Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-11900H vs Intel Core i9-12900K

Intel Core i9-11900H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-11900H

The Intel Core i9-11900H is a high end octa core SoC for gaming laptops and mobile workstations. It is based on the Tiger Lake H45 generation and was announced in mid 2021. It integrates eight Willow Cove processor cores (16 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP setting and at 45 Watt is at 2.5 GHz. The single core boost speed can reach up to 4.9 GHz, all cores can reach up to 4.5 GHz. The CPU offers 24 MB level 3 cache and supports DDR4-3200 memory. 

Thanks to the new Tiger Lake architecture, the i9-11900H should be similar or faster than the old Intel Core i9-10885H (Comet Lake-H, 2.4 - 5.3 GHz, 16 MB L3) in single and multi threaded performance and similar to the Ryzen 9 5800H (Zen 3, 3.2 - 4.4 GHz, 16 MB L3). Therefore, the i9 should be one of the fastest laptop CPUs in 2021 and well suited for even very demanding tasks.

The SoC also included the improved Xe graphics card called UHD graphics with all 32 EUs.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (20 lanes in the H45 series), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6E in the chip.

The chip is produced on the improved 10nm process (called 10nm SuperFin) at Intel, which should be comparable to the 7nm process at TSMC (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series). The default TDP is rated at 45 W at 2.5 GHz base speed, at 35 Watt the base clock speed decreases to 2.1 GHz (cTDP down).

All articles on Tiger Lake can be found on our Tiger Lake architecture hub.

Intel Core i9-12900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-12900K

The Intel Core i9-12900K is a high end CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 8 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 24 Threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 5.2 GHz (Turbo Boost Max 3.0), the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.9 GHz. All cores can use 30 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (most likely only using AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe architecture and called Intel UHD Graphics 770. It clocks between 300 and 1.55 GHz.

Performance

The average 12900K in our database nearly matches the Ryzen 9 3950X and the Ryzen 9 5950X in multi-thread performance. This is a great result, as of mid 2022.

Learn more by reading the Corsair One i300 review.

Power consumption

This Core i9 series chip has a Base power consumption of 125 W, with 241 W being its "Maximum Turbo" power consumption.

