Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D vs AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

► remove from comparison AMD R7 9800X3D

Der AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D ist ein High-End-Prozessor, der speziell für Gamer und anspruchsvolle Anwender entwickelt wurde. Er basiert auf der neuesten Zen-5-Architektur von AMD und wird im fortschrittlichen 4-nm-Verfahren gefertigt, was nicht nur höhere Effizienz, sondern auch eine bessere Leistung ermöglicht. Mit seinen 8 Kernen und 16 Threads bietet der 9800X3D eine solide Basis für rechenintensive Anwendungen.

Der größte Vorteil des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D ist die 3D V-Cache-Technologie, die komplett überarbeitet wurde und sich signifikant von den Modellen der 7000er-Serie unterscheidet. Die Änderungen resultieren in einer deutlich gesteigerten Taktfrequenz und einer besseren Wärmeverteilung. Der interne Aufbau besteht weiterhin aus einem I/O-Die sowie einem CCD. Letzterer beinhaltet die 8 Kerne sowie den 3D V-Cache und wird im 4nm-Prozess hergestellt. Beim I/O-Die hält AMD weiterhin am 6nm-Herstellungsprozess fest. Die Taktraten steigen im Vergleich zum Vorgängermodell spürbar. So beträgt der Basistakt 4,7 GH/z, wenngleich im Turbo bis zu 5,2 GH/s möglich sind.

Neben der überragenden Gaming-Performance überzeugt der AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D auch in produktiven Anwendungen. Während er speziell auf Spieleoptimierung ausgelegt ist, schneidet er in Anwendungen wie 3D-Modellierung, Videobearbeitung und anderen kreativen Workloads spürbar besser ab als ein AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Die Leistungsaufnahme des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D beträgt 120 Watt, welche als PPT maximal 162 Watt beträgt. Damit gibt es in diesem Punkt keine Änderungen im Vergleich zum AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D. Aufgrund gesteigerter Leistung kann die Effizienz des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D spürbar gesteigert werden. An die Effizienz der Arrow-Lake-Prozessoren kommt AMD allerdings trotz deutlich besserer Gaming-Leistung nicht heran.

Hier geht es zu unserem Test des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D.

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

► remove from comparison AMD R9 9955HX3D

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is a high-end notebook processor of the Fire Range series with 16 cores and hyperthreading (SMT), which means it can process up to 32 threads simultaneously. The CPU uses the new Zen 5 architecture for all 16 cores and clocks them at 2.5 to 5.4 GHz (single-core boost). As a special feature, the HX3D has an additional 64M 3D V-Cache on a CCD. This means that the CPU offers combined 128 MB L3 cache and 16 MB L2 cache. The chip was presented at CES in early 2025 and is intended for fast and expensive gaming notebooks.

AMD claims that the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is the fastest mobile gaming CPU. Based on the experience with its predecessor, the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, this is quite realistic. The 3D V-Cache in particular can accelerate demanding 3D games. However, the 16 fast Zen 5 cores should also provide enough power for all possible demanding applications.

The 9955HX3D is intended for large and heavy gaming notebooks and can therefore draw quite an amount of power (configurable from 55- to 75 watts TDP, default 55 watts). The SoC consists out of three dies on a package where the processor dies are manufactured in the modern 4nm 4nm FinFET process at TSMC (I/O die in 6nm) and should therefore still have a good energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX

► remove from comparison AMD R9 9850HX

The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX is a high-end notebook processor from the Fire Range series with 12 of 16 cores and hyperthreading (SMT), which means it can process up to 24 threads simultaneously. Unlike the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, the chip does not offer a 3D V-Cache. The chip was presented at CES in early 2025 and is intended for fast and expensive gaming laptops.

The CPU uses the new Zen 5 architecture for the 12 cores and clocks them at up to 5.2 GHz (single-core boost).

