Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 256V vs AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

Intel Core Ultra 7 256V

► remove from comparison Intel Core Ultra 7 256V

The Intel Core Ultra 5 256V is an upper mid-range Lunar Lake family processor. This is an SoC for use in tablets and laptops of the slimmer kind that was unveiled in Autumn 2024. It sports 4 new Skymont E-cores and 4 new Lion Cove P-cores running at up to 3.7 GHz and 4.8 GHz respectively, along with the new Arc 140V iGPU and 16 GB of on-package LPDDR5x-8533 RAM. A new 47 TOPS neural engine, Thunderbolt 4 and PCIe 5 SSD support are included as well.

The only difference between this chip and the Ultra 7 258V is the amount of on-package, non-replaceable RAM: 16 GB vs 32 GB respectively.

Architecture and Features

Lunar Lake is built using the Foveros technology (stacking several dies on top of each other and next to each other), just like Meteor Lake was. The new chips make use of the enormous BGA2833 socket interface. Of the 8 cores, not a single one is Hyper-Threading-enabled which is the opposite of what AMD currently does with its Zen 5/5c chips.

Intel claims Lion Cove cores bring a 14% IPC improvement over Redwood Cove. For Skymont and Crestmont, the difference is much higher at 68%. Several tweaks and improvements are present here, such as the Low Latency Fabric that is supposed to make small data transfers between cores/caches a lot faster. The 256V has a very healthy 12 MB of level 3 cache; elsewhere, it has 4 PCIe 5 and 4 PCIe 4 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices, including NVMe SSDs at up to 15.75 GB/s. Thunderbolt 4 support is onboard by default, as is support for CNVi WiFi 7 + BT 5.4 cards from Intel. The 47 TOPS "AI Boost" neural engine is present along with technologies such as Threat Detection to make AI-enabled applications such as the Windows Defender more powerful.

Intel is predicted to get short of on-package RAM in subsequent CPU generations.

Performance

Based on the time we've had with 2 systems powered by the 256V, the chip's multi-thread performance is as good as that of the Core Ultra 7 165U and the Core i7-1360P. Please note that both systems had a higher long-term TDP power target than the Intel-recommended value: 30 W and 32 W vs 17 W.

Generally speaking, the 288V, 268V, 266V, 258V, 256V are faster than the 238V, 236V, 228V and 226V due to the difference in their last-level cache size (8 MB vs 12 MB) as well as clock speeds. However, the difference in performance between the slowest Lunar Lake chip, the 226V, and the fastest chip, the 288V is fairly small at around 10% to 15%. It depends on the TDP figures of the laptops being pitted against each other more than on anything else.

Graphics

The Arc Graphics 140V is here to replace the Arc 8 iGPU. Its 8 Xe² architecture "cores" run at up to 1,950 MHz and it also has 8 ray tracing units at its disposal. The adapter is DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled and able to HW-decode a long list of popular video codecs such as h.266 VVC, h.265 HEVC, h.264 AVC, AV1 and VP9. Three SUHD 4320p monitors can be used simultaneously with this iGPU.

All 2023 and 2024 games are playable at 1080p on low graphics settings or higher with this iGPU. We got well over 30 fps in Ghost of Tsushima and almost 40 fps in Baldur's Gate 3. This means the Radeon 780M gets left behind while the Radeon 890M reigns supreme.

Power consumption

This 2nd generation Core Ultra processor is supposed to consume 17 W when under long-term workloads. The Intel-recommended short-term power limit for the chip sits at 37 W.

AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 is a powerful mobile processor from the Krackan Point family that was announced at CES in early 2025. The APU integrates 8 CPU cores (4x Zen 5 with up to 5 GHz and 4x Zen 5c with less cache and a maximum of 3.5 GHz) and a big 16 MB L3-Cache.

Architecture and features

The Krackan Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores located in separate clusters, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is the size of the cache; the Zen 5 cores have larger caches available.

However, the mobile Zen 5 implementation is reportedly (ChipsAndCheese) is closer to desktop Zen 4 than desktop Zen 5 due to the different cache sizes, large differences in AVX-512 throughput, and other factors.

Elsewhere, the Ryzen AI 7 chip supports DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, giving system designers a choice between lower latency and higher throughput. The chip is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU, which is much more complex than the first generation XDNA, delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

As usual with laptop CPUs, the Ryzen 7 AI chip cannot be replaced by the user as it is soldered.