The i9-12900K is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower than average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i9-11900HIntel Core i9-12900K
CodenameTiger Lake-HAlder Lake
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Alder Lake-S
Series: Alder Lake-S Alder Lake
Intel Core i9-11900KB compare3.3 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11900H « 2.5 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11950H compare2.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-11955M compare2.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11850H compare2.5 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11800H compare2.3 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-11855M compare3.2 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11500B compare3.3 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400H compare2.7 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11260H compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900K « 3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K compare2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock2500 - 4900 MHz3200 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache640 KB1.4 MB
L2 Cache10 MB14 MB
L3 Cache24 MB30 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 1616 / 24
TDP45 Watt125 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1787LGA1700
FeaturesDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, 8 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 5, Thread Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterprise, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) (350 - 1450 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
$589 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-11900H
36.3 pt (60%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900K
43.7 pt (73%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 11135     avg: 12109     median: 12143.5 (11%)     max: 13012 Points
min: 25245     avg: 26125     median: 26125 (24%)     max: 27005 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1574     avg: 1585     median: 1580.5 (66%)     max: 1605 Points
min: 1998     avg: 2005     median: 2004.5 (84%)     max: 2011 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 600     avg: 607     median: 608 (66%)     max: 615 Points
min: 766     avg: 772     median: 771.5 (84%)     max: 777 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4324     avg: 4758     median: 4878 (12%)     max: 5160 Points
min: 9630     avg: 9935     median: 9935 (24%)     max: 10240 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1770     avg: 2068     median: 2148 (14%)     max: 2211 Points
min: 3473     avg: 3877     median: 4057 (26%)     max: 4102 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 236     avg: 239.8     median: 241 (67%)     max: 243 Points
min: 286     avg: 289     median: 289 (80%)     max: 292 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 44.18     avg: 45.6     median: 45.6 (59%)     max: 47.06 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.49     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (83%)     max: 3.5 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 9812     avg: 9859     median: 9859 (60%)     max: 9906 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 70420     avg: 71819     median: 71819 (52%)     max: 73218 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 112749     avg: 112821     median: 112821 (72%)     max: 112893 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 16144     avg: 16271     median: 16270.5 (20%)     max: 16397 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 190.6     avg: 192.8     median: 192.8 (2%)     max: 195 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.398     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (1%)     max: 4.924 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 10792     avg: 11834     median: 11834 (19%)     max: 12876 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 49486     avg: 52910     median: 53205 (31%)     max: 57263 MIPS
min: 96960     avg: 97316     median: 97315.5 (56%)     max: 97671 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5582     avg: 5781     median: 5795 (68%)     max: 6018 MIPS
min: 6571     avg: 6576     median: 6575.5 (78%)     max: 6580 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 196     avg: 201     median: 201 (67%)     max: 206 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 365     avg: 366.8     median: 366.8 (85%)     max: 368.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 13.6     avg: 15     median: 15 (26%)     max: 16.7 fps
min: 29     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (52%)     max: 30 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2 (57%)     max: 2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 3.5     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (62%)     max: 3.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 18.5     avg: 19.3     median: 19.3 (50%)     max: 20 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
479 Seconds (6%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 231     avg: 247     median: 243 (2%)     max: 270 Seconds
min: 121.1     avg: 124.7     median: 124.7 (1%)     max: 128.3 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.52     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.544 sec
min: 0.3946     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4216 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 18426     avg: 18753     median: 18752.5 (40%)     max: 19079 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.04     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.063 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.59     avg: 15.6     median: 15.6 (1%)     max: 15.67 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 338.6     avg: 347     median: 347 (2%)     max: 355.4 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 97859     avg: 97907     median: 97907 (75%)     max: 97955 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 14467     avg: 17623     median: 18686 (46%)     max: 19231 Points
min: 23010     avg: 25787     median: 26223 (65%)     max: 28789 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 81757     avg: 101311     median: 101311 (82%)     max: 120865 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 78981     avg: 99892     median: 99891.5 (81%)     max: 120802 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 80654     avg: 99678     median: 99678 (83%)     max: 118702 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13550     avg: 15637     median: 16364 (41%)     max: 17649 Points
min: 25449     avg: 25582     median: 25581.5 (65%)     max: 25714 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 21513     avg: 24434     median: 24867 (44%)     max: 26502 Points
min: 39112     avg: 39903     median: 39903 (71%)     max: 40694 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 9050     avg: 9865     median: 9631.5 (41%)     max: 11145 Points
min: 18431     avg: 18556     median: 18555.5 (78%)     max: 18680 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2355 Points (59%)
2715 Points (68%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
9401 Points (36%)
17450 Points (68%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1576     avg: 1634     median: 1632 (64%)     max: 1692 Points
min: 1969     avg: 2006     median: 2005.5 (78%)     max: 2042 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7725     avg: 9140     median: 9628 (17%)     max: 9856 Points
min: 17698     avg: 17776     median: 17776 (32%)     max: 17854 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1927     avg: 1948     median: 1947.5 (8%)     max: 1968 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17697     avg: 17828     median: 17828 (56%)     max: 17959 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8593     avg: 8629     median: 8629 (86%)     max: 8665 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 63583     avg: 63911     median: 63910.5 (64%)     max: 64238 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 603     avg: 606     median: 606 (1%)     max: 608 ms
min: 475     avg: 478     median: 478 (1%)     max: 481 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
96769 Points (73%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
227 Points (62%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 272     avg: 275.2     median: 273 (49%)     max: 286 Points
min: 320     avg: 325     median: 325 (58%)     max: 330 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1632 Points (61%)
2308 Points (86%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 88.9     avg: 110.4     median: 116 (20%)     max: 122 Watt
min: 257     avg: 268.3     median: 268.3 (46%)     max: 279.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 89.3     avg: 137.7     median: 152 (28%)     max: 159 Watt
min: 265     avg: 294.7     median: 294.7 (54%)     max: 324.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
17.3 Watt (11%)
56.1 Watt (37%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 13.3     avg: 14.4     median: 14.1 (10%)     max: 16 Points per Watt
min: 12.5     avg: 12.8     median: 12.8 (10%)     max: 13.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-11900H → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900K → 157% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 28. 19:57:58

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13143 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13851 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753725478s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:17:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13143 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 13143 +0.009s ... 0.019s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13851 +0.005s ... 0.024s

#10 got single benchmarks 13851 +0.009s ... 0.033s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.033s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.038s ... 0.071s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.073s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)