39.3 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9880H
31 pt (51%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - E-2276M
31.4 pt (52%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
103.7 Points (58%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
869 Points (16%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14621     avg: 14784     median: 14784 (14%)     max: 14947 Points
min: 8504     avg: 8670     median: 8747 (8%)     max: 8758 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1712     avg: 1724     median: 1724 (73%)     max: 1736 Points
min: 1140     avg: 1174     median: 1174 (49%)     max: 1208 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 671     avg: 673     median: 673 (74%)     max: 675 Points
min: 441     avg: 459     median: 465 (51%)     max: 474 Points
484 Points (53%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5760     avg: 5820     median: 5819.5 (14%)     max: 5879 Points
min: 2953     avg: 3271     median: 3235 (8%)     max: 3712 Points
min: 2700     avg: 2783     median: 2782.5 (7%)     max: 2865 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2427     avg: 2458     median: 2458 (16%)     max: 2489 Points
min: 1317     avg: 1506     median: 1508 (10%)     max: 1721 Points
min: 1205     avg: 1243     median: 1242.5 (8%)     max: 1280 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 271     avg: 271.5     median: 271.5 (76%)     max: 272 Points
min: 181     avg: 190.1     median: 190 (53%)     max: 198 Points
min: 189     avg: 195     median: 195 (54%)     max: 201 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
26.4 Points (34%)
18.9 Points (25%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.6 Points (61%)
2.1 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5809 Points (35%)
6967 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
39747 Points (29%)
42456 Points (31%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
362.5 s (4%)
118.7 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.9 s (2%)
5.4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
21172 Points (34%)
6683 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 63624     avg: 63845     median: 63845 (37%)     max: 64066 MIPS
min: 39455     avg: 42728     median: 42138 (24%)     max: 46591 MIPS
33994 MIPS (20%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6261     avg: 6289     median: 6289 (74%)     max: 6317 MIPS
min: 4837     avg: 4943     median: 4924 (58%)     max: 5068 MIPS
5214 MIPS (61%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
102.4 fps (34%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
217 fps (50%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 17.8     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (31%)     max: 18 fps
min: 10.6     avg: 11.2     median: 11.1 (20%)     max: 11.86 fps
9.7 fps (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
0.7 GB/s (20%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
1 GB/s (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
14.2 GB/s (37%)
7.5 GB/s (20%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 345     avg: 354.5     median: 354.5 (5%)     max: 364 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 212     avg: 217     median: 217 (2%)     max: 222 Seconds
min: 293     avg: 336.5     median: 334.5 (2%)     max: 384 Seconds
384 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4568     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4747 sec
min: 0.621     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.6904 sec
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 11788     avg: 12226     median: 12225.5 (26%)     max: 12663 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.7 s (2%)
8.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20.7 s (1%)
18.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
571 s (3%)
476.5 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 20839     avg: 20940     median: 20940 (52%)     max: 21041 Points
min: 12593     avg: 15310     median: 15556 (38%)     max: 17046 Points
min: 12006     avg: 12568     median: 12568 (31%)     max: 13130 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
40635 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 10705     avg: 12582     median: 12214 (31%)     max: 15206 Points
10449 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 23922     avg: 24665     median: 24664.5 (44%)     max: 25407 Points
min: 14940     avg: 18040     median: 18580 (33%)     max: 20125 Points
16082 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8914     avg: 9434     median: 9433.5 (40%)     max: 9953 Points
min: 6412     avg: 7482     median: 7221 (30%)     max: 9138 Points
6343 Points (27%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2594     avg: 2607     median: 2607 (65%)     max: 2620 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 12118     avg: 12481     median: 12480.5 (48%)     max: 12843 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1925 Points (75%)
min: 1115     avg: 1176     median: 1176 (46%)     max: 1237 Points
1303 Points (51%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11318     avg: 11430     median: 11430 (20%)     max: 11542 Points
min: 7109     avg: 7231     median: 7231 (13%)     max: 7353 Points
6595 Points (12%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1139     avg: 1188     median: 1186 (5%)     max: 1239 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6841     avg: 7034     median: 7100 (22%)     max: 7161 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5166     avg: 5409     median: 5457 (54%)     max: 5605 Points
5218 Points (52%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 28192     avg: 29022     median: 29077 (29%)     max: 29798 Points
24150 Points (24%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 537     avg: 538     median: 537.5 (1%)     max: 538 ms
min: 715     avg: 919     median: 934 (1%)     max: 1044 ms
784 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
86267 Points (65%)
min: 38079     avg: 43238     median: 40443 (31%)     max: 50837 Points
56114 Points (42%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 226     avg: 238.5     median: 238.5 (66%)     max: 251 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 298     avg: 304.9     median: 304.9 (55%)     max: 311.8 Points
184 Points (33%)
220 Points (39%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1648     avg: 1701     median: 1701 (64%)     max: 1754 Points
940 Points (35%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 59.1     avg: 61     median: 61 (11%)     max: 62.8 Watt
85.2 Watt (15%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
61.6 Watt (11%)
min: 99.9     avg: 131.6     median: 131.6 (24%)     max: 163.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 6.65     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (5%)     max: 7.55 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.31     avg: 6.5     median: 6.5 (7%)     max: 6.62 Watt
6.4 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
39.4 Points per Watt (29%)
min: 10.5     avg: 12.5     median: 12.5 (9%)     max: 14.4 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9880H → 65% n=17

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon E-2276M → 64% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 30. 22:30:43

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18727 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11348 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11549 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751315443s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 28 Jun 2025 05:20:10 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 18727 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 18727 +0.006s ... 0.017s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11348 +0.004s ... 0.021s

#11 got single benchmarks 11348 +0.011s ... 0.033s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11549 +0.004s ... 0.037s

#13 got single benchmarks 11549 +0.005s ... 0.042s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.042s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.056s ... 0.098s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.098s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)