Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 7 150U vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100

Intel Core 7 150U

► remove from comparison Intel Core 7 150U

The Intel Core 7 150U is a high-end notebook CPU based on the Raptor Lake-U Refresh (RPL-U) series (Alder Lake architecture), which was introduced in January 2024. The CPU offers 2 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficiency cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support hyperthreading (therefore 12 threads together) and clock from 1.8 to 5.4 GHz. The E-cores clock from 1.2 - 4 GHz and should offer comparable performance to old Skylake cores (e.g. i7-6300HQ). The Core 7 150U also supports vPro Essentials management features.

Performance

Due to the similar clock rates, the performance is slightly above the old Core i7-1365U. As usual with Alder Lake, the performance is heavily dependent on the cooling and the TDP settings.

Graphics unit

Like its predecessor, Intel integrates an Intel Xe-based graphics unit called Intel Graphics in Alder Lake. All 96 EUs are probably activated on the 150U.

Features

Like Tiger Lake, Alder-Lake-P also has WiFi 6E and Thunderbolt 4 (4x) partially integrated. The integrated memory controller supports LPDDR5-6400 and the integrated Gaussian and Neural Accelerator (GNA) is installed in version 3.0. The Quick Sync 8 media engine is the same as in Rocket Lake and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode. The chip supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a dGPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs. The PCH also offers PCIe Gen3 x12.

Power consumption

The Intel Core 7 150U is specified with 15 watts (PL1) TDP and 55 watts (PL2) max. turbo power. The processor is manufactured using the further improved Intel 7 process (10 nm SuperFin).

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X Elite X1E-84-100

The Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 is a pretty fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops. As the second-fastest X Elite chip in September 2024, the X1E-84-100 has 12 Oryon CPU cores running at up to 4.2 GHz, along with the 4.6 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 iGPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller delivering over 100 GB/s of throughput. USB 4.0, TB 4 and PCIe 4 are all onboard, too.

Two slower Snapdragon X Elite flavors exist, known as the X1E-80-100 and X1E-78-100. In the meantime, the X1E-00-1DE is a special version of the X1E-84-100 aimed at system makers and software developers that has just slightly higher single-core and dual-core Boost clock speeds of 4.3 GHz but otherwise the same CPU/GPU/NPU configuration.

Architecture and Features

The Oryon cores (3 clusters of essentially identical cores; 12 threads) are mostly based on Nuvia IP and they reportedly make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 however it does not appear to support eGPUs as of September 2024.

Like most X Elite and X Plus processors, the X1E-84-100 is based on the larger die codenamed Hamoa. The processor is believed to have at least 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU present for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

When all of the 12 cores are under load, they run at up to 3.8 GHz. The 4.2 GHz clock speed is only achievable under single-thread or dual-thread loads.

If the Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 review is any indication, the Snapdragon is almost as fast as the Core Ultra 7 155H in applications compiled for ARM while being up to 30% slower when executing x86 code.

A lot depends on how high the power limits of the system are, and how competent its cooling solution is.

Graphics

The 4.6 TFLOPS X1-85 iGPU has 1,536 unified shaders running at up to 1,500 MHz. It is reportedly (ChipsAndCheese) based on the significantly older Adreno 730 iGPU, rendering the X1-85 DX12-compatible but not DX12 Ultimate-compatible. AVC, HEVC and AV1 video codecs can be both hardware-decoded and hardware-encoded; with VP9, only decoding is possible. The highest monitor resolution supported is UHD 2160p rather than SUHD 4320p.

Its gaming performance is in many use cases almost as good as the Intel Arc 8 for reasonably playable experience in many 2023 and 2024 games such as Baldur's Gate 3 at 1080p on low graphics settings.

Power consumption

An X1E-84-100 can eat up to 80 watts depending on the system and the power profile chosen. This will differ from one laptop to another, with most designs expected to target the ~45 W sweet spot. The Samsung laptop that we finished testing in early September certainly does.

It must be said that the power consumption figures include RAM, unlike it is with most Intel and AMD chips.

The Qualcomm SoC is built with the TSMC N4P process for better-than-average, as of H2 2024, energy efficiency.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X1-26-100

The 8-core Snapdragon X (X1-26-100) is an affordable ARM architecture processor for use in Windows laptops. Unveiled in Jan 2025, this Qualcomm SoC features 8 Oryon CPU cores running at up to 2.98 GHz, along with the 1.7 TFLOPS X1-45 iGPU and the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU. The super-fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller, USB 4.0 support, TB 4 support and PCIe 4 support are all onboard as well.

