Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 3550H vs Intel Celeron N4505 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3450U

AMD Ryzen 5 3550H

► remove from comparison AMD R5 3550H

The AMD Ryzen 5 3550H is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.1 GHz to 3.7 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics adapter with 8 CUs (512 Shaders) clocked at up to 1,200 MHz. Compared to the similar Ryzen 5 3500U, the 3550H offers a 20 Watt higher TDP and therefore a better performance under long periods of load. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12 nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

Performance

The average 3550H in our database proves to be a solid mid-range CPU, its multi-thread benchmark scores hovering close to those of the Intel Core i7-10710U and the Core i5-8257U. Which is a little slow for an H-class processor, as of late 2021, but still more than enough for the vast majority of apps and games, provided one is fine with having to wait a little longer than usual for that 4K video encoding job to get completed.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and sufficiently high CPU power limits, the Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng is among the fastest laptops powered by the 3550H that we know of. It can be more than 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 35 W. Laptop makers are free to reduce that value significantly with 12 W being the minimum AMD-recommended value. Clock speeds and performance would take a hit as a result; either way, that's a little too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

Last but not the least, the AMD Ryzen 5 3550H is built with a 12 nm process for lower-than-average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Celeron N4505

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4505

The Intel Celeron N4505 is a dual-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive and small desktops and was announced in early 2021. The two Tremont CPU cores clock between 2 and 2.9 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N4505 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is built with Intel's first-gen 10 nm process, just like Ice Lake family processors.

CPU Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the dual-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 16 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 450 - 750 MHz and a LPDDR4(x) dual channel memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N4505 in our database is just as fast as AMD's dual-core Athlon Silver 3050e and Intel's previous-gen Celeron N4100, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. In other words, the Celeron is good for basic day-to-day activities but not much more than that, as of mid 2022.

Power consumption

This Celeron series SoC has a default TDP, also known as the long-term Power Limit, of 10 W, which is low enough to allow for passively cooled designs.

The N4505 is manufactured on the first-gen or the second-gen (no exact data available) 10 nm Intel process making for average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 5 3450U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 3450U

The AMD Ryzen 5 3450U is a mobile SoC that was announced in Q2 2020 as a refresh. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.1 GHz to 3.5 GHz (-200 MHz versus 3500U) with a Radeon RX Vega 8 iGPU with 8 CUs (512 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz.

The Picasso SoC uses the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12 nm process allows for higher clocks at similar power consumption.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Performance

The average 3450U in our database is in the same league as the Core i3-1115G4 and also the Ryzen 3 4300U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a better-than-expected result for an aging lower mid-range chip that is the 3450U, as of mid 2022.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

The Ryzen 5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are allowed to change to anything between 12 W and 35 W if required with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. These values are fairly high, making active cooling solutions something of a necessity.

