Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-14700K vs AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

Intel Core i7-14700K

► remove from comparison Intel i7-14700K

The Intel Core i7-14700K is a desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, which inherits the 13th generation of Intel Core processors with minor improvements. The processor offers a base clock of 2.5 GHz or 3.4 GHz and reaches up to 5.6 GHz in Turbo. The basic CPU structure remains unchanged. The Intel Core i7-14700K features 8 P-cores and 12 E-cores, allowing up to 28 threads to be processed in parallel. The Intel Core i7-14700K still offers a freely selectable multiplier, which makes overclocking much easier. It is also based on the LGA 1700 socket, which was already introduced with Alder Lake.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i7-13700K, the IPC of the new Core i7-14700K has only been increased slightly. This means that the difference in performance is only due to the higher number of efficiency cores (12 vs. 8) and higher clock rates.


Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i7-13700K, the Intel Core i7-14700K also has an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, nothing has changed with the Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i7-14700K is 125 Watts, with the option of consuming up to 253 watts in Turbo mode.

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8845HS

The Ryzen 7 8845HS is a powerful Hawk Point family chip that we believe to be a Ryzen 7 7840HS in disguise but with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The R7 8845HS was brought to life in H2 2023; it features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 5.1 GHz. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say that there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD uncorks its 2nd generation Ryzen AI technology meaning the new processors are expected to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs. Dozens of popular apps such as DaVinci Resolve support this technology, as of late 2023.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8845HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the 8845HS is a 7840HS in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The R7 8845HS is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-14700KAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
CodenameRaptor LakeHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-RAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Intel Core i9-14900K compare3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K « 2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900 compare2 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700 compare1.5 - 5.4 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14600K compare3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500 compare2.6 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500T compare1.7 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 H 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS compare3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock2500 - 5600 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz
L2 Cache28 MB8 MB
L3 Cache33 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads20 / 28
8 x 5.6 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
12 x 4.3 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP125 Watt45 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2253 Watt
Technology10 nm4 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1600 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$409 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache512 KB
Die Size178 mm2
NPU / AI16 TOPS INT8
Chip AI38 TOPS INT8

