Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron J4115 vs Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Celeron N4100

Intel Celeron J4115

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J4115

The Intel Celeron J4115 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive mini PCs and was announced late 2017. It runs at 1.8 GHz to 2.5 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessors, the chip is manufactured on a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, all in a smaller package. Partial Wi-Fi 5 support is baked into the chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The processor is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture ist still called Goldmont Plus. Compared to the older Goldmont cores in Apollo Lake, they feature a larger L2 cache (now 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not anywhere near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average J4115 in our database only just matches the Core i5-4260U, a somewhat more power-hungry SoC that saw the light of day in 2014, in multi-thread performance. This means the Celeron is a very basic CPU that isn't really ready to handle anything beyond the most basic tasks such as writing e-mails and listening to Spotify.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 750 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 (8-bit color-depth).

Power consumption

Like most other J-class Intel processors, the Celeron has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 10 W. This is low enough to allow laptop makers to build passively cooled laptops, mini-PCs, tablets and other gadgetry around the chip.

The Intel Celeron J4115 is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Celeron J4025

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J4025

The Intel Celeron J4025 is an energy-efficient, dual-core processor (SoC) of the Gemini Lake Refresh product family; as such, it is designed for use in mini-PCs of the most affordable flavor. The Celeron was launched in Q4 2019. Its CPU cores run at 2 GHz to 2.9 GHz (single core boost). Other key specs include a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (up to 2,400 MHz and up to 8 GB, with independent reports claiming as much as 32 GB will work just fine) and the integrated UHD Graphics 600 graphics adapter.

Architecture

Just like Apollo Lake family products, the ever-popular N3350 included, Celeron J4025 is manufactured by Intel on a 14 nm process. What makes these newer Celerons different are the slightly improved processor cores with double the L2 cache and also, somewhat counterintuitively, their smaller chip area.

The Goldmont Plus microarchitecture is familiar to us from Gemini Lake processors like the N4000. A moderately large 4 MB L2 cache features prominently on the rather short list of Goldmont Plus' strong sides, allowing for a marginal increase in performance-per-MHz figures compared to Goldmont. Still, Gemini Lake Refresh processors are a clear step-down from the Core i3/i5/i7/i9 series processors, both in performance and in features.

J4025 has six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes at its disposal. While very few J4025-based SBCs, nettops and laptops feature an NVMe M.2 slot, you can use an NVMe SSD as a boot drive with this processor (read/write rates will be limited to 2 GB/s though). Furthermore, partial Wi-Fi 5 support is built into the CPU. The Celeron also supports up to eight USB 3.0 ports and two SATA III storage devices.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. They solder it straight on to the motherboard for good (FCBGA1090 socket interface).

Performance

The Celeron J4025 is positioned in the lower entry level and only slightly faster than the mobile Celeron N4020. Therefore, it is best suited for basic tasks like word processing and web browsing with just two or three tabs open.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, much like HD Graphics 520 or UHD Graphics 615 or so many other widespread Intel iGPUs.

Just like HD Graphics 500, the UHD Graphics 600 supports DX 12 and has 12 EUs clocked at up to 650 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 iGPU that certain 10th Gen Ice Lake processors have packs 64 EUs, for reference. As a low-end solution, UHD Graphics 600 will let you play some seriously old titles, but that's about it.

Perhaps more importantly, this graphics solution will let you run up to 3 monitors with resolutions as high as 4096x2160@60. Furthermore, it will have no trouble HW-decoding AVC, HEVC and VP9 videos. The newer AV1 codec will be decoded via software, with the limited CPU horsepower imposing a hard limit on the video resolution that can be played back without stuttering. 1080p60 YouTube videos are out of reach while 720p25 videos run fine, to give you an example.

Power Consumption

As a J-series CPU, the TDP is rated at 10 Watts and therefore 4 W higher than the mobile N4020. 

Intel Celeron N4100

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4100

The Intel Celeron N4100 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced late 2017. It runs at 1.1-2.4 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi Core Burst max 2.3 GHz) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured on a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is permanently soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. It features an increased Level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N4100 in our database directly competes with AMD's 3020e and 3050e, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. The Intel Core m3-8100Y and the Celeron 6305 are close nearby as well. Routinely described as "entry-level" in 2019 and 2020, the Celeron N4100 is a slow processor that is good for the most basic tasks only such as Web browsing with no more than two or three tabs open at a time.

The LapBook Pro is among the fastest systems built around the N4100 that we know of. It can be around 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 700 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

Celeron N4100 has a default TDP of 6 W (also known as PL1), making it a great option for passively cooled setups.

