Qualcomm Adreno 618 vs Qualcomm Adreno 690 vs Qualcomm Adreno 650
Qualcomm Adreno 618 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 618 is a mobile graphics card for upper mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 and 730G SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).
In our benchmarks, the Adreno 618 in the Snapdragon 730 was 14 to 30% faster than the Adreno 616 in the Snapdragon 710. The performance in the 730G should be additional 15% faster, due to higher clock rates.
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).
Qualcomm Adreno 690 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 SoC for Windows laptops. According to Qualcomm, the 690 is up to 60% faster than the previous generation. In our tests with the Lenovo ThinkPad X13s, the Adreno 690 was only on par with a low en Intel UHD Graphics iGPU and not well suited for 3D games.
The chip is manufactured in 5nm at Samsung (5LPE) and suited for fanless laptops.
Qualcomm Adreno 650 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 650 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 , 865+ and 870 SoCs. The chip will be available from early 2020 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices. The base clock speed of the GPU is 250 MHz and the boost depends on the used SoC. For the 865 it is 587 MHz, the 865 Plus increased to 846 MHz and the 2021 870 reached 670 MHz.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 650 GPU offers a 25% improved performance over the Adreno 640 , its predecessor, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 855 SoC. The enhanced performance is achieved by the Adreno 650 having 50% more compute units (ALUs) than the Adreno 640. Furthermore, the clock speed of the pixel shaders was also increased by 50%.
The performance in our first benchmarks of a reference system positions itself above the ARM Mali-G76 MP16 and e.g. in 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme even on the top spot. In GFXBench only the Apple A13 GPU is able to best the Adreno 650 (regarding smartphone GPUs).
As a novelty, the GPU driver can be updated in the Android Play Store. Furthermore, some features are running under the Elite Gaming brand (e.g., 144 Hz display support, desktop forward rendering).
The Adreno 650 supports Vulkan 1.1, DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP. Furthermore, games and videos can use HDR10+ and Dolby Vision (with a supported display). The 650 supports 2 displays with up to 4K 60 Hz / QHD+ 144 Hz.
Qualcomm Adreno 618 Qualcomm Adreno 690 Qualcomm Adreno 650 Adreno 600 Series Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600 Shared Memory yes yes yes API DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 12 DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 technology 14 nm 5 nm 7 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 Date of Announcement 09.04.2019 06.12.2018 04.12.2019 Power Consumption 7 Watt Core Speed 250 - 670 (Boost) MHz
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Adreno 690
1.3 pt (4%)
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
129 Points (0%)
909 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
112 Points (0%)
811 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 44009 avg: 51701 median: 52650 (6%) max: 56640 Points
min: 110875 avg: 149779 median: 149017 (17%) max: 180392 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
2900 Points (3%)
min: 8602 avg: 9818 median: 9818 (10%) max: 11034 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
3273 Points (1%)
min: 13768 avg: 16708 median: 16707.5 (4%) max: 19647 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
494 Points (1%)
min: 2758 avg: 2835 median: 2834.5 (5%) max: 2911 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
504 Points (1%)
min: 2837 avg: 2933 median: 2932.5 (3%) max: 3028 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
14652 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3002 avg: 3603 median: 3646 (16%) max: 3939 Points
min: 7970 avg: 9563 median: 9684 (42%) max: 11492 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3101 avg: 3734 median: 3753.5 (8%) max: 4256 Points
min: 11617 avg: 13051 median: 12858 (28%) max: 16809 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2214 avg: 2624 median: 2626 (13%) max: 2938 Points
min: 6960 avg: 8089 median: 8085 (40%) max: 8975 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2085 avg: 2495 median: 2471 (7%) max: 2832 Points
min: 8593 avg: 9728 median: 9498 (28%) max: 11999 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 637 avg: 899 median: 934 (0%) max: 1124 Points
min: 3789 avg: 4168 median: 4230 (2%) max: 5039 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 258 avg: 447 median: 313 (0%) max: 1047 Points
3067 Points (4%)
min: 1103 avg: 1218 median: 1223 (1%) max: 1246 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
1921 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
1849 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 624 avg: 639 median: 645 (1%) max: 648 Points
min: 3063 avg: 3085 median: 3077 (4%) max: 3115 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 572 avg: 590 median: 599 (1%) max: 599 Points
min: 2898 avg: 2930 median: 2912 (3%) max: 2979 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 618 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
288 Points (0%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 690 558 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 13.4 avg: 13.7 median: 13.7 (1%) max: 14 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 9.7 avg: 9.9 median: 10 (4%) max: 10 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 5.4 avg: 7 median: 6.9 (1%) max: 10 fps
min: 18 avg: 21.1 median: 21 (4%) max: 27 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 15 avg: 18.1 median: 18 (1%) max: 21 fps
min: 27 avg: 55 median: 55 (4%) max: 67 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 14 avg: 17.1 median: 17 (2%) max: 19 fps
