Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 9

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

► remove from comparison Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 (GT3e) is a processor graphics card that was first seen in the Apple MacBook Pro 13 (Entry, 2019) in mid 2019. It is similar to the Iris Plus Graphics 655 in the 28 Watt CPUs.

The so called GT3e version of the Coffee-Lake GPU still has 48 Execution Units (EUs), which can reach up to 1150 MHz depending on the model. Besides eDRAM cache, the Iris 645 can also access the system memory (2x 64 Bit DDR3L-2133/DDR4-2400) via processor interface.

Performance

The exact performance of the Iris Plus Graphics 645 depends on the CPU model, because maximum clock as well as the size of the L3 cache can differ a bit. The system memory (DDR3/DDR4) will influence the performance as well.

The fastest chips are high-clocked Core i7 models like the Core i7-8557U. Depending on the game, the Iris Plus 655 will probably be on par with a dedicated GeForce 930M or GeForce 940MX and can handle smooth gameplay in modern titles in low up to medium settings.

Features

The reworked video engine now fully supports hardware decoding of H.265/HEVC videos. Contrary to Skylake, however, Kaby Lake can now also decode H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The video output is possible via DP 1.2/eDP 1.3 (up to 3840 x 2160 @60 Hz), whereas HDMI is also supported in the older 1.4a standard. An HDMI 2.0 output can be added via converter from DisplayPort. The GPU can drive up to three displays simultaneously.

Power Consumption

The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used for 15-Watt processor and therefore small-sized notebooks.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 9

► remove from comparison AMD Vega 9

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 is an integrated GPU for notebooks. It is used for the Ryzen 5 APUs, which were launched in the end of 2019. The GPU is based on the Vega architecture (5th generation GCN) and has 9 CUs (= 576 of the 704 shaders) clocked at up to 1300 MHz (Ryzen 5 3580U). The performance depends on the configured TDP (12-25 W at launch), the clocks, the cooling, and the memory configuration). The GPU should benefit from fast dual-channel DDR4-2400 RAM (contrary to DDR4-2133 single-channel, which is also possible).

The Vega architecture offers some improvements over the Polaris generation and now supports DirectX 12 Feature Level 12_1. More information is available in our dedicated article about the Raven Ridge architecture.

The performance of the integrated graphics card should be between the Vega 8 and Vega 10. Therefore, demanding games like Control or Borderlands 3 should be playable in lowest settings and 720p. Less demanding games like Fifa 20 or League of Legends can be played fluently in 1080p and highest settings. See e.g. our Vega 8 page for additional benchmarks.

Thanks to the 14nm process and clever power-saving features, the power consumption is comparatively low (according to AMD), so the graphics card can also be used for slim and light notebooks.

