ARM Mali-G72 MP12 vs Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs ARM Mali-G76 MP12
ARM Mali-G72 MP12 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G72 MP12 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced in October 2017 in the Huawei Mate 10 and uses 12 clusters (hence the MP12 name). In our benchmarks it performs between a Adreno 530 and 540 and is therefore suitable for demanding mobile games.
The G72 is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture and offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing.
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.
Qualcomm Adreno 685 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 685 is an integrated graphics card in the Microsoft SQ1 ARM-based SoC. It is similar to the Adreno 680 in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx SoC for Windows laptops but higher clocked and therefore with a higher theoretical performance (2 versus 1.8 TFlops).
ARM Mali-G76 MP12 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G76 MP12 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced early 2019 in the Samsung Exynos 9820 (e.g. Galaxy S10 Plus). It integrates 12 of the 20 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing. Compared to the old Mali-G72, the G76 should offer twice the performance per cluster.
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.
ARM Mali-G72 MP12 Qualcomm Adreno 685 ARM Mali-G76 MP12 Mali-G Series Architecture Bifrost Bifrost Pipelines 12 - unified 10 - unified Core Speed 850 MHz Shared Memory no yes no API OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12 OpenGL ES 3.2 technology 16 nm 7 nm 7 nm Date of Announcement 18.10.2017 06.12.2018 31.08.2018 Link to Manufacturer Page developer.arm.com developer.arm.com Power Consumption 7 Watt
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 22429 avg: 32596 median: 33740 (4%) max: 36231 Points
min: 65614 avg: 68730 median: 68654 (8%) max: 72022 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 2021 avg: 3208 median: 3360.5 (15%) max: 3710 Points
min: 4052 avg: 4561 median: 4618 (20%) max: 5048 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2062 avg: 3386 median: 3545 (8%) max: 4040 Points
min: 4449 avg: 5066 median: 5083 (11%) max: 5605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2487 avg: 2882 median: 2961.5 (15%) max: 3070 Points
min: 4529 avg: 4827 median: 4720.5 (23%) max: 5300 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2597 avg: 2945 median: 3012.5 (9%) max: 3109 Points
min: 5358 avg: 5606 median: 5394.5 (16%) max: 6087 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1968 Points (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
1927 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 685 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
373 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 8.4 avg: 8.6 median: 8.6 (2%) max: 8.7 fps
min: 16 avg: 17.2 median: 17 (3%) max: 18 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 10 avg: 20.6 median: 23 (2%) max: 24 fps
min: 38 avg: 43.8 median: 45 (3%) max: 48 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 11 avg: 20.4 median: 21 (2%) max: 23 fps
min: 21 avg: 35.5 median: 39 (4%) max: 43 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 19 avg: 33.9 median: 38.5 (1%) max: 39 fps
min: 47 avg: 58.7 median: 59 (1%) max: 67 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 23 avg: 54.6 median: 59 (3%) max: 66 fps
31.7 fps (2%)
min: 67 avg: 80 median: 85 (5%) max: 89 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G72 MP12 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 45 avg: 108 median: 118 (1%) max: 125 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 685
167.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G76 MP12
min: 50 avg: 103.7 median: 96.5 (1%) max: 143 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
25922 Points (59%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
39033 Points (87%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2292 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
8180 Points (8%)
7354 Points (7%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
3761 Points (7%)
6315 Points (11%)
Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G72 MP12 → 100% n=2 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 685 → 98% n=2 Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G76 MP12 → 113% n=2
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
32 [X] Honor Play 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
18 fps, max:
33 fps
fps
181%
Mali-G76 MP12:
58 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
32 [X] Honor 10 0.5.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
20 fps, max:
42 fps
32 [X] Honor Play 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
22 fps, max:
33 fps
33 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
14 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 0.7.0 mit GPU Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
16 fps, max:
42 fps
~ 34 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
60 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
31 55 [X] Honor Play 1.24.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
43 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 43 fps
140%
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 54 [X] Honor Play 1.24.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
21 fps, max:
61 fps
58 [X] Honor 10 1.21.1.3
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
2 fps, max:
60 fps
58 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 1.23.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
40 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 50 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
60 fps
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 30 30 59 [X] Huawei P20 1.3.3
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
46 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 37 fps
162%
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
29 29 30 30 [X] Huawei P20 3.6.0k
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
26 fps, max:
31 fps
~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 fps
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
29 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
51 fps
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G72 MP12 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G76 MP12 → 127% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 136%
ARM Mali-G76 MP12 low med. high ultra QHD 4K PUBG Mobile 58 39 39 Arena of Valor 60 60 Shadow Fight 3 60 60 Battle Bay 60 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 30 30 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 2 1 2 3 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 11. 10:33:46
#0 checking url part for id 8138 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 9954 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 9822 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 May 2024 05:38:50 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.175s ... 0.177s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.177s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.177s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8138 +0.045s ... 0.222s
#9 got single benchmarks 8138 +0.026s ... 0.248s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9954 +0.002s ... 0.25s
#11 got single benchmarks 9954 +0.008s ... 0.259s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9822 +0.002s ... 0.261s
#13 got single benchmarks 9822 +0.02s ... 0.28s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.28s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.115s ... 0.395s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.396s
#17 Got 52 rows for game benchmarks. +0.03s ... 0.425s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.425s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.43s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.022s ... 0.452s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.452s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.454s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)