min: 39 avg: 52.6 median: 51 (6%) max: 62 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 24 avg: 29.8 median: 30 (1%) max: 33 fps
min: 67 avg: 87.2 median: 88 (2%) max: 103 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 34 avg: 40.9 median: 41 (2%) max: 45 fps
min: 96 avg: 125.1 median: 125 (7%) max: 151 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 618 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 67 avg: 83.1 median: 84.5 (1%) max: 91 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 650
min: 168 avg: 209.5 median: 206 (2%) max: 266 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 74888 avg: 89032 median: 90943.5 (11%) max: 95350 Points
min: 214123 avg: 240087 median: 240035 (30%) max: 276746 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 23.89 avg: 26.3 median: 26.3 (0%) max: 28.78 fps
min: 72.6 avg: 75.5 median: 75 (0%) max: 78.57 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
2688 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
2532 Points (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 10269 avg: 16045 median: 10289 (10%) max: 27578 Points
54110 Points (54%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 3043 avg: 9739 median: 3056 (5%) max: 23117 Points
42627 Points (75%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 17 avg: 19.7 median: 19.7 (3%) max: 22.3 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
15.8 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
16.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
3.4 Watt (1%)
min: 5.18 avg: 8.2 median: 7.6 (3%) max: 12.7 Watt
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 618 → 100% n=1 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 690 → 980% n=1 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 650 → 391% n=1
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
79%
Adreno 650:
60 119 [X] Asus ROG Phone 3 2.0.0.3727
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
106 fps, max:
122 fps
~ 90 fps
90%
Adreno 650:
60 [X] Xiaomi Poco F4 3.3.0.5735
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
54 fps, max:
61 fps
117 [X] Asus ROG Phone 3 2.0.0.3727
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
97 fps, max:
121 fps
~ 89 fps
107%
Adreno 650:
60 118 [X] Asus ROG Phone 3 2.0.0.3727
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
111 fps, max:
121 fps
~ 89 fps
105%
Adreno 650:
60 [X] Asus ROG Phone 3 1.0.17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
56 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 650:
60 60 [X] OnePlus 8T 1.0.0_1112729_1135452
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
54 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 60 fps
Adreno 650:
59 60 [X] OnePlus 8T 1.0.0_1112729_1135452
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
50 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] Asus ROG Phone 3 1.1.1_1437351_1398019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
29 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] Xiaomi Poco F3 1.5.0_2574575_2578841
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
37 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 618:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
113%
Adreno 650:
60 60 62 ~ 61 fps
109%
Adreno 650:
60 60 61 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 618:
60 [X] Xiaomi Mi 9T 1.18.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 2.2GHz
Adreno 618
min:
1 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
150%
Adreno 650:
30 [X] OnePlus 8 Pro 2.1.2a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 2.4GHz
Adreno 650
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 60 60 ~ 45 fps
Adreno 650:
60 144 ~ 102 fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 618 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 690 → 343% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 343%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 650 → 125% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 137%
Qualcomm Adreno 690 low med. high ultra QHD 4K F1 22 26 22.5 17 12.6 X-Plane 11.11 14 12 11 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 19 12.3 7.29 Dota 2 Reborn 58 55 44 37 The Witcher 3 25 16 10 4 GTA V 29.9 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 5 1 4 1 4 1 2 1
Qualcomm Adreno 618 low med. high ultra QHD 4K League of Legends: Wild Rift 114 99 83.5 Call of Duty Mobile 60 58 57 Armajet 56 PUBG Mobile 38 40 30 Arena of Valor 54 55 Shadow Fight 3 60 60 Dota 2 Reborn 27.6 19.7 9.6 8.7 Asphalt 8: Airborne 30 Asphalt 9: Legends 30 30 BioShock Infinite 23 17.6 16.9 Diablo III 20.7 20 17.2 12 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 3 3 3 1 3 5 2 2 2 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 25. 15:07:50
#0 checking url part for id 9900 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 11411 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 9971 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 May 2024 05:40:03 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.128s ... 0.129s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.129s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.129s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9900 +0.039s ... 0.168s
#9 got single benchmarks 9900 +0.058s ... 0.226s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11411 +0.016s ... 0.242s
#11 got single benchmarks 11411 +0.01s ... 0.252s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9971 +0.002s ... 0.254s
#13 got single benchmarks 9971 +0.095s ... 0.348s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.348s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.216s ... 0.564s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.564s
#17 Got 278 rows for game benchmarks. +0.057s ... 0.622s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.622s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.012s ... 0.634s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.05s ... 0.684s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.684s
#22 return log +0.003s ... 0.686s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)