Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 940 vs Qualcomm Adreno 620

Samsung Xclipse 940

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 940

The Samsung Xclipse 940 is a graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Samsung Exynos 2400 SoC (iGPU). It is based on the AMD RDNA 3 architecture and includes hardware ray tracing support. #

The performance is similar or slightly better than the older Adreno 740 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

The Exynos 2400 is the first Exynos processor to use a Fan-out Wafer Level Package (FOWLP) to boost thermal management.

The SoC is manufactured in the 4nm process at Samsung.

Qualcomm Adreno 620

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 620

The Qualcomm Adreno 620 is a mobile graphics card for upper mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G and 765 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 620 in the 765G is 10% faster than the one in the 765 and 20% faster than the old Adreno 618. In our benchmarks, the Adreno 620 in the Snapdragon 765G even was 25% faster in selected benchmarks, but the faster CPU will also influence the results.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Samsung Xclipse 940Qualcomm Adreno 620
Adreno 600 Series
Xclipse 950 compare 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 compare 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 compare @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Shared Memoryyesyes
technology4 nm14 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 11_1)
Date of Announcement09.10.2023 09.04.2019
ArchitectureAdreno 600
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1
CPU in Xclipse 940GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 240010 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 2400e10 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 620GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7658 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 1821     avg: 1919     median: 1919 (4%)     max: 2017 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 12652     avg: 13765     median: 13472.5 (7%)     max: 15464 Points
min: 1022     avg: 1402     median: 1604 (1%)     max: 1681 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3933     avg: 4172     median: 4188.5 (5%)     max: 4378 Points
min: 443     avg: 443.5     median: 443.5 (1%)     max: 444 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 6649     avg: 8042     median: 8361 (4%)     max: 8797 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
937 Points (44%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 15466     avg: 17363     median: 17362.5 (75%)     max: 19259 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 34989     avg: 35721     median: 35720.5 (79%)     max: 36452 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 15675     avg: 16588     median: 16451 (69%)     max: 17638 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 23545     avg: 25100     median: 25121 (63%)     max: 26633 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 30     avg: 32.5     median: 33 (12%)     max: 34 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 69     avg: 77.5     median: 76 (14%)     max: 89 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 153     avg: 159.8     median: 155 (11%)     max: 176 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 130     avg: 134.5     median: 134.5 (13%)     max: 139 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 214     avg: 231     median: 229.5 (5%)     max: 251 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 269     avg: 296.8     median: 299.5 (12%)     max: 319 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 940
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 378     avg: 388     median: 385.5 (3%)     max: 403 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 620
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 613580     avg: 652246     median: 649947 (52%)     max: 695509 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 239     avg: 245.7     median: 249 (6%)     max: 249 fps
30.4 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 13590     avg: 16104     median: 16919 (4%)     max: 16987 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 16011     avg: 16689     median: 16082.5 (4%)     max: 18578 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 11776     avg: 21536     median: 21536 (7%)     max: 31296 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 5334     avg: 16658     median: 16657.5 (28%)     max: 27981 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 10.2     avg: 11.7     median: 11.8 (5%)     max: 13.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 940 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 620 → 16% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 620:
60  fps
high
Adreno 620:
60  fps
ultra
Adreno 620:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 940:
56.2 58 59 60 ~ 58 fps
med.
Adreno 620:
52  fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 940:
47 50.8 58 59 ~ 54 fps
43%
Adreno 620:
23  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 620:
60 90 ~ 75 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 940:
59.1 81 90 90 ~ 80 fps
48%
Adreno 620:
30 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 38 fps
med.
Adreno 620:
40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Xclipse 940:
57 58.8 60 60 ~ 59 fps
53%
Adreno 620:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 40 ~ 31 fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 940:
39.2 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 620:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
ultra
Adreno 620:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Xclipse 940:
105 119 119 ~ 114 fps
80%
Adreno 620:
62 120 ~ 91 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 620:
29 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Adreno 620:
21 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 29 fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 940 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 620 → 56%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 50%

Samsung Xclipse 940Qualcomm Adreno 620
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift606060
Genshin Impact58545223
Armajet75
PUBG Mobile805940384031
Arena of Valor4545
Dead Trigger 211491
Asphalt 9: Legends3029
Samsung Xclipse 940Qualcomm Adreno 620
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1




1
1

2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3
1

2

1
1
3
1
1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 10. 05:48:46

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12422 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10317 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760068126s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 Oct 2025 05:19:00 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.023s ... 0.023s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.023s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12422 +0.018s ... 0.04s

#9 got single benchmarks 12422 +0.008s ... 0.048s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10317 +0s ... 0.048s

#11 got single benchmarks 10317 +0.015s ... 0.064s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.081s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.081s

#15 Got 67 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.091s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.091s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.092s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.095s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.095s

#20 return log +0s ... 0.096s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)