Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-8559U vs AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

Intel Core i7-8559U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i7-8559U is a quad-core SoC for notebooks based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in April 2018. Compared to its predecessor Core i7-7567U, the CPU is now a quad-core with Hyperthreading support for the execution of up to 8 threads simultaneously. The base frequency is 2.7 GHz, but the Turbo goes all the way up to 4.5 GHz. It is also equipped with an Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 GPU with 128 MB eDRAM, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Compared to faster Core i5 models with eDRAM and 28 Watts, the i5-8559U features 8 MB smart cache and the fastest clock of the Iris Plus GPU.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Clocked at up to 4.5 GHz, the Core i7-8559U is currently the fastest quad core ULV from Intel. Whether these speeds can be maintained in practice depends on the cooling capabilities of the laptop, but the performance should be above the Core i7-8650U due to the increased TDPConsidering the clocks of the Core i7-8559U, its performance should be between the 15W models Core i5-8350U and Core i7-8550U. The i5-8259U should still be faster than the i7-8550U in practice thanks to the increased TDP, especially during sustained workloads.

Graphics

The integrated Intel Iris Plus 655 Graphics is the GT3e model of the Coffee Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9.5). It has 48 Execution Units running at 300-1200 MHz  and the performance is comparable to a GeForce 930M or 940MX thanks to fast eDRAM cache. However, there aren't any significant improvements compared to the old Iris Plus 650, so modern games can often not be played smoothly or only at the lowest or medium settings, respectively.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm++ process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel specifies the TDP with 28 Watts, which can be reduced to 23 Watts (cTDP Down) depending on the usage scenario. The TDP is pretty high compared to the common 15-Watt TDP for quad-core processors, but allows a better utilization of CPU and GPU Turbo.

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 3750H

The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 - 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1400 MHz. Compared to the similar Ryzen 7 3700U, the 3750H offers a 20 Watt higher TDP and therefore a better performance under long periods of load. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements.

Performance

The average 3750H in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-10610U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a fairly good result, as of early 2022.

The ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU is among the fastest laptops built around the 3750H that we know of. It can be about 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 has a default TDP of 35 W (also known as the long-term power limit). Laptop manufacturers are free to change that value to anything between 12 W and 35 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly. These values are comparatively high, making an active cooling solution pretty much a necessity.

Last but not the least, this AMD APU is built with a rather old, as of late 2022, 12 nm process for lower-than-average energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-8559UAMD Ryzen 7 3750H
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenameCoffee Lake-UPicasso (Zen+)
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-U
Intel Core i7-8559U « 2.7 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8557U compare1.7 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8269U compare2.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8279U compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8259U compare2.3 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8257U compare1.4 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8109U compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2700 - 4500 MHz2300 - 4000 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB
L3 Cache8 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 8
TDP28 Watt35 Watt
Technology14 nm12 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1528FP5
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE 4.2DDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (300 - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
Transistors4500 Million

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8559U
32.7 pt (45%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 3750H
27 pt (37%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
3897 Points (4%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
971 Points (41%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
466 Points (52%)
min: 340     avg: 363.8     median: 364.5 (41%)     max: 386 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1691 Points (4%)
min: 1514     avg: 1691     median: 1713 (4%)     max: 1825 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
798 Points (5%)
min: 672     avg: 743     median: 734 (5%)     max: 805 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
188 Points (57%)
min: 135     avg: 143.9     median: 144 (43%)     max: 157 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
7.3 Points (10%)
9.2 Points (12%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (54%)
1.6 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7249 Points (44%)
min: 4527     avg: 4732     median: 4770 (29%)     max: 4898 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
23215 Points (17%)
min: 19290     avg: 20242     median: 20687 (15%)     max: 20750 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
234.6 s (3%)
197.1 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.5 s (1%)
7.4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6656 Points (11%)
2866 Points (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 22033     avg: 26302     median: 26301.5 (15%)     max: 30570 MIPS
min: 17077     avg: 18318     median: 18689 (11%)     max: 19187 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4826     avg: 5499     median: 5498.5 (66%)     max: 6171 MIPS
min: 3511     avg: 3641     median: 3659 (44%)     max: 3752 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
45.6 fps (16%)
48.6 fps (17%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
191.4 fps (44%)
139.4 fps (32%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 5.523     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (10%)     max: 5.9 fps
min: 4.14     avg: 4.3     median: 4.4 (8%)     max: 4.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.8 GB/s (14%)
0.7 GB/s (12%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5 GB/s (13%)
5 GB/s (13%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 650     avg: 666     median: 666 (5%)     max: 682 Seconds
min: 584     avg: 630     median: 633 (4%)     max: 672 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
min: 0.6902     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.723 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
8313 Points (18%)
min: 7187     avg: 7715     median: 7431 (16%)     max: 8812 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.3 s (2%)
11 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.7 s (1%)
25.7 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
464.1 s (2%)
650 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
24670 Points (22%)
25143 Points (22%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
9162 Points (25%)
min: 6360     avg: 7609     median: 7878 (21%)     max: 8648 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
52765 Points (43%)
min: 39182     avg: 48304     median: 48251 (39%)     max: 57479 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 44524     avg: 50874     median: 51438 (42%)     max: 56661 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 55479     avg: 58242     median: 55515 (47%)     max: 63731 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
7377 Points (19%)
min: 5698     avg: 7447     median: 7716 (20%)     max: 8117 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
10418 Points (19%)
min: 10095     avg: 11205     median: 11316 (20%)     max: 11900 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
3625 Points (15%)
min: 2861     avg: 3318     median: 3344 (14%)     max: 3574 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
723 Points (31%)
874 Points (37%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3660 Points (7%)
3537 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1150 Points (5%)
min: 853     avg: 895     median: 884 (4%)     max: 959 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4440 Points (14%)
min: 3007     avg: 3467     median: 3571.5 (11%)     max: 3718 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5372     avg: 5384     median: 5383.5 (54%)     max: 5395 Points
min: 3898     avg: 4104     median: 4166 (42%)     max: 4186 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17702     avg: 18095     median: 18095 (20%)     max: 18488 Points
min: 11396     avg: 12985     median: 13403.5 (15%)     max: 13738 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
16848 Points (26%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4494 Points (67%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14478     avg: 14749     median: 14748.5 (26%)     max: 15019 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3717     avg: 3768     median: 3768 (74%)     max: 3819 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
9111 Points (73%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
10023 Points (91%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
16013 Points (31%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
15397 Points (31%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
13909 Points (36%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1132     avg: 1170     median: 1160 (1%)     max: 1228 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 29949     avg: 30479     median: 30626 (28%)     max: 30714 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
153 Points (32%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 43.3     avg: 106.8     median: 95 (16%)     max: 182 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
74.2 Watt (14%)
min: 40.7     avg: 68.1     median: 66.4 (12%)     max: 97.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
10.8 Points per Watt (8%)
min: 8.29     avg: 12     median: 11 (8%)     max: 16.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8559U → 100% n=37

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 3750H → 90% n=37

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 02:39:42

#0 checking url part for id 10072 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11131 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.021s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10072 +0.019s ... 0.04s

#7 got single benchmarks 10072 +0.012s ... 0.052s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11131 +0.018s ... 0.07s

#9 got single benchmarks 11131 +0.057s ... 0.126s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.126s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.391s ... 0.518s

#12 return log +0.029s ... 0.546s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)