, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA Quadro M5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M620

NVIDIA Quadro M5500

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5500

The Nvidia Quadro M5500 is a high-end, DirectX 12 (FL_12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM204 chip with all 2048 shader cores activated and is manufactured in 28 nm at TSMC. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 (Notebook). Compared to the slower and less power hungry Quadro M5000M, the M5500 offers 512 more shaders which should result in 30-40% more performance according to Nvidia.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.2) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M5000M can be used for general calculations.

The power consumption of the Quadro M5000M is rated at the same TGP of 150 Watt. Therefore, the card is suited for very large notebooks with 17-inch displays or greater.

The first laptop with the M5500 in it is the MSI WT72 Workstation.

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

The NVIDIA Quadro 5000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture. Therefore, the 5000M likely shares many similarities  to the GeForce GTX 480M which offers more CUDA cores. The Quadro is the first mobile GPU that offers ECC RAM and double-precision floating point cores.

The Quadro series also offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications. 

The shader/CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11 or OpenGL 4.1 for graphics rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 5000M should offer higher performance in general purpose calculations compared to its predecessors.

Furthermore, the Quadro 5000M is compatible with Nvidia 3D Vision Pro for stereoscopic viewing.

Similar to the GeForce GTX 480M, the Quadro 5000M is specified at 100 Watt TDP and is therefore usually reserved for large laptops with ample cooling, such as the Clevo D901F.

At the time of arrival (mid 2010), the Quadro 5000M was the fastest professional workstation graphics card for laptops and is the successor to the old G92b-based GeForce FX 3800M. Compared to desktop Quadro cards, the mobile Quadro 5000M offers less shader cores and likely a lower core clock rate as well.

NVIDIA Quadro M620

► remove from comparison

The 28nm NVIDIA Quadro M620 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a 1st generation Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM107 architecture with 512 of the 640 shader cores activated. Therefore, the GPU is not similar to any current consumer card. The Geforce GTX 950M, for example, uses the full 640 shader cores. The older Quadro M1000M offers very similar specs (same amount of shader cores and also based on the same chip but more graphics memory), but was intended for the Skylake generation. The M620 is intended for the Kaby Lake generation.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Performance

Due to the smaller amount of memory, the Quadro M620 should be slightly slower than the older Quadro M1000M. However, the exact clock speeds are not known up to now. In early benchmarks we have, the M1000M is about 9 % faster than the M620 in SPECviewperf 12.

Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2, the cores of the Quadro M620 can be used for general calculations.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M620 is rated for a 30 Watt TGP including the board and memory components (21.2 Watt TDP), which is 10 Watt lower than the M1000M (which offers more memory). Therefore, the card is suited for 15-inch notebooks and greater.

