Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13450HX vs Intel Core i5-14501E vs Intel Core i9-13900K

Intel Core i5-13450HX

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13450HX

The Intel Core i5-13450HX is a fast mid-range mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023. The CPU integrates 6 fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and 4 Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading. The P-Cores clock between 2.4 GHz (base) up to 4.6 GHz (single core boost, all-core 4.5 GHz). The smaller E-Cores clock between 1.8 and 3.4 GHz. All cores can access the combined 20 MB L3 cache (compared to the 36 MB of the i9 models).

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX, but only 4800 MHz for the i5).

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the 13450HX as of August 2023, we have tested several systems featuring the Core i5-12600K, a CPU with very similar specs (six P-cores mated to four E-cores, both running at insignificantly faster clock speeds than what the 13450HX has). Based on that, we expect the 13450HX to be 10% to 15% behind the Ryzen 7 7840HS and the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the system's cooling solution is and how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

The chip's "minimum assured" power consumption sits at 45 W. Its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to go over 157 W and its "base" power consumption is supposed to be around 55 W. Most laptop makers will probably go for a value much higher than 55 W to extract as much performance out of the chip as possible.

The i5-13450HX is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-14501E

► remove from comparison Intel Core i5-14501E

The Intel Core i5-14501E is a peculiar Raptor Lake family desktop processor (SoC) that has 6 performance cores but 0 efficient cores. It's the lack of E-cores that makes 14X01 chips special.

The product has decently sized level 2 and 3 caches at 12 MB and 24 MB, respectively. Its CPU cores run at up to 5.2 GHz. The UHD 770 serves as the integrated graphics solution. There is no 'proper' NPU here, however, vPro Enterprise features such as RPE (Remote Platform Erase) are onboard.

The i5 chip is manufactured built with the Intel 7 process which is fairly old, as of mid 2025. Its base TDP sits at 65 W which is the standard value for desktop CPUs.

Performance

While we have not tested a single 14X01 processor as of July 2025, we do know that a single 4.6 GHz Raptor Cove core, such as that of an Core i7-14650HX is good for 116 Cinebench 2024 points and 285 Cinebench R15 points. (The 14501E can run at up to 5.2 GHz, too, to remind you.) If we multiply the values by 6, we get a reasonably fair projection that sees the 14501E being about as fast as lower mid-range laptop AMD chips of 2025, such as the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340. While not particularly impressive, this is definitely sufficient for any tasks and applications one could run in 2025, top games included.

Intel Core i9-13900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13900K

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a fast high-end desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3 - 5.8 GHz and sixteen Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.2 - 4.3 GHz.

Thanks to the faster P-cores and more E-cores, the i9-13900K is significantly faster than the old i9-12900K (especially in multi-threaded workloads). Compared to the Raphael AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (Zen 4), the 13900K offers a slightly higher multi-thread-performance and a slightly lower single core performance. In games, the Intel CPU is currently the clear winner (at the time of announcement of the 7950X).

The 13900K is rated at 125 Watt TDP base power (PL1) and 253 Watt Turbo Power (PL2) and therefore slightly higher than the old i9-12900K.