Thanks to the 12 fast Zen 5 cores, the performance should be excellent and well suited for all demanding applications. We assume that the performance will be similar to the old Ryzen 9 7845HX (12 x Zen 4 with up to 5.2 GHz) is similar. The faster Ryzen 9 9955HX and 9955HX3D should be able to set themselves apart significantly due to the higher number of cores (with multi-thread performance).

The 9850HX is intended for large and heavy gaming notebooks and is therefore configurable from 45 - 75 watts TDP (default 55 watts). The SoC is manufactured in the modern 4nm FinFET process at TSMC (both compute dies, I/O die in 6nm) and should therefore have very good energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 9800X3DAMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3DAMD Ryzen 9 9850HX
CodenameGranite RidgeFire Range-HX (Zen 5)Fire Range-HX (Zen 5)
SeriesAMD Granite Ridge (Zen 5, AM5)AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X)AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X)
Series: Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X) Fire Range-HX (Zen 5)
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X4.4 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X3.8 - 5.5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D « 4.7 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X3.9 - 5.4 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D « - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX3 - 5.2 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX « 3 - 5.2 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
Clock4700 - 5200 MHz <=5400 MHz3000 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache640 KB1.3 MB960 KB
L2 Cache8 MB16 MB12 MB
L3 Cache96 MB128 MB64 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 5
16 / 32
16 x 5.4 GHz AMD Zen 5
12 / 24
12 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 5
TDP120 Watt55 Watt45 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2162 Watt
Transistors9970 Million
Technology4 nm
Voltage1.28 - 1.31 (nominal), 1.4 (max) V
Die Size192.6 mm2
max. Temp.95 °C
SocketAM5 (LGA 1718)
FeaturesDDR5-5600 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, FMA3, EVP, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, SHA, XFR2
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$479 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 9800X3D
47.3 pt (79%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 9955HX3D
49.5 pt (82%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
132 Points (74%)
min: 129.4     avg: 129.7     median: 129.7 (73%)     max: 130 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1358 Points (25%)
min: 2072     avg: 2117     median: 2120 (39%)     max: 2160 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
23230 Points (22%)
min: 38864     avg: 39065     median: 39065 (36%)     max: 39266 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2080 Points (88%)
min: 2165     avg: 2172     median: 2172 (91%)     max: 2179 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
818 Points (89%)
min: 847     avg: 849     median: 849 (92%)     max: 851 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
9057 Points (22%)
min: 15146     avg: 15162     median: 15161.5 (37%)     max: 15177 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3647 Points (23%)
min: 6041     avg: 6043     median: 6042.5 (38%)     max: 6044 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
328 Points (91%)
min: 321     avg: 327     median: 327 (91%)     max: 333 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
41.7 Points (54%)
min: 69.12     avg: 69.9     median: 69.9 (90%)     max: 70.66 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.8 Points (91%)
4 Points (95%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8933 Points (54%)
min: 9264     avg: 9269     median: 9269 (56%)     max: 9274 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
60825 Points (44%)
min: 77481     avg: 79410     median: 79410 (58%)     max: 81339 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
119288 Points (76%)
144628 Points (92%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
16618 Points (20%)
17085 Points (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
54.3 s (1%)
min: 135     avg: 172.7     median: 172.7 (2%)     max: 210.4 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.3 s (0%)
min: 4.4     avg: 5     median: 5 (1%)     max: 5.5 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
15574 Points (25%)
min: 11412     avg: 29422     median: 29421.5 (47%)     max: 47431 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 90226     avg: 90604     median: 90354 (52%)     max: 91233 MIPS
min: 145803     avg: 146945     median: 146944 (84%)     max: 148086 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 8346     avg: 8407     median: 8392 (99%)     max: 8484 MIPS
min: 7151     avg: 7226     median: 7225.5 (85%)     max: 7300 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
203 fps (68%)
257.1 fps (86%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
375.5 fps (87%)
363.6 fps (84%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
30.6 fps (54%)
min: 42.3     avg: 42.5     median: 42.5 (75%)     max: 42.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.7 GB/s (50%)
min: 3.2     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (97%)     max: 3.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.9 GB/s (50%)
min: 4.5     avg: 5     median: 5 (85%)     max: 5.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
