Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron J4115 vs Intel Celeron J4025

Intel Celeron J4115

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J4115

The Intel Celeron J4115 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive mini PCs and was announced late 2017. It runs at 1.8 GHz to 2.5 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessors, the chip is manufactured on a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, all in a smaller package. Partial Wi-Fi 5 support is baked into the chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The processor is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture ist still called Goldmont Plus. Compared to the older Goldmont cores in Apollo Lake, they feature a larger L2 cache (now 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not anywhere near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average J4115 in our database only just matches the Core i5-4260U, a somewhat more power-hungry SoC that saw the light of day in 2014, in multi-thread performance. This means the Celeron is a very basic CPU that isn't really ready to handle anything beyond the most basic tasks such as writing e-mails and listening to Spotify.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 750 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 (8-bit color-depth).

Power consumption

Like most other J-class Intel processors, the Celeron has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 10 W. This is low enough to allow laptop makers to build passively cooled laptops, mini-PCs, tablets and other gadgetry around the chip.

The Intel Celeron J4115 is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Celeron J4025

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J4025

The Intel Celeron J4025 is an energy-efficient, dual-core processor (SoC) of the Gemini Lake Refresh product family; as such, it is designed for use in mini-PCs of the most affordable flavor. The Celeron was launched in Q4 2019. Its CPU cores run at 2 GHz to 2.9 GHz (single core boost). Other key specs include a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (up to 2,400 MHz and up to 8 GB, with independent reports claiming as much as 32 GB will work just fine) and the integrated UHD Graphics 600 graphics adapter.

Architecture

Just like Apollo Lake family products, the ever-popular N3350 included, Celeron J4025 is manufactured by Intel on a 14 nm process. What makes these newer Celerons different are the slightly improved processor cores with double the L2 cache and also, somewhat counterintuitively, their smaller chip area.

The Goldmont Plus microarchitecture is familiar to us from Gemini Lake processors like the N4000. A moderately large 4 MB L2 cache features prominently on the rather short list of Goldmont Plus' strong sides, allowing for a marginal increase in performance-per-MHz figures compared to Goldmont. Still, Gemini Lake Refresh processors are a clear step-down from the Core i3/i5/i7/i9 series processors, both in performance and in features.

J4025 has six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes at its disposal. While very few J4025-based SBCs, nettops and laptops feature an NVMe M.2 slot, you can use an NVMe SSD as a boot drive with this processor (read/write rates will be limited to 2 GB/s though). Furthermore, partial Wi-Fi 5 support is built into the CPU. The Celeron also supports up to eight USB 3.0 ports and two SATA III storage devices.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. They solder it straight on to the motherboard for good (FCBGA1090 socket interface).

Performance

The Celeron J4025 is positioned in the lower entry level and only slightly faster than the mobile Celeron N4020. Therefore, it is best suited for basic tasks like word processing and web browsing with just two or three tabs open.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, much like HD Graphics 520 or UHD Graphics 615 or so many other widespread Intel iGPUs.

Just like HD Graphics 500, the UHD Graphics 600 supports DX 12 and has 12 EUs clocked at up to 650 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 iGPU that certain 10th Gen Ice Lake processors have packs 64 EUs, for reference. As a low-end solution, UHD Graphics 600 will let you play some seriously old titles, but that's about it.

Perhaps more importantly, this graphics solution will let you run up to 3 monitors with resolutions as high as 4096x2160@60. Furthermore, it will have no trouble HW-decoding AVC, HEVC and VP9 videos. The newer AV1 codec will be decoded via software, with the limited CPU horsepower imposing a hard limit on the video resolution that can be played back without stuttering. 1080p60 YouTube videos are out of reach while 720p25 videos run fine, to give you an example.

Power Consumption

As a J-series CPU, the TDP is rated at 10 Watts and therefore 4 W higher than the mobile N4020. 

ModelIntel Celeron J4115Intel Celeron J4025
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Gemini Lake
CodenameGemini LakeGemini Lake Refresh
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake Refresh
Intel Celeron J4105 compare1.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 compare1.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4005 compare2 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J4115 « 1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4100 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4000 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 compare2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 compare1.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4125 compare2 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4120 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4025 « 2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N4020 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1800 - 2500 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 2
TDP10 Watt10 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1090FCBGA1090
FeaturesDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXIntel UHD Graphics 600 (12 EUs, 250 - 700 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR4/LPDDR4-2400
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron J4115
17.2 pt (24%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron J4025
16.9 pt (23%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
857 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
461 Points (20%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 156     avg: 156.5     median: 156.5 (17%)     max: 157 Points
178 Points (20%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 503     avg: 547     median: 546.5 (1%)     max: 590 Points
293 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 225     avg: 244     median: 244 (2%)     max: 263 Points
148 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 70.1     avg: 70.6     median: 70.6 (21%)     max: 71.1 Points
77 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3.2 Points (4%)
1.8 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.8 Points (21%)
1 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2087 Points (13%)
2337 Points (14%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
7426 Points (5%)
4556 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
7049 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3920 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
564 s (7%)
983 s (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
19.1 s (4%)
31.1 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1203 Points (2%)
783 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 7129     avg: 7614     median: 7613.5 (4%)     max: 8098 MIPS
4955 MIPS (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2184     avg: 2200     median: 2199.5 (26%)     max: 2215 MIPS
2636 MIPS (32%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
17.5 fps (6%)
10.6 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
76.3 fps (18%)
53.1 fps (12%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.34     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (2%)     max: 1.49 fps
1 fps (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (4%)
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.7 GB/s (4%)
1 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
7396 Seconds (94%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 2380     avg: 2515     median: 2515 (18%)     max: 2650 Seconds
3792 Seconds (27%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.7 sec (37%)
1.4 sec (31%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3683 Points (8%)
2575 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
27.4 s (6%)
23.1 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
63.3 s (3%)
51.9 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1472 s (7%)
1176 s (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2688     avg: 2793     median: 2792.5 (8%)     max: 2897 Points
4284 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
27642 Points (22%)
41689 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 26282     avg: 28448     median: 28448 (23%)     max: 30614 Points
41654 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
46730 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2318     avg: 2482     median: 2481.5 (6%)     max: 2645 Points
3720 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3560     avg: 3758     median: 3758 (7%)     max: 3956 Points
5474 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1063 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 388     avg: 399     median: 399 (17%)     max: 410 Points
500 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1410     avg: 1421     median: 1420.5 (3%)     max: 1431 Points
927 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
497 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
919 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2170 Points (22%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3847 Points (4%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2457     avg: 2482     median: 2482 (3%)     max: 2507 ms
2151 ms (3%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
67.1 Points (19%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 80.1     avg: 81.7     median: 81.7 (17%)     max: 83.2 Points
89.2 Points (19%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
362 Points (14%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
14.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.2 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
21.6 Points per Watt (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4115 → 100% n=34

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4025 → 95% n=34

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 09:37:45

#0 checking url part for id 12643 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14663 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.036s ... 0.037s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.037s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12643 +0.02s ... 0.057s

#7 got single benchmarks 12643 +0.014s ... 0.071s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14663 +0.015s ... 0.086s

#9 got single benchmarks 14663 +0.011s ... 0.097s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.097s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.413s ... 0.511s

#12 return log +0.038s ... 0.549s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)