Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 2700U vs Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6

AMD Ryzen 7 2700U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 2700U

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700U is a mobile SoC that was announced in October 2017. It combines four Zen cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.2 - 3.8 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1300 MHz. The TDP can be configured by the laptop manufacturer between 12 to 25 Watt (15 Watt nominal) and therefore the APU is also suited for thin and light laptops. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

The performance of the Zen CPU cores should be better than a high end Kaby-Lake-Refresh Quad-Core CPU (e.g. the Core i7-8650U) according to AMD. Therefore, the Ryzen 7 2700U is suited for all applications.

Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6

► remove from comparison Intel E3-1535M v6

The Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 is a fast quad-core processor for workstation notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. It is the top model of the mobile Kaby-Lake-H series at the time of the announcement. Besides four cores including Hyper-Threading support running at 3.1 - 4.2 GHz (4 cores up to 3.9 GHz, 2 cores up to 4.1 GHz), the processor is also equipped with the professional HD Graphics P630 GPU as well as a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2400). It is manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

The performance is a bit higher compared to the fastest Kaby Lake consumer CPU, the Intel Core i7-7920HQ, thanks to slightly higher Turbo clocks (100 - 200 MHz), so it is the fastest mobile consumer processor in the beginning of 2017. The performance is sufficient even for very demanding tasks and on par with powerful desktop quad-core processors.

Graphics

The integrated professional Intel HD Graphics P630 has 24 Execution Units (similar to previous HD Graphics 530) running at 350 - 1100 MHz. The performance depends a lot on the memory configuration; it should be comparable to a dedicated Nvidia GeForce 920M in combination with fast DDR4-2133 dual-channel memory. It offers certified drivers for 15 professional and CAD applications.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors, which were announced in January, should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel still specifies the TDP with 45 Watts, but it can also be reduced to 35 Watts by the notebook manufacturers (cTDP down). This will obviously affect the performance, because the Turbo Boost cannot be maintained for longer periods.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 2700UIntel Xeon E3-1535M v6
CodenameZenKaby Lake
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)Intel Kaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G compare3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U « 2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G compare3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H compare3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 « 3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock2200 - 3800 MHz3100 - 4200 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB256 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 8
TDP15 Watt45 Watt
Transistors4500 Million
Technology14 nm14 nm
SocketAM4
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, SIPP, vPro, TXT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1300 MHz)Intel HD Graphics P630 (300 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
max. Temp.100 °C
$623 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 2700U
25 pt (42%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
3603 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
886 Points (36%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 347     avg: 361.3     median: 356 (39%)     max: 381 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1392     avg: 1439     median: 1422 (3%)     max: 1504 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 546     avg: 640     median: 644 (4%)     max: 719 Points
min: 675     avg: 784     median: 806 (5%)     max: 848 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 134     avg: 141.9     median: 143.5 (40%)     max: 150 Points
min: 171     avg: 175.3     median: 175.5 (49%)     max: 179 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5.88     avg: 7     median: 7.5 (10%)     max: 7.66 Points
7.5 Points (10%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.58     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (39%)     max: 1.71 Points
1.9 Points (46%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4379     avg: 4474     median: 4515 (27%)     max: 4527 Points
6426 Points (39%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 9812     avg: 13528     median: 13729 (10%)     max: 17043 Points
20729 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
28617 Points (18%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8325 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 268.1     avg: 269.1     median: 269.1 (3%)     max: 270.1 s
341.4 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 8.3     avg: 8.6     median: 8.6 (2%)     max: 8.8 s
10.6 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4363 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
17317 MIPS (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3592 MIPS (42%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
36.4 fps (1%)
39.8 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
128 fps (3%)
169.3 fps (4%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
4 fps (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.8 GB/s (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.7 GB/s (12%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
713 Seconds (5%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.8 sec (18%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 5366     avg: 5838     median: 6072 (13%)     max: 6076 Points
min: 7635     avg: 8228     median: 8227.5 (18%)     max: 8820 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.8 s (3%)
8.9 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
27.3 s (1%)
20 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
698 s (3%)
496.9 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 19828     avg: 20243     median: 20242.5 (16%)     max: 20657 Points
min: 25309     avg: 32892     median: 32892 (25%)     max: 40475 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3205     avg: 5438     median: 5445 (13%)     max: 6952 Points
min: 7754     avg: 9618     median: 10501 (26%)     max: 10599 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 33097     avg: 33808     median: 33808 (27%)     max: 34519 Points
min: 43269     avg: 51632     median: 55248 (45%)     max: 56380 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
33326 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 27944     avg: 29171     median: 28356.5 (23%)     max: 32027 Points
58534 Points (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 4058     avg: 5240     median: 5232 (13%)     max: 7076 Points
min: 5705     avg: 8092     median: 8823.5 (22%)     max: 9016 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 6059     avg: 8060     median: 7851 (14%)     max: 9911 Points
min: 9389     avg: 11581     median: 12217.5 (22%)     max: 12500 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2750     avg: 2868     median: 2868 (12%)     max: 2986 Points
min: 3208     avg: 4249     median: 4534.5 (19%)     max: 4719 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
813 Points (27%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
2969 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3357     avg: 3487     median: 3495 (35%)     max: 3610 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5034     avg: 7595     median: 8582 (8%)     max: 9169 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3331 Points (37%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8210 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10423     avg: 11434     median: 11433.5 (20%)     max: 12444 Points
13561 Points (24%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3136     avg: 3249     median: 3248.5 (42%)     max: 3361 Points
3695 Points (48%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
14022 Points (22%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3878 Points (58%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1193     avg: 1408     median: 1361 (2%)     max: 1686 ms
min: 862     avg: 870     median: 871 (1%)     max: 878 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
217.4 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 20231     avg: 25163     median: 26482 (17%)     max: 27727 Points
min: 41579     avg: 42725     median: 42224 (28%)     max: 44371 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
142 Points (25%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 61.2     avg: 73     median: 73 (13%)     max: 84.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 63.3     avg: 70.6     median: 70.6 (13%)     max: 77.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 10.3     avg: 10.5     median: 10.5 (8%)     max: 10.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 2700U → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 → 138% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 29. 02:52:07

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9314 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8423 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1761702727s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 Oct 2025 05:18:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9314 +0.002s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 9314 +0.005s ... 0.011s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8423 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#10 got single benchmarks 8423 +0.007s ... 0.019s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.028s ... 0.047s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.048s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)