Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-10320 vs Intel Core i9-10900K

Intel Core i3-10320

► remove from comparison Intel i3-10320

The Intel Core i3-10320 is an entry level quad-core desktop processor based on the Comet Lake-S architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.8 and 4.6 GHz and can execute up to eight threads with its four cores simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. 

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The performance is similar to the old high end Intel Core i7-7700K due to the same architecture and similar clock speeds. 

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 65 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 90 Watt are consumed (PL2 for 28s).

Intel Core i9-10900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10900K

The Intel Core i9-10900K is a high-end processor for desktops with ten cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.7 and 5.3 GHz (all 10 cores up to 4.8 GHz) and can execute up to twenty threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.3 GHz can be only achieved below 70°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost of 100 MHz).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-9900K, the 10900K offers increased clock speeds and two more cores. Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the CPU is the fastest gaming CPU available at the time of announcement. Using all cores, the i9 however is slower than the top Ryzen CPUs (like the Ryzen 9 3950X) which offer more cores.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 125 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 250 Watt are consumed (PL2). In default mode these 250 Watt and therefore high clock speeds can be maintained for up to 56 seconds, however, all boards offer the option to alter these settings.

ModelIntel Core i3-10320Intel Core i9-10900K
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-SComet Lake-S
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-S
Intel Core i9-10900K3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10910 compare3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 1212 MB
» Intel Core i3-103203.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 87.9 MB
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
» Intel Core i9-10900K3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i9-10910 compare3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 2020 MB
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 1616 MB
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i3-103203.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 87.9 MB
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 86 MB
Clock3800 - 4600 MHz3700 - 5300 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB640 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2.5 MB
L3 Cache7.9 MB20 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 810 / 20
TDP65 Watt125 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1200LGA 1200
FeaturesHyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, VirtualizationTVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, Virtualization
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630
Architecturex86x86
$162 U.S.$488 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Comet Lake i3-10320

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-10320
40.5 pt (48%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10900K
58.2 pt (69%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
5986 Points (10%)
15821 Points (26%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1185 Points (58%)
1374 Points (67%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
458 Points (58%)
min: 493     avg: 516     median: 524 (67%)     max: 532 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2320 Points (10%)
min: 5825     avg: 6129     median: 6181 (26%)     max: 6381 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
949 Points (10%)
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
min: 2513     avg: 2555     median: 2533 (26%)     max: 2620 Points
0135270405540675810945108012151350148516201755189020252160229524302565Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
188 Points (58%)
min: 206     avg: 215.7     median: 217 (67%)     max: 224 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
10.5 Points (19%)
29 Points (53%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (7%)
2.6 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7164 Points (64%)
8127 Points (73%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
28383 Points (39%)
59368 Points (81%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
80495 Points (66%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
10625 Points (65%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
66.3 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
9739 Points (56%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
25864 MIPS (18%)
min: 67252     avg: 69402     median: 69987 (50%)     max: 70968 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4899 MIPS (59%)
min: 5349     avg: 5705     median: 5811 (70%)     max: 5954 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
58.8 fps (24%)
149 fps (62%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
218 fps (58%)
289.5 fps (77%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
8.2 fps (18%)
01234567891011121314Tooltip
min: 18.2     avg: 19.7     median: 19.8 (42%)     max: 21 fps
051015202530Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
1.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (0%)
2.6 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.3 GB/s (0%)
14.6 GB/s (0%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
469 Seconds (3%)
min: 167.3     avg: 178.8     median: 179 (1%)     max: 190 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
min: 0.528     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.567 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9911 Points (21%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.7 s (2%)
7.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
516 s (2%)
403.4 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
10518 Points (36%)
min: 20541     avg: 21539     median: 21935 (76%)     max: 22140 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63063 Points (41%)
74951 Points (48%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
75063 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
76898 Points (65%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
9675 Points (24%)
min: 19766     avg: 20118     median: 20117.5 (51%)     max: 20469 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
13564 Points (31%)
min: 29145     avg: 29466     median: 29447 (68%)     max: 29805 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4368 Points (23%)
min: 13028     avg: 13470     median: 13056 (70%)     max: 14326 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1217 Points (54%)
min: 1336     avg: 1404     median: 1428 (63%)     max: 1449 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4846 Points (17%)
min: 10725     avg: 11177     median: 11393 (40%)     max: 11414 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1330     avg: 1385     median: 1385 (63%)     max: 1440 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10714     avg: 11061     median: 11060.5 (35%)     max: 11407 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5904     avg: 6126     median: 6126 (67%)     max: 6348 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 40236     avg: 41647     median: 41647 (51%)     max: 43058 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
784 ms (1%)
min: 709     avg: 720     median: 721 (1%)     max: 729 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
160 ms (2%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
224 Points (59%)
min: 243     avg: 251     median: 255 (67%)     max: 255 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1254 Points (52%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
115 Watt (20%)
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
275.7 Watt (48%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
96.3 Watt (25%)
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
268.5 Watt (71%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9.9 Points per Watt (11%)
9.8 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10320 → 100% n=31

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10900K → 186% n=31

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 07. 11:54:03

#0 checking url part for id 14009 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12211 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 05 Oct 2022 13:14:23 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.007s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.01s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#17 composed specs +0s ... 0.01s

#18 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.017s

#20 getting avg benchmarks for device 14009 +0s ... 0.017s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#23 got single benchmarks 14009 +0.007s ... 0.025s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.027s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.028s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.029s

#27 getting avg benchmarks for device 12211 +0s ... 0.029s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#29 got single benchmarks 12211 +0.012s ... 0.041s

#30 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.042s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.044s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.046s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.047s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.052s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.012s ... 0.064s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.068s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.069s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.071s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.071s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.073s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.074s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.077s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.084s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.012s ... 0.096s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.097s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.098s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.1s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.101s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.103s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.103s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.104s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.105s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.106s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.106s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.107s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.113s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.114s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.115s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.116s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.121s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.124s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#120 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.126s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.128s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.129s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.13s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.131s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#132 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.131s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#136 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.132s

#137 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.134s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.135s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.135s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.135s

#141 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.136s

#142 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.138s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.142s

#144 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.144s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.146s

#146 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.148s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.149s

#148 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.149s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.149s

#150 return log +0.004s ... 0.153s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)