ModelIntel Core i5-13450HXIntel Core i5-14501EIntel Core i9-13900K
CodenameRaptor Lake-HXRaptor LakeRaptor Lake
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HXIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Raptor Lake-S
Series: Raptor Lake-S Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13980HX1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX « 1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900K3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-135002.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14501TE2.2 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14501E « 3.3 - 5.2 GHz6 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14401E2.5 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14401TE2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T1.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900K « 3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-135002.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14501TE2.2 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14501E3.3 - 5.2 GHz6 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14401E2.5 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14401TE2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T1.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock1800 - 4600 MHz3300 - 5200 MHz3000 - 5800 MHz
L3 Cache20 MB24 MB36 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 16
6 x 4.6 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
6 / 12
6 x 5.2 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
24 / 32
8 x 5.8 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.3 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP55 Watt65 Watt125 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm10 nm
Die Size257 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1964LGA1700LGA 1700
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, DL Boost, GNA, vPro En., RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHAIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1450 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1550 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.comwww.intel.com
L2 Cache12 MB32 MB
$589 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13450HX
37.7 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900K
49 pt (82%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
101.5 Points (57%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
812 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16575     avg: 16869     median: 16797 (16%)     max: 17234 Points
min: 32592     avg: 37310     median: 38271.5 (36%)     max: 40103 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1710     avg: 1741     median: 1746 (73%)     max: 1766 Points
min: 2203     avg: 2238     median: 2238.5 (94%)     max: 2272 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 652     avg: 666     median: 667 (73%)     max: 680 Points
min: 828     avg: 849     median: 849.5 (93%)     max: 870 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6489     avg: 6539     median: 6532 (16%)     max: 6595 Points
min: 13415     avg: 14459     median: 14620.5 (36%)     max: 15181 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2427     avg: 2478     median: 2503 (16%)     max: 2505 Points
min: 5321     avg: 5798     median: 5805.5 (37%)     max: 6191 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 239     avg: 246     median: 248 (69%)     max: 251 Points
min: 299     avg: 314.1     median: 318 (88%)     max: 328 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
29.2 Points (38%)
min: 62.2     avg: 67     median: 67.5 (87%)     max: 70.78 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (72%)
min: 3.8     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (92%)     max: 3.93 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9840 Points (59%)
min: 11661     avg: 11989     median: 12017.5 (73%)     max: 12259 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
58749 Points (43%)
min: 85342     avg: 88253     median: 87738 (64%)     max: 92192 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 132000     avg: 134526     median: 133567 (85%)     max: 138969 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 17418     avg: 17943     median: 17998.5 (22%)     max: 18355 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 79.738     avg: 84.6     median: 84.2 (1%)     max: 90.13 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 1.818     avg: 2.1     median: 2 (0%)     max: 2.305 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6830 Points (11%)
min: 13210     avg: 14265     median: 14271 (23%)     max: 15309 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 59026     avg: 61014     median: 61811 (35%)     max: 62204 MIPS
min: 127201     avg: 142777     median: 146984 (84%)     max: 148053 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5370     avg: 5506     median: 5571 (66%)     max: 5576 MIPS
min: 7176     avg: 7343     median: 7272 (86%)     max: 7539 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
141.7 fps (47%)
min: 247.5     avg: 261.5     median: 264.8 (89%)     max: 269 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
324.6 fps (75%)
min: 412     avg: 419     median: 419.3 (97%)     max: 425.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 16.9     avg: 18.3     median: 17.5 (31%)     max: 20.5 fps
min: 34.5     avg: 39.9     median: 40.7 (72%)     max: 42.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (29%)
min: 2.6     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (85%)     max: 3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.6 GB/s (28%)
min: 5.2     avg: 5.4     median: 5.4 (93%)     max: 5.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
13.5 GB/s (35%)
min: 20.5     avg: 23.3     median: 22.9 (60%)     max: 27 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 338     avg: 374     median: 387 (5%)     max: 397 Seconds
min: 136     avg: 145.2     median: 140.5 (2%)     max: 174 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 196     avg: 208.3     median: 200 (1%)     max: 229 Seconds
min: 80     avg: 85.7     median: 84 (1%)     max: 101 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4582     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4838 sec
min: 0.3468     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3911 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
14017 Points (30%)
min: 19989     avg: 20578     median: 20192 (43%)     max: 21934 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.2 s (2%)
min: 5.655     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (1%)     max: 5.86 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
15.9 s (1%)
min: 12.287     avg: 12.6     median: 12.5 (1%)     max: 13.193 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
402 s (2%)
min: 289.628     avg: 296.6     median: 293.3 (1%)     max: 310.125 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 86915     avg: 97290     median: 96473 (74%)     max: 112434 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 21532     avg: 21934     median: 21982 (54%)     max: 22288 Points
min: 29023     avg: 31289     median: 31187.5 (77%)     max: 33181 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
82893 Points (67%)
min: 79257     avg: 97847     median: 97246.5 (79%)     max: 111988 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 80320     avg: 96904     median: 97919.5 (79%)     max: 102987 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 83056     avg: 98634     median: 97311 (81%)     max: 105981 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19916 Points (50%)
min: 26626     avg: 29034     median: 29044.5 (73%)     max: 30955 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 27233     avg: 27745     median: 27595 (49%)     max: 28408 Points
min: 46013     avg: 51456     median: 51140 (91%)     max: 54226 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 12644     avg: 12938     median: 13047 (55%)     max: 13123 Points
min: 16236     avg: 20507     median: 20037 (84%)     max: 22794 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2381     avg: 2415     median: 2417 (60%)     max: 2448 Points
3070 Points (77%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 12619     avg: 12701     median: 12684 (49%)     max: 12799 Points
20800 Points (81%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2301 Points (73%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
12295 Points (50%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1696     avg: 1739     median: 1757 (69%)     max: 1763 Points
min: 2106     avg: 2237     median: 2286 (89%)     max: 2290 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11973     avg: 12000     median: 12005 (22%)     max: 12022 Points
min: 22448     avg: 23743     median: 24033 (43%)     max: 24157 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2148     avg: 2191     median: 2197 (10%)     max: 2246 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 22024     avg: 23446     median: 23664 (75%)     max: 24021 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 9218     avg: 9542     median: 9598 (96%)     max: 9683 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 77347     avg: 84105     median: 85336 (85%)     max: 86695 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
7348 Points (81%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
41034 Points (59%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 531     avg: 537     median: 531 (1%)     max: 550 ms
min: 423     avg: 430.6     median: 432 (1%)     max: 438 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
87588 Points (66%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
243 Points (67%)
min: 304     avg: 317.6     median: 316 (87%)     max: 335 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 262     avg: 274.7     median: 281 (50%)     max: 281 Points
min: 338     avg: 364     median: 368 (66%)     max: 382 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1804 Points (67%)
min: 2263     avg: 2497     median: 2580 (96%)     max: 2589 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 108.7     avg: 134.8     median: 134.8 (23%)     max: 160.8 Watt
min: 228     avg: 354.3     median: 359 (62%)     max: 471 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 349     avg: 392.5     median: 370.5 (68%)     max: 480 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 19.2     avg: 25.4     median: 25.4 (17%)     max: 31.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 11.5     avg: 14.8     median: 14.8 (16%)     max: 18.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 12.9     avg: 15     median: 15.2 (11%)     max: 16.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13450HX → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900K → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 21. 03:14:05

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14673 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18709 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14625 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753060445s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 19 Jul 2025 13:28:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14673 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 14673 +0.006s ... 0.017s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18709 +0s ... 0.018s

#11 got single benchmarks 18709 +0s ... 0.018s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14625 +0.004s ... 0.022s

#13 got single benchmarks 14625 +0.021s ... 0.042s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.042s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.051s ... 0.094s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.094s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)