ARM Mali-G72 MP12 vs Qualcomm Adreno 644 vs Qualcomm Adreno 642L
ARM Mali-G72 MP12 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G72 MP12 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced in October 2017 in the Huawei Mate 10 and uses 12 clusters (hence the MP12 name). In our benchmarks it performs between a Adreno 530 and 540 and is therefore suitable for demanding mobile games.
The G72 is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture and offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing.
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.
Qualcomm Adreno 644 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 644 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SoC. The chip was announced mid 2022 and was available in early 2023 in upper mid-range Android smartphones.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 644 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 642 , its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 780G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR5 with 3200 MHz. In our benchmarks with the Mi 13 Lite however, the performance was only on par with the old Adreno 642.
The Adreno 644 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.
The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is manufactured in the modern 4nm process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.
Qualcomm Adreno 642L ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 642L is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SoC . The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642L GPU offers a 40% improved performance over the Adreno 620 (compared to the specified +50% of the 642 in the SD 780G), its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.
The Adreno 642L supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.
The Snapdragon 778G and therefore also the 642L is manufactured in the modern 6nm UEV process at TSMC that should provide a good power efficiency.
ARM Mali-G72 MP12 Qualcomm Adreno 644 Qualcomm Adreno 642L Adreno 600 Series Architecture Bifrost Pipelines 12 - unified Core Speed 850 MHz Shared Memory no yes yes API OpenGL ES 3.2 OpenGL ES 3.2 OpenGL ES 3.2 technology 16 nm 4 nm 6 nm Date of Announcement 18.10.2017 07.05.2021 07.05.2021 Link to Manufacturer Page developer.arm.com Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 Predecessor Adreno 642
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 22429 avg: 32596 median: 33740 (4%) max: 36231 Points
min: 88482 avg: 89308 median: 89307.5 (10%) max: 90133 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 2021 avg: 3208 median: 3360.5 (15%) max: 3710 Points
min: 6303 avg: 6921 median: 6953.5 (30%) max: 7472 Points
min: 6398 avg: 6666 median: 6638 (29%) max: 7281 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2062 avg: 3386 median: 3545 (8%) max: 4040 Points
min: 8656 avg: 8893 median: 8751 (19%) max: 9414 Points
min: 7199 avg: 7627 median: 7536 (17%) max: 8605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2487 avg: 2882 median: 2961.5 (15%) max: 3070 Points
min: 5501 avg: 6158 median: 6262 (31%) max: 6466 Points
min: 5032 avg: 5413 median: 5393.5 (27%) max: 5763 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2597 avg: 2945 median: 3012.5 (9%) max: 3109 Points
min: 6767 avg: 7037 median: 7012.5 (21%) max: 7388 Points
min: 5103 avg: 5654 median: 5612 (17%) max: 6240 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3035 avg: 3133 median: 3140 (2%) max: 3184 Points
min: 2321 avg: 2517 median: 2493.5 (1%) max: 2831 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 825 avg: 833 median: 829 (1%) max: 854 Points
min: 681 avg: 696 median: 687.5 (1%) max: 768 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 7 avg: 7.5 median: 7.5 (3%) max: 7.9 fps
min: 5.9 avg: 6.2 median: 6.1 (2%) max: 6.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 8.4 avg: 8.6 median: 8.6 (2%) max: 8.7 fps
min: 15 avg: 16.7 median: 17 (3%) max: 18 fps
min: 13 avg: 13.6 median: 13.5 (2%) max: 15 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 10 avg: 20.6 median: 23 (2%) max: 24 fps
min: 41 avg: 46 median: 46.5 (3%) max: 49 fps
min: 34 avg: 36.4 median: 36 (3%) max: 40 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 11 avg: 20.4 median: 21 (2%) max: 23 fps
min: 37 avg: 38.2 median: 38 (4%) max: 40 fps
min: 33 avg: 33.7 median: 33 (4%) max: 37 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 19 avg: 33.9 median: 38.5 (1%) max: 39 fps
min: 52 avg: 62.4 median: 65 (1%) max: 67 fps
min: 56 avg: 57.7 median: 57 (1%) max: 64 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 23 avg: 54.6 median: 59 (3%) max: 66 fps
min: 86 avg: 89.2 median: 88 (5%) max: 94 fps
min: 77 avg: 79.1 median: 78 (5%) max: 89 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G72 MP12 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 45 avg: 108 median: 118 (1%) max: 125 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 644
min: 147 avg: 150.2 median: 148 (1%) max: 158 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642L
min: 132 avg: 134.9 median: 133 (1%) max: 148 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 174679 avg: 177977 median: 175343 (22%) max: 187645 Points
min: 135972 avg: 157798 median: 157454 (20%) max: 175807 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
25922 Points (59%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
39033 Points (87%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 50.74 avg: 51.7 median: 51.7 (0%) max: 52.63 fps
min: 45.96 avg: 49.6 median: 46.9 (0%) max: 54.4 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 2448 avg: 2513 median: 2497 (1%) max: 2610 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 2650 avg: 2776 median: 2729.5 (1%) max: 2993 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
8180 Points (8%)
30029 Points (30%)
min: 23666 avg: 31803 median: 30994 (31%) max: 38436 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
3761 Points (7%)
42541 Points (74%)