17.8 GB/s (46%)
min: 27.5     avg: 29.1     median: 29.1 (76%)     max: 30.6 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
204 Seconds (3%)
123 Seconds (2%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
137 Seconds (1%)
80 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.3 sec (7%)
min: 0.3552     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3677 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 17855     avg: 18304     median: 18323 (39%)     max: 18804 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
7.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.1 s (1%)
16.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 373     avg: 373.3     median: 373.3 (2%)     max: 373.6 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 106182     avg: 108585     median: 108668 (83%)     max: 109721 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 34973     avg: 38215     median: 38658 (95%)     max: 40357 Points
min: 33212     avg: 34146     median: 34146 (84%)     max: 35080 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 104270     avg: 105581     median: 105638 (86%)     max: 107334 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 104072     avg: 105507     median: 105670 (86%)     max: 107497 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 106846     avg: 108918     median: 108620 (90%)     max: 112948 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 28550     avg: 29240     median: 29256 (74%)     max: 29952 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 38742     avg: 39177     median: 39211.5 (70%)     max: 39893 Points
min: 37856     avg: 41184     median: 42689 (76%)     max: 43007 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 14848     avg: 15748     median: 15799.5 (67%)     max: 16218 Points
min: 12913     avg: 13307     median: 13082 (55%)     max: 13926 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 3213     avg: 3279     median: 3285.5 (82%)     max: 3337 Points
min: 3146     avg: 3188     median: 3184.5 (80%)     max: 3237 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 17704     avg: 18169     median: 18205.5 (71%)     max: 18579 Points
min: 19788     avg: 20200     median: 20231 (79%)     max: 20551 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
2991 Points (95%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
19386 Points (80%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2382     avg: 2426     median: 2429 (95%)     max: 2450 Points
min: 2381     avg: 2391     median: 2391 (93%)     max: 2401 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15973     avg: 16469     median: 16532 (30%)     max: 16726 Points
min: 23468     avg: 23569     median: 23568.5 (42%)     max: 23669 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2176     avg: 2275     median: 2287 (10%)     max: 2316 Points
2270 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15903     avg: 16444     median: 16507 (52%)     max: 16773 Points
23588 Points (74%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 9107     avg: 9439     median: 9444 (94%)     max: 9739 Points
9492 Points (95%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 64532     avg: 68495     median: 68610 (68%)     max: 70460 Points
97490 Points (97%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
401 ms (0%)
397 ms (0%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
132328 Points (100%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
337 Points (93%)
min: 320     avg: 326.5     median: 326.5 (90%)     max: 333 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
353 Points (63%)
min: 342     avg: 354     median: 354 (64%)     max: 366 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2210     avg: 2279     median: 2278.5 (85%)     max: 2347 Points
min: 2199     avg: 2243     median: 2264 (85%)     max: 2265 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
272 Watt (47%)
min: 216     avg: 222     median: 222 (38%)     max: 228 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
238 Watt (43%)
221 Watt (40%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 87.4     avg: 105.8     median: 105.5 (70%)     max: 137.9 Watt
min: 12.3     avg: 35.1     median: 35.1 (23%)     max: 57.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 14.2     avg: 30.1     median: 30.1 (33%)     max: 45.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
15.3 Points per Watt (11%)
27.3 Points per Watt (20%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 06. 08:22:08

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18494 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18729 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 18733 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751782928s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 04 Jul 2025 05:20:26 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 18494 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 18494 +0.04s ... 0.05s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18729 +0.004s ... 0.054s

#11 got single benchmarks 18729 +0.006s ... 0.06s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 18733 +0.001s ... 0.06s

#13 got single benchmarks 18733 +0s ... 0.06s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.06s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.064s ... 0.124s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.124s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)