Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron J4005 vs Intel Pentium Silver J5040

Intel Celeron J4005

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron J4005 is a dual-core desktop SoC primarily for mini PCs and mini ITX mainboards. It runs at 2 - 2.7 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is permanently soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. It features an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not anywhere near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average J4005 in our database is in the same league as the Celeron N3450 and the Celeron 3865U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is an abysmally poor result, as of early 2023.

Power consumption

This Celeron series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 10 W. That's not much at all and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops and mini-PCs.

The J4005 is built with one of Intel's old 14 nm processes for poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Pentium Silver J5040

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium J5040

The Intel Pentium Silver J5040 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive mini-PCs and was announced late 2019. It runs at 2 GHz (base) to 3.2 GHz (single core burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform (refresh). Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a better GPU architecture and a partly integrated WiFi support. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture is still called Goldmont Plus. Compared to the older Goldmont cores in Apollo Lake, they feature an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

Thanks to the higher clock speed and TDP, the Pentium J5040 is slightly faster than the mobile counterpart, the Pentium Silver N5030. Compare to AMD, it ranks on average slightly higher compared to the Athlon Silver 3050e (Zen based Dual-Core) that wins in single-core tests but looses out in multi-threaded tests. Intel Core i3 from 2019 (like the i3-1005G1) are clearly faster and win even in multi-threaded tests easily although being only dual-core CPUs.

GPU Performance

The UHD Graphics 605 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 18 EUs and a clock of up to 800 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 5300 and HD Graphics 505 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

The J-variant of the Gemini Lake SoCs are specified at 10W TDP and therefore higher than the mobile N variants (6 Watt).

ModelIntel Celeron J4005Intel Pentium Silver J5040
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Gemini Lake
CodenameGemini LakeGemini Lake Refresh
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake Refresh
Intel Celeron J4105 compare1.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 compare1.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4005 « 2 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J4115 compare1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4100 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4000 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 « 2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 compare1.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4125 compare2 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4120 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4025 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N4020 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 - 2700 MHz2000 - 3200 MHz
L1 Cache112 KB
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
TDP10 Watt10 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1090FCBGA1090
FeaturesDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXIntel UHD Graphics 605 (18 EUs, 200 - 750 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR4/LPDDR4-2400
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 605 (250 - 800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
1634 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
519 Points (22%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
202 Points (22%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
630 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
144 Points (1%)
279 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
77 Points (23%)
91 Points (27%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.4 Points (2%)
3.5 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.9 Points (21%)
1.1 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2085 Points (13%)
2688 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3500 Points (3%)
8279 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
4741 Points (3%)
13248 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3365 Points (4%)
4422 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1042 s (12%)
516 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
33.1 s (7%)
15.3 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
798 Points (1%)
1391 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
8946 MIPS (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2833 MIPS (34%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
10 fps (3%)
19.2 fps (7%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
49.9 fps (12%)
89.1 fps (21%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.9 fps (2%)
1.7 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
0.3 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1 GB/s (3%)
2 GB/s (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
4124 Seconds (29%)
2060 Seconds (15%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.3 sec (29%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
4296 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
16.3 s (4%)
21.3 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
35.9 s (2%)
47.8 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1245 s (6%)
1083 s (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1877 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
18895 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
18968 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
19351 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1577 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
2241 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
538 Points (23%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1672 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
535 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1664 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1997 Points (20%)
2333 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3491 Points (4%)
6359 Points (7%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1957 ms (2%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
80.2 Points (23%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
108.2 Points (23%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
426 Points (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4005 → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver J5040 → 164% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 14. 13:52:16

#0 checking url part for id 10044 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14651 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 May 2024 05:39:12 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.031s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10044 +0.003s ... 0.034s

#7 got single benchmarks 10044 +0.009s ... 0.042s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14651 +0.003s ... 0.045s

#9 got single benchmarks 14651 +0.007s ... 0.052s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.052s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.234s ... 0.286s

#12 return log +0.036s ... 0.322s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)