The CPU is built with a somewhat old, as of late 2022, 12 nm process for lower-than-average energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 3550HIntel Celeron N4505AMD Ryzen 5 3450U
CodenamePicasso-U (Zen+)Jasper LakePicasso-U (Zen+)
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)Intel Jasper LakeAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Picasso-U (Zen+)
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H « 2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 « 2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U « 2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
Clock2100 - 3700 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz2100 - 3500 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1.5 MB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 82 / 24 / 8
TDP35 Watt10 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million
Technology12 nm10 nm12 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketFP5BGA1338FP5
FeaturesDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 3550H
25.1 pt (42%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4505
19.2 pt (32%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 3450U
23.7 pt (39%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 3646     avg: 3930     median: 3929.5 (4%)     max: 4213 Points
min: 1114     avg: 1149     median: 1148.5 (1%)     max: 1183 Points
min: 2658     avg: 2927     median: 2926.5 (3%)     max: 3195 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 850     avg: 886     median: 886 (37%)     max: 922 Points
min: 592     avg: 604     median: 603.5 (25%)     max: 615 Points
min: 858     avg: 875     median: 875 (37%)     max: 892 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 331     avg: 354.3     median: 359 (39%)     max: 370 Points
min: 224     avg: 230     median: 230 (25%)     max: 236 Points
min: 292     avg: 321.5     median: 321.5 (35%)     max: 351 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1421     avg: 1596     median: 1621 (4%)     max: 1728 Points
min: 431     avg: 441.5     median: 441.5 (1%)     max: 452 Points
min: 1089     avg: 1168     median: 1168 (3%)     max: 1247 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 635     avg: 717     median: 742 (5%)     max: 769 Points
min: 191     avg: 197.5     median: 197.5 (1%)     max: 204 Points
min: 530     avg: 567     median: 566.5 (4%)     max: 603 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 77     avg: 137.9     median: 144 (40%)     max: 146 Points
min: 104     avg: 106     median: 106 (29%)     max: 108 Points
min: 137     avg: 137.5     median: 137.5 (38%)     max: 138 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
8.6 Points (11%)
min: 2.46     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (3%)     max: 2.52 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.7 Points (39%)
min: 1.27     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (30%)     max: 1.28 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4575     avg: 5413     median: 4592 (28%)     max: 7893 Points
min: 3606     avg: 3622     median: 3621.5 (22%)     max: 3637 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 19002     avg: 19535     median: 19520.5 (14%)     max: 20097 Points
min: 6831     avg: 6861     median: 6860.5 (5%)     max: 6890 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
10063 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
5294 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
209.2 s (2%)
min: 1120.44     avg: 1132     median: 1131.7 (13%)     max: 1143 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.7 s (2%)
min: 35.481     avg: 35.8     median: 35.8 (7%)     max: 36.2 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
36.1 s (19%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2929 Points (5%)
min: 1000     avg: 1062     median: 1061.5 (2%)     max: 1123 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 16683     avg: 17967     median: 17978 (10%)     max: 19409 MIPS
min: 5871     avg: 6004     median: 6003.5 (3%)     max: 6136 MIPS
min: 15163     avg: 15782     median: 15878 (9%)     max: 16305 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3472     avg: 3554     median: 3547.5 (42%)     max: 3652 MIPS
min: 2971     avg: 3047     median: 3046.5 (36%)     max: 3122 MIPS
min: 3355     avg: 3375     median: 3359 (40%)     max: 3411 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
44.3 fps (1%)
min: 13.5     avg: 13.7     median: 13.7 (0%)     max: 13.8 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
146.8 fps (4%)
72.3 fps (2%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 3.7     avg: 4.1     median: 4 (7%)     max: 4.43 fps
min: 1.16     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (2%)     max: 1.22 fps
min: 2.77     avg: 3.1     median: 3 (5%)     max: 3.43 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (14%)
min: 0.099     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (3%)     max: 0.101 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.7 GB/s (12%)
min: 0.184     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (3%)     max: 0.192 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.7 GB/s (12%)
1.3 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1297 Seconds (17%)
min: 5719     avg: 5742     median: 5741.5 (73%)     max: 5764 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 612     avg: 675     median: 659 (5%)     max: 759 Seconds
min: 2845     avg: 2899     median: 2899 (20%)     max: 2953 Seconds
min: 834     avg: 919     median: 946 (7%)     max: 976 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.732     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.752 sec
min: 1.162     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (26%)     max: 1.224 sec
min: 0.76     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.806 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 7123     avg: 7227     median: 7174 (15%)     max: 7385 Points
min: 3165     avg: 3214     median: 3214 (7%)     max: 3263 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.9 s (3%)
min: 19.931     avg: 20.9     median: 20.9 (5%)     max: 21.9 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
