Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-11900K vs Intel Core i9-13950HX

Intel Core i9-11900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-11900K

The Intel Core i9-11900K is a high-end desktop CPU based on the Rocket Lake architecture. The CPU offers 8 cores and 16 threads clocked at 3.5 - 5.3 GHz (Turbo Boost 3.0 / TVB). With Turbo Boost 2.0, 5.1 GHz can be reached with a single thread. Using all cores, the CPU can clock up to 4.8 GHz. Adaptive Boost enables even higher multi-core frequencies (5.1 GHz all core Turbo) but uses a lot more power.

The TDP is rated at 125 Watt (PL1, power limit sustained load) but the PL2 is set to around 250 Watt for short term boosts (up to 56 seconds).

The Sunny Cove processor cores (known from the Ice Lake mobile CPUs) offer larger caches and an improved IPC (up to 19%). Furthermore, the chip also includes (partly) integrated WiFi 6E and Thunderbolt 4. The platform supports PCIe 4.0 and Intel DL Boost for AI acceleration.

The faster Rocket Lake-S CPUs also integrate a new Intel UHD Graphics 750 that is based on the current Intel Xe architecture (e.g. mobile Tiger Lake) and offers 32 EUs. In the 11900K, the GPU is clocked from 350 - 1300 MHz.

Performance

The average 11900K in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 7 5800X3D, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which is an impressive result, as of mid 2022, and good enough for any task imaginable including content creation and professional gaming.

Power consumption

This Core i9 has a 125 W TDP, also known as the long-term power limit. Intel lets PC manufacturers reduce that value somewhat if required, 95 W being the lower limit, which would result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. The reality is, an 11900K can be much more power hungry than either of the two numbers imply simply because of its sheer might but also because it is manufactured on an old 14 nm Intel process that makes for lower-than-average, as of mid-2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-13950HX

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13950HX

The Intel Core i9-13950HX is a fast high-end mobile processor of the Raptor Lake-HX series. Is was announced in early 2023 and is based on the desktop Core i9-13000K with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) clocked from 2.2 to 5.5 GHz (single core, all core boost 4.9 GHz) with HyperThreading and sixteen Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading clocked from 1.6 to 4 GHz. The 13950HX is very similar to the Core i9-13980HX, but with vPro Enterprise support and a 100 MHz reduced boost of the P-cores.

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX).

Performance

The average 13950HX in our database is in the same league as the i9-13980HX and the i9-13900HX while being noticeably faster than the Ryzen 9 7845HX, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very, very fast chip, as of mid 2023.

Thanks to its powerful cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 145 W, the MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US is among the fastest laptops built around the 13950HX that we know of.

Power consumption

The chip's "minimum assured" power consumption is 45 W while its Turbo power consumption isn't supposed to go over 157 W. Intel suggests the "base" power consumption should be set to 55 W, which laptop makers aren't really obliged to do. Most will go for a higher value to get better performance.