Performance

Thanks to the Zen 5 architecture and the high clock rates, the CPU performance should be very good.

Graphics

The Radeon 860M is the direct successor to the Radeon 760M and offers 8 cores (CUs = 512 shaders) and clocks at up to 3 GHz. It uses the new RDNA 3.5 architecture.

Power consumption

The AI 350 is said to have a base TDP of 28 W, although laptop manufacturers are free to set the TDP between 15 and 54 W.

The 4 nm TSMC process with which these CPUs are manufactured ensures above-average energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 7 256VAMD Ryzen AI 7 350
CodenameLunar LakeKrackan Point (Zen 5)
SeriesIntel Lunar Lake
Series: Lunar Lake Lunar Lake
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 266V compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V compare2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V « 2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V compare2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V compare2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V compare2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V compare2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2200 - 4800 MHz2000 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache1.4 MB
L2 Cache14 MB8 MB
L3 Cache12 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 8
4 x 4.8 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-Core
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Skymont E-Core
8 / 16
4 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 5
4 x 3.5 GHz AMD Zen 5c
TDP17 Watt28 Watt
TDP Turbo PL237 Watt54 Watt
Technology3 nm4 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA2833FP8
FeaturesLPDDR5x-8533 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, USB 4, AI Boost NPU (47 TOPS), Thread Director, PSE, Threat Detection, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNi, FMA3, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUIntel Arc Graphics 140V (300 - 1950 MHz)AMD Radeon 860M ( - 3000 MHz)
NPU / AI47 TOPS INT850 TOPS INT8
Chip AI115 TOPS INT866 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Core Ultra 7 256V
38.2 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 7 350
41 pt (68%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 117.4     avg: 119.1     median: 119.1 (60%)     max: 120.9 Points
min: 113.5     avg: 115.8     median: 115.5 (58%)     max: 119 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 435     avg: 547     median: 557.5 (10%)     max: 630 Points
min: 720     avg: 892     median: 905 (17%)     max: 1011 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 8589     avg: 10065     median: 10391 (10%)     max: 10768 Points
min: 12647     avg: 15721     median: 15971.5 (15%)     max: 17899 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1799     avg: 1859     median: 1875 (76%)     max: 1902 Points
min: 1916     avg: 1960     median: 1954 (79%)     max: 2006 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 700     avg: 717     median: 721 (79%)     max: 730 Points
min: 751     avg: 768     median: 769 (84%)     max: 784 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3822     avg: 4006     median: 4026.5 (10%)     max: 4162 Points
min: 4897     avg: 6114     median: 6245.5 (15%)     max: 6990 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1500     avg: 1567     median: 1570 (10%)     max: 1627 Points
min: 1932     avg: 2438     median: 2477 (16%)     max: 2734 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 275     avg: 282.4     median: 285 (79%)     max: 290 Points
min: 204     avg: 280.1     median: 296 (82%)     max: 305 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 28.96     avg: 29.9     median: 29.9 (39%)     max: 30.75 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.59     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (85%)     max: 3.6 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8478     avg: 8482     median: 8482 (51%)     max: 8486 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 48792     avg: 49866     median: 49865.5 (36%)     max: 50939 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
89153 Points (57%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15483 Points (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 68.229     avg: 171     median: 171 (2%)     max: 273.713 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.069     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (1%)     max: 5.935 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6.46     avg: 3177     median: 3176.7 (5%)     max: 6347 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 33926     avg: 35427     median: 35742.5 (21%)     max: 36072 MIPS
min: 48124     avg: 57016     median: 58647 (34%)     max: 64653 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5528     avg: 5650     median: 5665 (67%)     max: 5749 MIPS
min: 5544     avg: 6012     median: 6033.5 (71%)     max: 6371 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
155.1 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
319 fps (8%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 11.9     avg: 12.8     median: 12.9 (23%)     max: 13.5 fps
min: 14     avg: 19.9     median: 20.6 (36%)     max: 22.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (31%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.8     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (32%)     max: 1.9 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 9.1     avg: 9.8     median: 9.8 (26%)     max: 10.5 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 533     avg: 577     median: 582.5 (7%)     max: 616 Seconds
min: 281     avg: 333.6     median: 322 (4%)     max: 427 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 324     avg: 344.5     median: 338 (2%)     max: 373 Seconds