27.7 s (1%)
min: 44.275     avg: 45.7     median: 45.7 (2%)     max: 47.2 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
695 s (3%)
min: 997     avg: 1003     median: 1003.5 (4%)     max: 1009.94 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
24607 Points (19%)
6156 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6321     avg: 6969     median: 6803 (17%)     max: 7724 Points
min: 2700     avg: 2720     median: 2719.5 (7%)     max: 2739 Points
min: 4968     avg: 5979     median: 6400 (16%)     max: 6568 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 52657     avg: 54549     median: 54658 (44%)     max: 56221 Points
24182 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 53643     avg: 54868     median: 55096 (45%)     max: 56566 Points
min: 24027     avg: 24121     median: 24121 (20%)     max: 24215 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 60469     avg: 61391     median: 61297 (49%)     max: 62057 Points
min: 25571     avg: 25808     median: 25808 (21%)     max: 26045 Points
27926 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2848     avg: 6157     median: 6734.5 (17%)     max: 8124 Points
min: 2130     avg: 2131     median: 2130.5 (5%)     max: 2131 Points
min: 5106     avg: 5779     median: 5984 (15%)     max: 6248 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 10096     avg: 10671     median: 10554 (19%)     max: 11617 Points
min: 2979     avg: 2993     median: 2992.5 (5%)     max: 3006 Points
min: 8985     avg: 9259     median: 9204 (16%)     max: 9587 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2996     avg: 3268     median: 3363 (14%)     max: 3534 Points
894 Points (4%)
min: 1887     avg: 2208     median: 2170 (9%)     max: 2567 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
552 Points (14%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
970 Points (4%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
508 Points (16%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
852 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 880     avg: 896     median: 899 (35%)     max: 907 Points
min: 647     avg: 654     median: 653.5 (26%)     max: 660 Points
min: 698     avg: 819     median: 839 (33%)     max: 866 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3162     avg: 3316     median: 3281 (6%)     max: 3486 Points
min: 1225     avg: 1232     median: 1232 (2%)     max: 1239 Points
min: 2565     avg: 2918     median: 2972 (5%)     max: 3123 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 806     avg: 886     median: 902 (4%)     max: 914 Points
min: 645     avg: 648     median: 648 (3%)     max: 651 Points
853 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3034     avg: 3238     median: 3250 (10%)     max: 3562 Points
min: 1205     avg: 1215     median: 1214.5 (4%)     max: 1224 Points
2630 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3623     avg: 3797     median: 3807 (38%)     max: 3938 Points
min: 2942     avg: 2946     median: 2945.5 (29%)     max: 2949 Points
3486 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11183     avg: 12118     median: 11926 (12%)     max: 13441 Points
min: 5078     avg: 5082     median: 5082 (5%)     max: 5086 Points
10200 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13474     avg: 14342     median: 14437 (26%)     max: 15114 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3348     avg: 3420     median: 3353 (44%)     max: 3558 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1042     avg: 1145     median: 1173 (1%)     max: 1229 ms
min: 1578     avg: 1688     median: 1688 (2%)     max: 1798 ms
min: 1170     avg: 1185     median: 1185 (1%)     max: 1200 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
117.8 ms (1%)
353.4 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 28324     avg: 28827     median: 28811.5 (21%)     max: 29361 Points
24502 Points (18%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
124.3 Points (34%)
min: 79.3     avg: 80.3     median: 80.3 (22%)     max: 81.2 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 151.3     avg: 161.1     median: 162 (29%)     max: 174 Points
min: 113.3     avg: 114.2     median: 114.2 (20%)     max: 115 Points
min: 145     avg: 145.5     median: 145.5 (26%)     max: 146 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
832 Points (31%)
min: 442     avg: 444     median: 444 (17%)     max: 446 Points
min: 707     avg: 722     median: 722 (27%)     max: 737 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.9     avg: 50.3     median: 50.3 (9%)     max: 60.6 Watt
min: 18.3     avg: 19     median: 19 (3%)     max: 19.7 Watt
37.3 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
35.2 Watt (6%)
min: 15.4     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (3%)     max: 17.6 Watt
36.2 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
11.2 Watt (7%)
8 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
18.3 Points per Watt (14%)
13.2 Points per Watt (10%)
14.6 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 3550H → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4505 → 49% n=25

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 3450U → 85% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 18. 15:19:12

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11151 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13113 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 13235 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1758201552s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 17 Sep 2025 15:54:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11151 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#9 got single benchmarks 11151 +0.016s ... 0.03s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 13113 +0.005s ... 0.035s

#11 got single benchmarks 13113 +0.007s ... 0.042s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 13235 +0.004s ... 0.046s

#13 got single benchmarks 13235 +0.006s ... 0.053s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.053s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.084s ... 0.137s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.137s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)