Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX vs Intel Core i9-13900HX vs AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX

► remove from comparison Ryzen 9 7945HX Dragon Range CPU

The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX is a higher-end octa-core Dragon Range refresh lineup processor that debuted in April 2025 and is primarily targeted at gaming laptops. This is essentially a rebadged Ryzen 7 7745HX; as such, the product offers 8 SMT-enabled Zen 4 cores (16 threads) running at 3.6 GHz to 5.1 GHz, along with a rather basic Radeon 610M RDNA 2 architecture iGPU.

This Ryzen 7 8000 APU is composed of two dies made on two different nodes (5 nm for CPU cores; 6 nm for other componentry). It features a very healthy 28 PCIe 5 lanes for connecting graphics cards and SSDs as fast as 15.75 GB/s. The RAM controller is limited to DDR5-5200 or slower; there is no NPU and no Thunderbolt support, the product page on amd.com indicates, but the clock multiplier is unlocked for easy overclocking.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system featuring the 8745HX as of April 2025, multi-threaded Cinebench benchmarks put the 7745HX in the same ballpark as the Core Ultra 9 285H, Core Ultra 9 185H and Core i5-13500HX which is fast enough for any 2025 game.

Power consumption

Much like the 7745HX, the 8745HX has a base TDP (long-term power limit) of 55 watts that can officially be jacked up to as high as 75 watts. That's precisely what Minisforum did with only 7745HX system Notebookcheck has tested so far. Either way, to dissipate 50+ watts, at least one high-RPM fan is needed.

Intel Core i9-13900HX

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13900HX

The Intel Core i9-13900HX is a fast high-end mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023 and looks like it is based on the desktop Core i9-13000K with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading that clock between 2.2 GHz (base) and 5.4 GHz (single core boost, 4.9 GHz for all cores) and sixteen Gracemont efficiency cores without Hyper-Threading (1.6 - 3.9 GHz).

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13900HX).

Performance

The average 13900HX in our database is in the same league as the Core i9-13950HX and the Ryzen 9 7845HX, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is really impressive, to say the least.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 99 W, the Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 is among the fastest laptops built around the 13900HX that we know of. It can be about 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

The CPU is still produced in a further improved 10nm FinFET process (Intel 7) that allows the higher clock speeds. The power consumption is specified at 55W base power up to 157 Watt max. Turbo power.

AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

► remove from comparison Ryzen 9 7945HX Dragon Range CPU

The AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX is a flagship 16-core Dragon Range refresh lineup laptop processor that debuted in April 2025. The product offers 16 SMT-enabled Zen 4 cores (32 threads) running at 2.4 GHz to 5.3 GHz, along with a rather basic Radeon 610M RDNA 2 architecture iGPU. This Ryzen 9 8000 APU is essentially a Ryzen 9 7940HX with the Turbo clock speed increased by 100 MHz.

The 8940HX is composed of three dies made on two different nodes (5 nm for CPU cores; 6 nm for other componentry). It features a very healthy 28 PCIe 5 lanes for connecting graphics cards and SSDs as fast as 15.75 GB/s. The RAM controller is limited to DDR5-5200 or slower; there is no NPU and no Thunderbolt support, the product page on amd.com indicates, but the clock multiplier is unlocked for easy overclocking.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system featuring the 8940HX as of April 2025, we do have some Cinebench benchmark scores for the 7940HX. Based on those, the newer Ryzen 9 should have no trouble beating the Core i9-13950HX, Core i9-13980HX and Core i9-14900HX.

That being said, with this many cores the APU will probably do a much better job serving content creators rather than gamers.