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
RX Vega 2000/3000 Series
Iris Plus Graphics 655 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 650 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 645 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 640 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics P630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics P630 compare 24 64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
HD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 617 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
Vega 10 compare 640 @ 1.3 GHz
Vega 9 576 @ 1.3 GHz
Vega 8 compare 512 @ 1.2 GHz
Vega 6 compare 384 @ 1.1 GHz
Vega 3 compare 192 @ 0.6 - 1.2 GHz
Vega 2 compare 128 @ 1.1 GHz
CodenameKaby Lake GT3eVega Raven Ridge
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 Coffee LakeVega
Pipelines48 - unified576 - unified
Core Speed300 - 1150 (Boost) MHz1300 (Boost) MHz
Memory TypeDDR3, DDR4
Shared Memoryyesno
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 12_1
technology14 nm14 nm
FeaturesQuickSyncTiled Rasterization, Shared Memory (up to Dual-Channel DDR4-2400)
Date of Announcement10.07.2019 26.10.2017
Power Consumption15 Watt
Transistors4.5 Billion
CPU in Iris Plus Graphics 645GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-8557U4 x 1700 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1150 MHz
Intel Core i5-8257U4 x 1400 MHz, 15 W300 MHz1050 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz1050 - 1150 MHz
CPU in Vega 9GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U4 x 2100 MHz, 15 W? MHz1300 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Vega 9
1.3 pt (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
624 Points (2%)
974 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
550 Points (1%)
872 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
100%
1 Vega 9 +
131922 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
100%
1 Vega 9 +
70492 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
100%
1 Vega 9 +
13582 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
100%
1 Vega 9 +
19255 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
1736 Points (3%)
2524 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1893 Points (2%)
2789 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
100%
1 Vega 9 +
94659 Points (11%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
3238 Points (4%)
4424 Points (6%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
2985 Points (3%)
4380 Points (4%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
100%
1 Vega 9 +
12628 Points (4%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
100%
1 Vega 9 +
11100 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
3DMark 06
100%
1 Vega 9 +
13365 Points (17%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
100%
1 Vega 9 +
6966 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
100%
1 Vega 9 +
46.6 fps (16%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 55.3     avg: 67.1     median: 67.1 (4%)     max: 78.9 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
55 fps (3%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.8     avg: 98.6     median: 98.6 (99%)     max: 99.3 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
20.2 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
53.4 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
100%
1 Vega 9 +
49 fps (6%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
69.6 fps (1%)
57.4 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
101.8 fps (6%)
73.1 fps (4%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
198.3 fps (2%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
192 fps (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
100%
1 Vega 9 +
239 Samples/s (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
100%
1 Vega 9 +
588 Samples/s (1%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
100%
1 Vega 9 +
2806 Points (3%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 Vega 9 +
42.2 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 Vega 9 +
40.3 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
100%
1 Vega 9 +
45.1 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
100%
1 Vega 9 +
0.2 fps per Watt (16%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 Vega 9 +
0.2 fps per Watt (17%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
100%
1 Vega 9 +
39 dB(A) (62%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 → 120% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
Vega 9:
28.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
Vega 9:
13.5  fps
high 1920x1080
Vega 9:
7.8  fps
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
Vega 9:
51  fps
med. 1920x1080
Vega 9:
21  fps
high 1920x1080
Vega 9:
18  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Vega 9:
12  fps
low 1280x720
Vega 9:
60.7  fps
med. 1920x1080
Vega 9:
20.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Vega 9:
18  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Vega 9:
14.5  fps
low 1280x720
Vega 9:
29  fps
med. 1920x1080
Vega 9:
8  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
37.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
26.1  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
22.5  fps
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
Vega 9:
48  fps
med. 1920x1080
Vega 9:
22.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Vega 9:
15.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Vega 9:
9.1  fps
low 1280x720
Vega 9:
100.7  fps
med. 1920x1080
Vega 9:
46.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Vega 9:
30.4  fps
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
Vega 9:
92.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Vega 9:
36.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Vega 9:
19.3  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
76.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
57.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
29  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
26.9  fps
low 1024x768
Vega 9:
41.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Vega 9:
13.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Vega 9:
8.1  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
104.6  fps
113%
Vega 9:
117.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
60  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
51.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
22.1  fps
93%
Vega 9:
20.5  fps

Average Gaming Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 → 103%

AMD Radeon RX Vega 9lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Borderlands 328.313.57.8
F1 201951211812
Apex Legends60.720.91814.5
Shadow of the Tomb Raider298
Fortnite4822.315.79.1
Rocket League100.746.230.4
Overwatch92.336.319.3
The Witcher 341.913.38.1
BioShock Infinite117.920.5
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
3
4
5
1

5
2

6








Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645lowmed.highultraQHD4K
X-Plane 11.1137.426.122.5
Dota 2 Reborn76.557.32926.9
BioShock Infinite104.66051.622.1
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
2
1
1
1
2
1

2








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 16. 05:51:07

#0 checking url part for id 9902 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9952 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:38:48 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.097s ... 0.098s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.098s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.098s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9902 +0.027s ... 0.126s

#8 got single benchmarks 9902 +0.009s ... 0.134s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9952 +0.02s ... 0.154s

#10 got single benchmarks 9952 +0.008s ... 0.161s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.161s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.206s ... 0.367s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.367s

#14 Got 39 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.375s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.375s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.007s ... 0.383s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.024s ... 0.407s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.407s

#19 return log +0.064s ... 0.471s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)