Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Pentium Silver J5040 vs Intel Celeron N4100

Intel Celeron J4005

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron J4005 is a dual-core desktop SoC primarily for mini PCs and mini ITX mainboards. It runs at 2 - 2.7 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is permanently soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. It features an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not anywhere near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average J4005 in our database is in the same league as the Celeron N3450 and the Celeron 3865U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is an abysmally poor result, as of early 2023.

Power consumption

This Celeron series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 10 W. That's not much at all and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops and mini-PCs.

The J4005 is built with one of Intel's old 14 nm processes for poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Pentium Silver J5040

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium J5040

The Intel Pentium Silver J5040 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive mini-PCs and was announced late 2019. It runs at 2 GHz (base) to 3.2 GHz (single core burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform (refresh). Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a better GPU architecture and a partly integrated WiFi support. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture is still called Goldmont Plus. Compared to the older Goldmont cores in Apollo Lake, they feature an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

Thanks to the higher clock speed and TDP, the Pentium J5040 is slightly faster than the mobile counterpart, the Pentium Silver N5030. Compare to AMD, it ranks on average slightly higher compared to the Athlon Silver 3050e (Zen based Dual-Core) that wins in single-core tests but looses out in multi-threaded tests. Intel Core i3 from 2019 (like the i3-1005G1) are clearly faster and win even in multi-threaded tests easily although being only dual-core CPUs.

GPU Performance

The UHD Graphics 605 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 18 EUs and a clock of up to 800 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 5300 and HD Graphics 505 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

The J-variant of the Gemini Lake SoCs are specified at 10W TDP and therefore higher than the mobile N variants (6 Watt).

Intel Celeron N4100

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4100

The Intel Celeron N4100 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced late 2017. It runs at 1.1-2.4 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi Core Burst max 2.3 GHz) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured on a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is permanently soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. It features an increased Level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N4100 in our database directly competes with AMD's 3020e and 3050e, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. The Intel Core m3-8100Y and the Celeron 6305 are close nearby as well. Routinely described as "entry-level" in 2019 and 2020, the Celeron N4100 is a slow processor that is good for the most basic tasks only such as Web browsing with no more than two or three tabs open at a time.

The LapBook Pro is among the fastest systems built around the N4100 that we know of. It can be around 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 700 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

Celeron N4100 has a default TDP of 6 W (also known as PL1), making it a great option for passively cooled setups.