Power consumption

Much like the 7940HX, the 8940HX has a base TDP (long-term power limit) of 55 watts that can officially be jacked up to as high as 75 watts. To dissipate 50+ watts, at least one high-RPM fan is needed.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 8745HXIntel Core i9-13900HXAMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
CodenameDragon Range refresh (Zen 4)Raptor Lake-HXDragon Range refresh (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X)Intel Raptor Lake-HXAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X)
Series: Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X) Dragon Range refresh (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX2.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX2.4 - 5.3 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX2.9 - 5.1 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX « 3.6 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13980HX1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX « 1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX2.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX « 2.4 - 5.3 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX2.9 - 5.1 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX3.6 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
Clock3600 - 5100 MHz1600 - 5400 MHz2400 - 5300 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB1 MB
L2 Cache8 MB32 MB16 MB
L3 Cache32 MB36 MB64 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
24 / 32
8 x 5.4 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 3.9 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
16 / 32
16 x 5.3 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP55 Watt55 Watt55 Watt
TechnologyCCD = 5nm, I/O = 6 nm10 nmCCD = 5nm, I/O = 6 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFL1BGA1964FL1
FeaturesDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL B., GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1650 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comamd.com
Die Size257 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900HX
45 pt (75%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 8940HX
46.2 pt (77%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
121.4 Points (68%)
114 Points (64%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1675 Points (31%)
1717 Points (32%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 24270     avg: 28275     median: 27900 (26%)     max: 32623 Points
32521 Points (30%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1867     avg: 2044     median: 2056 (86%)     max: 2105 Points
1930 Points (81%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 722     avg: 784     median: 788 (86%)     max: 810 Points
747 Points (81%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 9152     avg: 10785     median: 10557 (26%)     max: 12541 Points
12720 Points (31%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3913     avg: 4521     median: 4494.5 (28%)     max: 4970 Points
5406 Points (34%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 247     avg: 292     median: 296 (82%)     max: 304 Points
290 Points (80%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 49.5     avg: 52.3     median: 52.3 (68%)     max: 55.14 Points
61 Points (79%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.64     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (87%)     max: 3.67 Points
3.6 Points (86%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 11618     avg: 11700     median: 11699.5 (71%)     max: 11781 Points
8248 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 76718     avg: 79300     median: 79299.5 (57%)     max: 81881 Points
67137 Points (49%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
111582 Points (71%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17169 Points (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
215.7 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 12876     avg: 12916     median: 12916 (20%)     max: 12956 Points
13544 Points (21%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 90675     avg: 112115     median: 115262 (66%)     max: 127283 MIPS
133175 MIPS (76%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6340     avg: 6859     median: 6895 (81%)     max: 7177 MIPS
7360 MIPS (87%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
217.7 fps (73%)
241.9 fps (81%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
387.7 fps (89%)
358.1 fps (83%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 23.5     avg: 29.2     median: 29.8 (52%)     max: 34.4 fps
36.2 fps (64%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 2.1     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (66%)     max: 2.4 GB/s
2.5 GB/s (74%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 4.1     avg: 4.3     median: 4.3 (73%)     max: 4.4 GB/s
3.9 GB/s (67%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 15.2     avg: 17     median: 17 (44%)     max: 18.8 GB/s
27.7 GB/s (72%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 175     avg: 209.9     median: 202 (3%)     max: 275 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 101     avg: 117.6     median: 113.5 (1%)     max: 153 Seconds
101 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.375     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4564 sec
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 16591     avg: 17802     median: 18036.5 (38%)     max: 18235 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.2     avg: 6.2     median: 6.2 (1%)     max: 6.215 s
6.3 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
13.4 s (1%)
14.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 315     avg: 315.1     median: 315.1 (1%)     max: 315.265 s
342.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 74788     avg: 76276     median: 76275.5 (59%)     max: 77763 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 19090     avg: 23181     median: 23767 (59%)     max: 25681 Points
27757 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 77043     avg: 86045     median: 83045 (67%)     max: 101046 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
82808 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
85007 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16532     avg: 21282     median: 21573 (55%)     max: 23984 Points
22068 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 28693     avg: 37096     median: 37730 (67%)     max: 43004 Points
37769 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 13288     avg: 15302     median: 15066 (64%)     max: 18304 Points
12464 Points (53%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2548     avg: 2770     median: 2871 (72%)     max: 2892 Points
min: 2767     avg: 2801     median: 2801 (70%)     max: 2835 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 15031     avg: 16586     median: 16712 (65%)     max: 18014 Points
min: 16188     avg: 16275     median: 16275 (63%)     max: 16362 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2191     avg: 2625     median: 2713 (86%)     max: 2818 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 14982     avg: 16173     median: 16420.5 (67%)     max: 16949 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1345     avg: 1991     median: 2041.5 (80%)     max: 2093 Points
1925 Points (75%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17614     avg: 19819     median: 20013.5 (36%)     max: 21075 Points
19421 Points (35%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1804     avg: 1964     median: 1982 (9%)     max: 2064 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 18612     avg: 19451     median: 19027 (60%)     max: 20594 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8706     avg: 8840     median: 8843 (88%)     max: 8936 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 66537     avg: 70316     median: 71143 (71%)     max: 71700 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
7589 Points (84%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
76142 Points (100%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 453     avg: 471     median: 464 (1%)     max: 520 ms
507 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 95898     avg: 101834     median: 103988 (76%)     max: 105526 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 243     avg: 289.1     median: 291 (80%)     max: 304 Points
230 Points (63%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 266     avg: 321.9     median: 322 (58%)     max: 358 Points
274 Points (49%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1825     avg: 2073     median: 2113.5 (79%)     max: 2295 Points
1977 Points (74%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 106.1     avg: 173.5     median: 178.7 (31%)     max: 231 Watt
146.5 Watt (25%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 176     avg: 216.9     median: 222 (41%)     max: 266 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 13.9     avg: 24.1     median: 25 (17%)     max: 31.5 Watt
30.8 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 15     avg: 19.7     median: 18.8 (21%)     max: 29 Watt
35.5 Watt (39%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 19.5     avg: 20.9     median: 21 (16%)     max: 21.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900HX → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 14. 12:46:20

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 19597 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14659 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 19595 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755168380s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Aug 2025 05:18:40 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 19597 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#9 got single benchmarks 19597 +0s ... 0.009s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14659 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#11 got single benchmarks 14659 +0.033s ... 0.047s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 19595 +0.004s ... 0.05s

#13 got single benchmarks 19595 +0.004s ... 0.055s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.055s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.063s ... 0.118s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.118s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)