min: 182     avg: 221.5     median: 200 (1%)     max: 386 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.439     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4645 sec
min: 0.403     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4934 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14510     avg: 15492     median: 15605 (33%)     max: 16362 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.541     avg: 8.7     median: 8.7 (2%)     max: 8.947 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 18.179     avg: 31.9     median: 31.9 (1%)     max: 45.607 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
8.7 s (0%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 72985     avg: 76362     median: 77404 (59%)     max: 78696 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 14943     avg: 15205     median: 15217.5 (37%)     max: 15389 Points
min: 13154     avg: 19303     median: 19672 (48%)     max: 21820 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 74698     avg: 77067     median: 77668.5 (63%)     max: 78233 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 77917     avg: 78292     median: 78291.5 (64%)     max: 78666 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 72599     avg: 75260     median: 75259.5 (60%)     max: 77920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13840     avg: 14107     median: 13988 (35%)     max: 14493 Points
min: 13958     avg: 17897     median: 18291 (46%)     max: 20125 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 14488     avg: 19749     median: 21097 (38%)     max: 22257 Points
min: 20603     avg: 27063     median: 28243 (50%)     max: 30008 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4853     avg: 6417     median: 6502 (27%)     max: 7490 Points
min: 7361     avg: 9857     median: 10149 (43%)     max: 11005 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2680     avg: 2746     median: 2748 (64%)     max: 2784 Points
min: 1874     avg: 2737     median: 2854 (66%)     max: 2942 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 9852     avg: 10801     median: 10952 (43%)     max: 11085 Points
min: 10774     avg: 12985     median: 13083 (51%)     max: 14194 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1972     avg: 1997     median: 2000 (67%)     max: 2013 Points
min: 805     avg: 1873     median: 2065.5 (69%)     max: 2155 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9302     avg: 9537     median: 9591 (17%)     max: 9715 Points
min: 6705     avg: 11162     median: 11344 (20%)     max: 12968 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1247     avg: 1736     median: 1970 (9%)     max: 1992 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10194     avg: 11057     median: 11207 (35%)     max: 11769 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5708     avg: 7251     median: 7765 (78%)     max: 8281 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 41544     avg: 42707     median: 41591 (41%)     max: 44985 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 470     avg: 473.3     median: 472.5 (1%)     max: 480 ms
min: 431     avg: 499.6     median: 437 (1%)     max: 702 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 105563     avg: 114061     median: 115427 (76%)     max: 119825 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 281.6     avg: 284.3     median: 284.5 (74%)     max: 286 Points
min: 193.1     avg: 250.6     median: 253.5 (66%)     max: 277 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 243     avg: 295.2     median: 304.5 (55%)     max: 310 Points
min: 256     avg: 297.6     median: 304 (55%)     max: 336 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1636     avg: 1685     median: 1681 (63%)     max: 1736 Points
min: 1406     avg: 1741     median: 1757 (66%)     max: 2005 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.1     avg: 44.3     median: 43 (7%)     max: 53.6 Watt
min: 32.9     avg: 75     median: 70.3 (12%)     max: 112.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 48.3     avg: 51.9     median: 51.2 (9%)     max: 57.1 Watt
min: 30     avg: 74.3     median: 67.5 (12%)     max: 115.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 1.596     avg: 3.4     median: 3.6 (2%)     max: 4.42 Watt
min: 3.7     avg: 10.5     median: 6 (4%)     max: 56.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 1.954     avg: 4.7     median: 5.3 (4%)     max: 5.91 Watt
min: 4.21     avg: 7.1     median: 6.9 (5%)     max: 12.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 30.6     avg: 30.8     median: 30.8 (23%)     max: 31.1 Points per Watt
min: 21     avg: 36.4     median: 35.9 (27%)     max: 67.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 256V → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 → 128% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 27. 00:00:54

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17996 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19172 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1766790054s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Dec 2025 05:19:44 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.01s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17996 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#8 got single benchmarks 17996 +0.017s ... 0.031s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 19172 +0.005s ... 0.037s

#10 got single benchmarks 19172 +0.031s ... 0.067s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.067s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.049s ... 0.116s

#13 return log +0.007s ... 0.123s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)