Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro M5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

NVIDIA Quadro M5500

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5500

The Nvidia Quadro M5500 is a high-end, DirectX 12 (FL_12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM204 chip with all 2048 shader cores activated and is manufactured in 28 nm at TSMC. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 (Notebook). Compared to the slower and less power hungry Quadro M5000M, the M5500 offers 512 more shaders which should result in 30-40% more performance according to Nvidia.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.2) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M5000M can be used for general calculations.

The power consumption of the Quadro M5000M is rated at the same TGP of 150 Watt. Therefore, the card is suited for very large notebooks with 17-inch displays or greater.

The first laptop with the M5500 in it is the MSI WT72 Workstation.

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

The NVIDIA Quadro K4100M is a high-end, DirectX 11 and OpenGL 4.3 compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Kepler-based GPU built on the GK104 chip with 1152 out of 1536 shader cores active and is manufactured in 28nm at TSMC. The Quadro K4100M is built for the Intel Shark Bay generation (Haswell) and is a successor to the Quadro K4000M (Chief River platform). As a new feature, PCIe 3.0 is supported for the first time. The K4100M usually comes with 4 GB GDDR5 VRAM clocked at 800 MHz (3200 MHz effective, 102.4 GB/s). 

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than with GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Architecture

The Kepler architecture is the successor to the Fermi architecture that first appeared in laptops with the GeForce 400M series. The GK104 Kepler core offers eight shader blocks, called SMX, that are clocked at the same speed as the central core. In the K4100M, 6 of 8 blocks are active leading to the 1152 CUDA cores. Although more shader cores are available in the Kepler architecture as compared to the Fermi design, the Kepler shaders are still expected to be up to twice as power efficient. However, due to the missing hot clock of the shader domain, two shaders of a Kepler chip offer similar performance to just one shader of a Fermi chip (as the latter is clocked twice as fast).

Performance

The performance is clearly above the old Quadro K4000M and similar to the Quadro K5000M. In 3D games, the K4100M offers a performance slightly above the consumer GeForce GTX 770M. Therefore, most demanding games of 2013 will run fluently with maxed out details.

Features

The improved feature set now includes support for up to 4 active displays. Furthermore, high resolution monitors of up to 3840 x 2160 pixels can now be connected using DisplayPort 1.2 or HDMI 1.4a if available. HD-Audio codecs, such as Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD, can be transmitted via bitstream mode through the HDMI port. However, as most laptops will feature Optimus, the integrated GPU will likely have direct control over the display ports and may limit the feature set available by the Nvidia Kepler cards.

Using CUDA or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro K4100M can be used for general calculations.

The 5th generation PureVideo HD video processor (VP5) is also integrated in the GK104 core and offers hardware decoding of HD videos. Common codecs such as MPEG-1/2, MPEG-4 ASP, H.264 and VC1/WMV9 are fully supported up to 4K resolutions while VC1 and MPEG-4 are supported up to 1080p. Two streams can be decoded in parallel for features such as Picture-in-Picture. Another novelty is the inclusion of a dedicated video encoding engine similar to Intel QuickSync that can be accessed by the NVENC API.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro K4100M is rated at a TGP of 100 W including the board and memory components. Therefore, the card is only suited for large notebooks with 17-inch displays or greater.

