, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

► remove from comparison

The NVIDIA Quadro 3000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (probably GF104 like the GeForce GTX 470M). Compared to the 5010M, the 3000M does not support ECC memory and DP floating point calculations.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance for example should be significantly better than similar specified GeForce graphics cards.

The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.1 for graphic rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 3000M should offer a high performance in general purpose calculations.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 3000M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called: NVIDIA 3D Vision Pro.

To automatically switch between the processor graphics card and the Quadro, the 3000M supports Nvidia Optimus (if the laptop vendor chooses to integrate it).

As the GeForce GTX 470M, the Quadro 3000M is specified at 75 Watt TDP and therefore only suited for large laptops with 17 inch displays.

NVIDIA Quadro M2200

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2200

The Nvidia Quadro M2200 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built most likely on the GM206 chip with 1024 shader cores. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M (second generation). The Quadro M2200M is built for the Intel Kaby Lake generation.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

The maximum core clock of the Quadro M2200 is 1038 MHz. The performance is between the old Quadro M2000M and Quadro M3000M, but generally closer to the latter (sometimes even on par). It is not surprising that the gaming performance is comparable to the Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M (Ti) and it is just behind the new GeForce GTX 1050 (Pascal).

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M2200 can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M2200 is rated at a TGP of 55 Watt (39.1 Watt TDP) – similar to the previous Quadro M2000M – and therefore best suited for 15-inch laptops and up.

NVIDIA Quadro 3000MNVIDIA Quadro M2200
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameFermiN17P-Q3
ArchitectureFermiMaxwell
Pipelines240 - unified1024 - unified
Core Speed450 MHz694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz
Shader Speed900 MHz
Memory Speed625 MHz5508 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB4096 MB
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0
technology40 nm28 nm
FeaturesOpenGl 4.1, FP32Optimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement22.02.2011 13.01.2017
Transistors4940 Million
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.de/object/mobile-works...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M2200
21.7 pt (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1845     avg: 1889     median: 1903 (10%)     max: 1920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1699     avg: 1724     median: 1724 (9%)     max: 1750 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 280203     avg: 289176     median: 289176 (45%)     max: 298148 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 20388     avg: 21012     median: 20644 (27%)     max: 22003 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 36877     avg: 37505     median: 37796 (19%)     max: 37841 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5232     avg: 5253     median: 5252 (13%)     max: 5275 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5786     avg: 5835     median: 5850 (12%)     max: 5869 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 127867     avg: 195445     median: 195444 (26%)     max: 263022 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1742 Points (4%)
min: 7453     avg: 7581     median: 7581 (18%)     max: 7709 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
1539 Points (3%)
min: 7319     avg: 7372     median: 7372 (12%)     max: 7425 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
7941 Points (8%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
24622 Points (24%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 6604     avg: 6661     median: 6660.5 (6%)     max: 6717 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
24915 Points (23%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
3DMark 06
min: 14054     avg: 14221     median: 14220.5 (26%)     max: 14387 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 26834     avg: 28150     median: 28149.5 (52%)     max: 29465 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 23.2     avg: 26.4     median: 27.9 (14%)     max: 28.1 fps
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
20.4 fps (15%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 48.26     avg: 48.9     median: 48.9 (35%)     max: 49.48 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
22.9 fps (38%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 49.11     avg: 51     median: 51 (85%)     max: 52.86 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
30.1 fps (36%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 42.66     avg: 49.7     median: 49.7 (60%)     max: 56.8 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
7.6 fps (32%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 16.23     avg: 19.2     median: 19.2 (80%)     max: 22.18 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
42.5 fps (32%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 56.57     avg: 57.1     median: 57.1 (43%)     max: 57.67 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
34.7 fps (37%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 47.95     avg: 52.7     median: 52.7 (57%)     max: 57.49 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
18.3 fps (9%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 55.72     avg: 57.1     median: 57.1 (27%)     max: 58.49 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
24.6 fps (30%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 48.49     avg: 50.6     median: 50.6 (61%)     max: 52.67 fps
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 85.32     avg: 90.4     median: 86.2 (37%)     max: 99.53 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 57.74     avg: 58.3     median: 58.1 (21%)     max: 59.02 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 31.14     avg: 32.2     median: 32.8 (14%)     max: 32.8 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 20.34     avg: 23.5     median: 24.6 (23%)     max: 25.66 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 46.93     avg: 47.4     median: 46.9 (20%)     max: 48.34 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 4.28     avg: 4.9     median: 5.2 (17%)     max: 5.26 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 68.15     avg: 69.3     median: 68.5 (39%)     max: 71.24 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 71.41     avg: 72.2     median: 72 (25%)     max: 73.2 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6519 (31%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
6833 (32%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 45.4     avg: 45.5     median: 45.5 (19%)     max: 45.65 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
88.6 fps (38%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 102.9     avg: 107     median: 103.9 (29%)     max: 115.51 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
432 fps (3%)
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
60 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
219 fps (24%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
59.9 fps (16%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
111 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
60 fps (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 1204     avg: 1276     median: 1306 (13%)     max: 1318 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 2086     avg: 2097     median: 2099 (7%)     max: 2107 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4332 (9%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
68.5 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
89.2 Watt (15%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
87.7 Watt (19%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 3000M → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 252% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
Quadro M2200:
83.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
37.1  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
33.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
17.6  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
Quadro M2200:
78  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
52.3 54.8 ~ 54 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
50.5 51.9 ~ 51 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
36.2 37.5 ~ 37 fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M2200:
14.6  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M2200:
139.4  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
105.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
47.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
42  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
123 128.7 ~ 126 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
68.5 71.6 72.8 ~ 71 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
37.4 40.7 41.6 ~ 40 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
33 34.4 35.2 ~ 34 fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M2200:
13.7  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
214.2  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
131.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
70.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
52.4  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
148.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
119  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
56.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
48.2  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
104.6 116.6 ~ 111 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
63.4 66.6 68.4 ~ 66 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
30.3 37.2 37.8 ~ 35 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
18 fps 20 20.3 ~ 19 fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M2200:
12.7  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
108.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
88.6  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
74.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
39.6  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
171.5  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
148.3  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
115.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
47.8  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M2200:
229.4 270.9 ~ 250 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
174.1 177.2 ~ 176 fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
149.1 155.5 ~ 152 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
56.8 58.6 ~ 58 fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
381.4  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
238.8  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
149.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
70.2  fps
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
206.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
127.3  fps
med. 1360x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
53.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
11.5  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
66.7  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
39.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
30.4  fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
104.8  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
70.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
43.3  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
113.5  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
71.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
40  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
187.6  fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
Quadro 3000M:
52.4  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 3000M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 31. 12:30:00

#0 checking url part for id 2433 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7706 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 29 Jul 2021 17:21:20 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.049s ... 0.05s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.05s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.05s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 2433 +0.023s ... 0.073s

#8 got single benchmarks 2433 +0.005s ... 0.078s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7706 +0.004s ... 0.082s

#10 got single benchmarks 7706 +0.01s ... 0.092s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.092s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.112s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.112s

#14 Got 83 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.12s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.12s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.123s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.012s ... 0.135s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.135s

#19 return log +0.003s ... 0.138s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)