, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA Quadro M5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200

NVIDIA Quadro M5500

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5500

The Nvidia Quadro M5500 is a high-end, DirectX 12 (FL_12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM204 chip with all 2048 shader cores activated and is manufactured in 28 nm at TSMC. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 (Notebook). Compared to the slower and less power hungry Quadro M5000M, the M5500 offers 512 more shaders which should result in 30-40% more performance according to Nvidia.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.2) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M5000M can be used for general calculations.

The power consumption of the Quadro M5000M is rated at the same TGP of 150 Watt. Therefore, the card is suited for very large notebooks with 17-inch displays or greater.

The first laptop with the M5500 in it is the MSI WT72 Workstation.

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

The NVIDIA Quadro 5000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture. Therefore, the 5000M likely shares many similarities  to the GeForce GTX 480M which offers more CUDA cores. The Quadro is the first mobile GPU that offers ECC RAM and double-precision floating point cores.

The Quadro series also offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications. 

The shader/CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11 or OpenGL 4.1 for graphics rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 5000M should offer higher performance in general purpose calculations compared to its predecessors.

Furthermore, the Quadro 5000M is compatible with Nvidia 3D Vision Pro for stereoscopic viewing.

Similar to the GeForce GTX 480M, the Quadro 5000M is specified at 100 Watt TDP and is therefore usually reserved for large laptops with ample cooling, such as the Clevo D901F.

At the time of arrival (mid 2010), the Quadro 5000M was the fastest professional workstation graphics card for laptops and is the successor to the old G92b-based GeForce FX 3800M. Compared to desktop Quadro cards, the mobile Quadro 5000M offers less shader cores and likely a lower core clock rate as well.

NVIDIA Quadro M2200

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2200

The Nvidia Quadro M2200 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built most likely on the GM206 chip with 1024 shader cores. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M (second generation). The Quadro M2200M is built for the Intel Kaby Lake generation.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

The maximum core clock of the Quadro M2200 is 1038 MHz. The performance is between the old Quadro M2000M and Quadro M3000M, but generally closer to the latter (sometimes even on par). It is not surprising that the gaming performance is comparable to the Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M (Ti) and it is just behind the new GeForce GTX 1050 (Pascal).

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M2200 can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M2200 is rated at a TGP of 55 Watt (39.1 Watt TDP) – similar to the previous Quadro M2000M – and therefore best suited for 15-inch laptops and up.

