Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 8945H vs Intel Core i5-1235U

AMD Ryzen 9 8945H

► remove from comparison AMD R9 8945H

The Ryzen 9 8945H is a rebadged Ryzen 9 7940HS with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. To be more specific, this is a powerful Hawk Point family laptop chip that has eight Zen 4 cores running at 4.0 GHz to 5.2 GHz. All of its cores are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads.

Compared to the 8945HS, the H seems to be a local variant for China and offers the same specifications.

The Radeon 780M serves as the integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are promised to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop even more powerful.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8945H has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast RAM (up to LPDDR5x-7500 or DDR5-5600; no ECC support). The processor is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt; PCIe support is limited to the 4.0 spec for a throughput of 1.97 GB/s per lane. 20 lanes are available.

OS support is limited to 64-bit editions of Windows 11 and Windows 10 and of course to Linux. Note that the chip isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The 8945H is an R9 7940HS in disguise, so it's realistic to expect the chip to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-12900HK and also the Ryzen 7 7840HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) running at up to 2,800 MHz. This is a very fast iGPU, as of late 2023. It will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p, and it is also capable of HW-encoding and HW-decoding the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1. More importantly, it is fast enough for proper 1080p gaming as long as one is fine with low to medium detail settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 8945H is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-1235U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1235U

The Intel Core i5-1235U is a mid-range mobile CPU for thin and light laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 2 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 12 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 1.3 to 4.4 GHz on the performance cluster and 0.9 to 3.3 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 12 MB L3 cache. Compared to the i5-1245U, the 1235U offers lower base clock speeds and only "Essentials" vPro management features. Compared to the P-series (28W) or H-series (45W), the 15W TDP may limit the sustained performance.

Performance

The average 1235U in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U and also, surprisingly enough, the i7-1250U and the i7-1260U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very respectable result, as of mid 2023.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 27 W, the Beelink SEi12 is among the fastest systems built around the 1235U that we know of. It can be twice as fast in CPU-bound workloads as the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Architecture

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 80 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.2 GHz.

Power consumption

This ULV processor has a Base power consumption of 15 W (also known as the long-term power limit), with 55 W being its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption. Both values are too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