NVIDIA Quadro M5500NVIDIA Quadro 5000MNVIDIA Quadro M620
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
ArchitectureMaxwellFermiMaxwell
Pipelines2048 - unified320 - unified512 - unified
Core Speed1139 - 1140 (Boost) MHz405 MHz1018 MHz
Memory Speed6606 MHz1200 MHz5012 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit256 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory8192 MB2048 MB2048 MB
Shared Memorynonono
DirectXDirectX 12_1DirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0
Transistors5200 Million3000 Million
technology28 nm40 nm28 nm
FeaturesCUDA, 3D Vision, PhysX, GeForce Experience, Surround, GameStream, GPU Boost 2.0, Adaptive Vertical Sync, G-SYNC, SLIOpenGL 4.1, DirectX 11, DirectCompute, OpenCL, CUDA, AXE, Error-Correction-Codes (ECC)-Memory, IEEE-Double-Precision-Floating-Point, PowerMizer 9.0Optimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelargelargelarge
Date of Announcement04.04.2016 27.07.2010 13.01.2017
CodenameFermi
Shader Speed810 MHz
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product-qua...http://www.nvidia.de/object/mobile-works...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M620
15.7 pt (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
968 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
862 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 11481     avg: 13620     median: 13620 (18%)     max: 15759 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 20980     avg: 22120     median: 22119.5 (11%)     max: 23259 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2694     avg: 2914     median: 2989 (8%)     max: 3059 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2867     avg: 3067     median: 3130 (6%)     max: 3204 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
163099 Points (22%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
14413 Points (34%)
min: 4015     avg: 4118     median: 4140 (10%)     max: 4200 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 3676     avg: 3761     median: 3801 (6%)     max: 3805 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 7700     avg: 7767     median: 7766.5 (8%)     max: 7833 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M620
17237 Points (17%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
7015 Points (6%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M620
15307 Points (14%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
41650 Points (22%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
18903 Points (28%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
3DMark 06
12967 Points (24%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
24751 Points (46%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
3DMark 06
13127 Points (24%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 15.6     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (8%)     max: 17.4 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
56.6 fps (11%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 28.13     avg: 28.6     median: 28.6 (20%)     max: 29 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
37.9 fps (27%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 25.96     avg: 26.4     median: 26.4 (44%)     max: 26.82 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
40.4 fps (68%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 29.99     avg: 30.1     median: 30.1 (36%)     max: 30.2 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
50.1 fps (61%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 6.4     avg: 6.6     median: 6.6 (27%)     max: 6.71 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
20.2 fps (84%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 43.9     avg: 44.6     median: 44.6 (34%)     max: 45.2 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
55.4 fps (42%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 31.9     avg: 33.3     median: 33.3 (36%)     max: 34.7 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
54.9 fps (59%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 28.6     avg: 29     median: 29 (14%)     max: 29.3 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
32.6 fps (16%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 25.1     avg: 26.9     median: 26.9 (33%)     max: 28.7 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
51.5 fps (63%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
144 fps (63%)
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 55.3     avg: 57.6     median: 56.3 (24%)     max: 62.5 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
120 fps (43%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 25.96     avg: 27.5     median: 27.8 (10%)     max: 28.2 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
60.3 fps (25%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 15.8     avg: 18.8     median: 20.2 (8%)     max: 20.3 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
53.8 fps (33%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 10.34     avg: 10.9     median: 10.9 (7%)     max: 11.6 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
95 fps (41%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 22.94     avg: 24.9     median: 25.2 (11%)     max: 26.5 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
12.2 fps (32%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 0.22     avg: 0.5     median: 0.6 (2%)     max: 0.67 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
110 fps (63%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 33.8     avg: 34.5     median: 34.4 (20%)     max: 35.26 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
137 fps (47%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 29.42     avg: 31.7     median: 32.1 (11%)     max: 33.32 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 17.3     avg: 24.9     median: 24.9 (8%)     max: 32.47 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
59.6 fps (27%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
46.8 fps (9%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
16.2 fps (7%)
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
5.2 fps (3%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
39.7 fps (8%)
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
0.6 fps (1%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
35.6 fps (10%)
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
40.7 fps (9%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
16.6 fps (5%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6851 (32%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
32.7 fps (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620
72.4 fps (31%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M5500
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
107 fps (30%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620
min: 82.74     avg: 95.3     median: 95.3 (27%)     max: 107.84 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
232 fps (2%)
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
60 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
134 fps (15%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
60 fps (16%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
65.2 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
58.6 fps (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 482     avg: 658     median: 658 (7%)     max: 834 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 718     avg: 1079     median: 1079 (3%)     max: 1440 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2530 (5%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
45.2 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
48.8 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
58.8 Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M5500 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 5000M → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M620 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
Quadro M620:
127.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
44.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
31.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M620:
15.7  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M620:
70.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
18.7  fps
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
Quadro M620:
59.2 60.4 ~ 60 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
25.2 46.3 ~ 36 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
18.7 25.2 ~ 22 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
13.9 19.5 ~ 17 fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
55.1 62.2 ~ 59 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
31.1 36.6 ~ 34 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
17.8 20.4 ~ 19 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
14.4  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M620:
4.9  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
110.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
64.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
28.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
24.4  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
53.9  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
32.8  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
18.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
10 fps  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
249  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
118.5  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
62.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
28.2  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
190.5  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
139.6  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M620:
114.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
17.8  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
51.7  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
44.4  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M620:
27.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
11.7  fps
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
Quadro M620:
192.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
147.4  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M620:
126  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
39.1  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M620:
176.4  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M620:
105.6  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M620:
92.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M620:
35.6  fps

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.16
log 24. 14:17:19

#0 checking url part for id 7282 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1939 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7708 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:22:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.009s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7282 +0.041s ... 0.05s

#9 got single benchmarks 7282 +0.005s ... 0.055s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 1939 +0s ... 0.056s

#11 got single benchmarks 1939 +0.006s ... 0.061s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 7708 +0.005s ... 0.066s

#13 got single benchmarks 7708 +0.01s ... 0.077s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.077s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.027s ... 0.104s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.104s

#17 Got 50 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.112s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.112s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.113s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.009s ... 0.121s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.121s

#22 return log +0.001s ... 0.122s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)