Architecture and Features

The Oryon cores (2 clusters of essentially identical cores; 8 threads) are mostly based on Nuvia IP and reportedly make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 (with no eGPU support).

The X1-26-100 is based on the smaller die codenamed Purwa, unlike most X Elite and some X Plus processors. It is believed to have at least 8 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5x-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU present for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

The CPU should be about 10% slower than its faster brother named X1P-42 due to the latter's higher CPU clock speeds. Generally speaking, a performance level similar to recent U-class Intel Core 5 chips is to be expected.

Graphics

The X1-45 used here delivers up to 1.7 TFLOPS of performance. Unlike the much faster 3.8 TFLOPS and 4.6 TFLOPS X1-85 iGPUs, this little guy here has much fewer unified shaders and runs at lower clock speeds, too. Games put it a little behind the GeForce MX350; this kind of performance is sufficient for older games and sub-900p resolutions only.

AVC, HEVC and AV1 video codecs can be both hardware-decoded and hardware-encoded whereas with VP9, only decoding is possible. The highest monitor resolution supported is UHD 2160p.

Power consumption

Expect to see anything between 15 W and 30 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and the power profile chosen. The number includes RAM power consumption.

The SoC is built with TSMC's N4P process for decent power efficiency, as of H1 2025.

ModelIntel Core 7 150UQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100
CodenameRaptor Lake-U RefreshOryonOryon
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-UQualcomm Snapdragon XQualcomm Snapdragon X
Series: Snapdragon X Oryon
Intel Core 7 150U « 1.2 - 5.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core 5 120U0.9 - 5 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core 3 100U0.9 - 4.7 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 « 3.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-1003.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 « - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Clock1200 - 5400 MHz3800 - 4200 MHz <=2980 MHz
L1 Cache928 KB2.3 MB2.3 MB
L2 Cache9.5 MB12 MB12 MB
L3 Cache12 MB6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 12
2 x 5.4 GHz Intel Golden Cove P-Core
8 x 4.0 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
12 / 12
12 x 4.2 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
8 / 8
8 x 3.0 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
TDP15 Watt
TDP Turbo PL255 Watt80 Watt
Technology10 nm4 nm4 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1700
FeaturesThread Director
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1300 MHz)Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPSQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
Architecturex86ARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Core 7 150U
37.1 pt (62%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X Elite X1E-84-100
34.6 pt (58%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X1-26-100
28 pt (47%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
108.5 Points (61%)
min: 124     avg: 128.3     median: 128 (72%)     max: 133 Points
96 Points (54%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 432     avg: 470     median: 470 (9%)     max: 508 Points
min: 866     avg: 1007     median: 970 (18%)     max: 1220 Points
min: 646     avg: 672     median: 672 (13%)     max: 698 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 7226     avg: 8722     median: 8883 (8%)     max: 9895 Points
9471 Points (9%)
min: 6897     avg: 7172     median: 7171.5 (7%)     max: 7446 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1698     avg: 1870     median: 1875.5 (79%)     max: 2032 Points
1350 Points (57%)
min: 975     avg: 977     median: 976.5 (41%)     max: 978 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 652     avg: 713     median: 708.5 (77%)     max: 782 Points
511 Points (56%)
min: 359     avg: 362.5     median: 362.5 (39%)     max: 366 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2821     avg: 3378     median: 3449.5 (8%)     max: 3790 Points
3561 Points (9%)
min: 2644     avg: 2743     median: 2743 (7%)     max: 2842 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1040     avg: 1415     median: 1505.5 (10%)     max: 1609 Points
1946 Points (12%)
min: 1338     avg: 1371     median: 1371 (9%)     max: 1404 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 243     avg: 260.3     median: 254 (70%)     max: 290 Points
252 Points (70%)
min: 181.5     avg: 183.8     median: 183.8 (51%)     max: 186 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
19.6 Points (25%)
14.8 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.6 Points (62%)
1.9 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
3234 Points (20%)
2299 Points (14%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
17722 Points (13%)
14395 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
227.3 s (3%)
308.5 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.4 s (1%)
9.5 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
13707 Points (22%)
9297 Points (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 31447     avg: 36682     median: 37996.5 (22%)     max: 39286 MIPS
41410 MIPS (24%)
min: 29312     avg: 29610     median: 29609.5 (17%)     max: 29907 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5407     avg: 5828     median: 5821.5 (69%)     max: 6261 MIPS
5521 MIPS (65%)
