Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS vs Intel Core i5-10200H

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 5900HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS is a processor for big (gaming) laptops based on the Cezanne generation. The R9 5900HS integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3 GHz (guaranteed base clock) to 4.6 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process. Compared to the 5900HX (up to 54 W), the 5900HS is configured with a TDP of 35 W.

The new Zen 3 microarchitecture offers a significantly higher IPC (instructions per clock) compared to Zen 2. For desktop processors AMD claims 19 percent on average and in applications reviews showed around 12% gains at the same clock speed.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 iGPU with 8 CUs at up to 2100 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 16 MB of Level 3 cache can be found on the chip.

Performance

The average 5900HS in our database matches the Core i7-12650H, the Core i9-11900H and the Core i9-11980HK in multi-thread performance. Surprisingly enough, it manages to come unbelievably close to the more power-hungry Ryzen 9 5900HX. This is a great CPU in all respects, and laptop makers as well as mini-PC manufacturers are taking notice.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 80 W, the Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC is among the fastest laptops powered by the 5900HS that we know of. It can be at least 10% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 35 W that laptop makers aren't really required to stick to. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The Ryzen 9 5900HS is built with TSMC's 7 nm process for average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-10200H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10200H

The Intel Core i5-10200H is a fast quad-core processor for laptops with four cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 4.1 GHz  and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured on 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i5-10200H supports no vPro, TXT or SIPP. These business features are available in the faster (and later released) Core i5-10400H (2.6 - 4.6 GHz).

Performance

The performance is only minimal better than the Core i5-9300H thanks to the support for faster DDR4-2933 RAM. This means, the CPU is well suited for demanding tasks, although the faster versions offer a significantly higher Turbo Boost clock speed for faster single core execution. 

Power consumption

This 10th gen Comet Lake processor has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are allowed to reduce somewhat, 35 W being the lower limit. Doing so will result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, this CPU is too power-hungry to be used as the base of a passively cooled laptop.

Intel Core i5-10200H is built with an old, as of late 2022, 14 nm Intel process for subpar energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 5900HSIntel Core i5-10200H
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)Intel Comet Lake
CodenameCezanne-HS (Zen 3)Comet Lake-H
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS compare3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS « 3 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS compare2.8 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS compare3 - 4.2 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H « 2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock3000 - 4600 MHz2400 - 4100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB256 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1 MB
L3 Cache16 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 164 / 8
TDP35 Watt45 Watt
Technology7 nm14 nm
SocketFP6BGA1440
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, BMI2, AES-NI, SSE4.1, ABM, VMX, EIST, RDRAND, SSE4.2, TM1, RDSEED, SSE, AVX, FMA, SMEP, TM2, SSE2, AVX2, ADX, SMAP, HT, SGX, SSE3, Turbo, SSSE3, MPX, SST
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 610 (350 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.100 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 5900HS
39.9 pt (55%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10200H
30.1 pt (42%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 11426     avg: 12533     median: 12745.5 (12%)     max: 13214 Points
5372 Points (5%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1457     avg: 1474     median: 1475.5 (63%)     max: 1488 Points
1089 Points (46%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 560     avg: 572     median: 571.5 (64%)     max: 584 Points
419 Points (47%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4414     avg: 4843     median: 4895.5 (12%)     max: 5167 Points
2082 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1927     avg: 2053     median: 2041 (13%)     max: 2180 Points
842 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 211     avg: 231     median: 236.5 (71%)     max: 240 Points
171.6 Points (52%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
24.9 Points (32%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.8 Points (70%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6380 Points (39%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
41235 Points (30%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
71832 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
12016 Points (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 47553     avg: 55451     median: 57286 (33%)     max: 59680 MIPS
21148 MIPS (12%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5540     avg: 5663     median: 5653 (68%)     max: 5804 MIPS
4497 MIPS (54%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 12.7     avg: 14.3     median: 14.6 (26%)     max: 15.4 fps
6.5 fps (11%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 230.9     avg: 254.5     median: 241 (2%)     max: 305 Seconds
515 Seconds (4%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.51     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.538 sec
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 14968     avg: 15607     median: 15002 (41%)     max: 16852 Points
6233 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
76855 Points (62%)
51050 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
77245 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
92395 Points (78%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16965     avg: 17453     median: 17509 (44%)     max: 17828 Points
7729 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 23339     avg: 24112     median: 24106 (43%)     max: 24896 Points
10760 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8261     avg: 8843     median: 8988.5 (38%)     max: 9134 Points
3613 Points (15%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1410     avg: 1485     median: 1497 (63%)     max: 1547 Points
min: 1093     avg: 1094     median: 1094 (46%)     max: 1095 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7767     avg: 7848     median: 7867 (14%)     max: 7910 Points
min: 3564     avg: 3845     median: 3845 (7%)     max: 4126 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1502 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7784 Points (25%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6311     avg: 6361     median: 6361 (64%)     max: 6411 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 31610     avg: 31805     median: 31805 (35%)     max: 32000 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 597     avg: 616     median: 607 (1%)     max: 654 ms
882 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
65400 Points (59%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 255     avg: 272.8     median: 275.5 (57%)     max: 285 Points
187.3 Points (39%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1414 Points (54%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.3     avg: 66.5     median: 67 (12%)     max: 86.3 Watt
99.5 Watt (17%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 66.7     avg: 78.5     median: 69.5 (13%)     max: 99.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
16.8 Watt (19%)
4.9 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 21.1     avg: 27.2     median: 27.7 (21%)     max: 32.7 Points per Watt
77 Points per Watt (57%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10200H → 61% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 22:51:25

#0 checking url part for id 13015 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12747 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:21:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.03s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13015 +0.015s ... 0.045s

#7 got single benchmarks 13015 +0.026s ... 0.071s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12747 +0.016s ... 0.087s

#9 got single benchmarks 12747 +0.012s ... 0.1s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.1s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.174s ... 0.274s

#12 return log +0.022s ... 0.296s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)