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-14700K
47.5 pt (79%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8845HS
39.9 pt (66%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 126     avg: 127     median: 127 (71%)     max: 127.9 Points
min: 102     avg: 104.4     median: 103.8 (58%)     max: 107.8 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1559     avg: 1771     median: 1770.5 (33%)     max: 1982 Points
min: 567     avg: 869     median: 902 (17%)     max: 956 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 30989     avg: 33441     median: 33440.5 (31%)     max: 35892 Points
min: 14895     avg: 16165     median: 16192 (15%)     max: 18037 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2153     avg: 2160     median: 2160 (91%)     max: 2167 Points
min: 1623     avg: 1751     median: 1769 (74%)     max: 1783 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 832     avg: 836     median: 836 (91%)     max: 840 Points
min: 673     avg: 686     median: 685 (75%)     max: 698 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 11814     avg: 12743     median: 12743 (31%)     max: 13672 Points
min: 5808     avg: 6317     median: 6346 (15%)     max: 7026 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4611     avg: 5035     median: 5035 (32%)     max: 5459 Points
min: 2342     avg: 2563     median: 2575 (16%)     max: 2908 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 313     avg: 313.5     median: 313.5 (87%)     max: 314 Points
min: 269     avg: 276     median: 276 (76%)     max: 283 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 54.22     avg: 57.8     median: 57.8 (75%)     max: 61.44 Points
min: 29.28     avg: 29.8     median: 29.8 (39%)     max: 30.3 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.7     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (89%)     max: 3.77 Points
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (79%)     max: 3.34 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 11745     avg: 11886     median: 11886 (72%)     max: 12027 Points
min: 7426     avg: 7545     median: 7523 (45%)     max: 7685 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 91081     avg: 91124     median: 91123.5 (66%)     max: 91166 Points
min: 47332     avg: 47532     median: 47500 (34%)     max: 47764 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 124651     avg: 130357     median: 130356 (83%)     max: 136062 Points
min: 85872     avg: 86827     median: 86827 (55%)     max: 87782 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 17400     avg: 17429     median: 17429 (21%)     max: 17458 Points
min: 14163     avg: 14360     median: 14360 (17%)     max: 14557 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 50.891     avg: 80.3     median: 80.3 (1%)     max: 109.801 s
min: 70.718     avg: 113.2     median: 98.9 (1%)     max: 170 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.147     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (0%)     max: 2.252 s
min: 2.703     avg: 3.6     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 5.3 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 12800     avg: 12813     median: 12812.5 (20%)     max: 12825 Points
min: 7275     avg: 11203     median: 7327 (12%)     max: 19008 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 117224     avg: 126436     median: 126436 (73%)     max: 135648 MIPS
min: 62669     avg: 68390     median: 68354 (39%)     max: 74664 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7040     avg: 7196     median: 7195.5 (85%)     max: 7351 MIPS
min: 5197     avg: 6319     median: 6393 (75%)     max: 6714 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 225.5     avg: 243.3     median: 243.3 (6%)     max: 261 fps
min: 143.7     avg: 146.8     median: 146.8 (4%)     max: 149.8 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 393.5     avg: 406.3     median: 406.3 (10%)     max: 419 fps
min: 286.5     avg: 287.8     median: 287.8 (7%)     max: 289 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 32.3     avg: 34.6     median: 34.6 (61%)     max: 36.8 fps
min: 18.6     avg: 20.1     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 22.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 2.2     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (71%)     max: 2.6 GB/s
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 4.4     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (78%)     max: 4.6 GB/s
min: 2     avg: 2     median: 2 (34%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 18     avg: 21.8     median: 21.8 (57%)     max: 25.6 GB/s
min: 14     avg: 14.4     median: 14.4 (38%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 155     avg: 181.5     median: 181.5 (2%)     max: 208 Seconds
min: 288     avg: 326.8     median: 318 (4%)     max: 367 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 91     avg: 100     median: 100 (1%)     max: 109 Seconds
min: 179     avg: 200.9     median: 198 (1%)     max: 216 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3788     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3826 sec
min: 0.4304     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4935 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 11741     avg: 16203     median: 16203 (34%)     max: 20665 Points
min: 15091     avg: 15422     median: 15313 (33%)     max: 15969 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 5.953     avg: 6     median: 6 (1%)     max: 5.98 s
min: 7.1     avg: 7.2     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.331 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 12.844     avg: 12.9     median: 12.9 (1%)     max: 12.894 s
min: 17.6     avg: 17.8     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 18.138 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 305.942     avg: 311     median: 311 (1%)     max: 316.148 s
min: 659.5     avg: 662     median: 662.4 (3%)     max: 665.289 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
96298 Points (74%)
min: 82048     avg: 82541     median: 82586.5 (63%)     max: 82943 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 28739     avg: 30538     median: 30537.5 (75%)     max: 32336 Points
min: 19492     avg: 22379     median: 22207 (55%)     max: 26212 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
82048 Points (67%)
min: 81620     avg: 84501     median: 84429 (69%)     max: 88462 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
81495 Points (66%)
min: 81607     avg: 85179     median: 85402 (69%)     max: 88305 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
85692 Points (69%)
min: 83958     avg: 87188     median: 85870 (69%)     max: 93052 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
23358 Points (59%)
min: 18507     avg: 20158     median: 20268.5 (51%)     max: 22215 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 40312     avg: 44727     median: 44727 (80%)     max: 49142 Points
min: 25099     avg: 27322     median: 27428 (49%)     max: 30715 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 15951     avg: 18746     median: 18746 (79%)     max: 21541 Points
min: 8550     avg: 11247     median: 10853 (46%)     max: 19164 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2902     avg: 2922     median: 2922 (71%)     max: 2942 Points
min: 2510     avg: 2624     median: 2630 (64%)     max: 2698 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 18504     avg: 19147     median: 19147 (74%)     max: 19790 Points
min: 11073     avg: 12854     median: 12998 (50%)     max: 14014 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2523     avg: 2562     median: 2577 (82%)     max: 2587 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12556     avg: 12666     median: 12719 (52%)     max: 12722 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2092     avg: 2107     median: 2106.5 (80%)     max: 2121 Points
min: 1765     avg: 1931     median: 1949 (74%)     max: 2004 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 19971     avg: 21565     median: 21565 (39%)     max: 23159 Points
min: 11256     avg: 11906     median: 11864 (21%)     max: 12726 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2039     avg: 2042     median: 2042 (9%)     max: 2045 Points
min: 1869     avg: 1895     median: 1898 (8%)     max: 1914 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 19766     avg: 21261     median: 21261 (67%)     max: 22756 Points
min: 11742     avg: 12016     median: 12086 (38%)     max: 12109 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8874     avg: 9089     median: 9089 (91%)     max: 9304 Points
min: 8034     avg: 8109     median: 8077.5 (81%)     max: 8245 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 72062     avg: 75782     median: 75781.5 (74%)     max: 79501 Points
min: 47602     avg: 48576     median: 48614.5 (48%)     max: 49473 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 439     avg: 439.5     median: 439.5 (1%)     max: 440 ms
min: 496     avg: 534     median: 527 (1%)     max: 664 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 85632     avg: 90739     median: 90496 (66%)     max: 96330 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 303     avg: 308.5     median: 308.5 (85%)     max: 314 Points
min: 176.4     avg: 255.2     median: 256.5 (70%)     max: 314 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 311     avg: 325     median: 325 (58%)     max: 339 Points
min: 275     avg: 304.2     median: 305 (55%)     max: 334 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2194     avg: 2241     median: 2241 (84%)     max: 2288 Points
min: 1531     avg: 1772     median: 1795.5 (67%)     max: 1939 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 191.9     avg: 296     median: 296 (51%)     max: 400 Watt
min: 42.5     avg: 82.2     median: 81.1 (14%)     max: 147.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 287     avg: 357.5     median: 357.5 (65%)     max: 428 Watt
min: 39     avg: 79.3     median: 78.1 (14%)     max: 145.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 22.4     avg: 63.6     median: 63.6 (42%)     max: 104.8 Watt
min: 3.78     avg: 9     median: 7.1 (5%)     max: 16.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.42     avg: 8.9     median: 7.8 (9%)     max: 16.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 12.8     avg: 14.5     median: 14.5 (11%)     max: 16.1 Points per Watt
min: 20     avg: 35.5     median: 33.7 (25%)     max: 66.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-14700K → 100% n=52

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS → 72% n=52

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 12. 03:32:42

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16391 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16399 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760232761s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 Oct 2025 05:18:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16391 +0.005s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 16391 +0.008s ... 0.019s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 16399 +0.004s ... 0.023s

#10 got single benchmarks 16399 +0.02s ... 0.043s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.059s ... 0.102s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.105s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)