NVIDIA Quadro M5500NVIDIA Quadro 5000MNVIDIA Quadro M2200
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
ArchitectureMaxwellFermiMaxwell
Pipelines2048 - unified320 - unified1024 - unified
Core Speed1139 - 1140 (Boost) MHz405 MHz694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed6606 MHz1200 MHz5508 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit256 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory8192 MB2048 MB4096 MB
Shared Memorynonono
DirectXDirectX 12_1DirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0
Transistors5200 Million3000 Million4940 Million
technology28 nm40 nm28 nm
FeaturesCUDA, 3D Vision, PhysX, GeForce Experience, Surround, GameStream, GPU Boost 2.0, Adaptive Vertical Sync, G-SYNC, SLIOpenGL 4.1, DirectX 11, DirectCompute, OpenCL, CUDA, AXE, Error-Correction-Codes (ECC)-Memory, IEEE-Double-Precision-Floating-Point, PowerMizer 9.0Optimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelargelargelarge
Date of Announcement04.04.2016 27.07.2010 13.01.2017
CodenameFermiN17P-Q3
Shader Speed810 MHz
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product-qua...http://www.nvidia.de/object/mobile-works...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M2200
21.7 pt (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1845     avg: 1889     median: 1903 (10%)     max: 1920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1699     avg: 1724     median: 1724 (9%)     max: 1750 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 280203     avg: 289176     median: 289176 (45%)     max: 298148 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 20388     avg: 21012     median: 20644 (27%)     max: 22003 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 36877     avg: 37505     median: 37796 (19%)     max: 37841 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5232     avg: 5253     median: 5252 (13%)     max: 5275 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5786     avg: 5835     median: 5850 (12%)     max: 5869 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 127867     avg: 195445     median: 195444 (26%)     max: 263022 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
14413 Points (34%)
min: 7453     avg: 7581     median: 7581 (18%)     max: 7709 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 7319     avg: 7372     median: 7372 (12%)     max: 7425 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 7700     avg: 7767     median: 7766.5 (8%)     max: 7833 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
24622 Points (24%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
7015 Points (6%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
24915 Points (23%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
41650 Points (22%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
18903 Points (28%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
3DMark 06
12967 Points (24%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 26834     avg: 28150     median: 28149.5 (52%)     max: 29465 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
3DMark 06
13127 Points (24%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 23.2     avg: 26.4     median: 27.9 (14%)     max: 28.1 fps
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 28.13     avg: 28.6     median: 28.6 (20%)     max: 29 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 48.26     avg: 48.9     median: 48.9 (35%)     max: 49.48 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 25.96     avg: 26.4     median: 26.4 (44%)     max: 26.82 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 49.11     avg: 51     median: 51 (85%)     max: 52.86 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 29.99     avg: 30.1     median: 30.1 (36%)     max: 30.2 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 42.66     avg: 49.7     median: 49.7 (60%)     max: 56.8 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 6.4     avg: 6.6     median: 6.6 (27%)     max: 6.71 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 16.23     avg: 19.2     median: 19.2 (80%)     max: 22.18 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 43.9     avg: 44.6     median: 44.6 (34%)     max: 45.2 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 56.57     avg: 57.1     median: 57.1 (43%)     max: 57.67 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 31.9     avg: 33.3     median: 33.3 (36%)     max: 34.7 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 47.95     avg: 52.7     median: 52.7 (57%)     max: 57.49 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 28.6     avg: 29     median: 29 (14%)     max: 29.3 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 55.72     avg: 57.1     median: 57.1 (27%)     max: 58.49 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 25.1     avg: 26.9     median: 26.9 (33%)     max: 28.7 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 48.49     avg: 50.6     median: 50.6 (61%)     max: 52.67 fps
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
144 fps (63%)
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 85.32     avg: 90.4     median: 86.2 (37%)     max: 99.53 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
120 fps (43%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 57.74     avg: 58.3     median: 58.1 (21%)     max: 59.02 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
60.3 fps (25%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 31.14     avg: 32.2     median: 32.8 (14%)     max: 32.8 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
53.8 fps (33%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 20.34     avg: 23.5     median: 24.6 (15%)     max: 25.66 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
95 fps (41%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 46.93     avg: 47.4     median: 46.9 (20%)     max: 48.34 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
12.2 fps (32%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 4.28     avg: 4.9     median: 5.2 (14%)     max: 5.26 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
110 fps (63%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 68.15     avg: 69.3     median: 68.5 (39%)     max: 71.24 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
137 fps (47%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 71.41     avg: 72.2     median: 72 (25%)     max: 73.2 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6833 (32%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
32.7 fps (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
88.6 fps (38%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
107 fps (30%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 102.9     avg: 107     median: 103.9 (29%)     max: 115.51 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
432 fps (3%)
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
60 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
219 fps (24%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
59.9 fps (16%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
111 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
60 fps (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 1204     avg: 1276     median: 1306 (13%)     max: 1318 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 2086     avg: 2097     median: 2099 (7%)     max: 2107 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4332 (9%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
68.5 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
89.2 Watt (15%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
87.7 Watt (19%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M5500 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 5000M → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
Quadro M2200:
83.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
37.1  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
33.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
17.6  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
Quadro M2200:
78  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
52.3 54.8 ~ 54 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
50.5 51.9 ~ 51 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
36.2 37.5 ~ 37 fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M2200:
14.6  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M2200:
139.4  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
105.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
47.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
42  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
123 128.7 ~ 126 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
68.5 71.6 72.8 ~ 71 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
37.4 40.7 41.6 ~ 40 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
33 34.4 35.2 ~ 34 fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M2200:
13.7  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
214.2  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
131.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
70.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
52.4  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
148.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
119  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
56.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
48.2  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
104.6 116.6 ~ 111 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
63.4 66.6 68.4 ~ 66 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
30.3 37.2 37.8 ~ 35 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
18 fps 20 20.3 ~ 19 fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M2200:
12.7  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
108.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
88.6  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
74.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
39.6  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
171.5  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
148.3  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
115.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
47.8  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M2200:
229.4 270.9 ~ 250 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
174.1 177.2 ~ 176 fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
149.1 155.5 ~ 152 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
56.8 58.6 ~ 58 fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
381.4  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
238.8  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
149.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
70.2  fps

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.16
log 21. 12:26:09

#0 checking url part for id 7282 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1939 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7706 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 Sep 2021 17:22:03 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.056s ... 0.056s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.056s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.056s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7282 +0.037s ... 0.094s

#9 got single benchmarks 7282 +0.005s ... 0.099s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 1939 +0s ... 0.099s

#11 got single benchmarks 1939 +0.005s ... 0.104s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 7706 +0.005s ... 0.11s

#13 got single benchmarks 7706 +0.012s ... 0.121s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.121s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.023s ... 0.144s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.144s

#17 Got 68 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.154s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.154s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.157s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.012s ... 0.169s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.169s

#22 return log +0.001s ... 0.17s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)