NVIDIA Quadro M5500NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Quadro K Series
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro K5100M compare 1536 @ 0.77 GHz256 Bit @ 3600 MHz
Quadro K5000M compare 1344 @ 0.71 GHz256 Bit @ 3000 MHz
Quadro K4100M 1152 @ 0.71 GHz256 Bit @ 3200 MHz
Quadro K4000M compare 960 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 2800 MHz
Quadro K3100M compare 768 @ 0.71 GHz256 Bit @ 3200 MHz
Quadro K3000M compare 576 @ 0.65 GHz256 Bit @ 2800 MHz
Quadro K2100M compare 576 @ 0.67 GHz128 Bit @ 3000 MHz
Quadro K1100M compare 384 @ 0.71 GHz128 Bit @ 2800 MHz
Quadro K620M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 2000 MHz
Quadro K2000M compare 384 @ 0.75 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Quadro K1000M compare 192 @ 0.85 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Quadro K610M compare 192 @ 0.95 GHz64 Bit @ 2600 MHz
Quadro K510M compare 192 @ 0.85 GHz64 Bit @ 2400 MHz
Quadro K500M compare 192 @ 0.85 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
ArchitectureMaxwellKepler
Pipelines2048 - unified1152 - unified
Core Speed1139 - 1140 (Boost) MHz706 MHz
Memory Speed6606 MHz3200 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB4 GB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 11, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.3
Power Consumption150 Watt100 Watt
Transistors5.2 Billion3.5 Billion
technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesCUDA, 3D Vision, PhysX, GeForce Experience, Surround, GameStream, GPU Boost 2.0, Adaptive Vertical Sync, G-SYNC, SLIOptimus, PhysX, Verde Drivers, CUDA, OpenCL 1.2, 3D Vision, 3DTV Play
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement04.04.2016 23.07.2013
CodenameN15E-Q3-A2
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro K4100M
1.7 pt (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 14801     avg: 16072     median: 16071.5 (17%)     max: 17342 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
24685 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3431     avg: 3505     median: 3505 (6%)     max: 3579 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
3654 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
113406 Points (14%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
14413 Points (20%)
min: 5151     avg: 5260     median: 5259.5 (7%)     max: 5368 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
4957 Points (4%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
19909 Points (6%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
18618 Points (11%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
3DMark 06
min: 23381     avg: 25560     median: 25559.5 (33%)     max: 27738 Points
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
48.1 fps (16%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
47.6 fps (21%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
59 fps (11%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 43.38     avg: 44.2     median: 44.2 (26%)     max: 45 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 47.86     avg: 48.9     median: 48.9 (28%)     max: 50 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 47.65     avg: 50.8     median: 50.8 (39%)     max: 54 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 15.88     avg: 19.9     median: 19.9 (23%)     max: 24 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 56.8     avg: 57.4     median: 57.4 (43%)     max: 58 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 51.7     avg: 52.4     median: 52.4 (56%)     max: 53 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 47.91     avg: 50     median: 50 (24%)     max: 52 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 47.1     avg: 52.1     median: 52.1 (27%)     max: 57 fps
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
144 fps (36%)
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
min: 35.15     avg: 59.1     median: 59.1 (15%)     max: 83 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
120 fps (18%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
min: 40.34     avg: 42.7     median: 42.7 (6%)     max: 45 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
60.3 fps (13%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
min: 23     avg: 23.3     median: 23.3 (5%)     max: 23.59 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
53.8 fps (14%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
min: 9.74     avg: 11.9     median: 11.9 (3%)     max: 14 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
95 fps (26%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
min: 31.89     avg: 35.5     median: 35.4 (10%)     max: 39 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
12.2 fps (11%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
min: 1.73     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 2.12 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
110 fps (44%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
min: 31.11     avg: 34.6     median: 34.6 (14%)     max: 38 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
137 fps (23%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
min: 41.52     avg: 44.8     median: 44.8 (7%)     max: 48 fps
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
7.8 Points (99%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
7.8 Points (99%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6751 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 89.3     avg: 102.5     median: 102.5 (35%)     max: 115.7 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
106.7 fps (6%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
min: 89.4     avg: 115     median: 115 (7%)     max: 140.6 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 138     avg: 231.5     median: 231.5 (1%)     max: 325 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 305     avg: 476.5     median: 476.5 (1%)     max: 648 Samples/s

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M5500 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro K4100M → 40% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
Quadro K4100M:
457  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
122  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro K4100M:
67  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K4100M:
33  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro K4100M:
12.5  fps
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
Quadro K4100M:
133  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
133  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro K4100M:
133  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K4100M:
92  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro K4100M:
76  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
55  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro K4100M:
28  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K4100M:
25  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
Quadro K4100M:
82  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
52  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
45  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K4100M:
26  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro K4100M:
191  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
146  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
121  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K4100M:
22  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro K4100M:
54  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
47  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
31  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K4100M:
15  fps
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
Quadro K4100M:
166  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
129  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
100  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K4100M:
43  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro K4100M:
86  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
73  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
44  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K4100M:
24  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro K4100M:
178  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
115  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
101  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K4100M:
37  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro K4100M:
196  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
118  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
76  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K4100M:
36  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro K4100M:
64  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
59  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
52  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K4100M:
38  fps
Torchlight 2

Torchlight 2

2012
low 1024x768
Quadro K4100M:
155  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
108  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K4100M:
102  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro K4100M:
158  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
119  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
77  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K4100M:
23  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro K4100M:
153  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
119  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
103  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K4100M:
65  fps
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
Quadro K4100M:
198  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
117  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro K4100M:
74  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K4100M:
42  fps
Total War: Shogun 2

Total War: Shogun 2

2011
low 1024x768
Quadro K4100M:
252  fps
med. 1280x720
Quadro K4100M:
99  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K4100M:
42  fps
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
Quadro K4100M:
342  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro K4100M:
197  fps
high 1280x1024
Quadro K4100M:
149  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro K4100M:
68  fps
NVIDIA Quadro K4100Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dirt Rally457122673312.5
F1 201413313313392
Ryse: Son of Rome76552825
Thief82524526
Total War: Rome II19114612122
Company of Heroes 254473115
GRID 216612910043
Metro: Last Light86734424
BioShock Infinite17811510137
Tomb Raider1961187636
Hitman: Absolution64595238
Torchlight 2155108102
Sleeping Dogs1581197723
Diablo III15311910365
Anno 20701981177442
Total War: Shogun 22529942
World of Warcraft34219714968
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
4
12

4
8
5
1
4
7
3
6
7
4



1


For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 01. 20:40:04

#0 checking url part for id 7282 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4830 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:39:27 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.081s ... 0.082s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.082s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.082s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7282 +0.025s ... 0.107s

#8 got single benchmarks 7282 +0.007s ... 0.114s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 4830 +0.015s ... 0.129s

#10 got single benchmarks 4830 +0.01s ... 0.138s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.138s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.142s ... 0.281s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.281s

#14 Got 67 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.286s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.286s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.01s ... 0.296s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.04s ... 0.336s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.336s

#19 return log +0.037s ... 0.373s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)