Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 940 vs Qualcomm Adreno 610 vs Qualcomm Adreno 620

Samsung Xclipse 940

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 940

The Samsung Xclipse 940 is a graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Samsung Exynos 2400 SoC (iGPU). It is based on the AMD RDNA 3 architecture and includes hardware ray tracing support. #

The performance is similar or slightly better than the older Adreno 740 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

The Exynos 2400 is the first Exynos processor to use a Fan-out Wafer Level Package (FOWLP) to boost thermal management.

The SoC is manufactured in the 4nm process at Samsung.

Qualcomm Adreno 610

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 610 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

In synthetic benchmarks, the Adreno 610 positions itself between the old Adreno 510 and Adreno 512 / 612

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 620

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 620

The Qualcomm Adreno 620 is a mobile graphics card for upper mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G and 765 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 620 in the 765G is 10% faster than the one in the 765 and 20% faster than the old Adreno 618. In our benchmarks, the Adreno 620 in the Snapdragon 765G even was 25% faster in selected benchmarks, but the faster CPU will also influence the results.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Samsung Xclipse 940Qualcomm Adreno 610Qualcomm Adreno 620
Adreno 600 Series
Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
technology4 nm11 nm14 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 11_1)
Date of Announcement09.10.2023 09.04.2019 09.04.2019
ArchitectureAdreno 600Adreno 600
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1
CPU in Xclipse 940GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 240010 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 2400e10 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 610GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6658 x 2200 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? - 1050 MHz
CPU in Adreno 620GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7658 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 1821     avg: 1919     median: 1919 (4%)     max: 2017 Points
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 12652     avg: 13765     median: 13472.5 (7%)     max: 15464 Points
min: 1022     avg: 1402     median: 1604 (1%)     max: 1681 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3933     avg: 4172     median: 4188.5 (5%)     max: 4378 Points
min: 443     avg: 443.5     median: 443.5 (1%)     max: 444 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 6649     avg: 8042     median: 8361 (4%)     max: 8797 Points
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
937 Points (44%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 15466     avg: 17363     median: 17362.5 (75%)     max: 19259 Points
min: 975     avg: 1855     median: 1827.5 (8%)     max: 2254 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 34989     avg: 35721     median: 35720.5 (79%)     max: 36452 Points
min: 1295     avg: 1759     median: 1746.5 (4%)     max: 2187 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 15675     avg: 16588     median: 16451 (69%)     max: 17638 Points
min: 267     avg: 1178     median: 1175.5 (5%)     max: 1597 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 23545     avg: 25100     median: 25121 (63%)     max: 26633 Points
min: 240     avg: 1040     median: 1033 (3%)     max: 1436 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 1400     avg: 1836     median: 1797 (16%)     max: 2222 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 1270     avg: 1713     median: 1691 (10%)     max: 2095 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 854     avg: 1210     median: 1164 (6%)     max: 1905 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 726     avg: 1040     median: 1021 (3%)     max: 1394 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 30     avg: 32.5     median: 33 (12%)     max: 34 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 69     avg: 77.5     median: 76 (14%)     max: 89 fps
min: 1.4     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 3.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 153     avg: 159.8     median: 155 (11%)     max: 176 fps
min: 5.1     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (1%)     max: 10.1 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 130     avg: 134.5     median: 134.5 (13%)     max: 139 fps
min: 5.2     avg: 7.3     median: 7.2 (1%)     max: 8.9 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 214     avg: 231     median: 229.5 (5%)     max: 251 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 269     avg: 296.8     median: 299.5 (12%)     max: 319 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 940
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 378     avg: 388     median: 385.5 (3%)     max: 403 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 610
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 620
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 613580     avg: 652246     median: 649947 (52%)     max: 695509 Points
min: 40315     avg: 41445     median: 40525 (3%)     max: 44415 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 239     avg: 245.7     median: 249 (6%)     max: 249 fps
min: 8.79     avg: 11.7     median: 11.4 (0%)     max: 14.76 fps
30.4 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 13590     avg: 16104     median: 16919 (4%)     max: 16987 Points
min: 343     avg: 347.7     median: 349 (0%)     max: 351 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 16011     avg: 16689     median: 16082.5 (4%)     max: 18578 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 7370     avg: 16213     median: 17873 (6%)     max: 21734 Points
min: 11776     avg: 21536     median: 21536 (7%)     max: 31296 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1595     avg: 12281     median: 13408 (22%)     max: 20711 Points
min: 5334     avg: 16658     median: 16657.5 (28%)     max: 27981 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 10.2     avg: 11.7     median: 11.8 (5%)     max: 13.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 940 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 610 → 6% n=13