Core i5-1235U is manufactured on Intel's fourth-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for decent, as of mid-2022, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 8945HIntel Core i5-1235U
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Alder Lake-U
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)Intel Alder Lake-M
Series: Alder Lake-M Alder Lake-U
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS compare3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1265U compare1.3 - 4.8 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1255U compare1.2 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1245U compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1235U « 0.9 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260U compare0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1250U compare0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240U compare0.8 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1230U compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1215U compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 8505 compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1210U compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 8500 compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7305 compare0.9 - 1.1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7300 compare0.7 - 1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Clock4000 - 5200 MHz900 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB928 KB
L2 Cache8 MB9.5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
10 / 12
TDP45 Watt15 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8BGA1744
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro Ess., MMX SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 8945H
40.5 pt (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1235U
33.5 pt (56%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
103.3 Points (58%)
93 Points (52%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
960 Points (18%)
406 Points (8%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 17423     avg: 17604     median: 17604 (16%)     max: 17785 Points
min: 2485     avg: 6365     median: 6623 (6%)     max: 9208 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1812     avg: 1813     median: 1813 (76%)     max: 1814 Points
min: 1444     avg: 1587     median: 1597 (67%)     max: 1698 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 638     avg: 654     median: 654 (71%)     max: 670 Points
min: 566     avg: 613     median: 617 (67%)     max: 651 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6859     avg: 6908     median: 6907.5 (17%)     max: 6956 Points
min: 1783     avg: 2709     median: 2801 (7%)     max: 3537 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2605     avg: 2734     median: 2777 (18%)     max: 2819 Points
min: 785     avg: 1125     median: 1093.5 (7%)     max: 1587 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 283     avg: 283.5     median: 283.5 (79%)     max: 284 Points
min: 151.5     avg: 213.2     median: 217.5 (61%)     max: 242.3 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
64 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7339 Points (12%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 72851     avg: 73037     median: 73036.5 (42%)     max: 73222 MIPS
min: 20166     avg: 30566     median: 30361.5 (17%)     max: 38643 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6615     avg: 6640     median: 6639.5 (78%)     max: 6664 MIPS
min: 4371     avg: 5000     median: 5137.5 (61%)     max: 5233 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
158.9 fps (53%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
284.5 fps (66%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 21.9     avg: 22.2     median: 22.2 (39%)     max: 22.4 fps
min: 4.99     avg: 7.8     median: 8.6 (15%)     max: 9.43 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
15.7 GB/s (41%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 286     avg: 289.5     median: 289.5 (4%)     max: 293 Seconds
min: 707     avg: 955     median: 872 (11%)     max: 1374 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 178     avg: 180     median: 180 (1%)     max: 182 Seconds
min: 366     avg: 491     median: 470 (3%)     max: 662 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4298     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4346 sec
min: 0.4986     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.603 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15945 Points (34%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
621 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 20449     avg: 22111     median: 22111 (54%)     max: 23773 Points
min: 7465     avg: 11105     median: 10290 (25%)     max: 15604 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
67708 Points (55%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 6543     avg: 9959     median: 10446 (26%)     max: 12476 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 27032     avg: 27721     median: 27721 (49%)     max: 28410 Points
min: 9965     avg: 15291     median: 15301.5 (27%)     max: 19386 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 11800     avg: 11812     median: 11811.5 (50%)     max: 11823 Points
min: 3133     avg: 5151     median: 5180.5 (22%)     max: 7083 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2692     avg: 2702     median: 2701.5 (67%)     max: 2711 Points
min: 1981     avg: 2095     median: 2094.5 (52%)     max: 2208 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 12638     avg: 12650     median: 12650 (49%)     max: 12662 Points
min: 6703     avg: 6875     median: 6874.5 (27%)     max: 7046 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 1688     avg: 1897     median: 1897 (60%)     max: 2106 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 5677     avg: 6161     median: 6160.5 (25%)     max: 6644 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1991     avg: 1993     median: 1993 (78%)     max: 1995 Points
min: 1426     avg: 1553     median: 1591.5 (62%)     max: 1643 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11949     avg: 11989     median: 11988.5 (21%)     max: 12028 Points
min: 5528     avg: 6774     median: 6084.5 (11%)     max: 8571 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1927 Points (8%)
min: 1402     avg: 1539     median: 1592 (7%)     max: 1602 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11903 Points (38%)
min: 5450     avg: 7106     median: 7643 (24%)     max: 8558 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
505 ms (1%)
min: 485.6     avg: 571     median: 585 (1%)     max: 634 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
99.6 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
96399 Points (73%)
min: 78578     avg: 80181     median: 79131 (60%)     max: 83104 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
263 Points (72%)
min: 206     avg: 224     median: 226 (62%)     max: 236 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
308 Points (55%)
min: 233     avg: 262.6     median: 251 (45%)     max: 305 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 9253     avg: 10006     median: 10006 (4%)     max: 10759 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 11508     avg: 11533     median: 11533 (42%)     max: 11558 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1800 Points (67%)
min: 983     avg: 1383     median: 1430.5 (53%)     max: 1644 Points
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
min: 162     avg: 169.5     median: 169.5 (94%)     max: 177 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
107.5 Watt (19%)
min: 27.8     avg: 43.5     median: 39.8 (7%)     max: 63.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 28.9     avg: 46.9     median: 44.9 (8%)     max: 69.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
19.8 Watt (13%)
min: 5.22     avg: 7.9     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 16.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
11.7 Watt (13%)
min: 3.41     avg: 5.4     median: 5.6 (6%)     max: 7.17 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20.3     avg: 25.3     median: 25.4 (19%)     max: 29 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 8945H → 100% n=28

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1235U → 64% n=28

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 28. 21:24:00

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17942 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14078 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751138640s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 28 Jun 2025 05:20:10 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17942 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 17942 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14078 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#10 got single benchmarks 14078 +0.02s ... 0.04s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.04s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.039s ... 0.079s

#13 return log +0.005s ... 0.084s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)