min: 26134 avg: 36660 median: 40236 (70%) max: 43000 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.19 avg: 4.8 median: 4.6 (2%) max: 5.9 Watt
min: 0 avg: 4.3 median: 4 (2%) max: 9.27 Watt
Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G72 MP12 → 100% n=12 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 285% n=12 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 258% n=12
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Adreno 644:
42 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
36 fps, max:
45 fps
fps
Adreno 642L:
59 59 ~ 59 fps
Adreno 644:
45 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
40 fps, max:
46 fps
fps
Adreno 642L:
51 60 ~ 56 fps
Adreno 642L:
61 [X] Xiaomi 12 Lite 3.4.0.5930
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 642L
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 644:
45 [X] Motorola Razr 40 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
44 fps, max:
45 fps
89 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
84 fps, max:
90 fps
~ 67 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
32 [X] Honor Play 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
18 fps, max:
33 fps
fps
188%
Adreno 644:
60 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
Adreno 644:
40 [X] Honor 90 5G 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
37 fps, max:
41 fps
fps
Adreno 642L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
32 [X] Honor 10 0.5.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
20 fps, max:
42 fps
32 [X] Honor Play 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
22 fps, max:
33 fps
33 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
14 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 0.7.0 mit GPU Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
16 fps, max:
42 fps
~ 34 fps
118%
Adreno 644:
40 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 2.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
34 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 2.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
22 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
38 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Honor 90 5G 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
37 fps, max:
41 fps
40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
60 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
31 55 [X] Honor Play 1.24.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
43 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 43 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 54 [X] Honor Play 1.24.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
21 fps, max:
61 fps
58 [X] Honor 10 1.21.1.3
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
2 fps, max:
60 fps
58 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 1.23.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
40 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 50 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
60 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 30 30 59 [X] Huawei P20 1.3.3
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
46 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 37 fps
162%
Adreno 644:
60 [X] Honor 90 5G 1.9.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
29 29 30 30 [X] Huawei P20 3.6.0k
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
26 fps, max:
31 fps
~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 fps
100%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 fps
100%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
51 fps
Adreno 644:
60 61 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 3.9.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
50 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 61 fps
Adreno 642L:
90 [X] Motorola Edge 30 2.36.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G 1.9GHz
Adreno 642L
min:
82 fps, max:
91 fps
fps
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G72 MP12 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 156% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 156%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 131% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 152%
Qualcomm Adreno 644 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Diablo Immortal 42 45 Armajet 67 PUBG Mobile 60 40 40 Dead Trigger 2 60 Subway Surfers 61 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 1 3 1
Qualcomm Adreno 642L low med. high ultra QHD 4K Diablo Immortal 59 56 League of Legends: Wild Rift 61 Armajet 89 PUBG Mobile 58 40 38 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 30 30 Subway Surfers 90 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 1 2 3 1 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.27
log 17. 07:21:50
#0 checking url part for id 8138 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 10945 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:38:48 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.153s ... 0.154s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.154s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.154s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8138 +0.039s ... 0.193s
#9 got single benchmarks 8138 +0.021s ... 0.213s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0.002s ... 0.216s
#11 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.015s ... 0.23s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10945 +0.002s ... 0.232s
#13 got single benchmarks 10945 +0.052s ... 0.284s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.284s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.18s ... 0.464s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.464s
#17 Got 90 rows for game benchmarks. +0.024s ... 0.488s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.488s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s ... 0.493s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.028s ... 0.521s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.521s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.523s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)