This i9 series processor is manufactured on Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i9-11900KIntel Core i9-13950HX
CodenameRocket LakeRaptor Lake-HX
SeriesIntel Rocket LakeIntel Raptor Lake-HX
Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX
Intel Core i9-11900K « 3.5 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700 compare2.5 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11600K compare3.9 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400F compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400T compare1.3 - 3.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX « 1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX compare1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX compare1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX compare1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX compare1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock3500 - 5300 MHz1600 - 5500 MHz
L1 Cache640 KB
L2 Cache4 MB32 MB
L3 Cache16 MB36 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 1624 / 32
8 x 5.5 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.0 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP125 Watt55 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA1200BGA1964
FeaturesDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, 8 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHADDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterp., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, TME
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (350 - 1300 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
Die Size257 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-11900K
38.1 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13950HX
45.1 pt (75%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
98 Points (55%)
119 Points (67%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
698 Points (13%)
1138 Points (21%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 13825     avg: 14669     median: 14747 (14%)     max: 15519 Points
min: 24560     avg: 29352     median: 28681 (27%)     max: 33277 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1604     avg: 1640     median: 1636 (69%)     max: 1693 Points
min: 1952     avg: 2067     median: 2096 (88%)     max: 2113 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 619     avg: 633     median: 633 (69%)     max: 647 Points
min: 742     avg: 788     median: 801 (87%)     max: 816 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5055     avg: 5499     median: 5306 (13%)     max: 5997 Points
min: 8697     avg: 10973     median: 10919 (27%)     max: 12648 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2238     avg: 2358     median: 2379 (15%)     max: 2436 Points
min: 3625     avg: 4565     median: 4529 (29%)     max: 5227 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 254     avg: 256.5     median: 255 (71%)     max: 262 Points
min: 274     avg: 292.9     median: 297 (82%)     max: 303 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
26.8 Points (35%)
60 Points (78%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (74%)
3.6 Points (85%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
10545 Points (64%)
11424 Points (69%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
62024 Points (45%)
80693 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
80613 Points (51%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14149 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
77.9 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
9030 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 54125     avg: 59047     median: 59658.5 (34%)     max: 62746 MIPS
min: 99351     avg: 115415     median: 116665 (67%)     max: 127295 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6174     avg: 6380     median: 6347 (75%)     max: 6652 MIPS
min: 6445     avg: 6775     median: 6754 (80%)     max: 7064 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
137 fps (46%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
309.5 fps (71%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 16.6     avg: 18.2     median: 18.2 (32%)     max: 19.8 fps
min: 26     avg: 30.7     median: 31 (54%)     max: 34.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (35%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.9 GB/s (33%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
13 GB/s (34%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
428 Seconds (5%)
min: 175     avg: 203.1     median: 196 (2%)     max: 254 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 190.3     avg: 210.8     median: 211.9 (1%)     max: 229 Seconds
min: 100     avg: 112.4     median: 111 (1%)     max: 137 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4733     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.4981 sec
min: 0.3823     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4121 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
19311 Points (41%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.3 s (1%)
6.2 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
13.7 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
331.4 s (1%)
322.8 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
79200 Points (61%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 20149     avg: 20662     median: 20662 (51%)     max: 21175 Points
min: 19337     avg: 23708     median: 23960 (59%)     max: 27078 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 74965     avg: 79326     median: 79325.5 (64%)     max: 83686 Points
81602 Points (66%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
75316 Points (61%)
77857 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
85348 Points (71%)
81621 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 18242     avg: 19567     median: 20094 (51%)     max: 20364 Points
16332 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 26699     avg: 27967     median: 28121 (50%)     max: 28927 Points
min: 31279     avg: 37843     median: 39372 (70%)     max: 42199 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 11012     avg: 12563     median: 12902.5 (54%)     max: 13433 Points
min: 13744     avg: 15379     median: 14805 (62%)     max: 18867 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2758     avg: 2862     median: 2870.5 (72%)     max: 2949 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 15490     avg: 16445     median: 16156.5 (63%)     max: 17977 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2750 Points (87%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
15049 Points (62%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1748     avg: 1796     median: 1787.5 (70%)     max: 1885 Points
min: 1805     avg: 2013     median: 2043 (80%)     max: 2097 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9547     avg: 10328     median: 10483 (19%)     max: 11035 Points
min: 16776     avg: 19501     median: 20036 (36%)     max: 21853 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1863 Points (8%)
min: 1856     avg: 1979     median: 2006 (9%)     max: 2048 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11008 Points (35%)
min: 16846     avg: 18847     median: 18486.5 (58%)     max: 21567 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7976 Points (80%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
42329 Points (42%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 544     avg: 566     median: 569.5 (1%)     max: 581 ms
min: 451     avg: 466.6     median: 468 (1%)     max: 478 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
103911 Points (79%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 244     avg: 247     median: 247 (68%)     max: 250 Points
min: 279     avg: 290.9     median: 291 (80%)     max: 302 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 217     avg: 268.5     median: 283.5 (51%)     max: 290 Points
min: 266     avg: 306.3     median: 318.5 (57%)     max: 346 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1592     avg: 1950     median: 1964 (73%)     max: 2139 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 197     avg: 235.6     median: 221.5 (38%)     max: 302.2 Watt
min: 134.5     avg: 188.3     median: 205 (35%)     max: 223 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 243     avg: 274.3     median: 259.2 (47%)     max: 336 Watt
min: 145     avg: 212.8     median: 204 (37%)     max: 259 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 14.2     avg: 20     median: 15.5 (10%)     max: 35 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 15     avg: 18.5     median: 17 (19%)     max: 27.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 7.03     avg: 8.4     median: 8.6 (6%)     max: 9.39 Points per Watt
min: 18.8     avg: 21.5     median: 21.4 (16%)     max: 25 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-11900K → 100% n=34

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13950HX → 139% n=34

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 28. 15:16:09

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13161 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14671 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753708569s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:17:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13161 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 13161 +0.01s ... 0.021s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14671 +0.005s ... 0.026s

#10 got single benchmarks 14671 +0.015s ... 0.041s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.055s ... 0.096s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.099s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)