Qualcomm Adreno 612 vs ARM Mali-G57 MP4 vs Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Qualcomm Adreno 612 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 612 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).
The performance is similar to the old Adreno 512 graphics card and therefore only in the lower mid-range of modern smartphone SoCs.
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).
ARM Mali-G57 MP4 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G57 MP4 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced late 2020 in the MediaTek Dimensity 800 and uses 4 clusters (hence the MC4/MP4 name).
The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones.
The performance of the G57MP4 in our benchmarks is comparable to the Adreno 620 .
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.
Qualcomm Adreno 642L ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 642L is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SoC . The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642L GPU offers a 40% improved performance over the Adreno 620 (compared to the specified +50% of the 642 in the SD 780G), its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.
The Adreno 642L supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.
The Snapdragon 778G and therefore also the 642L is manufactured in the modern 6nm UEV process at TSMC that should provide a good power efficiency.
Qualcomm Adreno 612 ARM Mali-G57 MP4 Qualcomm Adreno 642L Adreno 600 Series Architecture Adreno 600 Bifrost Shared Memory yes no yes API DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan OpenGL ES 3.2 technology 14 nm 7 nm 6 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 Date of Announcement 15.12.2015 03.07.2020 07.05.2021 Codename Valhall Pipelines 4 - unified Link to Manufacturer Page developer.arm.com
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 26320 avg: 28142 median: 26734 (3%) max: 31129 Points
37882 Points (4%)
min: 88482 avg: 89308 median: 89307.5 (10%) max: 90133 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1621 avg: 1897 median: 1737 (8%) max: 2344 Points
min: 4259 avg: 4459 median: 4459 (19%) max: 4659 Points
min: 6398 avg: 6666 median: 6638 (29%) max: 7281 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1571 avg: 1784 median: 1614 (4%) max: 2245 Points
min: 4497 avg: 4609 median: 4609 (10%) max: 4721 Points
min: 7199 avg: 7627 median: 7536 (17%) max: 8605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 1057 avg: 1207 median: 1110 (6%) max: 1499 Points
min: 3410 avg: 3484 median: 3483.5 (17%) max: 3557 Points
min: 5032 avg: 5413 median: 5393.5 (27%) max: 5763 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 851 avg: 1030 median: 955 (3%) max: 1303 Points
min: 3353 avg: 3361 median: 3360.5 (10%) max: 3368 Points
min: 5103 avg: 5654 median: 5612 (17%) max: 6240 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
482 Points (0%)
min: 1620 avg: 1631 median: 1630.5 (1%) max: 1641 Points
min: 2321 avg: 2517 median: 2493.5 (1%) max: 2831 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
143 Points (0%)
min: 681 avg: 696 median: 687.5 (1%) max: 768 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 5.9 avg: 6.2 median: 6.1 (2%) max: 6.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3 avg: 3.6 median: 3.3 (1%) max: 4.8 fps
8.2 fps (1%)
min: 13 avg: 13.6 median: 13.5 (2%) max: 15 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 9 avg: 9.4 median: 9.1 (1%) max: 10 fps
22 fps (2%)
min: 34 avg: 36.4 median: 36 (3%) max: 40 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 8 avg: 8.5 median: 8.2 (1%) max: 9.2 fps
20 fps (2%)
min: 33 avg: 33.7 median: 33 (4%) max: 37 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 14 avg: 15.7 median: 15 (0%) max: 18 fps
min: 30 avg: 33.8 median: 34 (1%) max: 37 fps
min: 56 avg: 57.7 median: 57 (1%) max: 64 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 20 avg: 22 median: 21 (1%) max: 25 fps
min: 47 avg: 51.3 median: 51.5 (3%) max: 55 fps
min: 77 avg: 79.1 median: 78 (5%) max: 89 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 612 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 41 avg: 43 median: 41 (0%) max: 47 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP4
min: 73 avg: 82.3 median: 84 (1%) max: 88 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642L
min: 132 avg: 134.9 median: 133 (1%) max: 148 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
43224 Points (5%)
min: 92378 avg: 101623 median: 105516 (13%) max: 106975 Points
min: 135972 avg: 157798 median: 157454 (20%) max: 175807 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
14.3 fps (0%)
34.2 fps (0%)
min: 45.96 avg: 49.6 median: 46.9 (0%) max: 54.4 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 9815 avg: 16853 median: 16853 (17%) max: 23891 Points
24573 Points (25%)
min: 23666 avg: 31803 median: 30994 (31%) max: 38436 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1491 avg: 8575 median: 8575 (15%) max: 15659 Points
22448 Points (39%)
min: 26134 avg: 36660 median: 40236 (70%) max: 43000 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0 avg: 4.3 median: 4 (2%) max: 9.27 Watt
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 100% n=16 Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP4 → 249% n=16 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 400% n=16
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Adreno 642L:
59 59 ~ 59 fps
Adreno 642L:
51 60 ~ 56 fps
Adreno 642L:
61 [X] Xiaomi 12 Lite 3.4.0.5930
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G 1.8GHz
Adreno 642L
min:
57 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
203%
Mali-G57 MP4:
61 [X] Oppo Reno4 Z 5G 1.56.9
MediaTek Dimensity 800 2GHz
Mali-G57 MP4
min:
60 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 642L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 612:
20 30 ~ 25 fps
120%
Mali-G57 MP4:
30 [X] Oppo Reno4 Z 5G 2.6.3a
MediaTek Dimensity 800 2GHz
Mali-G57 MP4
min:
19 fps, max:
31 fps
fps
120%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 612:
16 30 ~ 23 fps
130%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 642L:
90 [X] Motorola Edge 30 2.36.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G 1.9GHz
Adreno 642L
min:
82 fps, max:
91 fps
fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G57 MP4 → 126% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 203%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 153% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 124%
Qualcomm Adreno 642L low med. high ultra QHD 4K Diablo Immortal 59 56 League of Legends: Wild Rift 61 Armajet 89 PUBG Mobile 58 40 38 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 30 30 Subway Surfers 90 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 1 2 3 1 1
Qualcomm Adreno 612 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 30 PUBG Mobile 40 30 Shadow Fight 3 60 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 25 23 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 2 2
ARM Mali-G57 MP4 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 61 PUBG Mobile 30 30 Asphalt 9: Legends 30 30 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 2 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 13. 21:33:43
#0 checking url part for id 9876 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10599 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 10945 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 May 2024 05:40:51 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.125s ... 0.126s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.127s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.127s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9876 +0.038s ... 0.165s
#9 got single benchmarks 9876 +0.018s ... 0.183s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10599 +0.001s ... 0.185s
#11 got single benchmarks 10599 +0.015s ... 0.199s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10945 +0.002s ... 0.201s
#13 got single benchmarks 10945 +0.049s ... 0.25s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.25s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.126s ... 0.376s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.376s
#17 Got 62 rows for game benchmarks. +0.015s ... 0.391s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.391s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.394s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.019s ... 0.413s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.413s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.415s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)