The fairly old 14 nm process this Celeron is built with makes for so-so, as of mid-2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Celeron J4115Intel Celeron J4025Intel Celeron N4100
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Gemini LakeIntel Gemini Lake
CodenameGemini LakeGemini Lake RefreshGemini Lake
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake
Intel Celeron J41051.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50001.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40052 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J4115 « 1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41001.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N40001.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Silver J50402 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50301.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J41252 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41201.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4025 « 2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N40201.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J41051.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50001.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40052 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J41151.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4100 « 1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N40001.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1800 - 2500 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz1100 - 2400 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 24 / 4
TDP10 Watt10 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1090FCBGA1090BGA1090
FeaturesDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXIntel UHD Graphics 600 (12 EUs, 250 - 700 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR4/LPDDR4-2400DDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
$107 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron J4115
17.2 pt (24%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron J4025
16.9 pt (23%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4100
16.3 pt (23%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
857 Points (1%)
min: 955     avg: 961     median: 960.5 (1%)     max: 966 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
461 Points (20%)
min: 382     avg: 386.5     median: 386.5 (16%)     max: 391 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 156     avg: 156.5     median: 156.5 (17%)     max: 157 Points
178 Points (20%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 503     avg: 547     median: 546.5 (1%)     max: 590 Points
293 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 225     avg: 244     median: 244 (2%)     max: 263 Points
148 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 70.1     avg: 70.6     median: 70.6 (21%)     max: 71.1 Points
77 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3.2 Points (4%)
1.8 Points (2%)
min: 2.13     avg: 2.4     median: 2.2 (3%)     max: 2.9 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.8 Points (21%)
1 Points (24%)
min: 0.8     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (21%)     max: 0.83 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2087 Points (13%)
2337 Points (14%)
min: 1664     avg: 1951     median: 2013 (12%)     max: 2049 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
7426 Points (5%)
4556 Points (3%)
min: 4915     avg: 5999     median: 5904 (4%)     max: 7123 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
7049 Points (5%)
10929 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3920 Points (5%)
3337 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
564 s (7%)
983 s (12%)
min: 591     avg: 724     median: 790 (9%)     max: 790 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
19.1 s (4%)
31.1 s (6%)
min: 18.97     avg: 20.3     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 22.5 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1203 Points (2%)
783 Points (1%)
min: 1093     avg: 1148     median: 1139 (2%)     max: 1212 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 7129     avg: 7614     median: 7613.5 (4%)     max: 8098 MIPS
4955 MIPS (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2184     avg: 2200     median: 2199.5 (26%)     max: 2215 MIPS
2636 MIPS (32%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
17.5 fps (6%)
10.6 fps (4%)
min: 11.8     avg: 13.3     median: 11.8 (4%)     max: 16.3 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
76.3 fps (18%)
53.1 fps (12%)
min: 57.7     avg: 64.5     median: 58.2 (13%)     max: 77.7 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.34     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (2%)     max: 1.49 fps
1 fps (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.156     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.162 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (4%)
0.1 GB/s (3%)
min: 0.222     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (4%)     max: 0.236 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.7 GB/s (4%)
1 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
7396 Seconds (94%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 2380     avg: 2515     median: 2515 (18%)     max: 2650 Seconds
3792 Seconds (27%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.7 sec (37%)
1.4 sec (31%)
min: 1.75     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (38%)     max: 1.786 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3683 Points (8%)
2575 Points (5%)
min: 2748     avg: 2985     median: 2805 (6%)     max: 3580 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
27.4 s (6%)
23.1 s (5%)
min: 27.42     avg: 28.3     median: 28.5 (6%)     max: 28.94 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
63.3 s (3%)
51.9 s (2%)
min: 61.9     avg: 63.1     median: 62.6 (3%)     max: 64.8 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1472 s (7%)
1176 s (5%)
min: 1381     avg: 1462     median: 1474 (7%)     max: 1532 s
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2688     avg: 2793     median: 2792.5 (8%)     max: 2897 Points
4284 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
27642 Points (22%)
41689 Points (34%)
min: 12964     avg: 20919     median: 19160 (16%)     max: 31380 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 26282     avg: 28448     median: 28448 (23%)     max: 30614 Points
41654 Points (34%)
min: 12613     avg: 20195     median: 19086 (15%)     max: 29271 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
46730 Points (39%)
min: 19890     avg: 24471     median: 23934 (20%)     max: 32203 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2318     avg: 2482     median: 2481.5 (6%)     max: 2645 Points
3720 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3560     avg: 3758     median: 3758 (7%)     max: 3956 Points
5474 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1063 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 388     avg: 399     median: 399 (17%)     max: 410 Points
500 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1410     avg: 1421     median: 1420.5 (3%)     max: 1431 Points
927 Points (2%)
min: 1082     avg: 1267     median: 1271 (2%)     max: 1419 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
497 Points (2%)
min: 377     avg: 400.5     median: 408 (2%)     max: 409 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
919 Points (3%)
min: 1078     avg: 1238     median: 1232 (4%)     max: 1409 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2170 Points (22%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3847 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1813     avg: 1825     median: 1825 (25%)     max: 1837 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5056     avg: 5123     median: 5122.5 (12%)     max: 5189 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4998     avg: 5042     median: 5041.5 (9%)     max: 5085 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1623     avg: 1629     median: 1629 (32%)     max: 1635 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5490 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1762 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2457     avg: 2482     median: 2482 (3%)     max: 2507 ms
2151 ms (3%)
min: 2561     avg: 3127     median: 3214 (4%)     max: 3865 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
233 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 10309     avg: 11163     median: 11328 (10%)     max: 11852 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
67.1 Points (19%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 80.1     avg: 81.7     median: 81.7 (17%)     max: 83.2 Points
89.2 Points (19%)
min: 71.4     avg: 77     median: 75.2 (16%)     max: 84 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
7616 Points (50%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
362 Points (14%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
14.1 Watt (2%)
min: 6.4     avg: 11.3     median: 11.3 (2%)     max: 16.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.2 Watt (2%)
6.7 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
21.6 Points per Watt (16%)
24 Points per Watt (18%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4115 → 100% n=34

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4025 → 95% n=34

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4100 → 88% n=34

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 02. 12:25:05

#0 checking url part for id 12643 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14663 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9424 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 May 2024 05:34:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.043s ... 0.044s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.044s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12643 +0.015s ... 0.059s

#8 got single benchmarks 12643 +0.009s ... 0.068s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14663 +0.011s ... 0.079s

#10 got single benchmarks 14663 +0.008s ... 0.087s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9424 +0.011s ... 0.099s

#12 got single benchmarks 9424 +0.032s ... 0.13s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.13s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.399s ... 0.529s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.529s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)