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 620 → 16% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 610:
25.6  fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 610:
26.5  fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 610:
60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Adreno 620:
60  fps
high
Adreno 610:
56 59 60 60 ~ 59 fps
Adreno 620:
60  fps
ultra
Adreno 620:
60  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
Adreno 610:
42 59 ~ 51 fps
high
Adreno 610:
40  fps
ultra
Adreno 610:
29  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 940:
56.2 58 59 60 ~ 58 fps
53%
Adreno 610:
26.3 27.7 29.2 37 37 ~ 31 fps
med.
Adreno 610:
15  fps
Adreno 620:
52  fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 940:
47 50.8 58 59 ~ 54 fps
24%
Adreno 610:
11 13 13.1 14 15 ~ 13 fps
43%
Adreno 620:
23  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 38 44 50 53 54 57 57 59 59 60 60 60 87 ~ 52 fps
Adreno 620:
60 90 ~ 75 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 940:
59.1 81 90 90 ~ 80 fps
39%
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 38.8 39.8 ~ 31 fps
48%
Adreno 620:
30 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 38 fps
med.
Adreno 610:
25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 29.5 29.9 ~ 25 fps
Adreno 620:
40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Xclipse 940:
57 58.8 60 60 ~ 59 fps
42%
Adreno 610:
25  fps
53%
Adreno 620:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 40 ~ 31 fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 940:
39.2 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 60 ~ 38 fps
Adreno 620:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
ultra
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 60 ~ 38 fps
Adreno 620:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Xclipse 940:
105 119 119 ~ 114 fps
54%
Adreno 610:
60 60 66 ~ 62 fps
80%
Adreno 620:
62 120 ~ 91 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 610:
20 20 24 26 30 59 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 620:
29 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Adreno 610:
11 12 15 17 22 23 41.5 ~ 20 fps
Adreno 620:
21 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 29 fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
Adreno 610:
60  fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 940 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 610 → 43%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 49%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 620 → 56%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 50%

Samsung Xclipse 940Qualcomm Adreno 610Qualcomm Adreno 620
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal25.626.5
League of Legends: Wild Rift6059606060
Call of Duty Mobile514029
Genshin Impact58543115135223
Armajet5275
PUBG Mobile805940312525384031
Arena of Valor38384545
Dead Trigger 21146291
Asphalt 9: Legends30203029
Temple Run 260
Samsung Xclipse 940Qualcomm Adreno 610Qualcomm Adreno 620
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1




1
1

2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
5
1
2


2
3
2
3
1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3
1

2

1
1
3
1
1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.34
log 09. 06:54:08

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12422 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9921 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 10317 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759985648s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:57 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.027s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12422 +0.015s ... 0.041s

#10 got single benchmarks 12422 +0.007s ... 0.049s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9921 +0s ... 0.049s

#12 got single benchmarks 9921 +0.008s ... 0.057s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 10317 +0s ... 0.057s

#14 got single benchmarks 10317 +0.018s ... 0.075s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.075s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.076s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.08s

#18 min, max, avg, median took s +0.022s ... 0.102s

#19 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.102s

#20 Got 180 rows for game benchmarks. +0.023s ... 0.125s

#21 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.125s

#22 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.125s

#23 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.129s

#24 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.129s

#25 return log +0s ... 0.13s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)