Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G76 MP10 vs Qualcomm Adreno 613 vs Qualcomm Adreno 642

ARM Mali-G76 MP10

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G76 MP10

The ARM Mali-G76 MP10 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced in late 2018 in the Kirin 980 (e.g. Mate 20 Pro). It integrates 10 of the 20 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing. Compared to the old Mali-G72, the G76 should offer twice the performance per cluster. Therefore, the G76MP10 should be slightly faster than the G72MP18 e.g. in the Exynos 9810 (Galaxy S9).

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.

Qualcomm Adreno 613

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 613

The Adreno 613 is an entry-level graphics card, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2. It is intended for use in low-cost smartphones.

The performance is on a par with the ARM Mali-G52 MP2 (e.g. Helio G85) and is just ahead of the Adreno 612 in the Snapdragon 678. Although it is the successor to the Adreno 619 in the SD 4 Gen 1, the performance is significantly lower.

It works with a maximum clock frequency of 955 MHz and is manufactured in the 4 nm process at Samsung (in the SD 4 Gen 2). It supports common graphics APIs such as OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

Qualcomm Adreno 642

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 642

The Qualcomm Adreno 642 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G SoC. The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642 GPU offers a 50% improved performance over the Adreno 620, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.

The Adreno 642 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 780G is manufactured in the modern 5nm LPPE process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

show full text
ARM Mali-G76 MP10Qualcomm Adreno 613Qualcomm Adreno 642
Adreno 600 Series
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
ArchitectureBifrostAdreno 600
Pipelines10 - unified
Core Speed720 MHz955 MHz
Shared Memorynoyesyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 11.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanOpenGL ES 3.2
technology7 nm4 nm5 nm
Date of Announcement31.08.2018 26.06.2023 07.05.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.com
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 11.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
CPU in Mali-G76 MP10GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 9808 x ? MHz? MHz720 MHz
CPU in Adreno 642GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 665     avg: 667     median: 667 (0%)     max: 669 Points
3212 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 155     avg: 159     median: 159 (0%)     max: 163 Points
786 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 42128     avg: 53280     median: 47811.5 (5%)     max: 67956 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 2525     avg: 4247     median: 4311 (19%)     max: 5990 Points
5587 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2536     avg: 4495     median: 4469.5 (10%)     max: 6350 Points
8380 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2611     avg: 3823     median: 3777 (16%)     max: 5102 Points
1817 Points (8%)
4478 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2747     avg: 3997     median: 4132.5 (10%)     max: 5157 Points
1591 Points (4%)
6148 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 2567     avg: 4152     median: 4375 (39%)     max: 5638 Points
6989 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 2347     avg: 4277     median: 4497 (27%)     max: 6111 Points
8588 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 2276     avg: 3929     median: 4131.5 (20%)     max: 4835 Points
5098 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 2082     avg: 3960     median: 4203 (14%)     max: 4937 Points
6087 Points (20%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
1.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 13     avg: 13.7     median: 14 (3%)     max: 14 fps
4 fps (1%)
18 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 30     avg: 33.2     median: 33 (2%)     max: 37 fps
min: 11     avg: 11.5     median: 11.5 (1%)     max: 12 fps
50 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 17     avg: 28.8     median: 30.5 (3%)     max: 33 fps
9.6 fps (1%)
40 fps (4%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 25     avg: 45.2     median: 51.5 (1%)     max: 56 fps
19 fps (0%)
65 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 40     avg: 70     median: 75.5 (3%)     max: 91 fps
27 fps (1%)
90 fps (4%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G76 MP10
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 68     avg: 109.5     median: 119.5 (1%)     max: 138 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 613
54 fps (0%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642
153 fps (1%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
162946 Points (16%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
49834 Points (3%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
17.2 fps (0%)
48 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
411 Points (0%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
626 Points (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 12695     avg: 13303     median: 13303 (5%)     max: 13911 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 4620     avg: 5109     median: 5108.5 (7%)     max: 5597 Points

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G76 MP10 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 613 → 37% n=8

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 132% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 613:
87.3  fps
ultra
Adreno 613:
59.6  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 613:
38.9  fps
ultra
Adreno 613:
14.4  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 642:
30  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G76 MP10:
60  fps
65%
Adreno 613:
39  fps
100%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
med.
100%
Mali-G76 MP10:
25  fps
236%
Adreno 642:
59  fps
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP10:
30 30 30 40 40 ~ 34 fps
88%
Adreno 613:
29.9  fps
176%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
ultra
Adreno 642:
40  fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP10:
60  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Mali-G76 MP10:
60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
100%
Mali-G76 MP10:
60 60 60 60 61 ~ 60 fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP10:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-G76 MP10:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
200%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP10:
30 30 30 31 31 ~ 30 fps
200%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP10:
60  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G76 MP10 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 613 → 76%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 65%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 182%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 182%

ARM Mali-G76 MP10Qualcomm Adreno 613Qualcomm Adreno 642
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift87.359.6
Genshin Impact38.914.4
PUBG Mobile6025343929.960596040
ARM Mali-G76 MP10Qualcomm Adreno 613Qualcomm Adreno 642
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1



1










< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1



1


1
1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1

1



1

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.35
log 01. 07:34:17

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9038 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12697 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 10693 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1767249257s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 01 Jan 2026 05:18:57 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.025s ... 0.025s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.025s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9038 +0.021s ... 0.046s

#10 got single benchmarks 9038 +0.009s ... 0.054s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12697 +0s ... 0.055s

#12 got single benchmarks 12697 +0.005s ... 0.059s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 10693 +0s ... 0.059s

#14 got single benchmarks 10693 +0.003s ... 0.062s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.062s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.081s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.081s

#18 Got 40 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.085s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.085s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.085s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.089s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.089s

#23 return log +0s ... 0.089s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)