The fairly old 14 nm process this Celeron is built with makes for so-so, as of mid-2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Celeron J4005Intel Pentium Silver J5040Intel Celeron N4100
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Gemini LakeIntel Gemini Lake
CodenameGemini LakeGemini Lake RefreshGemini Lake
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake
Intel Celeron J41051.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50001.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4005 « 2 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J41151.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41001.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N40001.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 « 2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50301.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J41252 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41201.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40252 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N40201.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J41051.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50001.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40052 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J41151.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4100 « 1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N40001.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 - 2700 MHz2000 - 3200 MHz1100 - 2400 MHz
L1 Cache112 KB
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 44 / 4
TDP10 Watt10 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1090FCBGA1090BGA1090
FeaturesDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXIntel UHD Graphics 605 (18 EUs, 200 - 750 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR4/LPDDR4-2400DDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 605 (250 - 800 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4100
16.3 pt (23%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
1634 Points (2%)
min: 955     avg: 961     median: 960.5 (1%)     max: 966 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
519 Points (22%)
min: 382     avg: 386.5     median: 386.5 (16%)     max: 391 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
202 Points (22%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
630 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
144 Points (1%)
279 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
77 Points (23%)
91 Points (27%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.4 Points (2%)
3.5 Points (5%)
min: 2.13     avg: 2.4     median: 2.2 (3%)     max: 2.9 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.9 Points (21%)
1.1 Points (27%)
min: 0.8     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (21%)     max: 0.83 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2085 Points (13%)
2688 Points (16%)
min: 1664     avg: 1951     median: 2013 (12%)     max: 2049 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3500 Points (3%)
8279 Points (6%)
min: 4915     avg: 5999     median: 5904 (4%)     max: 7123 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
4741 Points (3%)
13248 Points (9%)
10929 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3365 Points (4%)
4422 Points (5%)
3337 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1042 s (12%)
516 s (6%)
min: 591     avg: 724     median: 790 (9%)     max: 790 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
33.1 s (7%)
15.3 s (3%)
min: 18.97     avg: 20.3     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 22.5 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
798 Points (1%)
1391 Points (2%)
min: 1093     avg: 1148     median: 1139 (2%)     max: 1212 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
8946 MIPS (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2833 MIPS (34%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
10 fps (3%)
19.2 fps (7%)
min: 11.8     avg: 13.3     median: 11.8 (4%)     max: 16.3 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
49.9 fps (12%)
89.1 fps (21%)
min: 57.7     avg: 64.5     median: 58.2 (13%)     max: 77.7 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.9 fps (2%)
1.7 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.156     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.162 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
0.3 GB/s (5%)
min: 0.222     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (4%)     max: 0.236 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1 GB/s (3%)
2 GB/s (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
4124 Seconds (29%)
2060 Seconds (15%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.3 sec (29%)
min: 1.75     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (38%)     max: 1.786 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
4296 Points (9%)
min: 2748     avg: 2985     median: 2805 (6%)     max: 3580 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
16.3 s (4%)
21.3 s (5%)
min: 27.42     avg: 28.3     median: 28.5 (6%)     max: 28.94 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
35.9 s (2%)
47.8 s (2%)
min: 61.9     avg: 63.1     median: 62.6 (3%)     max: 64.8 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1245 s (6%)
1083 s (5%)
min: 1381     avg: 1462     median: 1474 (7%)     max: 1532 s
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1877 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
18895 Points (15%)
min: 12964     avg: 20919     median: 19160 (16%)     max: 31380 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
18968 Points (15%)
min: 12613     avg: 20195     median: 19086 (15%)     max: 29271 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
19351 Points (16%)
min: 19890     avg: 24471     median: 23934 (20%)     max: 32203 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1577 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
2241 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 611     avg: 711     median: 706 (3%)     max: 841 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
538 Points (23%)
min: 378     avg: 403.3     median: 405 (17%)     max: 414 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1672 Points (3%)
min: 1082     avg: 1267     median: 1271 (2%)     max: 1419 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
535 Points (2%)
min: 377     avg: 400.5     median: 408 (2%)     max: 409 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1664 Points (5%)
min: 1078     avg: 1238     median: 1232 (4%)     max: 1409 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1997 Points (20%)
2333 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3491 Points (4%)
6359 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1813     avg: 1825     median: 1825 (25%)     max: 1837 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5056     avg: 5123     median: 5122.5 (12%)     max: 5189 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4998     avg: 5042     median: 5041.5 (9%)     max: 5085 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1623     avg: 1629     median: 1629 (32%)     max: 1635 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5490 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1762 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1957 ms (2%)
min: 2561     avg: 3127     median: 3214 (4%)     max: 3865 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
233 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 10309     avg: 11163     median: 11328 (10%)     max: 11852 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
80.2 Points (23%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
108.2 Points (23%)
min: 71.4     avg: 77     median: 75.2 (16%)     max: 84 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
7616 Points (50%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
426 Points (16%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 6.4     avg: 11.3     median: 11.3 (2%)     max: 16.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
6.7 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
24 Points per Watt (18%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4005 → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver J5040 → 164% n=23

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4100 → 129% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 29. 03:12:08

#0 checking url part for id 10044 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14651 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9424 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 May 2024 05:33:54 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.049s ... 0.051s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.051s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10044 +0.003s ... 0.054s

#8 got single benchmarks 10044 +0.012s ... 0.066s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14651 +0.003s ... 0.069s

#10 got single benchmarks 14651 +0.009s ... 0.078s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9424 +0.019s ... 0.097s

#12 got single benchmarks 9424 +0.045s ... 0.142s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.142s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.479s ... 0.621s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.621s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)