min: 4088     avg: 4095     median: 4095 (48%)     max: 4102 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 8.57     avg: 9.7     median: 9.6 (17%)     max: 11.1 fps
6.8 fps (12%)
min: 4.44     avg: 5     median: 5 (9%)     max: 5.52 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 638     avg: 704     median: 674 (9%)     max: 829 Seconds
619 Seconds (8%)
min: 791     avg: 821     median: 821 (10%)     max: 851 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 344     avg: 377.8     median: 358 (3%)     max: 451 Seconds
353 Seconds (2%)
min: 440     avg: 458.5     median: 458.5 (3%)     max: 477 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4386     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.502 sec
0.6 sec (14%)
min: 0.861     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (19%)     max: 0.888 sec
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
14.5 s (3%)
20 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
31.3 s (1%)
43.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
736 s (3%)
995 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
27727 Points (21%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10433     avg: 12470     median: 12807.5 (32%)     max: 13833 Points
13195 Points (32%)
min: 11816     avg: 11947     median: 11946.5 (29%)     max: 12077 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
68313 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 8566     avg: 10655     median: 10681 (27%)     max: 12693 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 14828     avg: 16968     median: 16556 (30%)     max: 19931 Points
15454 Points (28%)
min: 12446     avg: 12499     median: 12498.5 (22%)     max: 12551 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5039     avg: 5443     median: 5290.5 (22%)     max: 6153 Points
4847 Points (20%)
5659 Points (24%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2253     avg: 2586     median: 2655.5 (66%)     max: 2781 Points
min: 2777     avg: 2882     median: 2892 (72%)     max: 2966 Points
min: 2070     avg: 2106     median: 2121 (53%)     max: 2126 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 7737     avg: 8993     median: 9037.5 (35%)     max: 10160 Points
min: 14056     avg: 15136     median: 15412 (60%)     max: 15665 Points
min: 10492     avg: 10553     median: 10550 (41%)     max: 10618 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1631     avg: 1855     median: 1909.5 (75%)     max: 1969 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7178     avg: 7877     median: 7987 (14%)     max: 8354 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 463     avg: 502     median: 495.5 (1%)     max: 554 ms
381.2 ms (0%)
min: 518.4     avg: 520     median: 519.5 (1%)     max: 520.6 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
94348 Points (71%)
min: 65692     avg: 68056     median: 68055.5 (51%)     max: 70419 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 271     avg: 276     median: 276 (76%)     max: 281 Points
334 Points (92%)
min: 248     avg: 248.5     median: 248.5 (68%)     max: 249 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 257     avg: 295     median: 306 (55%)     max: 311 Points
476 Points (85%)
min: 353     avg: 355     median: 355 (64%)     max: 357 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1660     avg: 1756     median: 1734 (65%)     max: 1874 Points
1416 Points (53%)
min: 1093     avg: 1104     median: 1103.5 (41%)     max: 1114 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 40.6     avg: 50.7     median: 49.5 (9%)     max: 63 Watt
59 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45     avg: 59.1     median: 54.7 (10%)     max: 77.6 Watt
50.2 Watt (9%)
min: 41.4     avg: 44.1     median: 44.1 (8%)     max: 46.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.66     avg: 7.9     median: 7.7 (5%)     max: 12.8 Watt
3.9 Watt (3%)
min: 3.25     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (3%)     max: 4.99 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.79     avg: 7.8     median: 6.4 (7%)     max: 11.2 Watt
4.7 Watt (5%)
min: 4.16     avg: 4.4     median: 4.4 (5%)     max: 4.72 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20     avg: 23.3     median: 23.1 (17%)     max: 26.7 Points per Watt
38.8 Points per Watt (29%)
min: 28.6     avg: 31.3     median: 31.3 (23%)     max: 33.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 7 150U → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 → 109% n=23

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 → 83% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 08. 13:23:20

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17176 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15108 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 18623 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751973800s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 07 Jul 2025 05:21:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.01s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17176 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#9 got single benchmarks 17176 +0.009s ... 0.023s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 15108 +0.004s ... 0.027s

#11 got single benchmarks 15108 +0.005s ... 0.033s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 18623 +0.004s ... 0.037s

#13 got single benchmarks 18623 +0.006s ... 0.042s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.042s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.048s ... 0.09s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.09s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)